Does gallbladder angle affect gallstone formation?

Does gallbladder angle affect gallstone formation?

Bekir Sanal¹, Mehmet Korkmaz¹, Sezgin Zeren², Fatma Can¹, Ferhan Elmali³, Zulfu Bayhan^2,&

¹Department of Radiology, Dumlupinar University Faculty of Medicine, 43100, Kutahya, Turkey, ²Department of General Surgery, Dumlupinar University Faculty of Medicine, 43100, Kutahya, Turkey, ³Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, 38100, Kayseri, Turkey

^&Corresponding author
Zulfu Bayhan, Department of General Surgery, Dumlupinar University Faculty of Medicine, 43100, Kutahya, Turkey

Introduction    

Gallbladder contraction is induced by cholecystokinin that is secreted principally in the small intestine. Cholecystokinin secretion is mainly stimulated by fatty food that is taken in orally. Gallbladder contraction induced by cholecystokinin secretion is followed by the emptying of the stored bile. Impairment or failure of this mechanism causes gallbladder hypomotility [1, 2]. In addition to many risk factors which primarily cause increased cholesterol saturation in bile such as genetic factors, obesity, sudden weight loss, hyperlipidemia and high calorie diet, gallbladder hypomotility, followed by delayed gallbladder emptying and biliary stasis, plays a significant role in gallstone formation [3-6]. It is known that gallbladder emptying is delayed in the luteal phase of menstruation, pregnancy and perimenopausal period. In addition, the incidence of gallstones is particularly increasing among women receiving hormone replacement therapy with progesterone due to delayed gallbladder emptying [5, 7]. It has been shown that gallbladder residual volume is increased and gallbladder emptying isdecreased in diabetic patients [8]. Furthermore, diseases such as chronic liver disease and beta-thalassemia major and surgeries such as gastrectomy and vagotomy are known to produce a direct effect on contractility of gallbladder, leading to gallstone formation [9]. In addition to the above mentioned conditions affecting the gallbladder motility and leading to gallstone formation, such gallbladder anomalies as left-sided, retrohepatic, suprahepatic, intrahepatic and floating gallbladders and gallbladders with real septa have been reported to increase the incidence of gallstone formation by causing biliary stasis without impairing the gallbladder mobility [10-12]. These gallbladder anomalies are quite rare (0,026 %); however, it is quite common that gallbladder varies in size, shape and axis in healthy people [10]. Gallbladder varies also in ‘angle’, which, to the best of our knowledge, has never been investigated before. On sagittal reformatted computed tomography (CT) images, a majority of gallbladders are positioned somewhere in 90-degree-angle between anterior and inferior points. This angle, which is called gallbladder angle, varies considerably from person to person (Figure 1). It is known that stasis of a fluid in the body due to gravity predisposes the stone disease, as in urinary system [13] and submandibular duct [14]. Given that a healthy person spends a significant part of the day on foot or sitting, it can be assumed that biliary passages slows down due to gravity in a more vertically positioned gallbladder, resulting in partial biliary stasis and predisposition to gallstones. In this respect, the purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of gallbladder angle on gallstone formation by comparing patients with gallstones to control subjects without gallstones both of whom had completely normal gallbladders.

