Home | Volume 47 | Article number 170

Research

Characterization of genital chlamydia amongst female sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya

Characterization of genital chlamydia amongst female sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya

Priska Bwana1,2,&, Ferdinard Adungo1, Gabriel Magoma2, Matilu Mwau1

 

1Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 2Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

&Corresponding author
Priska Bwana, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

Abstract

Introduction: genital chlamydia, which is caused by diverse Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) genotypes, is largely asymptomatic. We aimed to identify C. trachomatis genotypes causing genital chlamydia among female sex workers attending a sex workers outreach program clinic in Nairobi, Kenya.

 

Methods: this cross-sectional study was conducted between 18 th April 2017 and 19 th March 2021. Genitourinary complaints from eligible female sex workers were documented using a structured questionnaire. Endocervical swabs were collected for laboratory analysis. C. trachomatis plasmid DNA was extracted, PCR-amplified, and sequenced. Consensus sequences were generated and aligned with reference sequences to determine the C. trachomatis genotypes. Bivariate analysis was used to determine the association between genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia.

 

Results: endocervical swabs were collected from a total of 348 participants. Of these, 46 (13.2%) were positive for C. trachomatis. Most (297, 85.3%) of the participants presented with pelvic discharge with or without other symptoms. Fifteen (15, 4.3%) had abdominal pain and 3 (0.9%) had an itchy vulva. There was no statistically significant relationship between clinical presentation and genital chlamydia. Twenty-three samples were successfully sequenced. Each sequence was at least 90% identical to each of the 13 references C. trachomatis genotypes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Ia, J, L1, L2, L2b and L3.

 

Conclusion: we found no significant association between individual genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia infection. The C. trachomatis genotypes circulating amongst female sex workers in Nairobi could be related to genotypes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Ia, J, L1, L2, L2b, and L3.

 

 

Introduction    Down

Genital chlamydia, caused by C. trachomatis [1] is a sexually transmitted bacterial infection [2]. In women, C. trachomatis infects the endocervix and causes cervicitis. Since no long-term immunity is induced, re-infection is common among patients. Nineteen different C. trachomatis genotypes have been identified, namely A, B, Ba, C, D, Da, E, F, G, Ga, H, I, Ia, J, K, L1, L2, L2a, and L3 [3]. Genotypes A to C are often associated with trachoma, L1 to L3 with lymphogranuloma venereum, and D to K with urogenital and neonatal infections [4]. Genotypes Da, E, F, G, Ga, H, I, Ia, J, and K cause genital chlamydia infections in women [3].

The most common complication of genital chlamydia infection in women is pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Long-term complications such as fibrosis and scarring due to the repair of tissue damaged by chlamydia-induced inflammation may lead to ectopic pregnancy, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain [5]. In infected pregnant women, the foetus is at risk of conjunctivitis and pneumonia [6]. Although early detection can help prevent these complications, this may be difficult as the infection is often asymptomatic or associated with nonspecific symptoms such as pelvic discharge, genital itchiness, or lower abdominal pain [7]. If untreated, the infection may persist for a long time. Globally, the estimated prevalence of genital chlamydia among female sex workers is between 0.6%-46.2% [8]. Female sex workers are at a high risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [9] and maybe the key drivers of genital chlamydia infections [10]. The risk of contracting genital chlamydia and other STIs is increased by drug and alcohol abuse, inconsistent condom use, multiple sexual partners, mobility, and a complex social network between female sex workers, their clients, and other sexual partners of the clients [11].

In Kenya, studies conducted on genital chlamydia have focused on its epidemiology in targeted populations, and, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no genetic studies. Prevalence rates of 6% [5] have been reported among urban women of reproductive age, 8.8% [12] in pregnant women, 3.2% [13] in fishermen along the Lake Victoria region, and 12% [14] in men who have sex with men. A study conducted among part-time female sex workers in a suburban community in 2002 reported a prevalence rate of 4.2% [9], while another study among Female Sex Workers in an urban community reported a prevalence of 3.1% [15]. Even though, the SWOP City clinic attends to a large number of female sex workers, there have been only limited attempts to describe their socio-demographic characteristics and to associate their genitourinary complaints with the genital Chlamydia they sometimes present. Further, the strains of genital chlamydia circulating among these female sex workers have not been described. In this study, our objectives were to identify C. trachomatis genotypes causing genital chlamydia among female sex workers attending a sex workers outreach program (SWOP) City clinic in Nairobi, Kenya, and to determine the association between genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia.

