Molecular characterisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated at a large referral hospital in Zambia

Molecular characterisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated at a large referral hospital in Zambia

Mulemba Tillika Samutela^1,&, Annie Kalonda¹, James Mwansa², Chileshe Lukwesa-Musyani², John Mwaba², Enoch Mulowa Mumbula³, Darlington Mwenya³, Edgar Simulundu⁴, Geoffrey Kwenda¹

 

¹Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Zambia,P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, ²Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, P/Bag RW X1 Lusaka, Zambia, ³Department of Pathology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia, ⁴Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Mulemba Tillika Samutela, Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Zambia,P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia

 

 

 

 

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been recognised as one of the major causes of nosocomial or hospital acquired infections worldwide [1]. Methicillin resistance is due to the acquisition of genes encoding a unique penicillin-binding protein namely PBP2a. PBP2a has decreased affinity for β-lactams and catalyses effective cell wall synthesis even in the presence of penicillins, cephalosporins and carbapenems [2-4]. PBP2a is encoded by the mec A gene which is carried on a mobile element known as the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) [3-6]. Several SCCmec subtypes and their variants have been characterised [4-6]. Currently there are twelve subtypes (i.e. SCCmec type I-XII) that have been identified [7, 8]. Since the discovery of MRSA in the United Kingdom (UK) in the early 1960s [9], its prevalence has steadily increased in the world with geographical variations [4, 10, 11]. The burden of MRSA infections has further been heightened by the emergence of community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) and livestock-acquired MRSA (LA-MRSA) [12, 13]. While the clonal relatedness of MRSA isolates from developed countries has been extensively analysed, there is sparse information from developing countries [14]. Staphylococcus aureus, including MRSA have several virulence factors that contribute to the pathogenicity of the organism. One such virulence factor is the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin encoded by two genes, lukF-PV and lukS-PV, carried on lysogenic bacteriophages. PVL is associated with CA-MRSA and is linked to skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). However, pvl genes have also been detected in Health-care associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) isolates [15].

 

Generally, the prevalence rates of MRSA from most African countries have been shown to range from 25% to 50% [16]. Studies conducted in South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, and Cameroon found the prevalence ranging from 21 to 33.3% [17, 18]. However, other studies conducted in Tunisia, Malta, and Algeria found the prevalence was below 10% [18]. A more recent study from Kenya found the MRSA prevalence rate of 84.1% among SSTIs which was higher than previous findings in the region [19]. These observations seem to suggest a trend of increasing MRSA cases over the years and hence the need for continued monitoring and control of MRSA infections in Africa. In Zambia, a similar pattern of increasing number of MRSA cases over the years has been observed. For example, at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH), a tertiary referral and teaching hospital in Lusaka, the prevalence of MRSA among Staphylococcus aureusisolates was found to be 23% and 30% in 2003 and 2010, respectively [20, 21]. Moreover, the most recent studies conducted at UTH in 2012 and 2014 estimated the prevalence of MRSA at 37% and 43% respectively [22, 23]. However, no systematic studies have been carried out to understand the extent of the problem of MRSA in Zambia. In a previous study, we determined that the MRSA strains isolated at UTH between 2009 and 2012 were highly multi-drug resistant [23]. However, the molecular characteristics of the MRSA strains were unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the molecular characteristics of MRSA isolated at UTH using SCCmec typing, spa typing and detection of pvl genes.

 

 

Study design and setting: the study was a laboratory-based cross-sectional study conducted at UTH in the Bacteriology Laboratory in the Department of Pathology and Microbiology.

 

Bacterial isolates: a total of 32 MRSA isolates collected from June, 2009 to December, 2012 at UTH, the largest referral hospital and the centre for all microbiology diagnostic work in Zambia were included in the study. These isolates were obtained from pus and blood samples. The clinical isolates were first plated onto Columbia blood agar plates (Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK) and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Staphylococcus aureus isolates were identified by standard microbiological methods including colony morphology, Gram stain, catalase reaction, coagulase activity and DNAse test as previously described [23]. Resistance to methicillin was detected using oxacillin and cefoxitin discs using the Kirby- Bauer disc diffusion method as previously described [23].

