Individualized dosing of oral propranolol for treatment of infantile hemangioma: a prospective study

Individualized dosing of oral propranolol for treatment of infantile hemangioma: a prospective study

Arun Prasad^1,&, Amit Kumar Sinha², Bindey Kumar², Abhiranjan Prasad³, Manju Kumari⁴

 

¹Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India, ²Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India, ³Department of General Surgery, Anugrah Narayan Magadh Medical College, Gaya, India, ⁴Department of Pharmacology, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College, Bhagalpur, India

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Arun Prasad, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India

 

 

 

 

Infantile hemangiomas are the most common infantile tumor [1, 2]. The prevalence of Infantile hemangioma in mature neonates is around 4.5% with a female (2.3-2.9 times higher) and white predominance [3]. The predominant locations are head and neck [4]. They arise in initial few weeks of life and then display a period of active growth followed by spontaneous involution. The proliferative phase spreads over three to six months. Most Infantile hemangiomas do not require therapy and regress spontaneously over months to years. However, about 10-15% of the cases result in complications such as obstruction, ulceration and disfigurement. It may also carry risk of bleeding. Treatment is required in such conditions [1]. Therapeutic effect of Propranolol over Infantile hemangioma was detected incidentally in the year 2008, when regression of facial hemangioma was noted in a child while being treated for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by this molecule [5]. Since then, it is being used for infantile hemangioma and currently oral Propranolol is the treatment of choice for this condition [6]. However, there is lack of consensus over its dosage as cited in literature of different studies [7-9].

Propranolol has been used for cardiovascular indications in the dosage up to 4mg/kg/d, but for treatment of infantile hemangioma, a lower dose is required. For treatment of Infantile hemangioma, some studies favor a lower dose (1-1.5 mg/kg/dose) [7, 8], while others favor a higher dose (3mg/kg/day) [9]. The precise mechanism of action of Propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma is unclear. The possible mechanisms include vasoconstriction, inhibition of angiogenesis and induction of apoptosis [6]. Although Propranolol has been widely used for this indication, other Beta blockers like Nadolol [10-13] and Acebutolol [14] have also been shown to be effective for Infantile hemangioma in small non-controlled studies. Other agents with reported activity in treating Infantile hemangioma include corticosteroids, Interferon alpha and Vinca alkaloids [15]. Besides pharmacotherapy, other treatment modalities include Laser therapy and surgical resection. Sometimes a combination of these modalities is required [16]. We conducted a prospective cross sectional study in 25 cases of infantile hemangioma to find out appropriate dosage of oral Propranolol for treatment of this condition.

 

 

Twenty seven patients of age 2 months and older, with vascular lesions suggestive of infantile hemangioma on clinical grounds, were selected. Approval from ethics committee of the institute was taken. History of any hypoglycemic event with the child was enquired. History of any heart block in the mother was also enquired in view of its potential association with complete heart block in the child. Baseline heart rate & blood pressure were noted. ECG and echocardiography were done to rule out any conduction or structural abnormality. Ultrasonography of the vascular lesions was done to confirm the diagnosis of infantile hemangioma. Abdominal ultrasound was also done to look for any hemangioma inside the abdomen. One patient was lost to follow up during initial investigations. Lesion of another patient came out to be venous malformation on ultrasonography, hence excluded. Amongst the remaining 25 patients, there were 18 males and 7 females. It was planned to start oral propranolol in patients with treatment indications, at the dose of 1 mg/kg/day with gradual increment by 0.5 mg/kg/d in subsequent visits. Daily dose of this medicine was given in two divided doses. First follow up was planned after 1 week, thereafter every 2 week till any response was observed or full dose of 3-4 mg/kg/d was reached. Indications for starting propranolol therapy were functional impairment, risk of bleeding and aesthetic concerns. Lower respiratory tract infection related bronchospasm was noted in two infants and they were treated before starting propranolol. Exclusion criteria were previous treatment with propranolol, rhythm abnormality like complete heart block, ventricular systolic dysfunction and any structural cardiac abnormality like ASD/VSD or PDA. 25 patients were selected for starting oral propranolol therapy, based on the above indications. 24 patients were given oral propranolol with starting dose of 1 mg/kg/d, as OPD treatment.