 

 

Methods Up    Down

Study design: this cross-sectional study was conducted between 18th April 2017 and 19th March 2021. Female sex workers who had genitourinary complaints sought medical services at the sex workers outreach program City clinic in Nairobi, and were able to give informed consent were recruited consecutively to the study.

Study setting: the study was conducted in the SWOP City clinic in Nairobi, Kenya. Nairobi, the capital city of Kenya, is an international hub for travel, trade, and economic development. Over the years, Nairobi has experienced rapid population growth and the current population of the city is approximately 4.3 million people. Since it is a trade and travel hub, commercial sex work is a significant economic activity in many parts of the city and the prevalence of STIs such as HIV/AIDS is higher in Nairobi than in the rest of the country. The SWOP City clinic in Nairobi, Kenya is situated in the city´s Central Business District. It has a sexual and reproductive health clinic, and it provides genitourinary medicine services to key populations (KPs) and priority populations in Kenya. Key populations (KPs) include female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM) as well as adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Recruitment was on a first to consent first to enroll basis until the sample size was achieved. The samples were collected, transported, and tested at the Kenya Medical Research Institute Laboratory for Molecular Biology in Nairobi.

Study participants: the study recruited female sex workers who had been advised by the clinician at the health facility to undergo genital Chlamydia testing during their visit for genitourinary medicine services. Pregnant women and patients with serious medical conditions that would have potentially affected the accuracy of normal laboratory tests and the interpretation of results were excluded. The age cut-off for inclusion was 18 years and above, which is the legal age for providing informed consent in Kenya. However, two emancipated minors [16] were enrolled, as the policy on the conduct of HIV and STI research in adolescents allows for the inclusion of emancipated minors since they do not need parental consent.

Study variables: this study collected socio-demographic, genitourinary, and laboratory variables. Socio-demographic characteristics included age, level of education, marital status, number of sexual partners in 2 weeks, and history of sexually transmitted infections in the past 1 year. Genitourinary complaints included the presence of color and smell of pelvic discharge, abdominal pain, pain during urination (dysuria), vulva itchiness, and other genitourinary complaints. These variables were collected from the study participants to document the socio-demographic characteristics and the genitourinary complaints the female sex workers at SWOP City clinic present. Endocervical swab samples were collected from the endocervix of the study participants. These were the laboratory test samples for this study and the test outcomes were documented as genital chlamydia positive or negative. The documented genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia positive test outcomes were used to determine the association between genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia.

Sampling and recruitment procedures: the study team worked closely with clinicians at the SWOP City clinic where the study was conducted. The nurse triaged female sex workers who came to the SWOP city clinic: some of the participants were reviewed by the nurse and given a new appointment date or sent to the pharmacy for medicine. Others were referred to the clinician. Based on the clinical assessment, eligible participants were recruited on a first-to-consent basis. Briefly, after routine consultation, the attending clinician informed the patient of the study, eligibility was assessed and patients who agreed were invited to participate. Written information was obtained from each participant. The rest of the participants were recruited consecutively in the same manner.

Data sources/measurement: socio-demographic characteristics and genitourinary complaints were documented using a structured questionnaire administered by the attending clinician. All participants were physically examined, and the attending clinician collected two endocervical swab samples. One swab was used for microscopy while the other swab was sent to the KEMRI laboratory for DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and DNA sequencing. The swabs were kept in cooler boxes at 4°C and couriered to the KEMRI laboratory within three hours of collection.

