Clinico-hysteroscopic analysis of severe intrauterine adhesions among nigerian infertile women

Clinico-hysteroscopic analysis of severe intrauterine adhesions among nigerian infertile women

Joseph Odirichukwu Ugboaja^1,&, Charlotte Blanche Oguejiofor¹, Anthony Osita Igwegbe¹

 

¹Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi, Nigeria

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Joseph Odirichukwu Ugboaja, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi Nigeria

 

 

 

 

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is a significant cause of infertility and reproductive failure in Nigeria and the prevalence ranges from 2.7% to 8.1% of all gynaecological cases seen [1-4]. Among infertile women being worked up for In-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, prevalence rates at hysteroscopy range from 49.1% to 64.2% [5, 6] Intrauterine adhesions usually result from post-traumatic or post infectious injury to the basalis layer of the endometrium leading to healing by fibrosis with the resultant obliteration of the uterine cavity. The common risk factors in Nigeria include dilatation and curettage for pregnancy related indications, complicated caesarean section, myomectomy and pelvic inflammatory diseases [3-8]. The diagnosis of IUA can be made by Hysterosalpingogram (HSG), Ultrasonography [9, 10] or hysteroscopy. But hysteroscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis. There are many classification systems for IUAs but the grading system of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) [11] has been the most popular. It grades IUAs into mild, moderate and severe depending on the assigned scores that are based on the nature of the adhesions, the extent of cavity involvement and the menstrual pattern. Severe IUAs are characterized by extensive involvement of uterine cavity. They are defined by an ASRM score of 9-12 [11]. The key goals of management of severe intrauterine adhesions are restoration of normal uterine cavity, prevention recurrence of adhesions, normalization of menstrual flow and improvement of reproductive outcome. Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis is the procedure of choice in excision of the adhesion bands. Although studies have shown good success rate in restoration of normal endometrial cavity [12-15], reproductive outcomes have been poor [16-18]. The main challenges in hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in cases of severe IUAs include difficulty in the excision of the dense adhesion bands, as well as prevention of recurrence. Ultrasound and laparoscopy guided procedures have been shown to facilitate complete surgical excision of adhesion bands as well reduction in complication rates [19-21]. Many methods have been devised to facilitate hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in cases of severe intrauterine adhesions but myometrial scoring in which 6 to 8 4-mm deep incisions are created in the myometrium using a resectoscope fitted with a Collins knife electrode from the fundus to the cervix to the isthmus to create a cavity in women with total obliteration of the cavity has also been particularly found to be effective in restoring reproductive function and associated with minimum complications [22]. Strategies that have been shown to reduce the rate of recurrence and improve reproductive outcomes in cases of severe IUAs include the use of paediatric foleys catheter, amnion graft applied over the foleys catheter balloon [23, 24]; use of oxidized, regenerated cellulose adhesion barrier(intercede) alongside an IUCD [25], as well as the use of estrogen for endometrial regeneration [26]. In Nigeria, there is paucity of data on the hysteroscopic management of severe intrauterine adhesions [1-5, 7]. This study was therefore, undertaken to evaluate the clinical presentation and hysteroscopic characteristics of severe intrauterine adhesions among a cross section of Nigerian women.

 

Objectives: the main objective was to study the clinical presentation and hysteroscopic characteristics of severe intrauterine adhesions among a cross section of Nigerian women. The specific objectives include to study the socio demographic characteristics of the women with severe intrauterine adhesions, the clinical presentations of the women with severe IUA seen among the women, the risk factors/aetiological events for severe IUA seen among the women as well as the hysteroscopic characteristics of severe IUA seen among the women.

 

 

Study setting: the fertility and gynaecological endoscopy units of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi Anambra State, Nigeria and Holy Rosary specialist hospital, Onitsha Nigeria.

 

Study design: a cross sectional descriptive survey of women who were managed for severe intrauterine adhesions in our units over an 18-month's period.( 1st November, 2015-30^th April, 2017).

 

Study population: All the women who were suspected of having severe intrauterine adhesions on clinical and radiological evaluations were recruited for the study, after adequate counseling. Those with mild to moderate IUAs and those who withheld consent were excluded from the study.

