Detection and analysis of drug–drug interactions among hospitalized cardiac patients in the Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital in Morocco

Detection and analysis of drug–drug interactions among hospitalized cardiac patients in the Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital in Morocco

Hicham Fettah^1,&, Youssef Moutaouakkil¹, Mohamed Reda Sefrioui¹, Badreddine Moukafih¹, Yassir Bousliman¹, Ahmed Bennana², Jamal Lamsaouri², Sanaa Makram¹, Yahia Cherrah¹

¹Laboratory of Pharmacology, Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rabat Institute, University Mohamed V, Rabat-Morocco, ²Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rabat Institute, University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco

^&Corresponding author
Hicham Fettah, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rabat Institute, University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco

Introduction    

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are defined as two or more drugs interacting in such a manner that the effectiveness or toxicity of one or more drugs is altered [1]. In every DDI, we should distinguish between the molecule which is at the origin of an interaction (that is to say modifying the other drugs' concentration and action) and the molecule whose altered concentration, resulting from the same interaction, ultimately leads to the desired or undesired effects (in the case of a narrow therapeutic index drug) [2]. Various studies have shown that adverse drug reactions are responsible of 0.5% to 2% of consultations in ambulatory medicine and are involved in 4% to 10% of hospitalizations [3, 4]. It has been estimated that 1/3 of the severe adverse effects are due to negligence and thus can be preventable; 20% of these side effects are caused by DDIs [4]. The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases has increased in the last decade and they are considered as the primary cause of mortality in the world [5]. Indeed, cardiac tropism drugs are the most common cause of drug-related iatrogenia, accounting for 12 to 28% of cases [6] and are the most implicated drugs in DDIs. Some 1500 out of 300 000 documented DDIs are considered clinically significant, the most serious of which appear in the field of cardiology [7]. Drug-related iatrogenia in their totality are the subject of various studies because of their impact in terms of health economics, but the number of specific studies on DDIs is limited. Although drug interactions are reported to be common in cardiology, there is no published report of the prevalence of such interactions among Moroccan cardiac patients. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of DDIs in patients admitted to the cardiology department of a hospital in Morocco.

Methods     

A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of four months (between June and September 2016) at the Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital in Morocco. Patients who were admitted consecutively to the cardiology department were included in the study. Only patients with two or more drugs prescribed during the hospitalization were selected for the study. The studied population comprised all patients aged 20 years or older admitted to the hospital with a length of stay greater than 48 hours. Demographic information (age and gender), number of drugs taken and length of hospital stay were obtained from the clinical records. All the prescriptions of the study population were screened for drug-drug interactions using a computerized DDI database system (Theriaque®) [8, 9]. The drugs were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification codes [10]. The interactions observed were classified into mild, moderate and severe and the data on severity was obtained from the DDI data of the drug database [8, 9]. The results of the study were reported using the Microsoft Excel software.

Results     

A total of 138 patients were analysed during the study period, with a male predominance of (73.9%) and a sex ratio of 0.35. The median patient age was 61.7 years old, with ages ranging from 20 to 92 years old. The average stay in hospital was 10 days (Figure 1). Most patients had cardiovascular diseases with a predominance of ischemic heart disease (42.75%, n: 59) followed by hypertension (39.85%, n: 55) and atypical chest pain (5.79%, n: 8) (Table 1). The analysis of prescriptions allowed us to identify 360 interactions among 94 patients, with an average number of drugs taken of 5.2 (Figure 2). The prevalence of DDIs was estimated at 68.11%, the most common of which concerned Kardegic/Plavix (12.22%), Kardegic/Heparin (8.33%), and Lasilix/Spironolactone (5.83%). Among the 726 prescribed drugs, 372 (51.24%) were drugs of the cardiovascular system, followed by blood and hematopoietic organ drugs (288 [39.67%]) according to the ATC classification codes (Table 2). These interactions were categorized on the basis of level of severity: Interactions of major severity accounted for 11.11% (40) of the total DDIs while those of moderate and minor severity accounted for 37.22% (134) and 51.66% (186), respectively. The clinical consequences of these drug interactions in most cases were hypotension, hypoglycaemia, increased risk of bleeding, and renal dysfunction. The classifications of the potential DDIs were made based on their pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic mechanisms. Among 360 DDIs, 77.78% were pharmacokinetic and 22.22% were pharmacodynamic.

Discussion     

This study revealed the overall prevalence of clinically important DDIs in the cardiology department to be 68.11%. The value obtained in the present study is higher compared with the study by Patel et al in India, who reported an incidence rate of 30.23% [11]. These differences might be because our study took into consideration all drug interactions of moderate and minor severity in contrast to the other studies. In our study, there were 726 drugs prescribed to 138 patients. The average number of drugs per patient was 5.2. This can be explained by the simultaneous use of many drugs. The frequent addition of new drugs makes these patients vulnerable to DDIs. The most common interacting pairs identified were Kardegic/Plavix (12.22%), Kardegic/Heparin (8.33%), and Lasilix/Spironolactone (5.83%). The concurrent use of Kardegic with these potentially interacting medications necessitates the tailoring of doses to the individual patient and careful monitoring by the patient and health care provider for signs of bleeding. The classes of drugs most commonly involved in DDIs, according to the ATC classification, were cardiovascular system and blood and blood-forming organs. These two classes together accounted for 90.91% of the identified DDIs. This might be due to the frequent use of these drug classes among the cardiac patients in the present study. The classifications of the potential DDIs were made based on their pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic mechanisms. Among 360 DDIs, (77.78%) were pharmacokinetic and (22.22%) were pharmacodynamic. This figure correlates with the results of similar studies [12-14]. In our study, the significant association of DDIs with old age, number of drugs taken, longer hospital stay, and multiple disease states is in accordance with published reports [15,16]. These findings suggest that patients with these risk factors are more exposed to DDIs. We recommend that such patients be monitored closely in order to avoid the grave consequences of DDIs. Of the total DDIs identified, the majority were of minor or moderate severity; these findings are different from the reports of spontaneous reporting studies [17, 18]. Ischemic heart diseases are a major cause of hospitalization. This can be due to the number of co-morbidities or to the high frequency of these diseases in the Moroccan population. This predominance of heart disease may explain the increase in the length of stay at the cardiology department [19]. The suggested action to be taken in most cases was to strictly control blood glucose; monitor renal function, serum potassium level and coagulation parameters; and watch for clinical signs of hypoglycaemia and bleeding.

