Clinical predictors of significant intracranial computed tomography scan findings in adults experiencing headache disorder

Clinical predictors of significant intracranial computed tomography scan findings in adults experiencing headache disorder

Ulrich Igor Mbessoh Kengne^1,&, Callixte Kuate Tegueu^1,2, Dorothée Soh Mankong¹, Maggy Mbede^1,3, Ulrich Gael Tene¹, Boniface Moifo^1,4

 

¹Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon, ²Neurology Department, Douala Laquintinie Hospital, Douala, Cameroon, ³Radiology Department, Yaounde Central Hospital, Yaounde, Cameroon, ⁴Radiology Department, Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital, Yaounde, Cameroon

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Ulrich Igor Mbessoh Kengne, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon

 

 

 

 

Headache or cephalalgia is defined as localized or diffused pain in various parts of the head, with the pain not confined to the area of distribution of a nerve, and eventually irradiating to the face or the neck [1,2]. Headache disorder is among the most common pain problem encountered in daily practice[1,3]. With a life-time prevalence estimated at 99% for women and 94% for men [4], it is designated in many literature as the most frequent neurological symptom leading adult people to consult a physician in emergencies [2,5,6]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) ranges headache disorder among the ten major world-wide pathological conditions [7-9]. Thus, headache disorder today is a global public health problem, due to numerous disabilities and financial implications of the management. International Headache Society (HIS) classifies headache into primary (without any organic substratum) or secondary (with organic substratum) according to many criteria in order to select which patients suffering from headache disorder will need CT-scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging workup [1,10]. Brain imaging for adult suffering from headache disorder show significant intracranial findings in 2.5% to 10% of CT-scans [5,11]. Yet, CT-scan has the greatest radiation exposure in imaging [12]; and impertinent requests will lead to unnecessary radiations with their consequences [13], and a financial burden for the patients [14,15]. Magnetic resonance imaging, which is the gold standard in the evaluation of headache disorder [6], is available only in big cities like Yaounde or Douala with very high cost in our setting. In sub-Saharan Africa, and specifically in Cameroon, data on clinical factors predicting abnormal CT-scan findings in headache disorder, are scarce. Therefore, we undertook a study on predictors of significant intracranial CT-scan findings in adults suffering from headache disorder; in order to help physicians to better select patients with secondary headache who need imaging, and subsequently reduce the cost of headache care.

 

 

Setting and period: we carried out a cross-sectional study in medical imaging departments of Yaounde Central Hospital and Douala Laquintinie Hospital, which are two teaching hospitals in Cameroon, from January to May 2017.

 

Inclusion criteria: we included all consenting patients aged eighteen years or above, referred to the Radiology Department to perform a head CT-scan as aetiological workup of headache disorder, from either traumatic or non-traumatic mechanism.

 

Exclusion criteria: patients having a known brain lesion and those with a Glasgow coma scale less than thirteen were excluded.

 

Data collection: after informed consent of eligible patients, we took their clinical history and performed a neurological examination and a complete physical examination before they undergo a brain CT-scan. The CT-scan was performed in helical mode with or without contrast enhancement according to the clinical context, beginning from C2 vertebra to the whole cranium, and with a millimetric and multiplan reconstruction. The interpretation was performed in both cerebral and bone windows by experimented radiologists, and the examination of the facial block and cervical occipital hinge was systematically done. The CT-scan results were classified in significant intracranial findings, which could be a cause of headaches; incidental findings and normal results were considered as non-significant findings. From each consenting patient, socio-demographic as well as past medical history, full general and neurological examination information were collected, clinical characteristics of headache and significant intracranial findings. Additionally, we studied the predictive values of clinical signs to get a significant intracranial finding in adult patients suffering from headache disorder.

 

Statistical analysis: data analysis used the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 23. Group's comparison used the chi square tests and variants, after stratification of continuous variables as appropriate. Continuous variables were reported as mean (SD) when the distribution was normal and as median (interquartile range) when the distribution was not normal. Categorical variables were analyzed using χ² and Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the predictors of significant CT-scan findings, with adjustment for potential confounders. The significance level of all tests was p ≤ 0.05.

