Cellulitis in aged persons: a neglected infection in the literature

Cellulitis in aged persons: a neglected infection in the literature

Anis Mzabi¹, Wafa Marrakchi¹, Zeineb Alaya^2,&, Fatma Ben Fredj¹, Amel Rezgui¹, Elyès Bouajina², Chedia Laouani Kechrid¹

 

¹Department of Internal Medicine, Sahloul Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia, ²Department of Rheumatology, Farhat Hached Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Zeineb Alaya, Department of Rheumatology, Farhat Hached Hospital, Faculty of medicine of Sousse, Ibn el Jazzar Street, 4000 Sousse, Tunisia

 

 

 

 

Cellulitis is a skin and soft tissue infection mostly caused by gram stain positive cocci especially streptococcus pyogenes and staphylococcus aureus [1-5]. Currently, the distribution of cellulitis has changed: the lower limbs are affected in 70 to 80% of cases, and the face is affected in 5 to 20% of cases [2–4]. Aged persons are frequently predisposed to this infection [2]. Cellulitis in this age range is associated with significant morbidity and health care costs [4]. Their characteristics in aged persons are not yet well determined. This infection in this age range is not well described in literature. The aims of our study are: to analyse the clinical forms of cellulitis in aged persons; To determine the microbial features of this infection; To evaluate the antibiotic therapy; To plan for optimal management.

 

 

This retrospective study was conducted at the Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Department in Sahloul Hospital in Sousse in Tunisia over a period of 18 years (1999-2016). It was based on the medical records of patients hospitalized for cellulitis. The study population was made up of all the patients whose age was superior to 65 years old, admitted into hospital for cellulitis of the legs, the arms or the face. The parameters of interest in the study were: epidemiological, clinical, microbial and therapeutic aspects. Data were recorded and analyzed statistically using the software SPSS evaluating free version.

 

 

Epidemiological characteristics of cellulitis

 

One hundred fifty eight patients comprising 94 men (59.5 %) and 64 women (40.5 %) (M/F sex ratio: 0.68) with a mean age of 73 years old (range: 65 to 94 years old) were enrolled. Among them, we noted diabetes mellitus in 81 cases (50.6%), smoking in 51 cases (32.3%), obesity in 52 cases (33%), heart failure in 25 cases (15.8%), recurrent cellulitis in 14 cases (8.8%) and alcoholism in two cases (1.2%). Thirteen patients (8.2%) received corticosteroids and four patients (2.5%) received anti-inflammatory treatment.

 

Clinical presentation

 

All patients had local signs of inflammation: erythema associated with pain and swelling. The infection was located in the lower limbs in 155 cases (98%), in the face in two cases (1.3%) and in the upper limb in one case (0.7%). Fever was noted in 59 cases (37%) with a mean temperature 38.9° (range: 38°-40.3°). Satellite lymph node was found in ten patients (6.3%). Twenty one patients (13.3%) presented with severe cellulitis and one presented with necrotizing fasciitis (Figure 1). Inflammatory syndrome was found in 143 cases (90%) the mean values of white blood cells, sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were respectively 13 220 elements/mm³ 92 mm and 140 mg/l. Blood culture was done in 28 patients and among them only one blood culture was positive and it isolated streptococcus B. Bacteriological superficial samples from the primary lesion were positive in 23 cases (14.5%) (Figure 2). Risk factors were toe web intertrigo in 53 cases (46%), a wound in 28 cases (25%) and vascular disease in 11 cases (10%) (Table 1).

 

Evolution Favorable evolution was noted in 144 patients (91.1%). Complicated cases were: diabetic ketoacidosis in three patients (1.8%), necrotizing fasciitis in eight cases (5%), skin abscess and phlebitis in six cases (3.8%) each one. Recurrent cellulitis was retained in 52 cases (33%). It was the second episode in 31 cases (20%), the third episode in 12 cases (7.6%) and more than three episodes in eight cases (5.4%).

 

Cellulitis treatment

 

Antibitic therapy

 

All patients received intra veinous antibiotic therapy. Different protocols were: cefazolin in 77 cases (48%), Penicillin G associated with Penicillin M in 45 cases (28%), amoxicillin in 20 cases (12.6%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid associated with fluorquinolone in 11 cases (7%) and Penicillin G in five cases (3%). Antibiotic oral relay was indicated in 52 cases: pristinamycin (31 cases), amoxicillin (10 cases), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (7 cases) and erythromycin (4 cases). Forty four patients (27.8%) received prophylactic antibiotics. Among them, 43 patients (97.7%) received Benzathine Benzylpenicillin and one patient received erythromycin. The treatment of intertrigo was recommended in all patients having this pathology. Surgical treatment was indicated in 14 cases (8.8%): seven patients (50%) underwent excision of necrotic tissue, four patients (28.5%) underwent flattening of abscess, two patients (14.2%) underwent amputation and one patient (7.1%) underwent coetaneous graft.