Bias: in this study, selection bias was expected because the study participants did not randomly originate from the community. To minimize bias after enrollment, the persons performing the test were completely blinded to the participant's status and clinical presentation. They were not aware of the patient's status before the samples were collected and the test performed. Some sociodemographic characteristic variables responses were missing for some participants' data, and this may have introduced reporting bias.

Sample size: a sample size of 347 study participants was determined to be sufficient to describe the presence of genital chlamydia with a significance criterion of 0.05. This was calculated using Fischer´s exact test formula [17] as well as prevalence rates from previous studies conducted in Kenya [5]. In the end, 348 participants were recruited.

Quantitative variables

Preparation of samples for PCR: at the laboratory, the samples were assigned unique and sequential numbers and stored at -30°C before DNA extraction. Before testing, the swabs were retrieved, thawed at room temperature, and then cut and put into 1.5ml Eppendorf tubes. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from the swabs using the ReliaPrep™ gDNA Tissue Miniprep System (Promega Corporation, 2800 Woods Hollow Road, Madison, Wisconsin, United States) according to the manufacturer´s instructions [18].

Amplification reaction: a 241-base pair (bp) fragment of the ORF2 region of the highly conserved C. trachomatis cryptic plasmid DNA [19] was amplified to identify C. trachomatis using the primer pair KL1 (forward primer) 5'- TCCGGAGCGAGTTACGAAGA-3' and KL2 (reverse primer) 5'-AATCAATGCCCGGGATTGGT-3' (reverse primer) [20]. We chose plasmid primers because the detection of C. trachomatis using this method is 10 to 1000 times more sensitive than those based on ribosomal DNA (rDNA) or the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) gene [21,22]. The 50μL PCR reaction mix comprised 25μL HotStar Taq master mix (Qiagen, Hilden Düsseldorf, and Germany), 10μL nuclease-free water, 5μL DNA sample and 10μM each of primers KL1 and KL2. PCR conditions included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 15 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 93°C for one minute, annealing at 64°C for one minute, and extension at 72°C for one minute. A final extension cycle at 72°C was run for 5 minutes [23]. The amplicons (5μL) were loaded onto a 1.0% agarose gel and electrophoresed at 100v for 50 minutes. The agarose gel was stained in ethidium bromide solution and visualized using a Clearview Ultra Violet Transilluminator (Cleaver Scientific Ltd, Unit 41 Somers Road, Rugby, United Kingdom). Fragment sizes were compared with the 100bp DNA ladder (Qiagen, Hilden Düsseldorf, Germany) to identify C. trachomatis; a 241bp fragment size was expected [20].

DNA sequencing: polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were purified with ExoSAP-IT™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) according to well-established protocols [24]. Forward and reverse sanger sequencing was conducted using BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States). A reaction mix containing a final volume of 11.5μL was prepared from 4μL of nuclease-free water, 2μL of 5x BigDye buffer, 3.5μL of DNA sample, 1μL of Big Dye Terminator v3.1 reaction mix and 4μM of each the KL1 and KL2 primers. The sequencing reaction was run for 25 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 50°C for 5 seconds, and extension at 60°C for 4 minutes [23]. The products were purified using the BigDye XTerminator™ purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) according to the manufacturer's instructions [24]. The purified products were analyzed in the 3730XL DNA analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Statistical methods: data were transferred from the questionnaires into a Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) database and analyzed using Stata/MP Version 13 for Windows (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, United States). Quantitative data on socio-demographic characteristics and genitourinary complaints were summarized using descriptive statistics. To facilitate analysis, PCR results were coded as either 1 for positive or 0 for negative and summarized using simple descriptive statistics. Pearson chi-square tests of independence were performed to examine the relationship between participant characteristics, clinical presentation, and genital chlamydia positivity. Consensus DNA sequences were generated using BioEdit software v7.2 (Bioz, Los Altos, California, United States), and C. trachomatis genotype identification was done using the Basic Local Alignment Sequence Tool (BLAST) [25] (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Maryland, United States). We used Blastn and Megablast programs as well as the BLAST default parameters to query the nucleotide collection (nr/nt) database.