 

Ethical approval: this study got approval from the Research and Ethics Institutional Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences.

 

 

One hundred and sixty nine patients were enrolled in the study; 56.2% were men, the sex ratio was 1.3. The mean age was 43.05±16.7 years. One hundred and thirty two patients (78.1%) performed head CT-scan for acute headaches, of which 45.6% were recent sudden-onset headache and 32.5% were recent progressive headache. The general characteristics of the study group are shown in Table 1. With regard to the relationship between the characteristics of headache and the findings on CT-scan, headache of sudden-onset were statistically associated with the risk of abnormal findings on CT-scan (p = 0.032) On the other hand, recurrent headache, those of occipital and cervical location, and recurrent paroxysmal headache were statistically associated with the absence of significant CT-scan finding (Table 2). An abnormal neurological examination in patients suffering from headache disorder (p = 0.018); aphasia (p = 0.006); periorbital ecchymosis after head trauma (p = 0.023) and abnormal reflexes (p = 0.026) were statistically associated with abnormal CT-scan findings (Table 2). Loss of consciousness (69.6%), raised intracranial pressure signs (70%), sensitivomotor weakness (72.7%), meningeal irritation signs (81.8%), and post-traumatic otorragia (100%), were positive predictive clinical signs of having abnormal intracranial findings on brain CT-scan of adult patients suffering from headache disorder (Table 3).

 

 

In this study involving patients referred to the Radiology Department to perform a head CT-scan as aetiological workup of headache disorder in two tertiary care hospital in sub-Saharan Africa where data are sparse, we report new data on clinical predictors of abnormal CT-scan findings. All patients included in the study for headache disorders underwent a brain CT-scan after full physical end neurological examination. Headache of sudden onset as well as patients with abnormal physical examination like aphasia, abnormal tendon reflexes, those with periorbital ecchymosis or epistaxis after head trauma were statistically associated with abnormal findings on brain CT-scan. A variability is observed in many studies about the sociodemographic profile of the sample included, closely due to the inclusion or not of headache disorder consecutive to a traumatic mechanism. Our sample was made of 56.2% of males, similarly to 56% of males in the study of Ndabahweje et al. [16]. Indeed, in many towns of low income countries of sub-Saharan Africa, the road traffic abounds of motor drivers with motor bikes as the main mode of transportation, and those motor bikes are driven mainly by men, therefore exposing them to brain trauma. In other hand, some professional activities are also at risk of causing brain trauma. Additionally, the epidemiological studies revealed that brain trauma are mainly attributed to younger adults [17-19]; almost half of the patients in our sample were aged less than 40 years. In studies with few or any case of post-traumatic headache disorders like those of Sonhaye et al. and Kouame et al. a female predominance was observed [5,20]. Recent sudden-onset headache and recent progressive headache were the headache's clinical presentation which mostly induced head CT-scan requests in our study. These were described respectively by 45.6% and 32.5% of patients. The study of Sonhaye et al. showed similar observations [5]. According to the literature, acute headache presentation alone or associated with other clinical signs denominated as "red flags" are warning signs that might lead physicians to suspect a serious intracranial pathology like tumors, hemorrhagic stroke and therefore the request for brain CT-scan or MRI [1,21-23].

 