 

DNA extraction : the NucliSENS easyMAG nucleic acid extraction protocol (bioMérieux Inc, Durham, NC, USA), was used to extract the genomic DNA. Briefly, the bacterial isolates were cultured overnight on blood agar at 37°C. Using a loop, 5 bacterial colonies of a pure culture were emulsified in 700µl of NucliSENS easyMAG lysis buffer in an eppendorf tube and left to stand for 30 minutes to one hour at room temperature for maximum off-board lysis. Then 400µl of the bacterial suspension was transferred to the easyMAG disposable sample strip wells and 100µl of undiluted silica were added to the sample-lysis buffer mix. The sample strips were then loaded onto the easyMAG machine 3.2 v3 system (bioMérieux Inc, Durham, NC, USA) and the NucliSENS easyMag off-board lysis procedure was followed according to the manufacturer's instruction to extract the DNA. Staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec typing To determine the SCCmec structural variants of each MRSA isolate, a previously described protocol for a SCCmec multiplex PCR [24, 25] was used. Plasmid DNA containing the SCCmec type I-IV was used as controls.

 

Spa typing: Spa typing was done following a previously described protocol [26]. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was used as the control strain.

 

DNA sequencing: sequencing of the protein A gene (spa) was performed at the Inqaba Biotechnical Industries Sequencing Facility (Pretoria, South Africa) using BigDye terminator method with an ABI PRISM 3730XL DNA analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The DNA sequence reads were edited using the Ridom TraceEdit Software (Ridom Bioinformatics GmbH, Würzburg, Germany).

 

Spa type determination and phylogenetic analysis : the spa types were determined using the software package Bionumerics Spa typing plugin version 7.1 (Bionumerics, Belgium) after in putting the chromatograph sequence files of the isolates. The phylogenetic and minimum spanning trees were also generated using the same software.

 

PVL genes detection: to detect the pvl genes, a previously described protocol was followed [27]. A previously known pvl gene positive Staphylococcus aureus isolate was used as a control strain.

 

 

Staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec types: the mec A gene was detected in all the 32 isolates. Three SCCmec types were identified namely SCCmec type IV (65.6%), SCCmec type III (21.9%) and SCCmec type I (3.1%). Nine point four percent of the isolates were untypable.

 

Staphylococcal protein A (spa) types : the MRSA strains were found to be of 5 spa types namely t064 (40.6%), t2104 (31.3%), t355 (3.1%), t1257 (21.9%) and unknown spa type (3.1%) as shown in Table 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the MRSA strains based on the spa types showed that isolate MS09 with spa type t355 was most distantly related when compared with the rest of the strains characterised. Also all the other isolates separated in two major groups. The first group included isolates with spa types t1257 and t064 while the other group included isolates with spa type t2104 and the novel spa type. A minimum spanning tree confirmed these relationships (Figure 1). PVL genes: the PVL genes were detected in 9.4% of the isolates (3/32).

 

 

The present study reports the molecular characteristics of MRSA isolated at the largest referral and teaching hospital in Zambia from 2009 to 2012. Three SCCmec types were found, the most predominant being type IV which is usually associated with CA-MRSA. However, it has been increasingly found in HA-MRSA [28, 29]. Moreover, the HA-MRSA strains with SCCmec type IV are multidrug resistant while CA-MRSA strains are generally more susceptible [28]. The MRSA isolates studied here were multi-drug resistant and the presence of the SCCmec types III and I confirmed this multidrug resistance as previously reported [23]. The findings of our study are similar to those of a study from South Africa in which the second predominant SCCmec type was type III [30]. SCCmec types I and III are normally harboured by HA-MRSA [31-33]. HA-MRSA strains containing SCCmec type III tend to be multi-drug resistant since this SCCmec type is known to harbour plasmids and transposons that encode resistance to tetracycline, cadmium, erythromycin and spectinomycin [6, 34-36]. The 9.4% of isolates detected in this study that were SCCmec non-typable is comparable to the 8% from the South African study [30] but slightly higher when compared to those from a study in Belgium (4%) [37].

 

In determining the spa types, 5 spa types were found and the most prevalent was t064 which was found in 40.6% of the isolates. Spa type t064 has been identified in the USA where it was designated ST-8 ORSA I and was also associated with persons living with AIDS [38, 39]. A study in Nigeria also found spa type t064 as the most predominant spa type in HIV positive Staphylococcus aureus carriers [40]. However, we could not associate our isolates belonging to this spa type with any condition or infection due to lack of patients' data. Spa types t2104 (31.3%) and t1257 (21.9%) were the second and third most common spa types identified in our study, respectively. We could not find other studies documenting spa type t2104 among MRSA isolates despite the relatively high frequency of t2104 in our study. However, according to data available on the spa server, this particular spa type has been reported in association with MRSA in the United States, Sweden and Japan [41]. Notably, spa type t2104 was reported among Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a study to determine the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus among rural Iowans, including individuals with livestock contact [42]. Spa type t1257 has been reported in South Africa and it accounted for about 9.7% of the isolates [43]. Spa type t1257 has been associated with HA-MRSA strains. The only singleton spa type found in this present study was spa type t355. Although this spa type is rarely reported, it was the most prevalent spa type identified among MRSA isolates in a study from Ghana [44]. It has also been documented in Nigeria and Uganda [45, 46].