Conclusion     

This study reports the prevalence of DDIs in patients admitted to the cardiology department of a hospital in Morocco. The study also examined patient and drug characteristics, and the severity of DDIs. This study shows that DDIs are frequent among hospitalized cardiac patients and highlights the need to screen prescriptions of cardiovascular patients for DDIs, as this helps in the detection and prevention of possible adverse drug interactions.

Competing interests     

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions     

Hicham Fettah designed the study protocol, collected data, analyzed the data and drafting of the manuscript. Youssef Moutaouakki, Mohamed Reda Sefriouiand Badreddine Moukafih assisted in designing the study protocol, contributed data and assisted in preparation of the manuscript. Yassir Bousliman, Ahmed Bennana and Jamal Lamsaouri critically revised the manuscript. Sanaa Makram and Yahia Cherrah contributed to study conception and design, interpretation of data and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments     

We thank members of the Pole Pharmacy and the cardiology department of the Military Teaching Hospital Mohamed V in Morocco.

Tables and figures     

Table 1: diagnosis of patients with cardiovascular diseases in Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital in Morocco (n = 138)

Table 2: the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification of prescribed drugs

Figure 1: distribution of patients according to the hospitalization period

Figure 2: number of drug-drug interactions by patient

References     

1. Levêque D, Lemachatti J, Nivoix Y, Coliat P, Santucci R, Ubeaud-Séquier G, Beretz L, Vinzio S. Mécanismes des interactions médicamenteuses d'origine pharmacocinétique. Rev Med Interne. 2010; 31(2): 170-179. Google Scholar


2. Scheen André. Interactions médicamenteuses: de la théorie à la pratique. Rev Méd Liège. 2006; 61(5-6): 471-82. Google Scholar


3. Doucet J, Jego A, Noel D, Geffroy CE, Capet C, Coquard A, Couffin E, Fauchais AL, Chassagne P, Mouton-Schleifer D, Bercoff E. Preventable and non-preventable risk factors for adverse drug events related to hospital admissions in the elderly. Clin Drug Investig. 2002; 22(6): 385-392. Google Scholar


4. Ibanez A, Alcala M, Garcia J, Puche E. Drug-drug interactions in patients from an internal medicine service. Farm Hosp. 2008; 32(5): 293-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, Hofman KJ. The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. JAMA. 2004; 291(21): 2616-2622. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Labetoulle M. La iatrogénie: quelle ampleur, pourquoi et comment la réduire. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2009; 32(1): 79-82. Google Scholar


7. Faculté de Pharmacie de Monastir. Guide de stage d'internat Pharmacie hospitalière et clinique 6eme. année pharmacie. 2012/2013. Google Scholar


8. Thériaque. Bienvenue sur banque de donnée sur les médicaments Thériaque. Accessed on 08 June 2017.


9. Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé. Thesaurus: Référentiel national des interactions médicamenteuses. Accessed on 08 June 2017.


10. World Health Organization ATC/DDD Index 2017. WHO collaborating centre for drug statistics methodology. Accessed on 08 June 2017.


11. Patel VK, Acharya LD, Rajakannan T, Surulivelrajan M, Guddattu V, Padmakumar R. Potential drug interactions in patients admitted to cardiology wards of a south Indian teaching hospital. AMJ. 2011; 4(1): 9-14. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krähenbühl S, Beer JH. Prevalence of drug-drug interactions at hospital entry and during hospital stay of patients in internal medicine. EFIM. 2008; 19(6): 413-420. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Aparasu R, Baer R, Aparasu A. Clinically important potential drug-drug interactions in outpatient settings. RSAP. 2007; 3(4): 426-437. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Sharma S, Chhetri HP, Alam K. A study of potential drug-drug interactions among hospitalized cardiac patients in a teaching hospital in Western Nepal. IJP. 2014; 46(2): 152. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Riechelmann RP, Moreira F, Smaletz O, Saad ED. Potential for drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005; 56(3): 286-290. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Doubova SV, Reyes-Morales H, Torres-Arreola Ldel P, Suarez- Orteg M. Potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in prescriptions for ambulatory patients over 50 years of age in family medicine clinics in Mexico City. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007; 7: 147. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Bjorkman IK, Fastbom J, Schmidt IK, Bernsten CB. Drug-drug interactions in the elderly. Ann Pharmacother. 2002; 36(11): 1675-81. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Nightingle PG, Adu D, Richards NT, Peters M. Implementation of rules based computerized bedside prescribing and administration: Intervention study. BMJ. 2000; 320: 750. Google Scholar


19. Smithburger PL, Kane-Gill SL, Seybert AL. Drug-drug interactions in cardiac and cardiothoracic intensive care units. Drug Saf. 2010; 33(10): 879-888. PubMed | Google Scholar