The Burden experienced by Family Caregivers of Patients with Epilepsy attending the Government Psychiatric Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria
Folorunsho Tajudeen Nuhu, Abdulkareem Jika Yusuf, Akinsola Akinbiyi, Joseph Oluyinka Fawole, Obafemi Joseph Babalola, Zainab Titilope Sulaiman, Olaniyi Oyeniran Ayilara
Corresponding author: Dr Folorunsho T. Nuhu, Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Barnawa, Kaduna, Tel: +2348056073975, +2348060465845, Nigeria
Received: 19 Feb 2010 - Accepted: 24 May 2010 - Published: 01 Jun 2010
Domain: Clinical medicine
Keywords: Disease burden, Caregiver, Epilepsy, Patients, Kaduna, Nigeria
©Folorunsho Tajudeen Nuhu et al. Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cite this article: Folorunsho Tajudeen Nuhu et al. The Burden experienced by Family Caregivers of Patients with Epilepsy attending the Government Psychiatric Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria. Pan African Medical Journal. 2010;5:16. [doi: 10.11604/pamj.2010.5.16.211]
Available online at: https://www.panafrican-med-journal.com//content/article/5/16/full
Original article
The Burden experienced by Family Caregivers of Patients with Epilepsy attending the Government Psychiatric Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria
The burden experienced by family caregivers of patients with epilepsy attending the government psychiatric hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria
Folorunsho Tajudeen Nuhu1,&, Abdulkareem Jika Yusuf2, Akinsola Akinbiyi3, Joseph Oluyinka Fawole4, Obafemi Joseph Babalola1, Zainab Titilope Sulaiman1, Olaniyi Oyeniran Ayilara1
1Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Barnawa, Kaduna. Nigeria, 2Department of Psychiatry, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria, 3Mercy Mental Health 117-129 Warring Crescent, Horpers crossing 3029 Australia, 4Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital, Abuja. Nigeria
&Corresponding author
Dr Folorunsho T. Nuhu, Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Barnawa, Kaduna, Tel: +2348056073975, +2348060465845, Nigeria
Burden of care is a multi-factorial construct which includes emotional, psychological, physical and economic impact as well as related distressing feelings such as shame, embarrassment, anger, feeling of guilt and self-blame [1]. It is customary to describe burden as objective or subjective. Objective burden refers to changes in household routine, family or social relations, work, leisure and physical health; while subjective burden consists of subjective distress among relatives, including impact on mental health [2].
Family caregivers have been described as forgotten patients and it was
suggested that caregiver’s symptoms such as mood swing, fatigue, headaches,
joint and muscle pains, marital and family conflicts, and financial problems
may be a reflection of caregiver stress in looking after a sick relative [3].
Studies have shown that caregivers of patients with epilepsy have high levels
of strains, fears that the illness may cause injury or death as well as concern
about what will happen to patients in future when the caregiver will not be
available to cater for patients [4, 5].
In addition, it has been shown that relatives who care for patients with
epilepsy have higher burden of care than control groups [6-8]
and that depression and patient’s functioning separate from seizure control [6]
and low income [7]
are predictors of burden in caregivers. In Nigeria, it has been reported that
caregivers of patients with schizophrenia [9-11]
and dementia [12,13]
are strained while caring for their relatives and that high burden was
associated with living in rural areas [9,11],
large family size [11],
severity of patient’s illness and caregiver’s low level of education [13].
However there is paucity of literature on the burden experienced by caregivers
looking after patients with epilepsy especially in the northern part of Nigeria
and it is against this background that we studied caregivers of epileptic
patients in our centre to assess their level of burden in caring for their
patients.
The test-retest reliability and face validity of ZBI has been
established in Nigeria [13]
and the instrument has previously been used in some studies conducted in the
country [11,13].
Few caregivers who did not understand English language were interviewed by one
of the authors (ZTS) using the Hausa version obtained through the method of
back-translation [15].
