Association between stage at diagnosis and knowledge on cervical cancer among patients in a Kenyan tertiary hospital: a cross-sectional study

Association between stage at diagnosis and knowledge on cervical cancer among patients in a Kenyan tertiary hospital: a cross-sectional study

Kabura Wamburu^1,2,&, Naftali Busakhala¹, Kevin Owuor³, Josephat Nyagero²

 

¹Moi University, School of Public Health, Nairobi, Kenya, ²AMREF Health Africa, Kenya, ³United States Agency for International Development, Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Kabura Wamburu, Moi University, School of Public Health, Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

 

 

Cervical cancer is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths among women with approximately 529,800 new cancer cases and 275,100 cancer deaths occurring in women worldwide. Close to 86% of these new cases and deaths occur in developing countries [1]. Sub-Saharan Africa has a disproportionately enormous burden of cervical cancer which is mostly due to scarce screening programs that allow for early detection of precancerous lesions and early stage cervical cancer [2]. In Kenya, cervical cancer is the second most prevalent cancer after breast cancer [3]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that approximately 4802 women were diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2012 with about 2451 of the incident cases dying of the disease [4]. The major underlying cause of cervical cancer is human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and its precursor lesions [5]. Smoking has been found to be an independent risk factor for cervical cancer after altering the effects of HPV infection [6]. Other risk factors for cervical cancer include having many sexual partners, high parity, early age at first intercourse, co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and long term use of oral contraceptives [7]. Early detection of cancer is vital due to the documented relationship between stage at diagnosis and survival. Prevention amenities such as information on cervical cancer, screening services, vaccination against HPV, the causes of and treatment of pre-cancerous lesions are all vital in treating cervical cancer at its early stage [8]. Abridging cancer time of diagnosis is dependent on a patient presenting to a healthcare facility with probable cancer symptoms commonly referred to as patient delay, on primary healthcare providers reacting aptly to the symptoms, by either setting up additional investigations and or referring them to a specialist also known as doctor or practitioner delay and by minimising the interval between referral and diagnosis, referred to as hospital or system delay. However, patient delay is known to play a major role in most delays [9, 10]. Low levels of education make it difficult for the patients to understand the implications of the disease and to take note of the common symptoms. In African countries, approximately 95% of cancer patients are diagnosed with late stage or end stage disease. Culture, low level of cancer knowledge in the population, lack of specialized health care practitioners and limited access to health care facilities contribute to the delay in diagnosis for cancer patients [11, 12]. Similarly, poor implementation of cervical cancer screening programs is a likely cause of few women being screened in health facilities with the basic infrastructure and facilities for cervical cancer screening in the east, central and southern African countries (ECSA) [13]. Women at risk of developing cervical cancer require accurate information for them to understand prevention methods and to prompt them to use screening services. Although a few women might have knowledge on the disease, fear of the procedure, embarrassment concerning pelvic examination, family pressures, or fear of cancer may prevent them from seeking healthcare services [14]. This study aimed to establish the association between stage at diagnosis and knowledge on cervical cancer among women attending Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH).

 

 

Study design and study population: a cross-sectional study was carried out on patients with cervical cancer attending KNH, a national referral hospital and primary teaching hospital for the school of medicine, University of Nairobi (UoN). This study focused on women above the age of 18 years with a histological diagnosis of cancer receiving treatment at the cancer treatment centre (CTC), radiotherapy department and the obstetrics and gynaecology department. Patients who were critically unwell thus unable to respond to questions, those in documented remission of cancer and those who were unwilling to take part in the study were excluded. The stage at presentation of cervical cancer based on histological diagnosis was abstracted from clinical records of patients. A total of 385 women attending the clinics were selected through convenience sampling after written informed consent was obtained during the period of May to July 2015; 24 women were excluded from the study as their clinical records did not have staging information. Overall, 361 out of the 385 eligible women were recruited.

Data collection : a semi-structured questionnaire was administered with the help of a trained research assistant who conducted face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire contained detailed questions concerning socio-demographic information such as age, marital status, age at marriage, parity, education level and partners' education level, occupation and total household income. Knowledge on cervical cancer risk factors; HPV, smoking and contraceptive use and symptoms such as vaginal bleeding between periods, bleeding after sex, vaginal discharge and bleeding after menopause were assessed. The study was approved by the Kenyatta National Hospital/University of Nairobi ethics and review committee (KNH/UON-ERC) as well as by the Institutional Research and Ethics Committee at Moi University College of Health Sciences (MUCHS-IREC).

Data analysis: the main outcome variable, stage at diagnosis, was determined using the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. For these analyses, stage at presentation was grouped as early (IA1, IA2, IB1 and IIA) or advanced (IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IVA and IVB). Stage at presentation was noted as the stage that a clinician reported at first diagnosis of malignancy. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Analysis System, ver. 9 (SAS Inc., North Carolina, USA) and statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Statistical associations between stage at diagnosis and knowledge on cervical cancer were tested using chi-square statistic and fisher's exact test at 95% confidence interval.

