Expanding health insurance scheme in the informal sector in Nigeria: awareness as a potential demand-side tool

Expanding health insurance scheme in the informal sector in Nigeria: awareness as a potential demand-side tool

David Ayobami Adewole^1,&, Saidat Abisola Akanbi¹, Kayode Omoniyi Osungbade¹, Segun Bello²

 

¹Department of Health Policy & Management, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, ²Department of Epidemiology & Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

 

 

^&Corresponding author
David Ayobami Adewole, Department of Health Policy & Management, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

 

 

 

 

Globally, prepayment methods of financing healthcare have been embraced as a viable strategy to achieving universal health coverage [1]. However, it is a relatively new concept in the majority of African countries, including Nigeria [2-4]. State supported social security systems of financing healthcare substantially reduce the burden of healthcare costs on individuals and families. Such social security systems are not common in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. The form of social security available in the majority of African countries is the age-old traditional system of reciprocal loans and savings microfinance institutions called Esusu [5], a common financing institution among women's groups [6]. In addition to the fact that the financial bases of these institutions are narrow, financing healthcare is usually not one of the rationales of such traditional systems [7]. Because the majority of the people in the informal sector in low to middle income countries do not have health insurance, despite their willingness to participate in such schemes [6, 8], the alternative choice of payment for health care is the out-of-pocket payment method. Many reasons have been proposed to explain the poor progress of prepayment schemes in Africa [9-11]. Poor engagement in partnerships with the beneficial populations as a result of a poor level of awareness and knowledge of the scheme and its benefits is a major factor [9, 12]. Other factors are poverty, low level of trust in government social policies, and mistrust of fund management in health insurance schemes, while conflicts with religious and cultural beliefs are also common [3,4,11]. Electronic media such as radio and television have been cited as sources that could enhance the level of awareness of health insurance [13, 14]. Studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between awareness of and participation in a health insurance scheme. Thus, factors that promote awareness invariably influence participation in the scheme [3, 15,16]. Other important factors include socio-demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and the marital and educational statuses of intended beneficiaries [17]. It is generally known that individuals and groups of people with a form of formal education are likely to be more responsive to certain policies, especially the health related forms [18, 19]. Potential beneficiaries of health insurance could act as policy 'entrepreneurs'if they are aware and have adequate knowledge of the scheme and its benefits [20]. The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) of Nigeria was established over a decade ago with the sole aim of facilitating access to quality healthcare for all Nigerians. Broadly, there are three different programmes under the scheme designed to ensure that different segments of the populace are catered for. These segments are the Formal and the Informal as well as vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, children under five, prison inmates, retirees and the aged.

Currently, less than 10% of Nigeria's population is beneficiaries of the scheme, and these are mainly in the formal sector. In Nigeria, awareness of prepayment schemes for health is low, as a consequence of inconsistent awareness creation strategies and efforts by the NHIS. As one of the efforts to scale-up the scheme, and to ensure that the informal sector is not disenfranchised, the National Council on Health (NCH) recently approved state ownership of health insurance schemes [21]. The NHIS adopted the family enrolment system whereby a formal sector employee is entitled to enroll a spouse and a maximum of four children under the age of 18 years in addition to himself or herself [12, 22]. It is important that the potential beneficiaries are empowered to play active roles in its design and implementation [10, 23] to encourage its uptake and ensure sustainability. For many reasons associated with reproductive health and related factors, the health seeking behaviour of women is better than that found among men [24]. As the present poor health indicators have established [25], the impact of inadequate access to quality healthcare services in the majority of developing countries is mainly borne by women (and children) [26]. More so, studies have shown that generally compared to men, women are a disadvantaged group in income generating opportunities in Nigeria [27]. Health insurance schemes will enhance women's access to quality healthcare services and they are more likely to support it, compared to men [6]. Empowerment of women through appropriate awareness creation channels will contribute to efforts to promote health insurance schemes among the people. The primary aim of this study was to assess the awareness and perception of market women of prepayment schemes as they are currently available through the NHIS. The secondary aim was to assess determinants of awareness of the prepayment schemes. Findings will contribute to the current efforts in the promotion of prepayment schemes for health, especially in the informal sector and by extension in the general populace.