 

Only one novel spa sequence was determined in our study. It has not been reported previously from any other country and its name could not be determined by the spa sever. Although this novel spa type seems to be closely related to spa type t2104, its repeat sequence contains two repeats r25 end and is shorter than the repeat sequence for t2104. This finding possibly denotes mutations in the S. aureus genome. Spa typing also allows for the grouping of isolates into groups called spa-clonal complex (spa-CC) [47]. When examining the spa types belonging to a specific spa-CC, there is usually a repeat or several repeats that all the spa types have in common [47]. It is generally accepted that MRSA strains are related, i.e. belong to the same spa-CC, if the spa type repeat motif is related [47]. From literature, we could deduce that most of our isolates belong to the spa-CC 064 [38-40, 48]. This is because alignment of the repeat patterns of spa types t064, t1257 and t2104 showed the presence of both motifs 11-19-, (start); followed by motif 05-17-34-; followed by motif 24- 34-22; and finally repeat r25 (end). However, spatype t2104 has relatively fewer repeats since it lacks the motifs 05-17-. In addition the repeat sequence of the novel spa type is also very similar to that of spa type t2104. It is worth noting that spa-CC 064 is associated with HA-MRSA [38, 39, 48].

 

The prevalence of the pvl genes in the present study among MRSA isolates was very low. Data from other studies conducted in Africa have shown that the proportion of PVL-positive MRSA carriage and/or infections ranges from 0.3 to 100% in humans [49]. Studies from Algeria and Tunisia reported higher PVL prevalence while investigations from South Africa reported the lowest prevalence [49]. PVL-positive MRSA is more frequently reported with SSTIs, and community-associated clones. The presence of PVL-positive MRSA could present a significant challenge in disease management and infection control in resource-limited countries such as Zambia. Therefore there is need to conduct more studies on the carriage of pvl genes in Staphylococcus aureus in Zambia. Although the lack of clinical data limited our conclusions on the possible origin/source of MRSA infections as well as with respect to disease severity or treatment outcome, our results intimate on the need for evaluating infection prevention and control procedures at UTH and possibly other health facilities in the country Therefore, further work is warranted to better understand the epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infections in humans in Zambia for institution of effective prevention and control strategies and patient care.

 

 

In conclusion, these data appear to indicate that most of the strains studied may have been hospital acquired and hence the need for close examination of infection prevention and control procedures at UTH. Also, the present study underscores the need for country-wide monitoring of MRSA in both community and hospital settings for infection control.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

MTS and GK conceived and designed the study. MTS performed the experiments. MTS, GK and ES analyzed the data. MTS wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, while the rest of the authors made significant intellectual contributions to the study and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

We would like to thank Dr. Musso Munyeme (The University of Zambia, Department of Disease Control) for critically proof-reading the manuscript. We would also like to thank the University Teaching Hospital, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Lusaka, Zambia, for providing the Staphylococcus aureus isolates for the study. This work was supported by the University of Zambia, Staff Development Office, the School of Medicine and the Southern Africa Consortium for Research Excellence. However, these funding bodies had no part in influencing the design of the study, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data and decision to publish.

 

 

Table 1: distribution of spa types among the MRSA isolates (n=32)

Figure 1: minimum spanning tree showing the relationship of the isolates in relation to the most frequent spa type determined (t064): the different colours represent the spa types namely green for t064, red for t2104, blue for t1257, orange for t355 and sky blue for the unkown spa type

 

 

1. Gould IM, David MZ, Esposito S, Garau J, Lina G, Mazzei T, Peters G. New insights into meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pathogenesis, treatment and resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012; 39(2):96-104. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Chen L, Mediavilla JR, Oliveira DC, Willey BM, de Lencastre H, Kreiswirth BN. Multiplex real-time PCR for rapid Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(11):3692-3706. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. D'Souza N, Rodrigues C, Mehta A. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with emergence of epidemic clones of sequence type (ST) 22 and ST 772 in Mumbai, India. J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48(5):1806-1811. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Moellering RC Jr. MRSA: the first half century. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67(1):4-11. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE.The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol. 2008; 8(6):747-763. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Deurenberg RH, Vink C, Kalenic S, Friedrich AW, Bruggeman CA, Stobberingh EE. The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007; 13(3):222-235. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Wu Z, Li F, Liu D, Xue H, Zhao X. Novel Type XII Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Harboring a New Cassette Chromosome Recombinase, CcrC2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(12):7597-7601. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. (IWG-SCC) IWGotCoSCCE. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53(12):4961-4967. Google Scholar


