Impact of heart rate in atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm on mortality in octogenarian patients with acute coronary syndrome

Impact of heart rate in atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm on mortality in octogenarian patients with acute coronary syndrome

Shijun Li^1,2,&, Salim Barywani², Michael Fu²

 

¹Department of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China, ²Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Shijun Li, Department of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital at No. 28, Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, PR China

 

 

 

 

Advanced age is associated with greater prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and higher risk of ischemic complications and mortality, and 30% of deaths related to myocardial infarction occur in patients aged > 85 years [1]. Moreover, most deaths in patients aged ≥ 75 years are of ischemic origin [2]. Despite of the increased complexity of management in very elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), data on those aged ≥ 80 years are limited, since these patients are often excluded from clinical trials [1,3]. Current guidelines for this population are thus based on extrapolation of data for younger patients, which may not be applicable to the advanced ages. How to better management for these octogenarian patients with ACS is becoming more and more pressing. Heart rate control is currently being considered to be an effective management for patients with ACS. An increasing resting HR might be a marker or even a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [4-7]. Admission heart rate (HR) values could independently predict mortality in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) [8-11]. In the context of non- STEMI, the relationship between presenting HR and in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes has a ‘J-shaped’ curve (higher event rates at very low and high HRs) [12]. However, impact of HR on mortality isn’t adequately studied in the overall ACS setting. Limited data showed that low (< 60 bpm) or high HR (≥ 70bpm, ≥ 80bpm or ≥ 90bpm) is a marker of high risk that needs more attention and management, and higher HR is highly predictive of higher short- and long-term mortality in patients with ACS [13-16]. However these studies were conducted in ACS patients aged < 80 years, and their results weren’t further analyse in sinus rhythm (SR) or a trial fibrillation (AF) subgroup and the cut off value of HR was mostly pre-defined before the study was conducted. The impact of heart rate in AF versus SR on mortality in octogenarian ACS patients isn’t adequately studied. We therefore aimed to evaluate the association of HR in AF versus SR with all-cause mortality in octogenarian patients in the overall ACS setting.

 

 

Study design

 

The in-hospital patients (n = 353) aged ≥ 80 years with ACS were enrolled from January 2003 to December 2007. Acute myocardial infarction was defined by at least 2 of the following features [17]: 1) electrocardiographic changes indicative of ischemia (ST-segment elevation or depression); 2) compatible clinical symptoms; and 3) specific diagnostic biomarker elevations (troponin I > 0.4 ng/ml and serum creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) > 8.8 ng/ml). Unstable angina was defined by the occurrence of 1 or more angina episodes, at rest, within the preceding 48 h, corresponding to class III of the Braunwald classification [18]. The exclusion criteria were: stable angina pectoris and inaccessible medical data, and a missing discharge status or leaving against medical advice during the follow-up period. All hospitalized patients received the optimal therapy according to their clinical status. We didn’t enrolled the patients with pacing rhythm or the other rhythms rather than SR or AF, and excluded 17 (4.8%) due to a missing discharge status. The final study population included 336 (95.2%) in this current study.

 

Clinical assessments

 

We collected data on clinical characteristics, past medical history, comorbidities, heart rate and blood pressure indicators, therapies, interventions, and outcomes. All hospitalized patients received the optimal therapy according to their clinical status. The HR was obtained from the first measurement record by using electrocardiogram (ECG) after presentation to the emergency department or the hospital ward. The presence of AF at the time of presentation was based on ECG data and documentation in the medical records.

 

Outcomes

 

The endpoint of interest was death from any cause. Survival status was ascertained on 1 December, 2012 by cross-referencing the Cause of Death Register maintained by the National Board of Health and Welfare (a Swedish government agency).

 

Ethics approval

 

This study was approved by the Human Subjects Review Committee at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden.

