Sclerosing mesenteritis: a benign cause of mesenteric mass lesions

Sclerosing mesenteritis: a benign cause of mesenteric mass lesions

Diogo Carrola Gomes^1,&, Luísa Quaresma¹

 

¹Surgery Service, Hospital Center Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Diogo Carrola Gomes, Surgery Service, Hospital Center Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal

 

 

 

 

Sclerosing mesenteritis is a rare disease, part of a spectrum of idiopathic primary inflammatory and fibrotic processes that affect the mesentery [1]. It is often discovered incidentally, with a prevalence of 0.6% reported in the literature [2]. Clinical manifestations are varied and mostly unspecific, depending on the mass effect exerted by the lesions on the viscera and vessels. The most common complaint is abdominal pain, followed by abdominal distention, diarrhea and weight loss. Physical examination reveals a deep, poorly-defined abdominal mass in only about 50% of the patients [3]. It is therefore essential to maintain a high degree of suspicion for the differential diagnosis and ruling out malignancy. Diagnosis is attained from a combination of imaging and histopathologic findings. Dual-phase CT is the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting this disease. Two findings, "fat ring sign" and "tumor pseudocapsule" are considered specific for sclerosing mesenteritis [2, 3]. However, due to the broad differential diagnosis of mesenteric mass lesions, pathologic confirmation should be obtained in all suspected cases of sclerosing mesenteritis. We present this case report with the goal of raising awareness for this rare disease in patients with abdominal pain and mesenteric lesions.

 

 

A 54-year-old caucasian male with unremarkable medical history presented with worsening of a several-year history of lower-quadrant abdominal pain and nausea. There were no abnormal findings on his physical examination and laboratory workup. An abdominal CT revealed the presence of a soft tissue mass located in the root of the mesentery, 4.7x4.1x5cm, heterogenous with some calcifications within (Figure 1), with thickening of the surrounding fatty tissue, vascular encasement without infiltration of the vessels and lymphadenopathy (Figure 2). The lesion was further characterized by MRI as slightly hyperintense in T2 and hypointense in T1 with peripheral late phase contrast enhancement and "tumor pseudocapsule" (Figure 3). The patient was admitted for a surgical biopsy. During the surgery, we found a nodular thickening of the ileal mesentery, with apparent inflammation and retraction of the surrounding tissue. No other lesions were apparent. Since the size and location precluded a complete resection of the mass, several biopsies were performed and the fragments were sent for histopathologic review. The biopsy revealed a thickening of the connective tissue with fibrotic areas and lymphoplasmocytary infiltration rich in IgG4-positive plasmocytes. These findings were consistent with sclerosing mesenteritis. Serum IgG4 levels taken post-operatively were within the normal range. The patient was started on Prednisone (50mg a day) and quickly became asymptomatic. He was tapered off steroids after 3 months. Follow-up CTs at 6 and 12 months documented stability of the mesenteric mass (Figure 4).

 

 

The first case of sclerosing mesenteritis was reported by Jura in 1924 as "retractile mesenteritis" [4]. Since then, several other terms have been used to describe this entity, including mesenteric panniculitis, mesenteric lipodystrophy or mesenteric sclerosis. Emory et al [1] proposed that they represented different stages in the natural history of a single disease: firstly, adipocyte necrosis and infiltration of the mass by lipid-filled macrophages (mesenteric lypodistrophy); secondly, chronic inflammation with lymphocytic infiltrates and lipid necrosis (mesenteric panniculitis); finally, diffuse fibrosis with calcifications and shrinkage of the mesentery (sclerosing mesenteritis). The epidemiology is unknown. Daskalogiannaki et al reported a prevalence of 0.6% on abdominal CT examinations [2], but this number might be an underestimation. Most patients are Caucasian males in the fifth to seventh decades of life [1, 2]. The exact etiology of the inflammation and immune response that leads to this disease is still unknown. Associations with abdominal surgery and trauma, autoimmune processes, ischemic injury, malignancy and infections have been described [1, 3]. Symptoms are often unspecific, depending on the size and location of the mass and its relationship with the bowel, vessels and lymphatics [1, 3]. Akram et al [3] reported in a case series of ninety-two patients that the most common symptoms were abdominal pain (70%), bloating and distention (26%), diarrhea (25%) and weight loss (23%). Small bowel obstruction was present in 24% of patients and 10% were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Physical examination reveals a deep, poorly defined abdominal mass in half of the patients, usually located in the left upper quadrant or epigastrium [1]. Blood tests results are often normal. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level may be elevated and serve as markers of response to medical therapy [1]. The most common CT finding is a soft tissue mass in the small bowel mesentery. Kipfer et al [5] reported three patterns of lesions: type I with diffuse mesenteric thickening; type II with a single discrete mass; type III with multiple mass lesions. Types I and II appear to be the most common [3, 5]. Two CT signs are considered specific for SM: the "fat ring sign" is a preservation of the fatty tissue density around the mesenteric vessels and soft tissue lesions; "tumoral pseudocapsule" refers to the presence of a band of soft tissue surrounding the inflamed mass. Calcifications are present in about 20% of lesions, probably reflecting fat necrosis. Lymphadenopathy is present in 20-40% of patients [6].