The total burden for a subject is the sum of the scores in all the items. We
calculated the median score for all the subjects which is the midpoint between
the lowest total score and the highest total score of the burden interview. The
median is a measure of central tendency not sensitive to outlying values.
Subjects whose scores were below the median score were rated ‘low burden’ while
those scoring equal and above the median score were assessed to be ‘high
burden’ [11,16]. Statistical
analysis Using
the 15th edition of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences we
calculated the frequencies and percentages for the variables. Chi-square(X2)
test was used to determine the association between burden and categorical
variables while logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the
predictors of high burden. The level of significance was set at P value less
than 0.05 Table
1 and table 2 shows the socio-demographic/clinical characteristics of caregivers and
patients. For the caregivers the mean age was 43.6 ±9.5 years, mean year of
education was 9.7 ±6.0 and mean income was US$116 ±827. For the patients; the
mean age was 28±13.2, mean duration of illness was 9.5 ±8.2 years and mean
seizure-free period was 26.4 ±36.5 weeks. The
median ZBI score was 25. One hundred and twenty (51.9%) caregivers scored 25
and above and were rated as having “high burden”. The
mean and standard deviation of each item of the ZBI score for all the
caregivers are shown in table 3. The highest mean burden score was found on
item 7 (caregiver’s fear of what the future holds for the patients
(2.56±1.12)). This was followed by item 13 (feeling uncomfortable about having
friends or visitors around because of relative (1.82±1.76)). Caring
for patients below the age of 20 years (p value, 0.036), patient’s unemployment
(p value, 0.024), long duration of illness (p value, 0.009), short seizure-free
period (p value<0.001), family history of epilepsy (p value, 0.024) and
living outside Kaduna (p value <0.001) were all significantly associated
with caregiver high burden (table 4). The other socio-demographic
characteristics of caregivers were not significantly associated with high
burden (p value>0.05). After
a logistic regression analysis the following factors were predictive of high
burden in caregivers: seizure duration (p value=0.010, OR=2.634,
95%CI=1.264-5.487), seizure-free period (p value=0.002, OR=0.257, 95%CI=0.107-0.617)
and location of residence (p value <0.001, OR=3.069, 95%CI=1.697-5.550) The
results of this study show that about 52% of our subjects experienced high
level of burden while caring for their relatives and this was significantly
associated with caring for younger patients (below 20 years of age) who were
unemployed, had longer duration of illness, lived outside Kaduna, had family
history of epilepsy and short seizure-free periods. The
association of caring for patients below the age of 20 and high burden was
inconsistent with Martyns-Yellowe report [9]
among caregivers of schizophrenic patients. He found that those who cared for
patients in the age range “21-45” years were the most burdened. It is possible
that caring for younger patients may be more stressful. This is the stage when
children and adolescents are expected to be in school and especially if seizure
is poorly controlled they may spend time out of school. In this instance
caregivers may be forced to stay at home with patients. A study conducted in
Nigeria has reported a significant impact of epilepsy on some parents caring
for their children with the disease and a significant proportion of those
parents had to stop working in order to have enough time to look after the
children [18].
In addition children may not appreciate the effects of their illness on the
whole family and they are more likely to be unemployed and have to depend on
the caregivers for virtually all their needs. Indeed,
in this study unemployment was also found to be associated with high burden. In
patients who have had the illness for a long time, the burden experienced by
caregivers may be the cumulative effects of the disease over the years. A short
seizure-free period may be an indication of severe illness. Repeated seizure
attacks may challenge the coping ability of the caregiver. This may also
involve frequent hospital visits, using high doses of anticonvulsant drugs (and
hence increase cost), close monitoring of patients at home (with less time for
other responsibilities), fear of receiving visitors because of stigma and fear
of what future holds for the patient. Any of these (if present) may explain the
burden experienced by the caregivers. Where there is family history of
epilepsy, the burden experienced by caregivers may be the total burden of
caring for two or more “sick relatives”, the burden associated with stigma,
inability to meet financial requirement or a combination of all the above. Caregivers
living outside Kaduna had higher burden in this study. This is similar to
previous reports among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in Nigeria who
lived in rural areas [9,11].