 

 

Study area: this study was carried out in Aleshinloye market in Ibadan southwest Local Government Area (LGA), Ibadan Oyo State, Nigeria. Ibadan is the capital city of Oyo State, with a population of about 3 million people. Ibadan as a city has a number of institutions of higher learning and research centres, these include the first university in Nigeria - the University of Ibadan, established in 1948 [28]. Nigeria is administratively divided into states, with each state made up of varying numbers of LGAs. Ibadan southwest LGA is one of these, with a population of 283,098 and a total number of 31 healthcare facilities [29]. Within the LGA exists orthodox, alternative and traditional healthcare systems. The orthodox types are majorly the primary and the secondary healthcare providers. The LGAs are mainly responsible for the management of primary healthcare facilities. There was no known health insurance programme for the market women.

 

This was a cross-sectional, descriptive survey carried out between July 21 and August 29, 2015. The cross-sectional descriptive survey was to obtain the desired representative information on NHIS from the market women at the point of the interview. It involved women traders in Aleshinloye market. The market was chosen among others in Ibadan southwest LGA. It has a population of about 6,000 people of which women make up approximately 90%. The majority of the women trade in goods that include household items, clothing, foodstuffs and similar others. Only market women who were adults 18 years and above, and who owned a stall i.e. physical location in the market, were studied. Market women who worked in the formal sector were excluded. Market women without a specific physical space i.e. without a stall (including hawkers), were not recruited to avoid the difficulty in selecting this category of people during the sampling process. We estimated the sample size using the result of a previous study where the proportion of those who were aware of health insurance in the informal sector was 28.9% [30]. With a power of 80% and a confidence level of 95%, this yielded a sample size of 316, and adjusting for a 10% non-response rate, a total of 351 respondents were recruited for the study. A multi-stage sampling technique was used. Using a simple random sampling technique, 1 out of the 5 LGAs in Ibadan metropolis was selected. In the selected LGA, the largest market was purposively selected. There were two types of traders in the market, those who sell within the space of allocated stalls and those who hawk wares. The sampling frame of the stalls in this market containing 3744 stalls was obtained. Systematic sampling technique was used to select the stalls using a sampling fraction of 1:10. The stall owner or supervisor was enrolled in each of the selected stall.

 

Data collection: a semi-structured, pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The questionnaire was adapted from a previous study [2]. The questionnaire contained sections on socio-demographic characteristics of respondents, awareness of the availability of health insurance, how health insurance operates, and the attitude of respondents towards health insurance. The tool was pre-tested among market women in Ibadan southeast LGA, about 15km from the study site. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the University College Hospital Research Ethics Committee in Ibadan, Oyo State. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants before the interviews. The basic mechanisms of a prepayment scheme were explained to participants who did not have the knowledge [31]. This explanation was done using a 4-page information-education-communication (IEC) visual aid material titled 'Understanding National Health Insurance (NHIS) in Pictures (Figure 1). The material was designed to enlighten research participants on the basic concepts of fund collection, pooling, purchasing healthcare services and demystifying some superstitious beliefs associated with health insurance schemes in Nigeria and in other similar places. The questionnaire was administered to 1 respondent (a stall owner or the supervisor) in each of the selected stalls. Questions from the respondents about the research were also addressed. Those who declined to participate were excluded from the study.

 

Data analysis: the data was analysed using SPSS version 16. Frequency tables were generated. Chi-square test was used for categorical data to test associations between selected socio-demographic characteristics and awareness of the NHIS, while logistic regression model was used to determine predictors of awareness of the NHIS. Two models were built to investigate predictors of awareness of the NHIS. For both models, the dependent variable was awareness of the NHIS (Yes = 1, No = 0). For the first model, independent predictors of awareness found in previous studies were included in the model. Variables included age (> 40 = 1, ≤= 0), religion (Christianity = 1, Islam = 0), income (> median income of 5000 naira = 1, ≤ median income = 0), marital status (married = 1, single plus others = 0), highest educational attainment (post-primary = 1, primary or no education = 0). In the second model, we tested for the impact of the confounding variable, enrolment in health insurance. Respondents already enrolled were expected to be aware. Level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

 

 

A total of 344 market women aged 18 years and above participated in the study. Thus, the response rate was 98.0%. The mean age of women was 42 ± 12.6 years. As shown in Table 1, people in the age group 40 +/- 41years were in the highest proportion, 29.7%, the majority 80.2% were married, while those who have attained at least secondary school education were 77.6%. Slightly more than two-thirds of the study participants were Christians, 67.7%, while a majority were of the Yoruba ethnic group, 80.5%. More than half, 57.8% claimed to have 3 or more dependents. A great majority, 91.6% used the out-of-pocket (OOP) method to pay healthcare providers. Few of the study participants, 15.1% admitted ever having had difficulties paying for healthcare costs. Of these, almost two-thirds, 30.8% reported borrowing money to source funding during such difficult situations. Others cited other means while a great number, 42.3% did not respond to the question. (Table 2).