 

 

Our analysis had been particularly interested with aged persons. It is explicated by the fact that this age range in our population is currently important. Few published studies had evaluated this infection in aged persons [1]. The soft tissue and skin infections are also frequent [1,2]. They are a major problem of health care. Uncomplicated cellulitis are common infections and a frequent cause of hospital admission with considerable morbidity , costs and absenteeism [2,6,7] .The cellulitis of the lower leg is the most frequent [1]. It tends to recur in a substantial proportion of patients following an initial episode. Risk factors are well identified. The most important are tinea pedis or other toe web maceration or skin breaks, veinous oedema or lymphoedema, obesity and diabetes [2]. The other localisations are not frequent but are in the most cases more serious and hospitalization was recommended [1]. Aged persons are indeed concerned with cellulitis. They are fragile and their co-morbidities led to get the situation worse. They have multiple coexisting diseases such as diabetes, cardiac failure, vascular diseases and severe obesity which are risk factors for mortality from cellulitis [1]. In our study, the majority of patients had risk factors for severe cellulitis: diabetes in 50% of cases and obesity in 32.3%. Clinical presentation was typical with oedema, erythema and swelling [1]. However, all patients in our study had all criteria for hospitalization. They needed intra venous antibiotics in all cases. The failure of oral antibiotics is due to malabsoption described in aged patients. It has been suggested that aged patients have more severe cellulitis [4]. The risk of necrotizing fasciitis is estimated to be 13.3% according to our analysis. Thus, all clinical presentation should benefit from close monitoring in aged persons.

In our study, we had cases of decompensation of chronic diseases and local vascular complications like phlebitis. These results suggest that the decrease in activity due to the infection and the intra venous treatment could cause local vascular complications. Therefore, these data suggest that a simple cellulitis could increase the duration of hospitalization and the costs. The antibiotics were necessary in the management of cellulitis in aged persons [7]. Penicillin G and M, first generation cephalosporin had well results in this age range [7,8]. However, we should pay attention to kidney, heart and drug-drug interactions. Polymedication, renal problems and heart failure may lead to renal failure. Sodium overload caused by penicillin G could generate heart failure or renal failure [9]. Aged patients take frequently anti-vitamin K and allopurinol. Drug drug interaction between antibiotics and these treatments could be a cause of death. Recurrent cellulitis was noted in 33% of cases [3,5,8]. The age generates venous insufficiency, lymphoedema and fungal local infections [5,6]. These factors increase the risk of recurrence [8-10]. We should consider prophylactic treatment in all patients to prevent recurrence, hospitalization and to decrease morbid-mortality and costs [9]. However, in most cases, having an intramuscular treatment every two weeks could be associated with poor compliance. That is why sequential prophylactic treatment is recommended in aged patients [10]. The strong points of our study were that it included only aged patients. This infection in this age range is not well described in literature. It insists on complications, recurrence and costs. This should encourage authority to promote home care and to limit intra venous treatment in this age’s category. All physicians should consider recurrence and prescribe prophylaxis [8-10]. The limits of our study were the absence of comparison between young people and aged people and the small number of cellulitis of the face and the upper limb. The cost of cellulitis was not calculated.

 

 

To limit the cost of cellulitis and to decrease morbi-mortality in aged patients having cellulitis, health care officials must encourage aged persons to take care of their skin, to treat soft tissue infections and to prevent recurrence. Medical stuff must limit intra venous treatment and promote home care.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

All authors of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Department contributes in conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version to be published.

 

 

Table 1: risk factors for cellulitis

Figure 1: necrotizing fasciitis

Figure 2: microbial aspects of cellulitis

 

 

1. Begon E. Erysipèles,dermohypodermites bactériennes et fasciites nécrosantes. EMC Dermatol. 2013;8(2):1-10. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Amal S, Houass S, Laissaoui K, Moufid K, Trabelsi M. Érysipèle: profil épidémiologique, clinique et évolutif dans la région de Marrakech (100 observations). Médecine Mal Infect. 2004 Apr;34(4):171-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Chlebicki MP, Oh CC. Recurrent Cellulitis: Risk Factors, Etiology, Pathogenesis and Treatment. Curr Infect Dis Rep [Internet]. 2014 Sep [cited 2016 Sep 29];16(9). PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Kourouma Sarah KY. Comparative Study of Necrotizing Bacterial Dermohypodermitis or Necrotizing Fasciitis Depending on the HIV Serostatus in Abidjan (Cote d Ivoire). J Clin Exp Dermatol Res [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Sep 29];5(5). PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Leclerc S, Teixeira A, Mahé E, Descamps V, Crickx B, Chosidow O. Recurrent Erysipelas: 47 Cases. Dermatology. 2006 Dec 22;214(1):52-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Cox NH. Oedema as a risk factor for multiple episodes of cellulitis/erysipelas of the lower leg: a series with community follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Nov;155(5):947-50. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Zvonik M, Foldi E, Felmerer G. The effects of reduction operation with genital lymphedema on the frequency of erysipelas and the quality of life. Lymphology. 2011;44(3):121-130. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Grasland A, Groza M, Affo L, Mahé I. Aspects récidivants d’érysipèle. Presse Médicale. 2010 Jul;39(7-8):853-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Chakroun M, Ben Romdhane F, Battikh R, Souki A, Bouzouaia N. dans Interêt de la benzathine pénicilline dans la prévention des récidives d’érysipèle. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses. 1994;894-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Hachfi W, Ben Slimene D, Hattab Z, Bellazreg F, Souissi J, Kaabia N et al. E-10: Antibioprophylaxie séquentielle dans la prévention secondaire de l’érysipèle des membres inférieurs. Médecine Mal Infect. 2014 Jun;44(6):38. PubMed | Google Scholar