9. Barber M. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1997; 24(Suppl 1):S74-S79. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Johnson AP. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the European landscape. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 66(Suppl-4):iv43-iv48. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Vindel A, Cuevas O, Cercenado E, Marcos C, Bautista V, Castellares C, Trincado P, Boquete T, Perez-Vazquez M, Marin M et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Spain: molecular epidemiology and utility of different typing methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(6):1620-1627. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Mammina C, Cala C, Plano MR, Bonura C, Vella A, Monastero R, Palma DM. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and MRSA ST398, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(4):730-731. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. van Cleef BA, Monnet DL, Voss A, Krziwanek K, Allerberger F, Struelens M, Zemlickova H, Skov RL, Vuopio-Varkila J, Cuny C et al. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in humans, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17(3):502-505. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Breurec S, Zriouil SB, Fall C, Boisier P, Brisse S, Djibo S, Etienne J, Fonkoua MC, Perrier-Gros-Claude JD, Pouillot R et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineages in five major African towns: emergence and spread of atypical clones. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 17(2):160-165. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Hu Q, Cheng H, Yuan W, Zeng F, Shang W, Tang D, Xue W, Fu J, Zhou R, Zhu J et al. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates are associated with skin and soft tissue infections and colonized mainly by infective PVL-encoding bacteriophages. J Clin Microbiol. 2015; 53(1):67-72. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Falagas ME, Karageorgopoulos DE, Leptidis J, Korbila IP. MRSA in Africa: filling the global map of antimicrobial resistance. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e68024. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Bouchillon SK, Johnson BM, Hoban DJ, Johnson JL, Dowzicky MJ, Wu DH, Visalli MA, Bradford PA. Determining incidence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 38 centres from 17 countries: the PEARLS study 2001-2002. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004; 24(2):119-124. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Kesah C, Ben Redjeb S, Odugbemi TO, Boye CS, Dosso M, Ndinya Achola JO, Koulla-Shiro S, Benbachir M, Rahal K, Borg M. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in eight African hospitals and Malta. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003; 9(2):153-156. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Maina EK, Kiiyukia C, Wamae CN, Waiyaki PG, Kariuki S. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from skin and soft tissue infections in patients in Nairobi, Kenya. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(2):e115-119. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Kapatamoyo B, Andrews B, Bowa K. Association of HIV with breast abscess and altered microbial susceptibility patterns. Med J Zambia. 2010;37(2):58-63. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. Mwenya MD. Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus of wounds patients at the University Teaching Hospital. University of Zambia. 2003. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Mulipilwa MD. Detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus at the University Teaching Hospital. University of Zambia. 2012. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Samutela MT, Mwansa JCL, Kalonda A, Mumbula EM, Kaile T, Marimo C, Korolyova L, Hang'ombe BM, Simulundu E, Musyani CL et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the university teaching hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. Jour of Med Sc & Tech .January 2015; 4(1):19-25. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Milheirico C, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Multiplex PCR strategy for subtyping the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: 'SCCmec IV multiplex'. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007; 60(1):42-48. PubMed | Google Scholar


25. Milheirico C, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(9):3374-3377. PubMed | Google Scholar


26. Shopsin B, Gomez M, Montgomery SO, Smith DH, Waddington M, Dodge DE, Bost DA, Riehman M, Naidich S, Kreiswirth BN. Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37(11):3556-3563. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. Stegger M, Andersen PS, Kearns A, Pichon B, Holmes MA, Edwards G, Laurent F, Teale C, Skov R, Larsen AR. Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecA(LGA251). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18(4):395-400. PubMed | Google Scholar


28. Dhawan B, Rao C, Udo EE, Gadepalli R, Vishnubhatla S, Kapil A. Dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec type IV and SCCmec type V epidemic clones in a tertiary hospital: challenge to infection control. Epidemiol Infect.2015; 143(2):343-353. PubMed | Google Scholar