 

 

The socio-demographic characteristics of the population (n=361) are shown in Table 1. The mean age of patients was 49 years (range, 42-57 years) and the mean age at marriage was 20 years (range, 18-23 years). Majority of the women were multiparous with 48.6% having between 4 and 7 children. The number of women diagnosed with advanced stage cervical cancer was higher than those diagnosed at an early stage (72.6% vs 27.4). Table 2 summarises data on cervical cancer awareness and the relationship with stage at presentation. Knowledge on cervical cancer was low in women diagnosed with early and advanced stage cancer however, these differences were not statistically significant (62.6% vs 55.6%, respectively, p=0.226); the source of knowledge on cervical cancer was mostly through health education but with no statistical significance (p=0.163). Human papillomavirus was only mentioned as the cause of cervical cancer by 13.1% of women diagnosed with early stage and 3.5% of women diagnosed with advanced stage cancer (p=0.036). Most women diagnosed with early and advanced stage cervical cancer considered symptoms such as abnormal vaginal bleeding, bleeding after sex and post menopausal bleeding as a sign of infection and not cancer but the differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, vaginal discharge was attributed to infection by most women (p=0.04). There was no association between smoking and stage at presentation (p=0.526) as shown in Table 3. More than 70% of the women cited that they had never had genital warts (76.8% vs 83.1%, p=0.038). Women diagnosed with early and advanced stage disease did not frequently obtain gynaecological examinations (28.6% vs 13%, p=0.001). Awareness of the importance of obtaining regular gynaecological examinations was higher in women diagnosed with early stage cancer however with no statistical significance (69.4% vs 62.2%, p=0.137). Majority of the women diagnosed with early and advanced stage cancer cited that they did not know that cervical cancer could be sexually transmitted however, with no statistical significance (46.9% vs 48.5%, p=0.874). Hormonal contraceptive use was common in about 72% of the women diagnosed with early and advanced stage cancer but with no statistical significance (p=0.953).

 

 

This study demonstrated that majority of women presented with advanced stage cervical cancer. The most notable finding was the particularly low level of awareness of HPV as a causative agent of cervical cancer. This is consistent with other studies which found that about 40% of women had heard of HPV, but not more than half were aware that it caused cervical cancer [15]. In this study, awareness of HPV was linked to patients having had genital warts which would prompt them to seek treatment thereby enabling them to obtain information on HPV. Their ability to cite HPV as a cause of cervical cancer was also used as an indicator for awareness. Women's perception of cervical cancer would change substantially if HPV testing was introduced into cervical cancer screening programs as this would lessen the confusion in women who have had no previous knowledge of HPV or its connection to cervical cancer [16]. It was also observed that the number of women who were aware of cervical cancer prior to their diagnosis was low, consistent with studies in Nigeria that show low levels of awareness of cervical cancer [17]. There was also evidence that only a small proportion of the women were able to attribute cancer as a cause of most of the symptoms mentioned. This is consistent with other findings that showed that women assumed their symptoms were as a result of a continuation of their menses, genital infections and irregular menses [18]. Majority of the women correctly cited the need for frequent gynaecological examinations however, most were not screened regularly. This is consistent with findings that show that, in many developing countries, screening is opportunistic and is mostly characterised by poor coverage and lack of quality control systems [18]. Similarly, perceived barriers to screening such as cost, lack of information on where to obtain screening services and fear associated with pain from a Pap smear test hinder most women from being screened [14]. It was also observed that most of the women were not aware of the sexually transmitted nature of cervical cancer though some considered promiscuity to be a risk factor. This low level of awareness is consistent with other studies that show that information about the association between cervical cancer and sexual transmission or sexual activity is not well established [5]. Information regarding the link between cervical cancer and sexual activity is necessary in order to allow women to make informed choices concerning their sexual behaviour. However, care must be taken when providing this information to the public as the fear and stigma of associating cervical cancer with a sexually transmitted disease may deter women from taking up screening services [19].

 

Strengths and limitations of the study: one of the main strengths of this study is the use of information on the women's initial histological diagnosis which was obtained from the patient files. This enabled us to determine the proportion of patients who presented with early and advanced stage cervical cancer. Additionally, staging data for 94% of the participants was available. A further advantage of this study was the high response rate which reduced the likelihood of non-response bias. This study is subject to the limitation of self report data. However, the bias in the data was negligible because behavioural factors were not mainly being assessed. Studies have demonstrated that information on the frequency of cervical cancer screening in women is mostly based on their own account. The tendency to overestimate or underestimate their participation has been observed owing to the discordance between medical records and the patient's account of the number of Pap smears they have previously had [20]. Similarly, women who had had a gynaecological examination besides a Pap smear erroneously reported having had a Pap smear more frequently than women who hardly ever had gynaecological examinations [21].