 

Statistical analyses

 

Categorical variables are expressed as percentages, and continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD. All continuous variables were first tested for normality and homogeneity of variance. Patients were grouped by heart rate, and differences in baseline characteristics were tested using Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variables and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables with normality and Kruskal-Wallis H rank-sum tests for continuous variables with non-normality.

 

Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to study the predictive value of admission HR on the considered mortality endpoints and to select the best cut off (maximizing the sum of (sensitivity and specificity -1)). The area under the curve (AUC) was used as a measure of the predictive accuracy of HR.

 

Missing data were handled by multiple imputations with a run with automatic settings, and the method actually chosen by automatic method selection was Fully Conditional Specification. The variables were listed in the imputation sequence order. Scale variables were modelled with a linear regression, categorical variables with a logistic regression, and each model used all other variables as main effects. Multiple imputations were carried out with 5 imputations and 10 iterations per imputation. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate mortality and log-rank tests to assess differences in mortality in HR subgroups. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine univariate and multivariable associations of HR strata with mortality rate. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistic 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

 

The variables which were statistically significance (P < 0.05) by univariate Cox regression and interacted items with HR obtained from multivariate Cox regression (P < 0.05) were included in final multivariate Cox regression model. Due to some missing variables existing, a consistency analysis was performed excluding patients with missing variables with multivariate Cox regressions.

 

 

Baseline characteristics

 

We evaluated 336 patients with ACS during median 41.5-month (interquartile range (IQR): 5 to 64 months) follow-up period. Of these, 173 (51.5%) were men and 163 (48.5%) were women, and 177 (52.7%) were admitted for STEMI, 112 (33.4%) for NSTEMI and 47 (14.0%) for unstable angina. The demographic and baseline characteristics in HR strata were summarized in Table 1. The distributions of sinus rhythm (SR) and AF among these HR groups are shown in Figure 1. In total, 72 (21.4%) were with AF and 246(73.2%) were with SR. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of STEMI among different HR strata. The number of patients with AF was gradually increases, whereas ejection fraction and PCI operation were gradually decreased with heart rate increment (Table 1).

 

Outcomes

 

In total, 63 (87.5%) of patients with AF were dead and 147 (59.8%) of patients with SR were dead during the follow-up period (Table 1). Moreover, the mortality rate was obviously increased, and the survival rate was significantly decreased when HR was greater than 80 bpm in overall cohort. By ROC curve analysis, we obtained an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56-0.69, P < 0.001) for HR to predict all-cause mortality, and the best cut-off was 80 bpm, with a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 66%. 4HR ≤ 80 bpm in SR exhibited better outcome as compared with HR > 80 bpm (Chi-Square = 26.55, Log rank P < 0.001), whereas in AF, no significant difference in mortality was found among different HR strata (Chi-Square = 0.02, Log rank P = 0.898) by Kaplan-Meier analyses (Figure 2). Multivariate Cox regression showed that HR was an independent predictor for mortality in overall cohort and subgroup with SR (All P < 0.001). In overall cohort, the hazard ratios of HR ≤ 80 bpm were 0.55 (95% CI 0.42-0.72, P < 0.001) adjusted for age, 0.52 (95% CI 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001) adjusted for gender, 0.66(95% CI 0.47-0.90, P = 0.009) adjusted for multivariable respectively. In SR subgroup, the hazard ratios of HR ≥ 80 bpm were 0.51(95% CI 0.37-0.70, P < 0.001) adjusted for age, 0.46(95%CI 0.33-0.63, P < 0.001) adjusted for gender, 0.62(95%CI 0.42-0.93, P = 0.020) adjusted for multivariable respectively. In AF subgroup, the hazard ratios of HR ≥ 80 bpm were 0.83(95% CI 0.49-1.38, P = 0.464) adjusted for age, 0.96(95%CI 0.59-1.58, P = 0.882) adjusted for gender, 0.72(95% CI 0.41-1.26, P = 0.249) adjusted for multivariable respectively (Table 2).