Methods     

A total of 1075 abdominal CT images (Toshiba Alexion Advance, 16 slice, TSX-034A/1C, JAPAN) which were taken by the Radiology Department of our Hospital for any indication between 01.10.2013 – 01.03.2014 were retrospectively examined. Images belonging to patients over the age of 18 were selected for the study. Preliminary diagnoses of the patients were mainly as follows: urinary stone, acute appendicitis, trauma, malignancy, characterization of a lesion detected by ultrasonography, acute pancreatitis and nonspecific abdominal pain. Some of the CT scans were performed without contrast whereas some were performed with IV contrast only and the rest were performed with a combination of IV, oral and rectal contrast. Based on the reformatted images in all three planes, patients with gross abdominal pathologies, particularly acute cholecystitis, edema/inflammation of gallbladder, liver cirrhosis and liver masses and patients with abdominal scars which might represent intraabdominal surgeries were identified and excluded from the study. Later on, gallbladder morphology and axes were examined, and gallbladders extending in parallel to the section plane were identified on the multiplanar reformatted images in the sagittal plane. Gallbladders oriented to the right and left and extending at parasagittal directions, twisted gallbladders, folded gallbladders, contracted and inflamed gallbladders and gallbladders pushed or displaced by the liver or the other neighboring anatomical structures were excluded from the study. The remaining 378 patients were listed. Hospital records of these 378 patients were investigated in an effort to identify those with abdominal ultrasound scans, hemograme and biochemistry reports. As a result, it was found that 210 patients had an ultrasound scan between 01 01 2013 and 30 09 2014. Of these 210 patients, 165 had also blood tests as well as CT scans performed between the above mentioned dates. Patients other than these 165 patients were excluded from the study. Of these 165 patients with CT scans, blood tests and ultrasound scans dated between 01 01 2013 and 30 09 2014, 15 more were excluded from the study (7 with elevated liver function test values, 4 with elevated inflammatory markers and 4 with anemia). Ultrasound scans (Logiq 7, GE 76 Medical System, Milwaukee, WI, USA) of the remaining 150 patients were examined, and it was found that 52 had a pathological gallbladder whereas 98 had a normal gallbladder. Of these 52 patients, 11 had condensed bile, biliary sludge, cholesterol crystals, gallbladder polyps or acute cholecystitis. Of the remaining 41 patients, 40 had gallstones that met the standard criteria and 1 had a history of cholecystectomy due to gallstones. These 41 patients had a normal gallbladder volume, wall thickness and pericholecystic region, and none of them had biliary dilatation. Besides, they had no reported accompanying hepatobiliary pathologies other than diffuse or focal steatosis, simple cysts, typical hemangioma and non-specific calcification in the liver paranchyma. These 41 patients constituted the patient group in this study. On the other hand, 88 patients with a completely normal gallbladder who matched the patient group with regard to age, gender, lipid profile, degree of hepatic steatosis and presence of diabetes constituted the control group. As a result, 129 patients were included in this study. The patients and the control subjects were residing in the same city and were of the same ethnic origin. The personal information of the patients were not shared in this retrospective analysis. Measurements were made on the magnified reformatted CT images in the sagittal plane. Patient table was taken as the reference line. On the clearest longitudinal image of the gallbladder in the sagittal plane, the angle between the line which longitudinally halved the gallbladder from the fundus and the patient table was accepted as the "gallbladder angle" (Figure 1, Figure 2). Some of the patients did not have body mass index (BMI) data in the hospital records. Therefore, subcutaneous fat thickness was measured in 6 points in the transverse CT section passing through the level of umbilicus, namely both paraumbilical regions, corresponding dorsal parasagittal regions and right and left lateral regions, and the average value was calculated. This average value was accepted as subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness, which represented the BMI [15, 16]. Measurements were made in the same medical system (Siso Viewer - V2.9) by consensus between two radiologists with more than 10 years of abdominal CT experience who did not know whether the subjects were in the patient group or the control group. Five patients had radiopaque stones on CT. Data were analyzed in IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 statistical package. Summary statistics were expressed as (n) for number of units, (%) for percentage, (χ±sd) for mean standard deviation and (M(Q1-Q3)) for median 25^th and 75^th percentile values. Whether numeric variables demonstrated a normal distribution or not was determined by Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparison of numeric variables between the two groups was made by means of independent samples t test in variables which demonstrated a normal distribution and by means of Whitney U test in variables which did not demonstrate a normal distribution. Exact method of the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables. Binary logistic regression analysis was used for determination of factors that had an impact on gallstone formation. A p value smaller than 0.05 was considered statically significant.