 

At presentation, a proforma was used to collect data on all the women who were either diagnosed with or suspected of having severe intrauterine adhesions from clinical evaluation at the clinic. Severe intrauterine adhesions were defined by a score of 9-13 using the ASRM criteria [11]. The information obtained included the biosocial data, the presenting complaint, menstrual pattern, reproductive performance and the aetiological/initiating clinical event. Following clinical evaluation including transvaginal scan and hysterosalpingogram, the patients were scheduled for diagnostic hysteroscopy in the immediate post menstrual phase or at any convenient time for the women who were amenorrheic women. The procedures were done under general anaesthesia and Misoprostol (100ug) was inserted into the posterior fornix a night before the procedure in the nulliparous women to aid cervical os dilatation. During the procedure, a 5.5mm diagnostic hysteroscopy sheath was used to define and map the adhesions following a systematic survey of the cervical canal, cervical os and the uterine cavity including the uterine fundus whenever feasible. This was usually followed by hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with 6.5mm operative sheath using the micro scissor. In cases where this was not possible, a further cervical dilatation was done to accommodate the 9mm monopolar resectoscope and the tough adhesion bands were then resected with the 0 degree loop or colles knife using a monopolar cutting current set @ 60 watts with glycine or 5% d/w as the distension media. As much as possible, all the adhesion bands are resected using the appearance of the fleshy muscular myometrium, presence of bleeding and the internal os as guides to the extent of resection. In very difficult cases with complete obliteration of the cavity, the procedure was carried under ultrasound or laparoscopy guidance. Postoperatively, a paediatric foleys catheter is introduced into the uterine cavity and distended with 3-5mls of sterile water depending on the size of the cavity. Patients were also commenced on combined estradiol valerate tablets for 21 days and medroxy progesterone for the last 10 days. They were given antibiotics and discharged home the same day. The catheter was usually removed after 10 days. At the end of the procedure, the proforma was completed with the findings from diagnostic hysteroscopy and operative details.

 

Data analysis: data were analyzed with STATA software, version 12.0 SE (Stata Corporation, TX, USA). A simple descriptive analysis was done in which the mean and mode were calculated for the continuous variables while the frequencies of the composite variables of interest were expressed as percentages and presented in tables.

 

Ethical clearance: Ethical clearance was gotten from the Institutions ethical board and the ethical principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, confidentiality and respect of persons were applied throughout the duration of the study. The patients were well counseled on the purpose of the study and they all gave consent. Those who withheld consent were excluded from the study.

 

 

Severe intrauterine adhesion accounted for 19 (25.0%) out of 76 cases of intrauterine adhesions managed during the period. This constituted 11.9% of 160 infertile women who had diagnostic hysteroscopies in our units over the study period. The mean age was 36.3+/-4.3 years and all the women belong to the parity group of 0-1. The mean duration of symptom was 4.2+/-3.2.years (Table 1). Amenorrhea in association with infertility (68.4%) was the main presenting complaint while the major risk factors were complicated caesarean section (42.1%) and abdominal myomectomy (26.3%). On hysteroscopy, the adhesions were mainly dense (52.6%) and multiple (94.7%) with complete involvement of the uterine cavity in all the cases. Obliterative lesions were seen in 63.2% of the women. There were previous attempts at correction in 31.6% of the women which comprised of blind adhesiolysis with uterine sound in all cases (Table 2). Table 3 shows the characteristics of severe intrauterine adhesions as seen on hysteroscopy. The adhesions were mainly dense (52.6%), multiple (94.7%) and obliterative (63.2%). There was complete (100.0%) involvement of the uterine cavity in all the cases while the cervical os was involved in 68.4% of cases. Complications were encountered in 2 (10.5%) of the women.

 

 

The management of severe intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) is challenging and associated with poor reproductive outcomes and a high recurrence rate. In our study, severe intrauterine adhesion accounted for 19(25.0%) out of 76 cases of IUAs and 11.9% of all infertility patients who had diagnostic hysteroscopies in our units over the study period. This significant number of severe may not represent the true prevalence in our environment as our unit is a referral unit for gynaecological endoscopy but it has implications for management outcomes for the patient as severe IUAs are known to be associated with poor reproductive outcomes following surgery in terms of menstrual return, pregnancy rate and live birth rates [12-13]. It therefore means that there is need to acquire the necessary skills for the surgical treatment of these cases as the other options of fertility management in these women which may include gestational surrogacy and adoption in our environment. The major aetiological events/risk factors for severe IUAs as found in our work were caesarean section and myomectomy. In the previous reports from Nigeria, dilatation and curettage was the main risk factor identified [1-4]. But the women were not classified in terms of severity of the symptoms. It is known that intrauterine adhesions following caesarean section occur within the context of caesarean section complicated either by sepsis or postpartum haemorrhage warranting excessive uterine curettage. Therefore, maintaining asepsis, the use of prophylactic antibiotics as well as good surgical skills to manage postpartum haemorrhage will reduce the incidence of IUA following caesarean section. Abdominal myomectomy is another major risk factor from our work. Although many authors have reported on the relationship between peritoneal adhesions and myomectomy [27], only a few have evaluated the role of myomectomy in causing IUAs [28-30]. The incidence of IUAs following abdominal myomectomy ranges from 21.5% to 50% [29-31]. Damage to the endometrium is considered the aetiopathogenetic pathway to IUAs following open myomectomy. Gambadauro et al in 2012, [28] reported a significantly higher occurrence of IUA when the endometrium was breeched. However, in contrast, IUAs have also been found following myomectomies in which the endometrium was not breeched [31].

