South-South cooperation as a mechanism to strengthen public health services in Africa: experiences, challenges and a call for concerted action

South-South cooperation as a mechanism to strengthen public health services in Africa: experiences, challenges and a call for concerted action

Olushayo Olu^1,&, Amos Petu², Martin Ovberedjo³, Diane Muhongerwa¹

 

¹WHO Country Office, Kigali, Rwanda, ²WHO Intercountry Support Team for Eastern and Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe, ³WHO Country Office, Gaborone, Botswana

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Olushayo Olu, WHO Country Office, Kigali, Rwanda

 

 

 

 

Implementing new models of development cooperation has been on the increase [1] including a call for increased use of horizontal development cooperation mechanisms such as South-South Cooperation (SSC) as a mean to enhance aid effectiveness in the health sector of developing countries [2-4]. The call is fuelled by the often unfavourable terms of North-South Cooperation (NSC), [5,6] amplified by the need for self-determination, solidarity, sustainable home-grown development and more aid effectiveness among countries of the global south. SSC is also seen as a tool for ensuring equity between developed and developing countries and an opportunity to overcome colonial aid legacy [7, 8]. It is believed that SSC strengthens the principles of the Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action both of which stresses the need for aid effectiveness as well as the Busan Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which calls for more inclusive partnerships in development [9,10]. Historically, SSC referred to the process of exchanging knowledge and resources among countries of the global south. The High-level UN conference on SSC (2009) provides a more comprehensive operational definition of SSC which is 'a process whereby two or more developing countries pursue their individual and/or shared national capacity development objectives through exchanges of knowledge, skills, resources and technical know-how and through regional and interregional collective actions, including partnerships involving Governments, regional organizations, civil society, academia and the private sector, for their individual and/or mutual benefit within and across regions' [11]. Other form of development cooperation is the Triangular Cooperation (TC), a south-south partnership, led by two or more developing countries but supported by a developed country, multilateral organization or international foundation [11].

 

Recent public health events in Africa such as the recurrent outbreaks of endemic and emerging infectious diseases like Ebola, Cholera, Yellow Fever, Zika, Dengue and Rift Valley fever [12-15] in areas which hitherto never experienced such have put to test, the capacity and knowledge to respond in the face of increasing incidence of non-communicable diseases [16] and weak health systems. As such a call for a paradigm shift in development cooperation cannot be more apt at this time [17]. Furthermore, the domestication of the SDGs, with the renewed opportunity to address the health system and public health challenges further buttresses the need for more effective development cooperation among countries of the south. While NSC remains the flagship for health development aid in Africa, it is often fraught with inappropriate technology, lack of understanding of the developing countries context, and lack of equality in partnership thus calling for increasing horizontal partnerships among countries of the global south [18]. The foregoing underscores the need for better collaboration, experience sharing and capacity building among African countries given the similarities in their health and development contexts. In this case study paper, based on World Health Organization (WHO) [19] principle that cooperation among countries can be an effective tool to strengthen and accelerate health development, share knowledge and experiences to improve health-while also making the most of existing resources and capacities available within countries and across regions, we review recent experiences in application of SSC initiatives to two public health situations in Africa to demonstrate the veracity of this new paradigm. The objectives of the case study are to review the potential areas where SSC could be applied to strengthen health services delivery in Africa, identify the key challenges which may be associated with its implementation and make appropriate recommendations on how to address the challenges. References are made to other forms of international technical cooperation such as TC and Regional Cooperation (RC) but the main thrust of the paper is the use of SSC in health development cooperation.

 

 

Case studies: application of SSC, TC and RC to public health situations in Africa.

 

Case study 1: the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa.