 

 

This study revealed that stage at presentation among women attending Kenyatta national hospital was considerably advanced. Knowledge on cervical cancer symptoms, on the link between HPV and cervical cancer and on the sexually transmitted nature of cervical cancer was limited. There is therefore need to increase screening programs and health education programs that will highlight these linkages.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

Kabura Wamburu, Josephat Nyagero and Naftali Busakhala were involved in the study design with the statistical analysis carried out by Kevin Owour. Kabura Wamburu drafted the manuscript to which all authors subsequently contributed. All authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript.

 

 

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Mr. Buliva Amugune for his assistance with the data collection. We thank the management and staff at the radiotherapy and the obstetrics and gynaecology departments, KNH for providing a favourable environment for carrying out this study. We also appreciate the assistance accorded by AMREF health Africa.

 

 

Table 1: socio-demographic characteristics of participants

Table 2: differences in Knowledge on risk factors for cervical cancer and stage at presentation

Table 3: knowledge on infectious and non-infectious risk factors and stage at presentation

 

 

1. Ferlay Jacques, Shin Hai-Rim, Bray Freddie, Forman David, Mathers Colin, Parkin Donald. Globocan 2008 v12: Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC Cancer Base No 10 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2010. Google Scholar


2. Aleyamma Mathew, Preethi George. Trends in incidence and mortality rates of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix-worldwide. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009; 10(4):645-650. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Kenya Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation and Ministry of Medical Services. National Cervical Cancer Prevention Program Strategic Plan. 2012-2015. 2012. Google Scholar


4. Bruni Laia, Barrionuevo-Rosas Leslie, Albero Ginesa et al. ICO Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre): Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in Kenya. Summary Report 2014. Google Scholar


5. Waller JO, McCaffery Kristen, Wardle Jane. Beliefs about the risk factors for cervical cancer in a British population sample. Prev Med. 2004;38(6):745-753. PubMed | GoogleScholar


6. Plummer Martyn, Herrero Ronaldo, et al. Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case-control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2003; 14(9):805-814. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Munoz Nubia, Castellsagué Xavier, de González Amy B, Gissmann Lutz. HPV in the etiology of human cancer. Vaccine. 2006; 24(Suppl 3):S1-S10. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Thomson Catherine, Forman David. Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results?. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101(Suppl 2):S102-S109. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Arndt Volker, Stürmer Til, Stegmaier Christa, Ziegler Hartwig, Becker Annelie, Brenner Hermann. Provider delay among patients with breast cancer in Germany: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(8):1440-1446. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Macleod Una, Mitchell Elizabeth, Burgess Caroline, Macdonald, Ramirez Amanda. Risk factors for delayed presentation and referral of symptomatic cancer: evidence for common cancers. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101(Suppl 2):S92-S101. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Ibrahim Ahmed, Rasch Vibeke, Pukkala Eero, Aro Arja R. Predictors of cervical cancer being at an advanced stage at diagnosis in Sudan. Int J Women's Health. 2011; 3(1):385-389. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Pezzatini Massimo, Marino Graziella, Conte Stefano, Catracchia Valeria. Oncology: a forgotten territory in Africa. Ann Oncology. 2007; 18(12):2046-2047. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Chirenje Zvavahera M, Rusakaniko Simbarashe, et al. Situation analysis for cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment in East, Central and Southern African countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(2):127-132. PubMed | GoogleScholar


14. Abotchie Peter N, Shokar Navkiran K. Cervical cancer screening among college students in Ghana: knowledge and health beliefs. Int J Gynaecol Cancer. 2009; 19(3):412-416. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Tiro Jasmin A, Meissner Helen I, Kobrin Sarah, Chollette Veronica. What do women in the US know about human papillomavirus and cervical cancer?. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(2):288-294. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Waller JO, McCaffery Kristen, Forrest Sue, Szarewski Anne, Cadman Louise, Wardle Jane. Awareness of human papillomavirus among women attending a well woman clinic. Sex Transm Infect. 2003; 79(4):320-322. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Anorlu Rose, Orakwue Obi C, Oyeneyin Lawal, Abudu Olalekan. Late presentation of patients with cervical cancer to a tertiary hospital in Lagos: what is responsible?. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003; 25(6):729-732. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Anorlu Rose I. Cervical cancer: the sub-Saharan African perspective. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16(32):41-49. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Braun Virginia, Gavey Nicola. With the best of reasons: cervical cancer prevention policy and the suppression of sexual risk factor information. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48(10):1463-1474. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Amarin Zouhair, Badria Layla, Obeidat Basil. Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women. East Mediterr Health J. 2008; 14(2):389-397. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. Pizarro Judith, Schneider Tamera R, Salovey Peter. A source of error in self-reports of Pap test utilization. J Commun Health. 2002; 27(5):351-356. PubMed | Google Scholar