We report in this study that headache of sudden onset significantly multiplies by two the risk of having an abnormal finding on brain CT-scan. On the other hand, acute headache disorders are still a source of worry for the patients who subsequently ask their physician to order neuroimaging in order to alleviate their anxiety and for physicians too, due to the fear of missing a serious raised intracranial lesion [1,10,24]. Headaches evolving by crisis, of occipital and cervical location and recurrent paroxysmal headaches characteristically denominate clinical semiology of primary headache disorders, such as migraine or tension-type headaches [25]. Yet, as primary headache disorders don't have any organic substratum visible on neuroimaging [1,10], we found that they significantly increased the risk of normal brain CT-scan. Valenca et al. have also demonstrated that 61.5% of CT-scan requested for migraine or tension-type headaches were of no value [25]. Adult patients suffering from headache disorder experience other clinical signs of which we have identified those which are predictive of brain CT-scan abnormalities. An abnormal neurological examination significantly increases the risk of showing a lesion on brain CT-scan and a positive correlation was found with aphasia and abnormal myotatic reflexes. Other neurological positive predictive signs were loss of consciousness, signs of meningeal irritation, sign of raised intracranial pressure, and any neurological weakness. Likewise, studies from Mitchell et al. and Kajal et al. found that all patients of whom brain CT-scan revealed significant intracranial findings had an abnormal neurological examination [26,27]. In patients complaining of headache disorder after a minor head trauma, periorbital ecchymosis and epistaxis significantly increased the risk of abnormal finding on brain CT-scan and otorrhagia where highly predictive. Those results are corroborative with literature, who showed that the occurrence of nasal or auricular bleeding, loss of consciousness and weakness after a brain trauma would lead to a head CT-scan request. So, the occurrence of those clinical signs in patients experiencing headache disorders will increase the value of head CT-scan requests.

 

 

Adult patients experiencing headache disorder must be scrupulously and carefully questioned and examined to bring out the headache's characteristics and other associated clinical signs that may be warnings of an intracranial morbid process. The consideration of imaging for headache-experiencing patients with abnormal neurological examination, nasal or auricular bleeding, and periorbital ecchymosis after a minor head trauma, will substantially improve the value of head CT-scan in the management of headaches in daily practice.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Moifo Boniface, Mbessoh Kengne Ulrich Igor: conception and design of the study; Mbessoh Kengne Ulrich Igor, Kuate Tegueu Callixte: data collection; Soh Mankong Dorothée: data analysis; Soh Mankong Dorothée, Mbede Maggy: data interpretation; Mbessoh Kengne Ulrich Igor, Kuate Tegueu Callixte: article drafting; Tene Ulrich Gael, Mbede Maggy, Moifo Boniface: article revising; Moifo Boniface, Mbessoh Kengne Ulrich Igor, Kuate Tegueu Callixte, Soh Mankong Dorothée, Tene Ulrich Gael, Mbede Maggy; final approval. All authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

 

 

We thank the staff of medical imaging departments of Yaounde Central Hospital and Douala Laquintinie Hospital for their collaboration to this research; all patients who consented to attend this research; the administration of Yaounde Central Hospital and Douala Laquintinie Hospital for their authorizations and close collaboration to this research.

 

 

Table 1: distribution of socio-demographic data and headache's clinical presentation in the sample

Table 2: correlation between clinical signs and significant CT-scan findings

Table 3: predictive values of clinical signs on detecting significant brain CT-scan findings in adults suffering from headache disorder

 

 

1. Randall CC, Edward FH. Evaluation of Acute Headaches in Adults. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63(4):685-92. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Mapoure NY, Pokossy A, Njock R, Njifou NA, Luma NH, Mouelle SA. Céphalées en coup de tonnerre: aspects épidémiologique, étiologique et pronostique à Douala. Afr J Neurol Sci. 2016; 35(1). Google Scholar


3. Fromont A, Ben Salem D, Moreau T, Ricolfi F, Giroud M. Céphalées aiguës. EMC - Médecine. 2005;2(1):66-81. Google Scholar


4. Rizk B, Platon A, Tasu JP, Becker CD, Pereira VM, Perneger T et al. The role of unenhanced CT alone for the management of headaches in an emergency department: A feasibility study. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS, France), J neurad. 2013 Dec;40(5):335-41. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Sonhaye L, Kolou B, Tchaou M, Amadou A, Gbande P, Assih K et al. Aspects tomodensitométriques des céphalées de l'adulte vues au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Campus de Lomé, Togo. Rev Méd Madag. 2015; 5(1):497-500. Google Scholar