 

At the height of the 2014/15 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak which infected more than 28,000 persons out of which 11,000 died in West Africa [20], the huge load of cases and their contacts overwhelmed the response capacity of the principally affected countries namely Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone [21]. Available local experience, knowledge, logistic and human resources to manage these outbreaks were limited [22-24] while diagnostic and admission capacities were overstretched; resulting in a backlog of suspected and probable cases awaiting confirmatory laboratory tests and admission into Ebola isolation centres. This sustained community transmission of the disease. A number of SSC, RC and TC initiatives were undertaken during this crisis through negotiations between WHO and Regional Economic Communities (RECs) to provide additional capacity to strengthen diagnosis, case management, identification and follow up of contacts, and community mobilization in the affected countries (Ref: Dubois and Wake et al). The African Union mobilized and deployed more than 850 health workers drawn from 18 African countries to Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone through its African Union Support for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa programme [25, 26] while the Economic Communities of West African States deployed 150 West African health personnel to support case management, infection prevention and control, active surveillance, contact tracing, community mobilization and outbreak coordination [27]. Through these deployments experienced clinicians and nurses from Uganda and Democratic Republic of Congo, countries with long standing experience in EVD management were deployed to support outbreak response in the principally affected countries. Similarly, China [28] , South Africa and Nigeria (with support of the European Union) [29] also established level 4 EVD diagnostic laboratories in Liberia and Sierra Leone while Cuba deployed several Brigades of health workers including doctors, nurses, social workers, infection prevention and control specialists and health administrators to support the principally affected countries. These deployments provided the much needed capacity which significantly contributed to the eventual control of the outbreak, however challenges such as language barrier, sourcing of the funds required to deploy the teams, registration of the foreign medical workers in the destination country, inadequate understanding of the local public health context, slow deployment of teams due to lack of regional framework for use of SSC hampered timely and speedy deployment and effective utilization of the teams. Furthermore, logistic challenges of transporting, housing and equipping large medical teams and lack of readily available and deployable human resources were also experienced [27, 30].

 

Case study 2: health system strengthening experience sharing between Rwanda and Mozambique.

 

In Mozambique, financing of health services delivery is largely dependent on donor funding which peaked in 2010. On the average, donor funding through sector budget support, projects and vertical funds such as United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and Global Fund account for more than 70% of the spending on health in the country while government expenditure on health reduced from 13% to 7% between 2006 and 2010. On the other hand, Rwanda has made good progress in the financing of its health sector. The country has developed and is implementing robust health financing policies and strategic plans, enacted health insurance laws and introduced a community-based health insurance (CBHI) scheme which has over 80% national coverage thus boosting sustainable and equitable access to health services, including safety nets for the poor whilst reducing out of pocket expenditure. This enabled the country to improve its health services delivery mechanisms as well as provide bilateral technical support to a number of other African countries in the areas of health system strengthening and financing [2]. To this effect, a Mozambican delegation comprising of officials from the ministries of health, finance and economy, labour and social security undertook a study tour to Rwanda in October 2015 to share experiences and understudy the Rwanda model for financing national health services. During the study tour, the Mozambican delegation was enlightened on various mechanisms and strategies adopted by Rwanda to finance its health sector including tax-based and insurance funding and performance-based funding. The evidence base, pros and cons of each of these financing mechanisms were discussed and participants paid field visits to observe the practical implementation of the performance based funding, CBHI and community health workers scheme. Following the study tour, Mozambique initiated strategic actions such as finalization of health insurance scheme for public servants and the military, advocacy for health insurance subsidies to make the system sustainable and development of a proposal for pilot testing of CBHI in the country. While the study tour experienced challenges such as inadequate funding, long period of negotiations between the two countries and language barrier which are similar to those of the Ebola deployments, this did not reduce the potential benefits derivable from the exercise.

