Home | Volume 49 | Article number 119

Case report

Ureterocele with embedded stone suggesting a diagnosis of bladder tumor: beware of the diagnostic trap! Case report and literature review

Ureterocele with embedded stone suggesting a diagnosis of bladder tumor: beware of the diagnostic trap! Case report and literature review

Idriss Ziani1,2,&, Ahmed Ibrahimi1,2, Yassine Nouini1,2

 

1Urological Surgery Department "A", Rabat University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco, 2Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

 

 

&Corresponding author
Idriss Ziani, Urological Surgery Department "A", Rabat University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco

 

 

Abstract

Ureterocele is a congenital urinary malformation resulting in pseudo-cystic dilation of the terminal ureter under the mucosa. We present the case of a 47-year-old patient who presents with irritative symptoms of the lower urinary tract with hematuria. Initial imaging suggested a bladder tumor with a bladder stone, before correcting the diagnosis of ureterocele with embedded stone by cystoscopy. Treatment included endoscopic ureterocelotomy with laser stone fragmentation.

 

 

Introduction    Down

The ureterocele is a pseudo-cystic dilatation of the terminal ureter under the mucosa. It is a rare malformative uropathy especially if it occurs in a simplex ureter. Its symptoms are sometimes misleading [1]. As for treatment, the endoscopic approach is increasingly used [1]. The aim of this article is to illustrate with a clinical case the difficulties of diagnosing this uropathy, hence the interest in bringing together the results of several explorations before the therapeutic decision [2].

 

 

Patient and observation Up    Down

Patient information: we report a case of a 47-year-old patient who consulted for irritating symptoms of the lower urinary tract associated with a few episodes of hematuria.

Clinical findings: the clinical examination was unremarkable, microscopic hematuria was observed on the urine strip.

Timeline of the current episode: the symptoms had been evolving for 6 months with a gradual exacerbation.

Diagnostic assessment: ultrasound exploration revealed a left lateral bladder lesion process with an embedded stone (Figure 1), and the computed tomography (CT) scan revealed 12 mm lithiasis with suspicious tissue thickening (Figure 2).

Diagnosis: radiological exploration concluded that there was a suspicious bladder mass associated with bladder lithiasis; this required a comparison with the endoscopic data.

Therapeutic intervention and follow-up: an endoscopic exploration for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes was considered and revealed a tissue lesion with an inflammatory appearance, his endoscopic resection revealed a stone embedded in a ureterocele. The therapeutic approach consisted of resection of the ureterocele and then fragmentation of the stone using the holmium laser at the same time of operation (Figure 3). The resected tissue was analyzed by pathology examination which did not show any sign of malginity.

Prognostic characteristics: the prognosis for ureterocele is good after treatment, there are no notable complications.

Follow-up and outcome of interventions: the postoperative course was simple, allowing discharge home after removal of the bladder catheter on day 1. The check-up at 3 months and 6 months took place without any abnormality.

Patient perspective: the patient was pleased with the small incision required for the minimally invasive treatment and the noticeable reduction in clinical symptoms.

Informed consent: the patient gave his consent to the exploration.

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

Ureteroceles are congenital uropathies generally diagnosed during prenatal ultrasounds or early childhood assessments and are a rare phenomenon. However, there are exceptional cases where symptoms related to ureterocele can manifest later in life, which poses a diagnostic difficulty [3]. The risk of obstructive uropathy-induced chronic kidney damage necessitates treatment. Depending on the patient's age, the clinical presentation of ureteroceles can vary significantly due to the wide range of symptoms that are associated with the condition [4]. Diagnostic imaging studies, such as uroscan and urinary tree ultrasound, are crucial; in cases of doubt, cystoscopy is still required [5].

The endoscopic method enables endoscopic management of the ureterocele as well as diagnostic confirmation [5]. Transurethral incisions are still the current standard of care for ureteroceles [5]. Although some cases continued to exhibit mild vesicoureteral reflux even after intervention, this approach was found to be safe and effective [5].

The procedure progressively progressed toward a more prominent and shorter incision while maintaining the detrusor muscle's posterior wall and honoring the inert mucosa's valve mechanism, which relaxes in response to the filling bladder's pressure [6]. This is the idea behind Rodriguez et al. [6] "smiling mouth" endoscopic meatotomy technique. Rodriguez claims that endoscopic meatotomy was also successfully performed with a Nd-YAG type laser by Gupta et al. [7] and a Ho-YAG type by Mazo et al. [8]. Liu et al. [9] employed the endoscopic technique outlined by Rodriguez in our observation, followed by the Ho-YAG laser's fragmentation of the stone.

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

A rare congenital malformation called ureterocle is typically diagnosed in children and is rarely discovered in adults, necessitating sometimes lengthy diagnostic testing. Adult ureterocele treatment is not standardized. But for the time being, endoscopic meatotomy is still the recommended course of action.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors' contributions Up    Down

All the authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

 

 

Figures Up    Down

Figure 1: ultrasound aspect showing a bladder process with a bladder stone

Figure 2: computed tomography (CT) scan shows a bladder stone with wall thickening of the bladder

Figure 3: A) left lateral bladder mass; B) endoscopic resection of the mass; C) visualization of the stone in the ureterocele; D) endoscopic fragmentation of the stone by laser

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. Decter RM. Renal duplication and fusion anomalies. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1997 Oct;44(5):1323-41. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Coplen DE, Duckett JW. The modern approach to ureteroceles. J Urol. 1995;153(1):166-71. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Caldamone AA, Snyder HM 3rd, Duckett JW. Ureteroceles in children: followup of management with upper tract approach. J Urol. 1984 Jun;131(6):1130-2. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Scantling D, Ross C, Altman H. A 52-year-old male with bilaterally duplicated collecting systems with obstructing ureteral stones: a case report. Curr Urol. 2013 Nov;7(2):104-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Vijay MK, Vijay P, Dutta A, Gupta A, Tiwari P, Kumar S et al. The safety and efficacy of endoscopic incision of orthotopic ureterocele in adult. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011 Nov;22(6):1169-74. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Rodriguez JV. Endoscopic surgery of calculi in ureteroceles. Eur Urol. 1984;10(1):36-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Singh I. Laser endoscopic incision: a viable alternative to treat adult ureterocele. Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;33(2):325-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Mazo EB, Chepurov AK, Varentsov Gi, Nemenova AA. The Ho-YAG laser in surgical urology. Urol Nefrol (Mosk). 1996 May-Jun;(3):32-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Liu C, Chen W, Xie C, Guan W, Zhao Y, Ouyang Y et al. Efficacy and Safety of Transurethral Photoselective Greenlight(™) Laser Vaporization for the Treatment of Orthotopic Ureteroceles in Adults. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Jun;33(6):326-9. PubMed | Google Scholar