Results     

129 patients were included in this study, 58(45%) were males and 71(55%) were females. The mean patient age was 53 ± 9 years. The mean gallbladder angle was 51 ± 20 degrees. There was no statistically significant difference between the patients and the control subjects in age, gender, degree of hepatic steatosis, subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness, lipid profile and presence of diabetes (Table 1). The mean gallbladder angle was 49 ± 21 degrees in the group with gallstones and 53 ± 19 degrees in the group without gallstones. The mean gallbladder angle was smaller in the group with gallstones compared to the group without gallstones; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p=0,256). Effects of the variables on gallstone formation were investigated by the binary logistic regression analysis (Table 2). It was found by means of the "Enter" method that the larger the gallbladder angle was 1.015 (1/0.985) times lower the risk of gallstone formation was; however, this value was not statistically significant (p=0.145). In addition, no significant variable was left in the model as a result of backward logistic regression analysis.

Discussion     

The purpose of this study was to find out whether or not a more vertically positioned gallbladder was more prone to biliary stasis and gallstone formation under the influence of gravity. In this respect, "gallbladder angle" between the gallbladder axis and patient vertical axis was investigated, and this angle was found to be smaller in patients with gallstones compared to control subjects without gallstones. In addition, the larger the gallbladder angle was the lower the risk of gallstone formation was. However, these data were not statistically significant. Based on these findings, we considered that more vertically positioned gallbladders might be slightly more prone to gallstones. To best of our knowledge, no such data is available about this issue in the literature so far. Shape, diameter and position of gallbladder fundus and corpus, which stick to the posterior caudal surface of the liver and extend anteriorly and inferiorly between the right and left lobes, may vary considerably from person to person. The known positional differences of gallbladder might be primarily linked to congenital anomalies; might be just variations; or might be secondary to biliary tract malignancies or liver cirrhosis [10]. All the gallbladders included in this study were positioned differently. To the best of our knowledge, clinical significance of the “gallbladder angle” that was described in this study as an anatomical fact has not been investigated in the literature before. Biliary stasis and nucleation of cholesterol crystals occurring as a result of high levels of biliary cholesterol, low levels of bile salts and reduced gallbladder contractility are the main factors affecting gallstone formation [3, 4, 17]. Occurrence of biliary stasis, followed by gallstone formation, is easier in gallbladders with a larger fasting and post-prandial volume [18].

Indeed, dependent fluids inside the body with no flow or insufficient flow are always prone to condensation and sludge. Formation of bladder stones in case of bladder outlet obstruction [19], higher frequency of stones in the lower pole calyx of the kidney under the influence of gravity compared to other calices [20], higher frequency of stones in the submandibular duct due to its dependent position compared to the other salivary glands [14] can be given as examples for the abovementioned suggestion. In this respect, we considered that partial stasis in the bottom point of the fundus might have contributed to gallstone formation in gallbladders with stones which were more vertically positioned compared to gallbladders without stones. Several studies have shown that various diseases and habits affect the gallbladder via different mechanisms, predisposing it to stones. For example, gallbladder may be predisposed to stones in cholecystokinin deficiency in patients receiving long term parenteral nutrition treatment [1], as well as autonomic nervous system dysfunctions in such connective tissue diseases as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus [4] and reduced post-prandial gallbladder volume in case of low physical activity and chronic smoking [21, 22]. Irrespective of the primary cause, the main problem in all these examples is the biliary stasis. Although vertical position per se does not affect gallstone formation, it can contribute to a potential stasis in patients with more vertically positioned gallbladders. It has been shown that gallbladder hypomotility has an effect on not only primary stone formation but also stone recurrence after lithotripsy [17, 23].

Berr et al. studied patients with and without recurrent gallstones after lithotripsy that were well-matched in gallbladder composition and found that stones recurred in gallbladders with higher residual volume and lower ejection fraction. Based on their findings, they concluded that the most important factor in stone formation after lithotripsy was insufficient gallbladder emptying [24]. Investigation of gallbladder angle in patients that are monitored for stone recurrence after lithotripsy might provide clear insight into the impact of gallbladder angle on stone formation. This study has some limitations. Firstly, there were only a limited number of patients in the patient group. In this respect, increasing the number of patients with gallstones might contribute to the statistical strength of this study as well as providing data which might be supportive of our hypothesis. Secondly, no chemical analyses could be performed in the gallstones. Thirdly, we did not have patient’s genetic characteristics and medication history, which might have affected the gallbladder motility. Fourthly, this was a retrospective study. Further prospective studies are needed to shed light on the relationship between gallbladder angle and such parameters as fasting gallbladder volume, post-prandial gallbladder volume and ejection fraction.