 

MRI findings appear to be similar to CT, but a combination of the two has been suggested as having a higher sensitivity in the detection of sclerosing mesenteritis lesions [7]. The differential diagnosis includes all processes that can affect the mesentery. The most common radiological mimics are lymphoma, peritoneal carcinomatosis, carcinoid tumor, amyloidosis and mesenteric fibromatosis and mesenteric edema secondary to hypoalbuminemia, cirrhosis and congestive heart failure. Pathologic confirmation should be obtained in all cases of suspected SM to exclude malignancy. Since fine-needle aspiration specimens frequently lack enough architectural representation, a surgical biopsy is often needed. Some reports have shown that a subset of patients have lesions that stain abundantly for IgG4 and have proposed that this disease could be an IgG4-related sclerosing disorder. In the study by Akram et al [3], a third of the cases had abundant tissue infiltration by IgG4-positive plasma cells, while Chen et al [8] reported the same finding in two thirds of patients with sclerosing mesenteritis. Further studies are needed to assess the sensitivity and sensibility of IgG4 as a diagnostic marker for sclerosing mesenteritis [8]. An association between sclerosing mesenteritis and an elevated serum IgG4 and autoimmune pancreatitis has also been suggested [3]. Our patient, however, exhibited normal levels of serum IgG4 and had no personal or family history of autoimmune disorders. Due to the rarity of this disease, there is no recognized standard therapy regimen. Treatment is empiric and should be individualized. Immunomodulating agents such as glucocorticoids, colchicine, cyclophosphamide and tamoxifen have been reported to be beneficial in patients with non-obstructive symptoms. Complete surgical resection is often impossible due to disease extent and vascular compromise. Surgical bypass may be indicated to alleviate symptoms in case of small bowel obstruction [3, 9]. Although some cases of rapidly fatal disease have been reported largely due to complications of intestinal obstruction [3], sclerosing mesenteritis is believed to be a benign, stable or slowly progressing disease [10].

 

 

Sclerosing mesenteritis is a rare disease, often diagnosed incidentally. Diagnosis is challenging due to the non-specificity of the symptoms and physical findings, requiring that physicians maintain a high level of suspicion for this disease when approaching patients with mesenteric lesions. Imaging with CT is the most sensitive diagnostic tool, but surgical biopsy is required to make the diagnosis and exclude radiological mimics. Treatment is mostly medical, with surgery being indicated in cases of severe obstruction. The disease course is believed to be benign and stable.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

Diogo Carrola Gomes did conception and drafting of the case report while Luísa Quaresma did critical revision of the case report.

 

 

Figure 1: axial CT scan with contrast, demonstrating a heterogenous soft tissue mass with calcifications and lymphadenopathy

Figure 2: coronal CT scan with contrast, demonstrating vascular encasement within the mesenteric lesion

Figure 3: axial T2 contrasted MRI, demonstrating delayed hyperenhancement and "tumor pseudocapsule"

Figure 4: axial CT scan with contrast 12 months after the diagnosis, showing stability of the lesion

 

 

1. Emory TS, Monihan JM, Carr NJ, Sobin LH. Sclerosing Mesenteritis, Mesenteric Panniculitis and Mesenteric Lipodystrophy: a single entity. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 1997; 21(4): 392-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Daskalogiannaki M, Voloudaki A, Prassopoulos P, Magkanas E, Stefanaki K, Apostolaki E et al. CT evaluation of mesenteric panniculitis: prevalence and associated diseases. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2000 Feb; 174(2): 427-31. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Akram S, Pardi D S, Schaffner JA, Smyrk TC. Sclerosing mesenteritis: clinical features, treatment and outcome in ninety-two patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May; 5(5): 589-96. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Jura V Sulla. Mesenterite retratile e sclerosante. Policlinico (Sez Chir). 1924; 31: 575-581. Google Scholar


5. Kipfer RE, Moertel CG, Dahlin DC. Mesenteric lipodystrophy. Annals of internal medicine. 1974 May; 80(5): 582-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Sabate JM, Torrubia S, Maideu J, Franquet T, Monill JM, Perez C. Sclerosing mesenteritis: imaging findings in 17 patients. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1999 Mar; 172(3): 625-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Apostolakis S, Ioannidis A, Tsioga G, Papageorgiou K, Velimezis G. A systematic investigation of sclerosing mesenteritis through CT and MRI. Radiology case reports. 2016 Dec; 11(4): 299-302. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Chen TS, Montgomery EA. Are tumefactive lesions classified as sclerosing mesenteritis a subset of IgG4-related sclerosing disorders. J Clin Pathol. 2008 Oct; 61(10): 1093-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Issa I, Baydoun H. Mesenteric panniculitis: various presentations and treatment regimens. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug 14; 15(30): 3827-30. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Coulier B. Mesenteric panniculitis part 2: prevalence and natural course: mdct prospective study. Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology. 2011; 94(5): 241. PubMed | Google Scholar