Vulvar Darier-Ferrand dermatofibrosarcoma: unusual localization of a rare tumor

Vulvar Darier-Ferrand dermatofibrosarcoma: unusual localization of a rare tumor

Ines Zemni^1,&, Imène Sassi¹, Nedia Boujelbène², Sabrine Haddad¹, Raoudha Doghri², Riadh Chargui¹, Khaled Rahal¹

 

¹Department of Surgical Oncology, Salah Azaiez Institut, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia, ²Department of Pathology, Salah Azaiez Institute, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Ines Zemni, Department of Surgical Oncology, Salah Azaiez Institut, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia

 

 

 

 

First described by Darier and Ferrand in 1984, Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a low-to-intermediate grade sarcoma of dermal origin [1, 2]. The incidence of DFSP is 0.1% of all cancers and 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas that rarely presents in the vulva [1, 3]. Given the high local recurrence rate, surgical excision is the treatment of choice, and early recognition is extremely important because of the excellent prognosis following adequate excision [3].

 

 

A 47-year-old woman presented with a growing mass in the groin area. She complained of slow but progressive growth for the past 4 months. The patient had no medical or surgical history. She mentioned that the cutaneous lesion had started as a small plaque on the vulva, which was initially ignored then treated with traditional medicine. Given the continued growth of the tumor and the pain associated, the patient consulted our department. Physical examination revealed a 6cm firm erythematous nodular tumor of elastic consistency on the left major labia of the vulva (Figure 1A). After an excisional biopsy of the vulvar lesion, histological analysis showed a cellular neoplasm composed of plump spindle cells arranged in a storiform pattern, scattered pleomorphic cells. CD34 immunohistochemical study revealed diffuse reactivity. The tumor was radically excised with free margins of 5cm reconstruction by a lotus petal flap was performed by the plastic surgeons (Figure 1B,C). Onsectioning, the tumor was apparently well delineated, pearl-white in color and of firm consistency, measuring 50 x 40 x 35mm (Figure 2A). Histopathologic examination showed a dermal-based neoplastic proliferation with deep extension into hypodermis and fascial tissue. The neoplastic proliferation was predominantly arranged in short intersecting fascicles with abrupt transition in depth with a herringbone architectural pattern of growth and increased cellularity (Figure 2B). In these deep areas, increased cytologic atypia and mitotic activity were noted (Figure 2C). Immunohistochemical stains (Figure 2D) revealed diffuse CD34 positivity. Tumor cells show higher nuclear positivity to Ki67 in hypercellular areas than in DFSP typical areas (Figure 3A,B). Based on the histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings, a diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous transformation (FS-DFSP) was made, having tumor-free resection margins. The patient consulted a month later with a healed incision and good esthetic state. Regular evaluations are being performed for local recurrence and distant metastasis.

 

 

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), previously considered in the World Health Organization classification of tumors of soft tissue [4] as a neoplasm of fibrohistiocytic differentiation, is now listed as a tumor of fibroblastic/myofibroblastic differentiation in the 2013 edition of the classification [5]. It is a superficial low-grade sarcoma of intermediate malignancy that typically arises on the trunk and proximal extremities. Even though it has a low potential for distant metastases [6], it has a high frequency for local recurrence due to diffuse infiltration of the dermis and subcutis [5]. DFSP of the vulva is extremely rare and mostly affects women in the fourth or fifth decades of life. The labia majora was most commonly affected. Patients generally presented with a 4.2cm (average) firm, asymptomatic mass. Lesions presented with erythema, hyperpigmentation, ulceration, or even of orange peel skin appearance. Patients reported slow to minimal change in size (ranging from 3 months to 10 years) [7]. As with all solid tumors, clinical suspicion is confirmed by biopsy. Histopathogically, DFSP shows a distinct "storiform" or "cartwheel" arrangement of uniform appearing fibroblasts. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrates strong positivity for CD34 (sensitivity 84-100%) and vimentin [2, 8]. DFSP can rarely present as a more aggressive fibrosarcomatous variant which occurs in around 10-15% of cases. Areas of fibrosarcoma are characterized by increased cellularity and loss of CD34 imunopositivity. Patients with this more aggressive variant tend to be more prone both to local recurrence and distant metastasis. Currently, only around 150 cases of transformed DFSP have been reported with distant metastasis in 13% [9] The initial treatment of choice for DFSP is surgery. It must be extensive as to remove the tumor completely, given its proclivity for irregular and often deep subclinical extensions. Re-resection is recommended if the initial surgery did not achieve clear margins [10].