 

In these cases, tissue ischemia and vascular compromise arising from extensive tissue dissection are thought to be responsible for IUAs. This significant association of myomectomy with IUAs underscores the need to adopt measures to limit the occurrence of intrauterine adhesions post myomectomy. This is especially important as myomectomy is mostly done for low parity women, most of whom still desires further pregnancy. The main clinical presentation of women with IUA found in our work is amenorrhea. This is in line with the hysteroscopy finding of complete cavity involvement in almost all the cases. Complete occlusion of the internal cervical os can also lead to amenorrhea and is particularly of concern as it makes HSG evaluation of the cavity impossible. Secondary dysmenorrhea and cyclical abdominal pain were found in a small number of the women. In an earlier report by Takai et al [3] in Nigeria, most of the patients presented with hypomenorrhea and infertility. However, the patients in their work were not graded as diagnosis was made by hysterosalpingogram. The adhesion bands were mainly dense adhesions which were mainly multiple involving the whole of the cavity. The remaining was a mixture of filmy and dense adhesions. Dense adhesion bands are very tough fibrotic bands that are difficult to resect with the scissor thereby increasing the use of the electrosurgical systems with the attendant increased risk of endometrial damage and recurrence. It is not surprising then, that monopolar resectoscope was used for resection in majority (78.9%) of the cases. Also the adhesion bands were mostly complete obliterative lesions. Typically, these lesions present with amenorrhea which may be associated with cyclical abdominal pain in a few cases where there are still small endometrial tissues left. Cyclical abdominal pain found in 31.6% of the women would likely be majorly on account of the occlusive lesions and to a small extent, the obliterative lesions. The hallmark of presentation of the occlusive lesion is reduced/absent menstrual flow in association with cyclical abdominal pain. Our complication rate was minimal and constitute mainly of cervical lacerations. Complications are increased during operative hysteroscopies for severe intrauterine adhesions and may be in the form of cervical lacerations, uterine perforations and haemorrhage as well as anaesthetic and fluid overload complications. The use of ultrasonography and laparoscopy as guides during the procedure may have been responsible for the reduced rates of complications in our work.

 

Limitation: our main limitation was the fact that this was a hospital based study and therefore the findings may not be generalized. However, the study gave a very useful insight into the problem of severe intrauterine adhesions in our area as our units are referral units for infertility management.

 

 

The prevalence of severe IUA is high among women with IUAs and presents mainly with amenorrhea and infertility. The main risk factors for severe IUA are complicated caesarean section and myomectomy. There is need to build capacity for hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions in Nigeria to improve outcome.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Joseph Odirichukwu Ugboaja: made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and participated in, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data as well as drafting, revising and approval of the final manuscript; Charlotte Blanche Oguejiofor: made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and participated in, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data as well as drafting, revising and approval of the final manuscript; Anthony Osita Igwegbe: made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and participated in, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data as well as drafting, revising and approval of the final manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript.

 

 

We wish to acknowledge the contributions of the clinical staff that assisted in collecting data from the patients and also participated during the laparoscopy procedures.

 

 

Table 1: distribution by sociodemographic characteristics of the infertile Nigerian women with severe IUA

Table 2: distribution by the clinical presentation of the infertile Nigerian women with severe IUA

Table 3: distribution by hysteroscopic characteristics of severe intrauterine adhesions seen among infertile Nigerian women

 

 

1. Efetie ER. Reproductive outcome following treatment of intrauterine adhesion in Abuja Nigeria. NJCP. 2006; 9(2): 164-168. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Gaya SA, Adamu IS, Yakasai IA et al. Review of intrauterine adhesiolysis at the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2012 Apr-Jun; 11(2): 65-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Okohue JE, Onuh SO, Akaba GO et al. A 3 Years Review of Hysteroscopy in a Private Hospital in Nigeria. World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery. May-August 2009; 2(2): 26-29. Google Scholar