 

In sensitivity analyses without missing variables, heart rate ≤ 80 bpm was still related to better outcome in overall patients or in SR subgroup but not in AF subgroup by using multivariable Cox regression analyses (Table 3).

 

 

The current study reported the association of HR in AF versus SR with mortality in octogenarian patients with ACS. The principal findings are that admission heart rate is an independent predictor for all-cause mortality, and HR ≥ 80 bpm is associated with improved all-cause mortality in patients in SR but not in AF. Advanced age is an important risk factor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The very old patients with ACS often carried more co-morbidities such as AF, less early aggressive treatment and worse outcomes. Some data showed that AF occurs in about 5–20% of patients with ACS and both AF and ACS are common in patients of advanced age, which results in further poor prognosis [19-21]. In our study, 21.4% of patients with ACS and aged ≥ 80 years were with AF, and 87.5% of patients with AF were dead during the median 41.5-month follow-up period. Previously, every effort was made to restore and maintain SR for patients with AF, but it turned out to be difficult to keep SR in the long-term [22-24]. Recent studies showed that rate control was not inferior to rhythm control with regard to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [25-27], rate control has therefore been adopted as the front-line therapy in many patients with AF.

 

The Framingham Heart study and the French IPC study showed that resting HR was associated with cardiovascular mortality in the general population [4,28]. Evidence showed that admission heart rate (HR) values could independently predict mortality in patients with STEM or non-STEMI [8-12]. In the context of the overall ACS, a high HR had been shown to be an independent predictor of short-term (30 days) and medium-term (one year) prognoses in a population with ACS [13-16]. In ACS prognostic models, such as the PURSUIT and GRACE risk models, there was a linear association between heart rate and cardiovascular outcomes [29,30]. However, these previous studies were conducted in ACS patients aged < 80 years, and their results weren’t further analysed in SR or AF subgroup. Evidence showed that medications that are beneficial in lowering the heart rate and improving outcomes for patients in SR have not been shown to have similar value in patients with AF [31]. Similarly, findings from the CHARM programme suggested that high heart rates were not predictive of chronic heart failure outcomes in patients in AF compared to those in SR [32]. However, the impact of HR in AF versus SR on mortality in octogenarian patients isn’t still adequately studied in the overall ACS setting. The current study showed that the mortality rate was significantly increased when HR was less than 80 bpm, and the best cut-off was 80 bpm with a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 66%. Furthermore, HR was an independent predictor for mortality, and HR ≤ 80 bpm was associated with improving outcome in SR but not in AF subgroup. The sensitivity analyses further confirm the results.

 

Our study has some limitations. First, there are some missing values in the dataset, and we performed multiple imputations to reduce bias and retain statistical power. Second, to avoid potential confounding due to excessive imputation, we performed sensitivity analyses in patients without missing value. Third, the time point which AF was defined was at enrolment, so we were unable to differentiate new-onset AF and chronic atrial fibrillation and we were unable to separate paroxysmal, persistent and permanent AF in our database. At last, the present data provides no insight into the impact of resting heart rate in the healthy octogenarian population and haven’t provided with regard to cause specific mortality from cardiovascular disease or non-cardiovascular disease.

 

 

The current study demonstrates that admission heart rate is an independent predictor for all-cause mortality and HR = 80 bpm is associated with improved outcome in patients in SR but not in AF in octogenarian patients with ACS.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Shijun Li conceptualized this study, performed the analysis and drafted the manuscript. Michael Fu participated in the design and implementation, and performed the analysis. Salim Barywani supervised the study design, data management, analysis and drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 

 

We appreciate the expert help from Professor Max Petzold, Department of Biostatistics, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, and Professor Zhiwen Li, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University, China. This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

 

 

Table 1: baseline characteristics

Table 2: Cox regression analyses for impact of heart rate on mortality with imputation

Table 3: sensitivity analyses for impact of heart rate on mortality with multivariable Cox regressions in patients without missing variables

Figure 1: heart rate distribution in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier curves for mortality in patients with ACS and AF or SR according to heart rate strata