 

The surgical approach to DFSP must be meticulously planned. Size, location of the tumor and fibrosarcomatous transformation, as well as cosmetic issues, will dictate the most appropriate surgical procedure. Mohs or modified Mohs surgery and traditional wide excision, typically with 2 to 4cm margins to investing fascia that is subsequently verified to be clear by traditional pathologic examination, are all methods to achieve complete histological assessment [11]. A large retrospective series of 204 patients with DFSP showed a very low local recurrence rate (1%) using wide excision with a standardized surgical approach, underscoring the importance of meticulous pathologic margin evaluation with any surgical technique [11]. A systematic review found a lower rate of recurrence with Mohs surgery compared to wide local excision [12]. Radiation has occasionally been used as a primary therapeutic modality for DFSP, but it is more commonly used as adjuvant therapy after surgery [13]. Postoperative radiation therapy is a preferred option for positive surgical margins if further resection is not feasible. If a negative margin was achieved, no adjuvant treatment is necessary. No matter which treatment option is chosen for DFSP, long-term follow up is necessary. NCCN 2018 recommends a physical exam with a focus on primary site every 6-12 months with patient education about regular self-exam. As for DFSP-FS it is recommended that the patient undergoes a physical exam every 3 to 6 months for 2 to 3 years then annually [14]. Since recurrence rates are high, some studies have suggested that follow up should include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor for any sign of recurrence closely [15]. Some studies also suggest that patients should receive routine chest x-rays because multiple local recurrences as well as the fibrosarcomatous transformation can increase the risk for lung metastases [14, 15].

 

 

DFSP is a rare occurrence, especially in the vulva. The role of immunohistochemistry with CD34 is imperative in establishing the diagnosis. Surgical excision with free margins is the treatment of choice given that the entire prognosis depends on it. The rate of local recurrence is high, but rarely are metastatic lesions present thus a frequent clinical follow-up is imperative in this rare case to detect and diagnose any recurrence of the tumor, especially for cases with a fibrosarcomatous transformation.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript.

 

 

Figure 1: (A) a 6cm erythematous nodular tumor on the left major labia of the vulva; (B,C) wide excision with margins of 5cm and reconstruction by a lotus petal flap

Figure 2: (A) cut section: well delineated and pearl-white tumor; (B) DFSP associated with fibrosarcomatous transformation: abrupt transition of typical DFSP (right) to a fascicular proliferation of spindle cells (left) (HE ×x 40); (C) with increased cytologicatypia and mitotic activity infibrosarcomatous areas (HE x 200); (D) and diffuse CD34 positivity in both areas (IHCx40)

Figure 3: (A) Ki-67 staining: IHC, x 200: marked increase in cell proliferation in fibrosarcomatous areas; (B) IHC, x 200: lower Ki67 staining in conventional DFSP

 

 

1. Gilani S, Al-Khafaji B. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the vulva: a mesenchymal tumour with a broad differential diagnosis and review of literature. Pathologica. 2014; 106(4): 338-41. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Asiri M, Moghazy KM, Alsaif HS, Al-Qahtani MS. Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberance: a case report and review of literature. 2008. Google Scholar


3. Kontzoglou K, Stamatakos M, Polyzou E, Levidou G, Iannescu R, Safioleas M. Dermatofibrosarcoma: a rare form of soft tissue; management and review of the literature. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011; 106(5): 653-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Fletcher CD, Unni KK, Mertens F. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Iarc. 2002. Google Scholar


5. Fletcher C. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone: [this book reflects the views of a working group that convened for a consensus and editorial meeting at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, 18-20 April 2012]. Internet Agency for Research on Cancer. 2013.


6. Bhambri S, Desai A, Del Rosso JQ, Mobini N. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a case report and review of the literature. The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology. 2008; 1(1): 34. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Nguyen AH, Detty SQ, Gonzaga MI, Huerter C. Clinical Features and Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Affecting the Vulva: a Lliterature review. Dermatologic surgery: official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. 2017; 43(6): 771-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Gatlin JL, Hosch R, Khan M. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp with fibrosarcomatous degeneration and pulmonary metastasis. Journal of clinical imaging science. 2011; 1: 55. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Voth H, Landsberg J, Hinz T, Wenzel J, Bieber T, Reinhard G et al. Management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous transformation: an evidence-based review of the literature. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV. 2011; 25(12): 1385-91. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Oge T, Benedicic C, Tamussino K, Regauer S. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the vulva: a case report. BMJ case reports. 2009; 2009. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Farma JM, Ammori JB, Zager JS, Marzban SS, Bui MM, Bichakjian CK et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: how wide should we resect: annals of surgical oncology. 2010; 17(8): 2112-8. PubMed| Google Scholar


12. Foroozan M, Sei JF, Amini M, Beauchet A, Saiag P. Efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: systematic review. Arch Dermatol. 2012; 148(9): 1055-63. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Hamid R, Hafeez A, Darzi MA, Zaroo I, Rasool A, Rashid H. Outcome of wide local excision in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and use of radiotherapy for margin-positive disease. Indian dermatology online journal. 2013; 4(2): 93-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Ganjoo KN et al. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2 2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN. 2018; 16(5): 536-63. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Ohlinger R, Kuhl A, Schwesinger G, Bock P, Lorenz G, Kohler G. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the vulva. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2004; 83(7): 685-6. PubMed | Google Scholar