Ethical considerations: the Kenya Medical Research Institute´s Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (SERU) reviewed and approved this study under KEMRI/SERU Protocol No. 3357. The clinicians obtained written informed consent from all the study participants. All but two of the study participants were over 18 years of age. The two participants who were aged below 18 years were considered liberated minors. Written informed consent was obtained from them in line with the existing policy on the conduct of HIV and STI research in adolescents [16]. The endocervical swabs collected from study participants were labeled with unique de-identified study identification numbers to ensure the anonymity of participants.

 

 

Results Up    Down

Participants: three hundred and forty-eight (348) female participants who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and included in the study.

Descriptive data

Participant characteristics: some participants did not provide complete data on age (10 participants), level of education (6), marital status (2), number of sexual partners in 2 weeks (11), and history of STI (2). Fifty-three-point-eight percent (53.8% (182/338)) of the participants were aged between 15-30 years, while 46.2% (156/338) were aged 31-80 years (Table 1). Seventy-nine-point five percent (79.5(272/342)) of the participants had obtained secondary school education, 93.6% (324/346) were single, 89.0% (308/346) had not been infected by any STI in the past 1 year, and 39.8% (134/337) reported having had 28 sexual partners or less in the past 2 weeks.

Genitourinary complaints: a total of 330 (94.8 %) of the 348 participants had at least one genitourinary complaint, while 18 (5.17%) had none. Two hundred and ninety-seven (297/347 85.6%) participants presented with pelvic discharge with or without other symptoms. Fifteen (15, 4.3%) participants complained of abdominal pain, nine had lower abdominal pain, while six had pain during urination. Forty-six (46/347, 13.3%) participants had an itchy vulva as the main complaint, 43 had an itchy vulva accompanied by pain and pelvic discharge, while 3 had an itchy vulva only. Three (3/347, 0.9%) participants presented with bleeding from the cervix, genital wounds, and rash in the mons pubis.

Outcome data: of the 348 samples tested by PCR, 46/348 (13.2%) were positive for C. trachomatis, while 302/348 (86.8%) were negative. The agarose gel electrophoresis images for the samples that gave positive outcomes are provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Association between genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia: in all cases, there was no significant relationship between genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia. Only one of the 18 participants who had no symptoms tested positive for C. trachomatis, while three (3, 25.0%) of the 12 participants who provided no information or complaints were positive. Similarly, of the 297 participants who presented with pelvic discharge with or without other symptoms, 41 (13.8%) tested positive for C. trachomatis. One (1, 33.3%) of the three participants with an itchy vulva without other symptoms tested positive for C. trachomatis. None of the 15 participants presented with either lower abdominal pain or pain during urination, as their only complaint were positive for C. trachomatis. Also, none of the three (3, 100%) participants who had bleeding from the cervix, genital wounds, and rash in the mons pubis were positive for C. trachomatis.

Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes: of the 46 samples that tested positive for C. trachomatis, 40 had sufficient PCR product for subsequent sequencing. Twenty-three of these were successfully sequenced, while 17 failed quality checks due to suboptimal DNA quality. The 23 DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (National Centre for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Maryland, United States). Their accession numbers are provided in Table 2. Each of the 23 sequences was at least 90% identical to each of the 13 reference C. trachomatis genotypes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Ia, J, L1, L2, L2b, and L3 (Annex 1).

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

This study reports a genital chlamydia prevalence of 13.2% among female sex workers attending the SWOP City clinic in Nairobi. This differs from the previously reported rates of 3.1% [15] and 9% [26] in Kenya and 6.8% [27] in sub-Saharan Africa among female sex workers in the community. The observed higher prevalence rate in the current study could be attributed to the recruitment strategy. The female sex workers in this study were all recruited from a sex workers clinic. Furthermore, the risk factors for genital chlamydia could be different in each of these studies and the dynamics of the sexual networks that sustain STIs may differ between these study groups [28]. For instance, super-spreader events that are well described in other infectious diseases like the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) pandemic [29] may also affect the dynamics of genital chlamydia transmission within a community. Nonetheless, our findings fall within the global estimated genital chlamydia prevalence of between 0.6%-46.2% among female sex workers [8]. Local populations of female sex workers may have varying periods of high and low genital chlamydia prevalence based on extant population dynamics.