 

 

Africa is at a crossroad; more than ever, the challenge of poor human development, inadequate financial and logistics resources, climate change, and recurrent outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases and natural disasters continues to retard socioeconomic growth and negatively impact on its health systems. The similarities in the socioeconomic, cultural and public health contexts of African countries are opportunities for home-grown efforts to improve development cooperation among them. Available literature especially from countries of Latin America and the Caribbean and the two case studies presented in this paper provide evidence to support scaling up of the use of horizontal development coordination mechanisms to strengthen public health services delivery and socioeconomic development among African countries [31]. The debate is therefore not whether to use the SSC mechanisms for public health services strengthening in Africa or not but how to effectively use it [17]. African countries could reap immense benefits such as cost savings through application of economy of scale strategies in the joint production or procurement of medical products, better bargaining power through joint negotiations, synergy in cross border collaboration and coordination of public health activities such as immunization campaigns, outbreak and humanitarian response, and continuity in implementation of health programme across sub-regions through the use of regional commitments which is binding on participating countries from the use of SSC for health. Other benefits include better ownership and direct impact of actions on beneficiaries as a result of adaptation [31] and contributions to aid effectiveness. The use of SSC for health could also be an opportunity to strengthen regional integration. Our case studies illustrate the different dimensions to which SSC mechanisms can be applied to improve public health services delivery and also highlight some of the key challenges which would need to be addressed to ensure its effective use. Clear opportunities for SSC among African countries could be demonstrated in the areas of diseases prevention and control, [32] production of medical products and essential medicines [33], vaccine production and harmonization of regulatory processes [34], institutional capacity building and health workforce development [35], direct delivery of specialized health services, public health experience sharing, cross border collaboration and coordination of services delivery and implementation of the international health regulations among others.

 

Pitfalls such as poor coordination, inadequate political commitment, lack of conducive policy environments, language barrier and inadequate financing opportunities for SSC initiatives have been highlighted as challenges, observed in both case studies, and present a major dilemma for the use of SSC mechanisms in Africa. Other challenges such as lack of evidence from implementation of SSC in other regions [7], lack of information required for effective monitoring and evaluation of outcomes and impact of SSC initiatives and a regional oversight mechanism for issues such as licensing of health workers, regulation of essential medicines and medical products all needs to be addressed in order to benefit from the vast opportunities offered by SSC. The effective and systematic use of SSC mechanisms to strengthen health systems and public health services delivery in Africa would thus require: 1) assessment and identification of common public health problems and objectives in the region to which SSC could be applied; 2) mapping of available financial and human resources which could be harnessed to support the implementation of SSC initiatives across the continent; 3) establishment of a fund for SSC similar to the African Public Health Emergency Fund (APHEF) in the regional banks such as the African Development Bank. Incorporation of SSC mechanisms into existing funds such as APHEF could also be an opportunity to address the funding challenges associated with SSC implementation. Furthermore, increased advocacy to African countries to include funds for SSC in their health budgets would also be a valuable option; 4) development of appropriate regional public health SSC strategies and policy documents which outlines how challenges such as oversight and regulations should be addressed and advocacy for the inclusion of SSC in existing regional and countries policies would also be critical; 5) establishment of regional and national institutional mechanisms for coordination, monitoring and evaluation of SSC/TC activities; 6) overcoming cultural and linguistic barriers to ensure optimum cooperation among countries especially those with similar historic and cultural roots; and to provide opportunities for expansion of SSC activities beyond regional, cultural and linguistic borders would also be needed (Ref: IHP+, South-South and Triangular Cooperation in Health-Current status and trends, 2014).

 

Establishing a framework for effective implementation of the foregoing requires involvement of multiple stakeholders. The RECs, governments, private sector, the academia and the UN needs to be fully engaged to provide the overall platform for establishing SSC mechanisms and to advocate to their member states and other stakeholders to strengthen policy dialogue and resource mobilization for SSC in health. Public-private partnerships are crucial to bring manufacturing sector on board and in resource mobilization. National and regional public health organizations could provide the required technical and financial assistance to establish regional and national platforms for public health SSC. Furthermore, they could provide opportunities to links countries in need with appropriate support, provide technical expertise to manage and mobilize resources for public health SSC initiatives [36]. Importantly, African countries as the main duty bearers of their health development agenda should provide the overall leadership for implementation of public health SSC initiatives. The National Public Health Institutes which are proposed as part of the establishment of the Africa Centres for Disease Control [37], and the recently launched SDG Africa Centre [38] could provide a platform for developing capacity for and coordinating the increasing use of SSC mechanisms for public health services delivery on the continent. The community who are the ultimate beneficiaries of SSC initiatives, the civil society and local organizations who are present at the grassroots and can support community-based health initiatives also have critical roles to play.