 

Awareness about NHIS and predictors among respondents: just over two-fifths of the total study participants, 41.3% claimed to have ever heard of the NHIS. Electronic media, radio/TV and close associates were mainly the reported first source of information among those who have ever heard about the NHIS in 33.1% and 31.0% respectively. Open campaigns were another significant source of information cited by 26.1% of the people. (Table 3). Of those who claimed to have heard of the NHIS or any form of a prepayment scheme, 21.1% were currently enrolled in any prepayment scheme for health as of the time of the study. Of these, the majority, 70% were enrollees under the NHIS. Generally, respondents were positively disposed towards the NHIS. The majority preferred it to the OOP system as 87.8% were of the opinion that a prepayment scheme as it is available on the NHIS was better. They were also of the opinion that it would minimize financial hardship, 91.3% and would enhance access to good quality healthcare, 90.7 % among others (Table 4). Over two-thirds, 72.1% of the respondents expressed a willingness to participate in the scheme, while 61.0% were skeptical of the scheme. Of this group, expressed concerns centred on unstable income, 33.8%, mistrust with fund management in the scheme, 24.3% and conflicts with religious beliefs, 22.8% among others. Inability to differentiate between the contribution mechanism in health insurance and pre-existing savings and loans arrangement was also cited, 3.8%. Chi square test revealed marital status and educational status as the only significant factors associated with awareness about NHIS. Market women who were single were more likely not to be aware of NHIS (χ² = 14.8, p < 0.001). Market women who had tertiary education were more likely to be aware of NHIS (χ² = 85.3, p <0.001). Only educational status was independently associated with awareness of NHIS in a multivariate analysis. Market women who had post-primary education were ten times more likely to be aware of NHIS than those who had primary or no formal education (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 10.33; 95% CI = 4.12-25.93) (Table 5).

 

 

The response rate in this study was good. The educational status of the study participants was much better than was reported in the most recent National Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) for Nigeria. However, we recognized the effect of conducting the study in an urban setting with a much higher concentration of better educated people than would have been the case in a rural area. Only marital status and education were significantly associated with being aware of the availability of the NHIS and only education was an independent predictor of awareness. Although age showed a trend at bivariate analysis with the young and the old being less likely to be aware of NHIS, it was not statistically significant and would have been a contrasting finding with previously documented findings. Kirigia et al, (2005) in a study conducted among South African women to determine the ownership of health insurance reported that older people were more likely to buy health insurance because of the tendency to demand health care services as the ageing process sets in [17]. The effect of age on awareness of NHIS may be confounded by education. Exploration of our data showed that older people were significantly less educated and hence after controlling for education, age was no longer associated with awareness of NHIS. Similarly, market women who were married were significantly more educated in our data and after controlling for the effect of education, marital status was also not an independent predictor.

Thus, education appeared to be the single most important consideration responsible for variations in awareness of the NHIS. The reason for those who had higher educational status to be favourably disposed to participating in a health insurance scheme is not unlikely to be associated with the capacity to better comprehend beneficial social policies. In this study, the awareness of health insurance was low. However, among those who were aware of it, a higher education attainment predicted awareness of a health insurance scheme. Educational status may be a factor responsible for the lower awareness in the highest age group. The proportion of those who were aware of the scheme was better among 30 to 49 year-olds than it was among those who were at the extremes of ages. A combined factor of education and marriage could explain this observation as substantiated by previous studies [15, 17]. Because of its multi-pronged benefits, the more educated the people, the more likely they are to have health insurance cover [18, 32]. However, for this to happen, the people must be knowledgeable about the scheme. Foremost in this direction is awareness creation strategies using the most widely available media platforms such as radio and television. Recent successful Ebola disease control in Nigeria and in some other West African countries was partly attributed to effective information dissemination strategies to the general populace [33-35].