6. Ejaz K, Shuaid W, Dalmida SG, Faisal K, Khan SM, Hashmi M et al. Evidence-Based Practice: Best Neuroimaging Practice in Non Traumatic Headaches. J Emerg Nurs. 2015; 41(3):208-12. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Wang Y, Zhou J, Fan X, Li X, Ran L, Tan G et al. Classification and clinical features of headache patients: an outpatient clinic study from China. J Headache Pain. 2011 Oct;12(5):561-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. World Health Organisation. Atlas of headache disorders and resources in the world. 2011. Google Scholar


9. Belo M, Assogba K, Awidina-ama A, Guinhouya K, Apetse K, Kombate D et al. Céphalées et qualité de vie en milieu scolaire à Lomé, Togo. Afr J Neurol Sci. 2009; 28(2):29-34.


10. Aygun D, Bildik F. Clinical warning criteria in evaluation by computed tomography the secondary neurological headaches in adults. Eur J Neurol. 2003;10(4):437-42. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Quon JS, Glikstein R, Lim CS, Schwarz BA. Computed tomography for non-traumatic headache in the emergency department and the impact of follow-up testing on altering the initial diagnosis. Emergent Radiol. 2015; 22(5):521-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ, Phil D. Computed Tomography-An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. You JJ, Gladstone J, Symons S, Rotstein D, Laupacis A, Bell CM. Patterns of Care and Outcomes After Computed Tomography Scans for Headache. Am J Med. 2011 Jan;124(1):58-63.e1. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Akpek S, Arac M, Atilla S, Onal B, Yucel C, Isik S. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with headache. Headache. 1995 Apr;35(4):228-30. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Yusef J Jordan, Johnson B Lightfoote, John E Jordan. Computed Tomography Imaging in the Management of Headache in the Emergency Department: Cost Efficacy and Policy Implications. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009; 101(4):331-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Ndabahweje ND, Lelo TM. Principales pathologies cérébrales diagnostiquées au scanner à Goma. Rev Med Gd Lacs. 2015; 4(2): 137-47.


17. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PMC. Indications for Computed Tomography in Patients with Minor Head Injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(2):100-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Mahdi S-A, Hossein K, Mojtaba C, Vafa R-M. Indications for brain computed tomography scan after minor head injury. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4(4):472-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Jagoda AS, Jeffrey J Bazarian, John J Bruns, Stephen V Cantrill. Clinical Policy: Neuroimaging and Decision-making in Adult Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Acute Setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52(6):714-48. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Kouamé N, Nikiema Z, Gaimou BP, Boubé A, Manewa FS, N'gouan DAM et al. Contribution of Computed Tomography in the management of headache in adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Radiol. 2016; 3(1):102-5. Google Scholar


21. Barry LH, Eric MM. Approach to Acute Headache in Adults. Am Acad Fam Physicians. 2013;87(10):682-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Imarhiagbe FA, Ogbeide E. Should non acute and recurrent headaches have neuroimaging before review by a Neurologist: a review in a Southern Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Ann Afr Med. 2011;10(4):290-3. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Mireia Moragas-Garrido, Richard Davenport. Acute headache. Common medical presentations. 2013;41(3):164-8. Google Scholar


24. Grimaldi D, Cevoli S, Cortelli P. Headache in the emergency department: How to handle the problem. Neurol Sci Off J Ital Neurol Soc Ital Soc Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 29:103-106. PubMed | Google Scholar


25. Marcelo Moraes Valenca, Luciana Patrízia A Andrade Valenca, Terce Liana Menezes. Computed Tomography Scan of the Head in Patients With Migraine or Tension-Type Headache. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002; 60(3A):542-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


26. Mitchell CS, Osborn RE, Grosskreutz SR. Computed tomography in the headache patient: is routine evaluation really necessary. Headache. 1993; 33(2):82-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. Kajal M, Chetna R, Glossy S. Computed tomography (CT) in a headache patient: Is routine evaluation really necessary. 2011; 1(2).