 

 

Available literature and lessons from the two case studies presented in this paper show that SSC is an opportunity to strengthen national ownership, self-reliance and to harness existing capacities to address common and peculiar African public health problems including achievement of the post-2015 health development agenda and SDG targets. The foregoing demonstrates that the need for a paradigm shift from vertical to horizontal development cooperation needs no further proof but a call to action. We therefore call on concerned stakeholders to support establishment of a systematic approach for the use of SSC mechanisms in the health sector of Africa. Such a system should include a regional platform, policy environment and institutional arrangements for its implementation. Specifically, regional policy and strategy documents should be developed and implemented. Second, we call for designation of an African Centre of Excellence for international public health cooperation within an existing public health institution on the continent to conduct in-depth analysis of the enabling factors required for successful application of SSC to public health in Africa and to support coordination, research, knowledge sharing and establishment of a community of practice for SSC in public health. Lastly, we advocate for development of a regional mechanism for supervision, monitoring and evaluation of SSC and TC initiatives.

 

 

The authors declare there exists no competing interests.

 

 

Olushayo Olu conceived and coordinated the study. Olushayo Olu and Amos Petu drafted the manuscript. All authors read and provided significant inputs into the all drafts of the manuscript, agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work and approved the final draft of the manuscript for publication.

 

 

Production of this manuscript was approved by the WHO Regional Office for Africa (WHO ePub no. ePub-IP-00084073-EC). We acknowledge the contribution of MOH Rwanda and Mozambique and Ms Eva Das Dores Pascoal of WHO Mozambique to its production. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, which do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

 

 

1. Garrasi D. New Models of Development Cooperation: The G7+ and Fragile-to-Fragile Cooperation. 2015. Accessed 27 January 2017


2. Shakow AD, Bukhman G, Adebona O, Greene J, de Dieu Ngirabega J, Binagwaho A. Transforming South-South technical support to fight non-communicable diseases. Glob Heart. 2012; 7(1): 35-45. Google Scholar


3. Pan American Health Organization. Resolution CD52.R15 cooperation for health development in the Americas. 2013. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.


4. United Nations. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. 64/222. 2010. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.


5. Maizels A, Nissanke M. Motivations for aid to developing countries. World Dev. 1984; 12(9): 879-900. Google Scholar


6. Kharas H. The new reality of aid. Washington, DC: brookings Institution. United Nations. 2007; Accessed 5 Jan 2017.


7. The South Centre. South-south cooperation: The challenges of implementation. 2005; Accessed 5 Jan 2017.


8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and Accra Agenda for Action. 2005. Accessed 15 Dec 2016


9. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goal 17: revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development. 2016. 15 Dec 2016.


10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).The Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 2012. Accessed 15 Dec 2016


11. United Nations,South-South cooperation for development Framework of operational guidelines on United Nations support to South-South and triangular cooperation. 2012. Accessed 6 Dec 2016


12. Feldmann H. Ebola-a growing threat?. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(15): 1375-8. Google Scholar


13. WHO. Weekly epidemiological record: cholera articles. Cholera annual report, 2015. 2016; 91(38):433-440. Google Scholar


14. Chan M. Yellow fever: the resurgence of a forgotten disease. Lancet. 2016; 387(10034): 2165-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Bogoch II, Brady OJ, Kraemer MU, German M, Creatore MI, Brent S et al. Potential for Zika virus introduction and transmission in resource-limited countries in Africa and the Asia-Pacific region: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16(11):1237-1245. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Marquez PV, Farrington JL. The challenge of non-communicable diseases and road traffic injuries in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview. World Bank. 2013. Accessed 6 Dec 2016.