Yet, studies have shown that there is currently a low level of awareness of health insurance in developing countries especially among the informal sector of the population [2, 11, 14, 36]. Findings in this study were comparable. Empowerment of the women folk may be one of the most needed strategies to ensure successful health insurance schemes in developing countries. Factors that predispose women to have access to quality health care services for themselves and their wards are most prevalent in SSA [37, 38]. This might enhance the needed motivation for them to serve as policy brokers [20] between state and non-state actors, which oftentimes tends to have conflicting political and economic interests [39-41]. This is more important in the current approach by the Government of Nigeria to implement the State Supported Health Insurance Schemes through the sub-national governments (SSHIS) [21]. Innovative strategies as were used to explain the basic mechanisms of a prepayment scheme to the study participants in this work could be employed. In this study, a few of the women were enrollees under the NHIS. These few got enrolled on the platform of their spouses who were principal enrollees in the formal sector workforce, and who were eligible as stated in the NHIS guideline, to enroll a spouse and four children under the age of 18 years. Expansion of health insurance schemes will enable a shift from the predominant OOP method as shown in this study and previous others [36, 42], and along the continuum towards a much desirable prepayment method for healthcare. This will minimize the predominant poverty predisposing coping strategies such as borrowing to pay for healthcare expenses [43]. The aftermath of borrowing to pay for healthcare expenses could be burdensome but can be minimized greatly through health insurance schemes [44-46]. There is evidence that health insurance could succeed in Nigeria shown by the potential beneficiaries' interests and efforts by stakeholders to implement and expand it. However, interest shown by the people may not necessarily translate into enrolment in the scheme unless expressed areas of concerns are addressed. Conflicts between religious beliefs and the concept of prepayment method for health, lack of trust in government social policies as well as transparency of fund management are some of the issues cited in previous studies that need to be addressed [4,11].

Similar views were expressed in this study. Another salient issue that came up was the inability of the women to differentiate between premium contributions in a health insurance scheme and the traditional microfinance scheme called Esusu among the Yoruba's in the southwest of Nigeria. Variants of it are also practiced in different parts of Nigeria as well as in other developing countries of Africa and in the Caribbean [47, 48]. Bascom (1952) aptly described it as 'a fund to which a group of individuals make fixed contributions of money at fixed intervals; the total amount contributed by the entire group is assigned to each of the members in rotation' [5]. Although, it is found among small groups of individuals, it is much more common among small scale business owners as a source of business financing and re-financing institutions. As contributions in health insurance are not assigned to contributing members in physical cash as it is the practice in esusu, efforts must be made on the part of the stakeholders to make people understand this important difference. Although the socio-economic status of women in this study was not ascertained, studies have shown a correlation between socio-economic status and participation in a health insurance scheme, and that people of higher socio-economic status were more likely to be in a scheme than were those of lower status [16, 17]. Because women are more likely to be at a disadvantage in income generating activities especially in Nigeria and other developing countries [49], it would be beneficial if the government implemented supportive policies to improve the income generating capacity of women in their businesses as it could translate from a willingness to participate, to an ability to participate in a health insurance scheme [17].

 

 

As stakeholders are making efforts to design and implement health insurance schemes that will incorporate the different strata of the socio-economic groups, there still seems to be no consensus on the best way forward because of the many challenges peculiar to the informal sector group. Stakeholders should not underestimate the support and valuable contributions of communities in the design, implementation and sustainability of health insurance schemes [9, 23]. Successful insurance schemes from many parts of the world especially in Asia and some of the SSA countries have shown the importance of the active involvement of the potential beneficiaries; the government may take the lead role, however, the sustainability of a health insurance policy will depend on the people, accepting and participating in it [9,10,23,32]. Awareness of the NHIS among market women was sub-optimal, awareness creation using innovative concepts to enable the people to comprehend the concept and dispel superstitious beliefs associated with prepayment schemes may aid acceptance. Efforts to promote education may improve awareness of the NHIS, and as such, women's education should be considered a priority and promoted as educated women possess the potential to accept and drive beneficial social policies [6,18,32]. The study findings would have been more robust if the socio-economic status of the women had been determined. However, there was no data collected on this. We accept this as a limitation.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

David Adewole was responsible for the design of the study and the draft of the manuscript. He also designed the 4-page innovative Model used in the study. Saidat Akanbi was responsible for the data collection and performed the statistical analyses. Kayode Osungbade critically commented on the manuscript. Segun Bello answered the reviewers comments especially the statistical details. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 

 

We are grateful to the Aleshinloye Market women for taking time out to be part of this study. Likewise, the selfless sacrifice of the research assistants who helped in the data collection is sincerely appreciated.