Globally, sexually transmitted infections are managed symptomatically. However, genital chlamydia tends to be largely asymptomatic [30-32]. Interestingly, in our study, 42 (91.30 %) of the 46 participants who had genital chlamydia had genitourinary signs and symptoms such as pelvic discharge, itchy vulva, and lower abdominal pain/dysuria. These signs and symptoms appear not to be pathognomonic. It should be noted that the proportion of genital chlamydia-positive patients with signs and symptoms may not reflect the true population rate, as female sex workers who had no symptoms but may have had genital chlamydia had no reason to visit the SWOP City clinic. The current practice is to treat patients presumptively without laboratory testing. Even though this is highly effective, we propose that a simple and accurate multiplex laboratory test that can be applied at the point of care could help identify multiple pathogens that cause genitourinary infections [33].

Different C. trachomatis genotypes are associated with different genitourinary signs and symptoms. We sequenced a small number of samples. However, sequences of the short fragment of cryptic plasmid we sequenced did not yield sufficient resolution to distinguish different C. trachomatis genotypes. As such, we are not able to draw a distinct association between the C. trachomatis phenotypes and genotypes. Regardless of the genotype responsible, genital tract infections may cause a broad spectrum of clinical symptoms [34]. This is not surprising, as other studies have found that multiple genotypes may account for diverse clinical outcomes [7,35-37].

Study limitations: we have not tested for other STIs yet, STIs usually occur as co-infections. Therefore, testing for a broad range of pathogens could help explain many of the signs and symptoms we observed. Also, data on genital chlamydia is scanty, and it is therefore difficult to fully compare our findings with others. Lastly, the ∼241bp sequences obtained in this study did not provide sufficient resolution to identify distinct genotypes. In the future, we can address this limitation by sequencing large fragments of the ompA gene.

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

We found no significant association between individual genitourinary complaints and genital chlamydia infection. The C. trachomatis genotypes that are circulating amongst female sex workers in Nairobi could be related to genotypes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Ia, J, L1, L2, L2b, and L3 but not genotypes Ba, Da, Ga, H, I, K and L2a.

What is known about this topic

  • Female sex workers are at high risk of genital chlamydia infection;
  • Genital chlamydia infection can be symptomatic and asymptomatic;
  • There are Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes circulating in Nairobi.

What this study adds

  • Thirteen percent of the female sex workers under the study tested positive for Chlamydia trachomatis;
  • There was no significant relationship between genitourinary complaints and testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis;
  • The Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes that are circulating amongst female sex workers in Nairobi could be related to genotypes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Ia, J, L1, L2, L2b and L3.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors' contributions Up    Down

Priska Bwana and Matilu Mwau curated and analyzed the data, provided by project administration and wrote the original manuscript draft. Matilu Mwau conceptualized the study and acquired funding for the study. Priska Bwana, Ferdinard Adungo, and Matilu Mwau implemented the laboratory methodology, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript.

 

 

Acknowledgments Up    Down

The authors would like to acknowledge the study participants, staff members of the Sex Worker Outreach Program (SWOP) City Clinic in Nairobi, the staff members of Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nagasaki University Institute of Tropical Medicine project laboratory led by Dr. Samson Muuo Nzou, and the staff members of the Kenya Medical Research Institute Laboratory for Molecular Biology for their valuable contributions to this study.