 

One patient aged 2 months was admitted for 1 day for beginning oral propranolol and observation of any side effects. Caregivers of the child were advised to ensure regular feeding of the child to avoid hypoglycemia and to report back anytime in case of any adverse event, possibilities of which were explained to them. On follow up visit, response to the treatment was evaluated. Any fading of color of the tumor based on comparison with the previous photograph (in case of superficial hemangioma) or any decrease in size of the lesion were assessed. Blood pressure and heart rate were checked to look for any side effects like hypotension and bradycardia. Patients who tolerated the propranolol well, were given increased dose, 1.5 mg/kg/day after one week. Two patients with superficial hemangioma were noted to have marked response on follow up after 1 week in the form of marked fading of the color of hemangioma and reduction in its size and it was decided to continue with the same dose of 1 mg/kg/day in them for further duration of therapy. 2 infants developed irritability within 1 week of starting therapy and propranolol was discontinued in them. Others were treated as per plan. Those who responded to therapy with fading of color of tumor as compared to previous photograph, softening in consistency of the tumor or reduction in its size on physical measurement, were continued on same dose and a monthly follow up was done subsequently. Response for the deep (subcutaneous) hemangioma was assessed by physical measurement of the tumor. For this study, response was defined as 'subsided' when there was ≥ 90% reduction in size of tumor and 'partial' when reduction in tumor size was < 90%. Lei chang et al. used the similar parameter of measurement for labeling hemangioma as 'regression' and 'partial regression' after propranolol therapy [17]. In non-responders, the dose of propranolol was gradually increased at the rate of 0.5mg/kg/d every month till any response was observed or the maximum dose of 3-4mg/kg/dose was achieved. If no response was noted, one month after the maximum dose, propranolol was discontinued in them. In responder group, the criteria for tapering off propranolol was decided on the basis of subsidence of the tumor, decrease in tumor size and keeping the same size for 3 consecutive months and the child has received a minimum of 6 months of therapy. Follow up was done for 6 months after completion of therapy.

 

 

25 patients were started on oral Propranolol for treatment of their Infantile hemangioma. There were 18 males and 7 females (Table 1). Head and neck region was predominantly involved (76%) with infantile hemangioma (Figure 1). Two infants developed irritability during first week of therapy and lost to follow up. 1 patient lost to follow up after 1 month of treatment. 22 patients were further continued with the treatment. 17/22 (77%) patients responded to the treatment with regression of the tumor size (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6). Median dose of Propranolol in the responder group was 1.5 mg/kg/day. 1/22(5%) patient showed partial response. Response rate was maximum 93% (15/16) in children of ≤ 1 year age group (Table 2). 5/22(24%) patients did not respond to the treatment (Figure 2). Response to treatment in superficial hemangioma in the form of color change was noted within 1 week of starting therapy. Average duration of therapy was 10 months. 5 patients, who did not respond to the lower dose, were given gradually escalated dose of 3-4 mg/kg/day (4 patients received 3mg/kg/d & 1 Patient received 4 mg/kg/day). They were evaluated after 1 month after starting this maximum dose and when no response was observed in them, they were discontinued Propranolol therapy. None of the 22 patients (even one who was given 4mg/kg/d of Propranolol), were found to have bradycardia. 5/13 cases of superficial hemangioma developed ulceration during therapy and they were managed with topical Mupirocin. Two patients had an unusual side effect of itching over lesion after beginning of oral Propranolol. They were managed with two weeks of oral Hydroxyzine. Besides irritability in two infants and local ulceration over the lesion in 4 children, no significant side effects were noticed (Table 3). Follow up was done for 6 months after completion of therapy. 2/21 (10%) patients showed recurrence of lesion after completion of therapy. They were 10 months and 11 months old after completion of 6 months and 9 months of therapy respectively. They responded with further extending the duration of therapy for 6 months after restarting with the previous dose of 1.5 mg/kg/day.

 

 

After the incidental discovery of therapeutic effect of oral propranolol in treatment of infantile hemangioma, it has become the treatment of choice [18]. Most of the superficial hemangioma responded to the lower dose of propranolol (1.5mg/kg/dose) and those who responded, showed response within one week of starting treatment. Maximum response was noted in infants (< 1 year age group). Ren W et al (2017) also described effectiveness of low dose propranolol (1-1.5mg/kg/day) with change in color and growth of the tumor within one week [7]. Gabor Katona et al (2012) described resembling findings of the effect of propranolol used in the dosage of 2mg/kg/day, as regression in tumor size in first week [19]. After initial regression, the later improvement is much slower, sometimes with periods of stagnation. The treatment should be continued for at least 6 months because early cessation can cause a relapse [19]. Cessation of therapy before 1 year of age also may be associated with a relapse [20, 21].