 

 

Table 1: socio-demographic Characteristics of Participant's

Table 2: pattern of payment for health care and associated factors and awareness of health insurance

Table 3: respondents’ attitude towards health insurance

Table 4: association between socio-demographic factors and awareness of the NHIS

Table 5: predictors of awareness of the NHIS

Figure 1: understanding the concept of health insurance; an innovative social marketing tool

 

 

1. Mills A, Ataguba JE, Akazili J, Borghi J, Garshong B, Makawia S, et al. Equity in financing and use of health care in Ghana, South Africa, and Tanzania: implications for paths to universal coverage. Lancet. 2012 Jul; 380(9837):126-33. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Adewole DA, Adebayo AM, Udeh EI, Shaahu VN, Dairo MD. Payment for Health Care and Perception of the National Health Insurance Scheme in a Rural Southwest Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Sep; 93(3):648-54. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Donfouet HPP, Makaudze E, Mahieu P-A, Malin E. The determinants of the willingness-to-pay for community-based prepayment scheme in rural Cameroon. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2011 Sep; 11(3):209-20. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Jütting J. Health insurance for the poor?: Determinants of participation in community-based health insurance schemes in rural Senegal. OECD. 2003 ; Accessed 15 Jun 2016.
5. Bascom WR. The Esusu: A credit institution of the Yoruba. J R Anthropol Inst. 1952 Jan;82(1):63-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Kimani JK, Ettarh R, Kyobutungi C, Mberu B, Muindi K. Determinants for participation in a public health insurance program among residents of urban slums in Nairobi, Kenya: results from a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:66. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Damme WV, Leemput LV, Hardeman W, Meessen B. Out?of?pocket health expenditure and debt in poor households: evidence from Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2004 Feb;9(2):273-80. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Bärnighausen T1, Liu Y, Zhang X, Sauerborn R. Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):114-123. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Arin D, Hongoro C.Scaling up national health insurance in Nigeria: learning from case studies of India, Colombia, and Thailand. Washington, DC: Futures Group, Health Policy Project; 2013. Accessed 12 May 2016 .
10. Carapinha JL, Ross-Degnan D, Desta AT, Wagner AK. Health insurance systems in five Sub-Saharan African countries: medicine benefits and data for decision making. Health Policy. 2011 Mar; 99(3):193-202. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Chuma J, Mulupi S, McIntyre D. Providing financial protection and funding health service benefits for the informal sector: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. RESYST Working Paper 2. 2013;. Accessed 20 Dec 2015
12. Carrin G. Social health insurance in developing countries: a continuing challenge. Int Soc Secur Rev. 2002 Jan;55(2):57-69. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and Employees? Access to Healthcare Services in Cross River State, Nigeria. Glob J Hum Soc Sci. 2010 Aug;10:9-16. Google Scholar


14. Nyagero J, Gakure R, Keraka M. Health insurance education strategies for increasing the insured among older population a quasi experimental study in rural Kenya. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;12:9. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Bhat R, Jain N.Factors affecting the demand for health insurance in a micro insurance scheme. 2006. Accessed 25 May 2015
16. Xu K, James C, Carrin G, Muchiri S. An empirical model of access to health care, health care expenditure and impoverishment in Kenya: learning from past reforms and lessons for the future. Geneva: WHO, Department of Health Systems Financing, Health Financing Policy, Discussion paper. 2006. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Kirigia JM, Sambo LG, Nganda B, Mwabu GM, Chatora R, Mwase T. Determinants of health insurance ownership among South African women. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb; 5(1):17. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Nag M. Impact of social and economic development on mortality: Comparative study of Kerala and West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly. 1983 May;877-900. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. WHO. Closing the gap: policy into practice on social determinants of health. discussion paper. 2011. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. Making health policy. 2nd ed 2012. Berkshire; McGraw-Hill Education. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. National Council on Health.Memorandum of the Honourable Minister of Health on the implementation of the State Supported Health Insurance Schemes. 2015. Accessed 28 Nov 2015
22. Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH), Nigeria. Strategic Review of Nigeria's National Health Insurance Scheme. Abuja Nigeria. 2014. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. McFarlane GA, Sammon AM. A prepaid healthcare scheme in rural Africa. Trop Doct. 2000 Jul; 30(3):151-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health. Soc Sci Med. 2000 May; 50(10):1385-401. PubMed | Google Scholar