29. Lim KT, Hanifah YA, Mohd Yusof MY, Ito T, Thong KL. Comparison of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in 2003 and 2008 with an emergence of multidrug resistant ST22: SCCmec IV clone in a tertiary hospital, Malaysia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013; 46(3):224-233. PubMed | Google Scholar


30. Makgotlho PE, Kock MM, Hoosen A, Lekalakala R, Omar S, Dove M, Ehlers MM. Molecular identification and genotyping of MRSA isolates. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2009; 57(2):104-115. PubMed | Google Scholar


31. Afroz S, Kobayashi N, Nagashima S, Alam MM, Hossain AB, Rahman MA, Islam MR, Lutfor AB, Muazzam N, Khan MA et al. Genetic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes in Bangladesh. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008;61(5):393-396. PubMed | Google Scholar


32. Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. the role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Lab Invest.2007; 87(1):3-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


33. Wu D, Wang Q, Yang Y, Geng W, Wang Q, Yu S, Yao K, Yuan L, Shen X. Epidemiology and molecular characteristics of community-associated methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from skin/soft tissue infections in a children's hospital in Beijing, China. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;67(1):1-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


34. Chen JH, Cheng VC, Chan JF, She KK, Yan MK, Yau MC, Kwan GS, Yam WC, Yuen KY. The use of high-resolution melting analysis for rapid spa typing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J Microbiol Methods. 2013; 92(2):99-102. PubMed | Google Scholar


35. Ito T, Katayama Y, Asada K, Mori N, Tsutsumimoto K, Tiensasitorn C, Hiramatsu K.Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(5):1323-1336. PubMed | Google Scholar


36. Ito T, Okuma K, Ma XX, Yuzawa H, Hiramatsu K.Insights on antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from its whole genome: genomic island SCC. Drug Resist Updat.2003;6(1):41-52. PubMed | Google Scholar


37. Denis O, Deplano A, De Beenhouwer H, Hallin M, Huysmans G, Garrino MG, Glupczynski Y, Malaviolle X, Vergison A, Struelens MJ. Polyclonal emergence and importation of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains harbouring Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005; 56(6):1103-1106. PubMed | Google Scholar


38. Gordon RJ, Quagliarello B, Cespedes C, Chung M, de Lencastre H, Vavagiakis P, Miller M, Zeller B, Lowy FD.A molecular epidemiological analysis of 2 Staphylococcus aureus clonal types colonizing and infecting patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 40(7):1028-1036. PubMed | Google Scholar


39. McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, McAllister SK, Tenover FC. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):5113-5120. PubMed | Google Scholar


40. Olalekan AO, Schaumburg F, Nurjadi D, Dike AE, Ojurongbe O, Kolawole DO, Kun JF, Zanger P.Clonal expansion accounts for an excess of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus colonising HIV-positive individuals in Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Antimicrob Agents.2012;40(3):268-272. PubMed | Google Scholar


41. spa types. Google Scholar


42. Wardyn SE, Forshey BM, Smith TC. High prevalence of Panton-Valentine leukocidin among methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus colonization isolates in rural Iowa. Microb Drug Resist. 2012; 18(4):427-433. PubMed | Google Scholar


43. Moodley A, Oosthuysen WF, Duse AG, Marais E. Molecular characterization of clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48(12):4608-4611. PubMed | Google Scholar


44. Egyir B, Guardabassi L, Sorum M, Nielsen SS, Kolekang A, Frimpong E, Addo KK, Newman MJ, Larsen AR. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical Staphylococcus aureus from healthcare institutions in Ghana. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e89716. PubMed | Google Scholar


45. Seni J, Bwanga F, Najjuka CF, Makobore P, Okee M, Mshana SE, Kidenya BR, Joloba ML, Kateete DP. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from patients with surgical site infections at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e66153. PubMed | Google Scholar


46. Shittu AO, Okon K, Adesida S, Oyedara O, Witte W, Strommenger B, Layer F, Nubel U. Antibiotic resistance and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2011; 11(1):92. PubMed | Google Scholar


47. Ruppitsch W, Indra A, Stoger A, Mayer B, Stadlbauer S, Wewalka G, Allerberger F. Classifying spa types in complexes improves interpretation of typing results for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(7):2442-2448. PubMed | Google Scholar


48. Oosthuysen WF. Molecular characterisation of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from South Africa. University of the Witwatersrand. 2007. PubMed | Google Scholar


49. Abdulgader SM, Shittu AO, Nicol MP, Kaba M. Molecular epidemiology of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Africa: a systematic review. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:348. PubMed | Google Scholar