 

Ultrasonography is a good tool for objective assessment of the change in tumor size [22]. Leaute-Labreze et al. conducted a controlled trial with 1mg/kg/d and 3 mg/kg/d of oral propranolol with approximately 100 patient in each group. They found complete or near complete resolution of the hemangioma after six months of oral propranolol in 50% of the patients in 1 mg/kg/d group as compared to 60% in 3 mg/kg/day group, but the side effects like hypotension was more common in 3mg/kg group (3% vs 1%). Similarly Bronchospasm was more common in 3 mg/kg group compared to 1 mg/kg group (1% vs 0%) [23]. They observed that agitation as a side effect is more common in 1 mg/kg group (18%) as compared to 3 mg/kg(8%) group. This means that this side effect of propranolol is dose independent. We also observed irritability in 8% of children after starting propranolol therapy. This is important to explain to the caregiver of the child regarding possible side effects of propranolol before starting treatment. Lei Chang et al. described that there is individual variation of response after administration of propranolol. Chinese subjects have at least two fold greater sensitivity to propranolol [17]. We also suggest that the dose of propranolol should be individualized. A lower dose should be considered for therapy, if the response is observed with the lower dose. The non-responders who were labeled to have hemangioma on the basis clinical grounds and ultrasonography, might have had anatomically or histologically different lesion. We have found recurrence in 2 infants when the propranolol therapy was tapered off before 1 year of age. Thus the possibility of recurrence should be a point of consideration while tapering off propranolol therapy.

 

Recommendations: for the treatment of infantile hemangioma, dose of propranolol should be individualized and started with a lower dose with gradual escalation. If response is achieved with the lower dose (1-1.5 mg/kg/dose), further treatment should be continued with the lower dose. Those who show a marked response after initiation of therapy at the dose of 1 mg/kg/day, should be continued with the same dose till regression of the tumor size. If response is not achieved 1 month after the maximum dose (3-4mg/kg/day), it is unlikely that infantile hemangioma will respond to this pharmacotherapy and it should be discontinued to consider other modalities of treatment. Most of the patients can be managed as outpatient. Parents should be explained regarding possible side effects of propranolol including hypoglycemia and should be advised that the child needs to be fed regularly. They should also be explained that in case of any adverse event, they should discontinue propranolol and take medical consultation in nearby health facility. Inpatient management has been advocated for infants and children with - corrected gestational age of ≤ 8weeks, inadequate social support, comorbid conditions affecting the cardiovascular system, symptomatic airway hemangioma and history of hypoglycemia. As recurrence is more common if propranolol is stopped before 6 months of treatment or before 1 year of age of the child, it is logical to use lower dose for a longer period rather than higher dose for a shorter period.

 

 

Oral propranolol in the lower dose of 1-1.5 mg/kg/day is safe and efficacious in treatment of infantile hemangioma. Those who do not show initial response to the lower dose, remain unresponsive even at higher dose of 3-4 mg/kg/day. Most of the children can be treated as outpatient after proper counselling regarding possible side effects of propranolol.

 

Limitations of the study: although we suggest individualized and lower dose of propranolol therapy as per findings of this study, the limitations of this study are that this is an open labeled study and sample size is small.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Arun Prasad, Amit Kumar Sinha and Bindey Kumar were involved in acquisition of data of the patient. Abhiranjan Prasad and Manju Kumari were involved in drafting the manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript.

 

 

We are thankful to the patients and their parents and who contributed in this research.

 

 

Table 1: age and sex distribution of infantile hemangioma

Table 2: response to propranolol therapy in different age group

Table 3: side effects of propranolol therapy

Figure 1: site of infantile hemangioma in 25 patients

Figure 2: effect of propranolol therapy on infantile hemangioma

Figure 3: a child at various stages (before and after hemangioma) -10 days of life, 2 months of life and 9 months after propranolol

Figure 4: superficial hemangioma before and after treatment

Figure 5: deep hemangioma before and after treatment

Figure 6: hemangioma of lip unresponsive to propranolol therapy

 

 