 

 

Tables and figures Up    Down

Table 1: relationship between genital chlamydia, demographic characteristics and clinical presentation of female sex workers seeking services at the SWOP city clinic, Nairobi, Kenya between 18th April 2017 and 19th March 2021

Table 2: accession numbers of sequences obtained from commercial sex workers in an outreach clinic in Nairobi, Kenya, between 18th April 2017 and 19th March 2021

Figure 1: agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose) of PCR products for C. trachomatis positive samples; lower agarose gel wells from the right: DNA size marker of 100bp in well 1, positive control in well 2, C. trachomatis positive sample numbers 1 to 17 in wells 3-19 and negative control in well 20; upper agarose gel wells from the right: DNA size marker of 100bp in well 1 and C. trachomatis positive sample numbers 18-24 in wells 2-8

Figure 2: agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose) of PCR products for C. trachomatis positive samples; the lower agarose gel wells from the right: DNA size marker of 100bp in well 1, positive control in well 2, C. trachomatis positive samples number 25-39 in wells 2-11 and 14-19; the upper agarose gel wells from the right: C. trachomatis positive samples number 40-46 in wells 1-3, 5 and 6, 15, and well 21; the DNA size marker of 100bp is in well 23

 

 

Annex Up    Down

Annex 1: BLAST results of sequences obtained from commercial sex workers in an outreach clinic in Nairobi, Kenya, between 18th April 2017 and 19th March 2021 (PDF - 209 Kb)

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. Oliver VO, Otieno G, Gvetadze R, Desai MA, Makanga M, Akelo V et al. High prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among women screened for a contraceptive intravaginal ring study, Kisumu, Kenya, 2014. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2018;29(14):1390-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Jaczek KH. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: detection, treatment and patient education. Can Fam Physician. 1985;31:1861-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Quint KD, Geraets DT, van den Munckhof HA, de Koning MN, Smelov V, Melchers WJ et al. Evaluation of a novel Chlamydia trachomatis microsphere suspension assay for detection and genotyping of the different serovars in clinical samples. J Mol Diagn. 2011;13(2):152-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Gao X, Chen XS, Yin YP, Zhong MY, Shi MQ, Wei WH et al. Distribution Study of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars among High-Risk Women in China Performed Using PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Genotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Apr;45(4):1185-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Kohli R, Konya WP, Obura T, Stones W, Revathi G. Prevalence of genital Chlamydia infection in urban women of reproductive age, Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Feb 4;6:44. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Taylor BD, Haggerty CL. Management of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection: screening and treatment challenges. Infect Drug Resist. 2011;4:19-29. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. van de Laar MJ, van Duynhoven YT, Fennema JS, Ossewaarde JM, van den Brule AJ, van Doornum GJ et al. Differences in clinical manifestations of genital chlamydial infections related to serovars. Genitourin Med. 1996;72(4):261-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Cwikel JG, Lazer T, Press F, Lazer S. Sexually transmissible infections among female sex workers: an international review with an emphasis on hard-to-access populations. Sex Health. 2008;5(1):9-16. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Hawken MP, Melis RD, Ngombo DT, Mandaliya K, Ng'ang'a LW, Price J, Dallabetta G et al. Part time female sex workers in a suburban community in Kenya: a vulnerable hidden population. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(4):271-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Mayaud P, Mabey D. Approaches to the control of sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: old problems and modern challenges. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(3):174-82. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Medhi G, Mahanta J, Paranjape RS, Adhikary R, Laskar N, Ngully P. Factors associated with HIV among female sex workers in a high HIV prevalent state of India. AIDS Care. 2012;24(3):369-76. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Thomas T, Choudhri S, Kariuki C, Moses S. Identifying cervical infection among pregnant women in Nairobi, Kenya: limitations of risk assessment and symptom-based approaches. Genitourin Medicine. 1996;72(5):334-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Kwena ZA, Bukusi EA, Ng'ayo MO, Buffardi AL, Nguti R, Richardson B et al. Prevalence and risk factors for sexually transmitted infections in a high-risk occupational group: the case of fishermen along Lake Victoria in Kisumu, Kenya. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21(10):708-13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Sanders EJ, Thiong'o AN, Okuku HS, Mwambi J, Priddy F, Shafi J et al. High prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among HIV-1 negative men who have sex with men in coastal Kenya. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(6):440-1. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Musyoki H, Kellogg TA, Geibel S, Muraguri N, Okal J, Tun W et al. Prevalence of HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and risk behaviours among female sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya: results of a respondent driven sampling study. AIDS Behav. 2015 Feb;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S46-58. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. KEMRI N. Guidelines for Conducting Adolescent HIV Sexual and Reproductive Health Research in Kenya. National AIDS and STI Control Programme (NASCOP) & Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI). 2018;23:2015. Google Scholar