17. World Health Organization. South-South and Triangular Cooperation in Health: Current status and trends (Summary of findings from an analysis undertaken on behalf of IHP+). 2014. Accessed 18 Jan 2017.


18. Sridhar D. Seven challenges in international development assistance for health and ways forward. J Law Med Ethics. 2010; 38(3): 459-69. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. World Health Organization. Cooperation among countries. 2017. Accessed 27 January 2017.


20. World Health Organization. Ebola Situation Report (30 March 2016). 2016. Accessed 27 January 2017.


21. Chan M. Ebola Virus Disease in West Africa -No Early End to the Outbreak. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371 (13): 1183-84. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. DuBois M, Wake C, Sturridge S, Bennett C. The Ebola response in West Africa: exposing the politics and culture of international aid. 2015. Accessed 14 Dec 2016.


23. Spengler JR, Ervin ED, Towner JS, Rollin PE, Nichol ST. Perspectives on West Africa Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak, 2013-2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(6):956-63. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Kieny MP, Dovlo D. Beyond Ebola: a new agenda for resilient health systems. Lancet. 2015; 385(9963): 91-2. PubMed | Google Scholar


25. African Union. Annual report of the chairperson of the african union commission for the period january to december 2015. Janvier 2016. Accessed 20 Dec 2016


26. Lubogo M, Donewell B, Godbless L, Shabani S, Maeda J, Temba H et al. Ebola virus disease outbreak; the role of field epidemiology training programme in the fight against the epidemic, Liberia, 2014. Pan Afr Med J. 2015; 22 (Suppl 1):5. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. Bappah HY. Human security in practice: Securing people from the threat of epidemic-what can we learn from the ECOWAS response to Ebola. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.


28. Lu HJ, Qian J, Kargbo D, Zhang XG,Yang F, Hu Y et al. Ebola Virus Outbreak Investigation, Sierra Leone, September 28-November 11, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015; 21(11): 1921-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


29. Chen Z, Chang G, Zhang W, Chen Y, Wang X, Yang R et al. Mobile laboratory in Sierra Leone during outbreak of Ebola: practices and implications. Sci China Life Sci. 2015; 58(9): 918-21. PubMed | Google Scholar


30. Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The Fight against epidemic of the Ebola virus disease within ECOWAS. 2016. Accessed 20 Dec 2016


31. Carrillo Roa A, Santana JP. Regional integration and south-south cooperation in health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012; 32(5):368-75. PubMed | Google Scholar


32. Salvatella R, Irabedra P, Sánchez D, Castellanos LG, Espinal M. South-south cooperation for Chagas disease. Lancet. 2013; 382(9890): 395-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


33. Russo G, de Oliveira L, Shankland A, Sitoe T. On the margins of aid orthodoxy: the Brazil-Mozambique collaboration to produce essential medicines in Africa. Global Health. 2014; 10:70. PubMed | Google Scholar


34. Sáenz TW, Thorsteinsdóttir H, de Souza MC. Cuba and Brazil: an important example of South-South collaboration in health biotechnology. MEDICC Rev. 2010; 12(3): 32-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


35. Tambo E, Ugwu CE, Guan Y, Wei D, Xiao-Ning, Xiao-Nong Z. China-Africa Health Development Initiatives: benefits and implications for shaping innovative and evidence-informed national health policies and programs in sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of MCH and AIDS. 2016; 5(2): 119-133. PubMed | Google Scholar


36. Sakurai MY. The post-2015 development agenda and South-South and triangular cooperation- How the partnership model should be?. Glob Soc Policy. 2015; 15(3): 337-341. PubMed | Google Scholar


37. Nkengasong JN, Maiyegun O, Moeti M. Establishing the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: responding to Africa's health threats. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Mar; 5(3): e246-e24. PubMed | Google Scholar


38. Andre Gakwaya.« Instilling mindsets and habits conducive to attaining the SDGs is critical »-President Kagame. Janvier 2017. Accessed 7 February 2017