Indeed, rural dwellers are more likely to be poorer than their urban
counterparts [9]
and they have poor access to medical and mental health care. Poor access may
result from poor road network, distance from centres where the health
facilities are located or poverty [19].
In this study however, living outside Kaduna does not equate to living in a
rural setting. The main factor is the distance patients and their caregivers
have to cover before arriving at our hospital. Some of our subjects travel more
than 300km with their patients to attend clinics in our centre, some travels a
day before the clinic appointment and some have to sleep in Kaduna after the
clinic to avoid night journey back home. On the whole caregiver may lose up to
three days to ensure that their relatives keep a particular clinic appointment.
This, no doubt, will worsen their financial constraints and increase the
overall burden. Further analysis however showed that long duration of illness,
short seizure-free period (poor seizure control) and living outside Kaduna are
the main predictors of high burden in caregivers of patients with epilepsy. The
effects of high burden can be enormous. In fact, it has been established that
caregivers who experience high burden are at risk of developing emotional
disorders such as depression [20,21]. Limitations It
is a cross-sectional study carried out in only one centre in the country. We
also excluded caregivers of patients with co-morbid medical or psychiatric
disorders. However this was done to be certain that the burden experienced by
caregivers actually resulted from caring for relatives with epilepsy and not
other disorders. In addition, variables like duration of weekly or daily
contact with the patients were not assessed. Caring
for patients with epilepsy is really challenging and it is associated with
enormous burden. Factors that predict high burden are long duration of
epilepsy, poor seizure control and living far away from treatment centre. We
therefore recommend that all efforts should be made to control seizure in
epileptics and to make health care readily available to the entire populace at
affordable price. Assistance could also come through the proper implementation
of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). We declare that there is no competing interests FT Nuhu developed the idea and initiated the design of the
study, took part in the data collection, data analysis and writing of the
paper, and he read and approved the final copy. AJ Yusuf took part in the design, data analysis and writing of
the paper. He read and approved the final copy. Dr A Akinbiyi contributed to
the design, data analysis and writing of the paper. He also read and approved
the final copy. JO Fawole contributed to the design, data collection and
writing. He read and approved the final copy. OJ Babalola, ZT Sulaiman and
OO Ayilara contributed to the design, data collection, writing and approval of
the final copy. Table 1: Socio-demographic/clinical characteristics of caregivers Table 2: Socio-demographic/clinical characteristics of patients Table 3: Mean scores of items in the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) instrument Table 4: Burden and patients’ (and caregivers’) characteristics
The socio-demographic/clinical characteristics of the patients and
socio-demographic variables of the caregivers were recorded. The clinical
information such as duration of illness, seizure-free period (calculated from
the day of last seizure to the time of interview), past medical and psychiatric
history as well as family history of epilepsy were obtained from the case
files. In addition we conducted mental state assessment and physical
examination on the patients. We administered the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
instrument [14]
to all the eligible caregivers. The ZBI is a 22-item questionnaire with each
item rated from 0-4 (higher scores denoting higher burden for a particular
item).
The Research and Ethics committee of the Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital,
Kaduna gave approval for the study and all the participants gave informed
consent.
Majority of the caregivers are female and close to 40% are mothers. This is
similar to a recent report among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in
Nigeria [11].
The cultural belief that men should work, and in most cases they are the
bread-winners, may have shifted the responsibility of caring for the sick to
the women-folk. One other possibility is the polygamous nature of most families
in the study environment which makes it the duty of every mother to look after
her own children.
More than half of the caregiver had high burden with their greatest concern
being what will happen to the relatives in future when they (the caregivers)
may not likely be available to look after them. However the low mean burden
scores on items 16 and 18 (table 3) suggest that caregivers will continue to
care for their relatives despite their experience of burden. This is similar to
the findings among caregivers of cancer patients in Southern Nigeria [17].