  17. Eng J. Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied? Radiology. 2003;227(2):309-13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Corporation P. Technical Manual. ReliaPrep™ gDNA Tissue Miniprep System. Protocol for Buccal Swabs. 2013.

  19. Lovett M, Kuo KK, Holmes K, Falkow S. Plasmids of the genus Chlamydia. Current chemotherapy and infectious diseases. 1980;2:1250-2. Google Scholar

  20. Schachter J. DFA, EIA, PCR, LCR and other technologies: what tests should be used for diagnosis of chlamydia infections? 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1-2):157-61. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW, Chernesky MA. Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31(7):1753-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Tam JE, Davis CH, Thresher RJ, Wyrick PB. Location of the origin of replication for the 7.5-kb Chlamydia trachomatis plasmid. Plasmid. 1992;27(3):231-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Santos C, Teixeira F, Vicente A, Astolfi-Filho S. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical smears of sexually active women in Manaus-AM, Brazil, by PCR. Braz J Infect Dis. 2003;7(2):91-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Thermofisher. HIV-1 Genotyping Workflow. Accessed on April 12, 2023.

  25. National Centre for Biotechnology Information. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. Accessed on April 12, 2023.

  26. Fonck K, Kaul R, Keli F, Bwayo JJ, Ngugi EN, Moses S et al. Sexually transmitted infections and vaginal douching in a population of female sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77(4):271-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Dubbink JH, Verweij SP, Struthers HE, Ouburg S, McIntyre JA, Morré SA et al. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among women in sub-Saharan Africa: A structured review. Int J STD AIDS. 2018 Jul;29(8):806-824. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Jolly AM, Muth SQ, Wylie JL, Potterat JJ. Sexual networks and sexually transmitted infections: a tale of two cities. J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):433-45. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Stein RA. Super-spreaders in infectious diseases. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15(8):e510-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Horner PJ, Boag F. National guideline for the management of genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Clinical Effectiveness group. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. 2006. Google Scholar

  31. WE S. Chlamydia trachomatis: progress and problems. Journal of Infectious Disease. 1999;179(380):3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Gonzales GF, Muñoz G, Sánchez R, Henkel R, Gallegos-Avila G, Díaz-Gutierrez O et al. Update on the impact of Chlamydia trachomatis infection on male fertility. Andrologia. 2004;36(1):1-23. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. Davenport M, Mach KE, Shortliffe LMD, Banaei N, Wang TH, Liao JC. New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(5):296-310. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Holmes K, Sparling P, Stamm W, Piot P, Wasserheit J, Corey L. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the adult. Sexually Transmitted Infections. New York: McGraw Hill Professional. 2007:575-94. Google Scholar

  35. Workowski KA, Stevens CE, Suchland RJ, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA, Pettinger MB et al. Clinical manifestations of genital infection due to Chlamydia trachomatis in women: differences related to serovar. Clincal Infectious Disease. 1994;19(4):756-60. PubMed | Google Scholar

  36. van Duynhoven YT, Ossewaarde JM, Derksen-Nawrocki RP, van der Meijden WI, van de Laar MJ. Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes: correlation with clinical manifestations of infection and patients' characteristics. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(2):314-22. PubMed | Google Scholar

  37. Dean D, Oudens E, Bolan G, Padian N, Schachter J. Major outer membrane protein variants of Chlamydia trachomatis are associated with severe upper genital tract infections and histopathology in San Francisco. J Infect Dis. 1995;172(4):1013-22. PubMed | Google Scholar