1. Leavitt DA, Hottinger DG, Reed RC, Shukla AR. A case series of genital vascular anomalies in children and their management: lessons learned. Urology. 2012; 80(4): 914-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Kulungowski AM, Schook CC, Alomari AI, Vogel AM, Mulliken JB, Fishman SJ. Vascular anomalies of the male genitalia. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46(6): 1214-21. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Munden A, Butschek R, Tom WL, Marshall JS, Poeltler DM, Krohne SE et al. Prospective study of infantile hemangiomas: incidence, clinical characteristics, and association with placental anomalies. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Apr; 170(4): 907-13. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Baselga E, Chamlin SL, Garzon MC, Horii KA et al. Prospective study of infantile hemangiomas: clinical characteristics predicting complications and treatment. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(3): 882-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Leaute-Labreze C, Dumas de la RE, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taieb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12; 358(24): 2649-51. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Hogeling M, Adams S, Wargon O. A randomized controlled trial of propranolol for infantile hemangiomas. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug; 128(2): e259-66. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Ren W, Li S, Gao L, Huang S, Zhang L, Qiang C et al. Low-dose propranolol for infantile hemangiomas of head and neck: an analysis of 23 consecutive patients. Pediatrics International. 2017; 59(2): 213-17. PubMed


8. Qin ZP, Liu XJ, Li KL, Zhou Q, Yang XJ, Zheng JW. Treatment of infantile hemangiomas with low-dose propranolol: evaluation of short-term efficacy and safety. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Dec 1; 89(44): 3130-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Leaute-Labreze C, Hoeger P, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Guibaud L, Baselga E, Posiunas G et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19; 372(8): 735-46. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Pope E, Chakkittakandiyil A, Lara-Corrales I, Maki E, Weinstein M. Expanding the therapeutic repertoire of infantile haemangiomas: cohort-blinded study of oral nadolol compared with propranolol. Br J Dermatol. 2013; 168(1): 222-224. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Bernabeu-Wittel J, Narváez-Moreno B, de la Torre-García JM, Fernández-Pineda I, Domínguez-Cruz JJ, Coserría-Sánchez F et al. Oral nadolol for children with infantile hemangiomas and sleep disturbances with oral propranolol. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015 Nov-Dec; 32(6): 853-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Ábarzúa-Araya A, Navarrete-Dechent CP, Heusser F, Retamal J, Zegpi-Trueba MS. Atenolol versus propranolol for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas: a randomized controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jun; 70(6): 1045-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Bayart CB, Golden AB, Tamburro JE et al. A standardized clinical assessment plan (SCAMP) for the use of atenolol to treat infantile hemangiomas. Pediatr Dermatol. 2015; 32: 754.


14. Fuchsmann C, Quintal MC, Giguere C, Ayari-Khalfallah S, Guibaud L, Powell J et al. Propranolol as first-line treatment of head and neck hemangiomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 137(5): 471-478. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Drolet BA, Frommelt PC, Chamlin SL, Haggstrom A, Bauman NM, Chiu YE et al. Initiation and use of Propranolol for Infantile hemangioma: report of a consensus conference. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(1): 120-40. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Zheng JW, Zhang L, Zhou Q, Mai HM, Wang YA, Fan XD et al. A practical guide to treatment of Infantile hemangioma of the head and neck. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013 Oct 25; 6(10): 851-860. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Chang L, Gu Y, Yu Z, Ying H, Qiu Y, Ma G et al. When to stop Propranolol for infantile hemangioma. Scientific Reports. 2017 Feb 22; 7: 43292. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Torres EB, Wittel JB, Van EssoArbolave DL, Bosch MIF, Sanz AC, Laguna RDL et al. Consenso espanol sobre el hemangioma infantil. An Pediatr (Barc). 2016; 85(5): 256-265. Google Scholar


19. Katona G, Csákányi Z, Gács E, Szalai Z, Ráth G, Gerlinger I. Propranolol for Infantile haemangioma: striking effect in the first weeks. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Dec; 76(12): 1746-50. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Tan ST, Itinteang T, Leadbitter P. Low-dose propranolol for infantile haemangioma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Mar; 64(3): 292-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. Al Dhaybi R, Superstein R, Milet A, Powell J, Dubois J, McCuaig C et al. Treatment of periocular infantile hemangiomas with propranolol: case series of 18 children. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun; 118(6): 1184-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Rotter A, Samorano LP, de Oliveira Labinas GH, Alvarenga JG, Rivitti-Machado MC, Bouer M et al. Ultrasonography as an objective tool for assessment of infantile hemangioma treatment with propranolol. Int J Dermatol. 2017 Feb; 56(2): 190-194. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Léauté-Labrèze C1, Hoeger P, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Guibaud L, Baselga E, Posiunas G et al. A randomized controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19; 372(8): 735-46. PubMed | Google Scholar