 

 

1. Kolloch R, Legler UF, Champion A, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Handberg E, Zhou Q, Pepine CJ. Impact of resting heart rate on outcomes in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: findings from the International Verapamil-SR/trandolapril Study (INVEST). Eur Heart J. 2008;29(10):1327-1334. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tendera M, Robertson M, Ferrari R, BEAUTIFUL investigators. Heart rate as a prognostic risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9641):817-821. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Bertomeu V, Morillas P, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Quiles J, Guindo J, Soria F, Llacer A, Lekuona I, Mazón P, Martín-Luengo C, Rodriguez-Padial L. Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients with Acute Coronary Síndrome (PAMISCA) Investigators - Prevalence and prognostic influence of peripheral arterial disease in patients >or=40 years old admitted into hospital following an acute coronary event. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36(2):189-196. Google Scholar


4. Kannel WB, Kannel C, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Cupples LA. Heart rate and cardiovascular mortality. The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1987;113(6):1489-1494. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Cooney MT, Vartiainen E, Laatikainen T, Juolevi A, Dudina A, Graham IM. Elevated resting heart rate is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in healthy men and women. Am Heart J. 2010;159(4):612-619. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Jouven X, Desnos M, Guerot C, Ducimetière P. Predicting sudden death in the population: The Paris Prospective Study I. Circulation. 1999;99(15):1978-1983. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Mensink GB, Hoffmeister H. The relationship between resting heart rate and all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(9):1404-1410. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Han Z, Yan-min Y, Jun Z, Li-sheng L, Hui-qiong T, Yao L. Prognostic value of admission heart rate in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: role of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012;12:104. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Honda T, Kanazawa H, Koga H, Miyao Y, Fujimoto K. Heart rate on admission is an independent risk factor for poor cardiac function and in-hospital death after acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiol. 2010;56(2):197-203. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Davidovic G, Iric-Cupic V, Milanov S. Associated influence of hypertension and heart rate greater than 80 beats per minute on mortality rate in patients with anterior wall STEMI. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6(5):358-366. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Davidovic G, Iric-Cupic V, Milanov S, Dimitijevic A, Petrovic-Janicijevic M. When heart goes "BOOM" to fast - Heart rate greater than 80 as mortality predictor in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;3(3):120-128. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Bangalore S, Messerli FH, Ou FS, Tamis-Holland J, Palazzo A, Roe MT, Hong MK, Peterson ED, CRUSADE Investigators. The association of admission heart rate and in-hospital cardiovascular events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from 135 164 patients in the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(5):552-560. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Asaad N, El-Menyar A, AlHabib KF, Shabana A, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Almahmeed W, Al Faleh H, Hersi A, Al Saif S, Al-Motarreb A, Sulaiman K, Al Nemer K, Amin H, Al Suwaidi J. Initial heart rate and cardiovascular outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Acute Card Care. 2014;16(2):49-56. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Timóteo AT, Toste A, Ramos R, Oliveira JA, Ferreira ML, Ferreira RC. Admission heart rate as a predictor of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Acute Card Care. 2011;13(4):205-210. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Kovar D, Cannon CP, Bentley JH, Charlesworth A, Rogers WJ. Does initial and delayed heart rate predict mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes?. Clin Cardiol. 2004;27(2):80-86. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Fácila L, Morillas P, Quiles J, Soria F, Cordero A, Mazón P, Anguita M, Martín-Luengo C, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Bertomeu V. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome (PAMISCA) - Prognostic significance of heart rate in hospitalized patients presenting with myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol. 2012;4(1):15-19. Google Scholar


17. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(3):959-969. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Braunwald E. Unstable angina - A classification. Circulation. 1989;80(2): 410-414. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Lip GY, Windecker S, Huber K, Kirchhof P, Marin F, Ten Berg JM, Haeusler KG, Boriani G, Capodanno D, Gilard M, Zeymer U, Lane D, Document Reviewers, Storey RF, Bueno H, Collet JP, Fauchier L, Halvorsen S, Lettino M, Morais J, Mueller C, Potpara TS, Rasmussen LH, Rubboli A, Tamargo J, Valgimigli M, Zamorano JL. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(45):3155-3179. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Bryniarski L, Pelc-Nowicka A, Zabojszcz M, Mirek-Bryniarska E. Dual antiplatelet therapy and antithrombotic treatment: recommendations and controversies. Cardiol J. 2009;16(2):179-189 Review. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. Mehta RH, Dabbous OH, Granger CB, Kuznetsova P, Kline-Rogers EM, Anderson FA Jr, Fox KA, Gore JM, Goldberg RJ, Eagle KA, GRACE Investigators. Comparison of outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes with and without atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(9):1031-1036. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Roy D, Talajic M, Dorian P, Connolly S, Eisenberg MJ, Green M, Kus T, Lambert J, Dubuc M, Gagné P, Nattel S, Thibault B. Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(13):913-920. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Ahmed S, Rienstra M, Crijns HJ, Links TP, Wiesfeld AC, Hillege HL, Bosker HA, Lok DJ, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC, CONVERT Investigators. Continuous vs episodic prophylactic treatment with amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 ;300(15):1784-1792. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Sairaku A, Nakano Y, Oda N, Makita Y, Kajihara K, Tokuyama T, Motoda C, Fujiwara M, Kihara Y. How many electrical cardioversions should be applied for repetitive recurrences of atrial arrhythmias following ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation?. Europace. 2011;13(12):1703-1708. PubMed | Google Scholar


25. Kotecha D, Holmes J, Krum H, Altman DG, Manzano L, Cleland JG, Lip GY, Coats AJ, Andersson B, Kirchhof P, von Lueder TG, Wedel H, Rosano G, Shibata MC, Rigby A, Flather MD, Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group. Efficacy of ß blockers in patients with heart failure plus atrial fibrillation: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9961):2235-2243. Google Scholar


26. Caldentey G, Khairy P, Roy D, Leduc H, Talajic M, Racine N, White M, O'Meara E, Guertin MC, Rouleau JL, Ducharme A. Prognostic value of the physical examination in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: insights from the AF-CHF trial (atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure). JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2(1):15-23. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. Heist EK, Mansour M, Ruskin JN. Rate control in atrial fibrillation: targets, methods, resynchronization considerations. Circulation. 2011;124(24):2746-2755. PubMed | Google Scholar


28. Benetos A, Rudnichi A, Thomas F, Safar M, Guize L. Influence of heart rate on mortality in a French population: role of age, gender and blood pressure. Hypertension. 1999;33(1):44-52. PubMed | Google Scholar


29. Boersma E, Pieper KS, Steyerberg EW, Wilcox RG, Chang WC, Lee KL, Akkerhuis KM, Harrington RA, Deckers JW, Armstrong PW, Lincoff AM, Califf RM, Topol EJ, Simoons ML. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation - Results from an international trial of 9461 patients - The PURSUIT Investigators. Circulation. 2000;101(22):2557-2567. PubMed | Google Scholar


30. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, Van De Werf F, Avezum A, Goodman SG, Flather MD, Fox KA, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Investigators. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(19):2345-2353. PubMed | Google Scholar


31. Lechat P, Hulot JS, Escolano S, Mallet A, Leizorovicz A, Werhlen-Grandjean M, Pochmalicki G, Dargie H. Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationships with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBIS II Trial. Circulation. 2001;103(10):1428-1433. PubMed | Google Scholar


32. Castagno D, Skali H, Takeuchi M, Swedberg K, Yusuf S, Granger CB, Michelson EL, Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Solomon SD; CHARM Investigators. Association of heart rate and outcomes in a broad spectrum of patients with chronic heart failure: results from the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(20):1785-1795. PubMed | Google Scholar