4. Ajayi A, Biobaku O, Ajayi V et al. Detection of Intrauterine Lesions by Hysteroscopy among Women with Fertility Challenges in an In-Vitro Fertilization Center in Lagos, Nigeria. Crit Care Obst&Gyne. 2015; 1: 1. Google Scholar


5. Takai IU, Kwayabura AS, Ugwa EA et al. A 10-year Review of the Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcome of Asherman's Syndrome at a Center with Limited Resources. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015 Nov-Dec; 5(6): 442-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Xiao S, Wan Y, Xue M et al. Etiology, treatment, and reproductive prognosis of women with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 May; 125(2): 121-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Gaya SA, Adamu IS, Yakasai IA et al. Review of intrauterine adhesiolysis at the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2012 Apr-Jun; 11(2): 65-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Socolov R, Anton E, Butureanu S et al. The endoscopic management of uterine synechiae: a clinical study of 78 cases. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2010 Jul-Aug; 105(4): 515-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Mar-Apr; 21(2): 262-74. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Kim MJ, Lee Y, Lee C et al. Accuracy of three dimensional ultrasound and treatment outcomes of intrauterine adhesion in infertile women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec; 54(6): 737-41. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. The American Fertility Society. Classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988(6); 49: 944-955. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Roy KK, Baruah J, Sharma JB et al. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with infertility due to Asherman's syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Feb; 281(2): 355-61. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Yang JH, Chen CD, Chen SU et al. The influence of the location and extent of intrauterine adhesions on recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. BJOG. 2016 Mar; 123(4): 618-23. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Hanstede MM, van der Meij E, Goedemans L et al. Results of centralized Asherman surgery, 2003-2013. Fertil Steril. 2015 Dec; 104(6): 1561-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Zhang A, Jamail G, Xue M et al. Hysteroscopic Intrauterine Adhesiolysis Using the "Ploughing" Technique with Cold Scissors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct; 22(6): 934-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Chen L, Zhang H, Wang Q et al. Reproductive Outcomes in Patients with Intrauterine Adhesions Following Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis: Experience From the Largest Women's Hospital in China. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb; 24(2): 299-304. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Dilbaz B, Akpinar F, Altinbas S et al. Reproductive Outcome of Patients With Asherman's Syndrome After Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec; 22(6S): S185-S186. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Yang JH, Chen CD, Chen SU et al. The influence of the location and extent of intrauterine adhesions on recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. BJOG. 2016 Mar; 123(4): 618-23. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Fraser IS, Song JY, Jansen RPS et al. Hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions under ultrasound guidance. Gynaecol Endosc. 1995; 4: 35-40. Google Scholar


20. Bellingham R. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic lysis and adjunctive methods. Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 36(2): 171-174. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO. A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003; 82(1): 49-56. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Protopapas A, Shushan A, Magos A. Myometrial scoring: a new technique for the management of severe Asherman's syndrome. Fertil Steril.1998; 69(5): 860-864. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Gan L, Duan H, Sun FQ et al. Efficacy of freeze-dried amnion graft following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of severe intrauterine adhesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 May; 137(2): 116-122. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Amer MI, Abd-El-Maeboud KH. Amnion graft following hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Dec; 32(6): 559-66. PubMed | Google Scholar


25. Cai H, Qiao L, Song K et al. Oxidized, Regenerated Cellulose Adhesion Barrier Plus Intrauterine Device Prevents Recurrence After Adhesiolysis for Moderate to Severe Intrauterine Adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1; 24(1): 80-88. PubMed | Google Scholar


26. Johary J, Xue M, Zhu X et al. Efficacy of estrogen therapy in patients with intrauterine adhesions: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb; 21(1): 44-54. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Farquhar C et al. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; 16(2): CD000475. PubMed | Google Scholar


28. Gambadauro P, Gudmundsson J, Torrejón R. Intrauterine adhesions following conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012; 2012: 853269. PubMed | Google Scholar


29. Asgari Z, Hafizi L, Hosseini R et al. Intrauterine synechiae after myomectomy; laparotomy versus laparoscopy: Non-randomized interventional trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015; 13(3): 161-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


30. Bhandari S, Ganguly I, Agarwal P et al. Effect of myomectomy on endometrial cavity: A prospective study of 51 cases. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun; 9(2): 107-11. PubMed | Google Scholar


31. Conforti A, Krishnamurthy GB, Dragamestianos C et al. Intrauterine adhesions after open myomectomy: an audit. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug; 179: 42-5. PubMed | Google Scholar