25. World Bank.Health Indicators: The World Bank. 2015. Accessed 16 Nov 2015.
26. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997 May; 349(9061):1269-76. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. National Population Commission, Nigeria. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. 2013. Accessed 21 Dec 2015. PubMed | Google Scholar


28. Oyo State Government.Our History. 2015. Accessed 20 Dec 2015. PubMed | Google Scholar


29. Oyo State Ministry of Health. Department of Planning Research and Statistics, Local Government Areas Profile. 2016.Accessed 20 Dec 2016. PubMed | Google Scholar


30. Bamidele J, Adebimpe W. Awareness, Attitude and Willingness of Artisans in Osun State Southwestern Nigeria to Participate in Community Based Health Insurance. Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care. 2013;24(1-2):1-10. PubMed | Google Scholar


31. Mathauer I, Schmidt JO, Wenyaa M. Extending social health insurance to the informal sector in Kenya: An assessment of factors affecting demand. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2008 Jan-Mar; 23(1):51-68. PubMed | Google Scholar


32. Abel-Smith B, Campling J. An Introduction to Health: Policy, Planning, and Financing. Longman. 1994. PubMed | Google Scholar


33. Bellizzi S. The current Ebola outbreak: old and new contexts. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 Nov; 8(11):1378-80. PubMed | Google Scholar


34. Elemuwa C, Kutalek R, Ali M, Mworozi E, Kochhar S, Rath B et al. Global lessons from Nigeria's ebolavirus control strategy. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015; 14(11):1397-400. PubMed | Google Scholar


35. Frieden TR, Damon IK. Ebola in West Africa-CDC's Role in Epidemic Detection, Control, and Prevention. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Nov; 21(11):1897-905. PubMed | Google Scholar


36. Brisibe S, Ordinioha B, Gbeneolol PK. Knowledge, attitude, and infection control practices of two tertiary hospitals in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):691-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


37. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug;369(5):448-57. PubMed | Google Scholar


38. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec; 380(9859):2197-223. PubMed | Google Scholar


39. Immergut EM. Institutions, veto points, and policy results: a comparative analysis of health care. J Public Policy. 1990 Oct;10 (04):391-416. PubMed | Google Scholar


40. Steinmo S, Watts J. It's the institutions, stupid! Why comprehensive national health insurance always fails in America. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Summer; 20(2):329-72. PubMed | Google Scholar


41. Adewole DA. The impact of political institution and structure on health policy making and implementation: Nigeria as a case study. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2015 Mar; 44(1):101-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


42. Olugbenga-Bello A, Adebimpe W. Knowledge and attitude of civil servants in Osun state, Southwestern Nigeria towards the national health insurance. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec; 13(4):421-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


43. Nahar S, Costello A. The hidden cost of ‘free’maternity care in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 1998 Dec; 13(4):417-22. PubMed | Google Scholar


44. Adhikari SR, Maskay NM, Sharma BP. Paying for hospital-based care of Kala-azar in Nepal: assessing catastrophic, impoverishment and economic consequences. Health Policy Plan.2009 March;24(2):129-39. PubMed | Google Scholar


45. McIntyre D, Garshong B, Mtei G, Meheus F, Thiede M, Akazili J et al. Beyond fragmentation and towards universal coverage: insights from Ghana, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov; 86(11):871-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


46. McIntyre D, Garshong B, Mtei G, Meheus F, Thiede M, Akazili J et al. Beyond fragmentation and towards universal coverage: insights from Ghana, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov; 86(11):871-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


47. Herskovits MJ. Trinidad village. Alfred A. Knopf; 1947. PubMed | Google Scholar


48. Nadel SF, Byzantium AB. The Kingdom of Nupe in Nigeria. International Institute of African Languages and Cultures. 1942;2:74-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


49. Malik, K. Human Development Report 2013: the Rise of the South. Human Progress in a Diverse World. 2013. PubMed | Google Scholar