Conclusion     

As a conclusion, in this study a more vertically positioned gallbladder does not directly affect gallstone formation. Gallbladder works effectively despite the gravity. However, although it is not influential per se, a smaller gallbladder angle might facilitate stone formation in patients with risk factors. It may be considered that gallstones develop perhaps more easily and early in gallbladders with a smaller angle. However, effects of gallbladder angle on biliary stasis and stone formation should be confirmed by further prospective studies with lager case series.

Competing interests     

The authors declare no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions     

BS and MK: conceptualization, data collection, data analysis and manuscript write up; SZ and FC: data collection, data analysis and manuscript write up; FE: data analysis and manuscript write up; ZB: data analysis and manuscript write up. All authors read and agreed to the final version of this manuscript and equally contributed to its content and to the management of the manuscript.

Tables and figures     

Table 1: demographic data of the control and gallstone groups

Table 2: enter method of binary logistic regression analysis was used for determination of factors that had an impact on gallstone formation

Figure 1: gallbladder angle varies considerably from person to person on sagittal reformatted CT images

Figure 2: gallbladder angle is the angle between the line which longitudinally halves the gallbladder from the fundus and the patient table on the clearest longitudinal image of the gallbladder in the sagittal plane

References     

1. Maas MI, Hopman WP, Katan MB, Jansen JB. The nondigestible fat sucrose polyester does not stimulate gallbladder emptying in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1998; 68(6): 1272-1275. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Schiedermaier P, Neubrand M, Hansen S, Sauerbruch T. Variability of gallbladder emptying after oral stimulation. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 1997; 32(7): 719-724. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR. Gallstones. British Medical Journal. 2014; 22: 348. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Pamuk ON, Umit H, Unlu E, Koker IH, Cakir N. An increased frequency of gallbladder stones in rheumatoid arthritis patients Factors related to gallbladder stone formation. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2006; 24(3): 317-320. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Petroianu A, Oliveira LC, Vieira MI. Delay in gallbladder emptying during the perimenopausal period. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2000; 33(9): 1037-1040. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Gebhard RL,Prigge WF, Ansel HJ, Schlasner L, Ketover SR, Sande D et al. The role of gall bladder emptying in gallstone formation during diet induced rapid weight loss. Hepatology. 1996; 24(3): 544-548. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Agarwal M, Agarwal AK, Singh S, Shukla VK. An ultrasonographic evaluation of gallbladder emptying in patients with cholelithiasis. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2000; 31(4): 309-313. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Mathur A, Megan M, Al-Azzawi HH Lu D, Swartz-Basile DA, Nakeeb A et al. High dietary carbohydrates decrease gallbladder volume and enhance cholesterol crystal formation. Surgery. 2007; 141(5): 654-659. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Sugo T, Hakamada K, Narumi S, Sasaki M. Decreased postprandial gallbladder emptying in patients with black pigment stones. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008; 14(18): 2825. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Naganuma S, Ishida H, Konno K, Hamashima Y, Hoshino T, Naganuma H et al. Sonographic findings of anomalous position of the gallbladder. Abdominal Imaging. 1998; 23(1): 67-72. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Grand D, Horton KM, Fishman E. CT of the gallbladder: spectrum of disease. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004; 183(1): 163-170. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Makni A, Magherbi H, Ksantini R, Rebai W, Safta ZB. Left-sided gallbladder: an incidental finding on laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2012; 35(2): 93-95. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Shekarriz B, Lu HF, Stoller ML. Correlation of unilateral urolithiasis with sleep posture. The Journal of Urology. 2001; 165(4): 1085-1087. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Siddiqui SJ. Sialolithiasis: an unusually large submandibular salivary stone. British Dental Journal. 2002; 193(2): 89-91. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Misra A, Garg A, Abate N, Peshock RM, Stray Gundersen J, Grundy SM. Relationship of anterior and posterior subcutaneous abdominal fat to insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic men. Obesity Research. 1997; 5(2): 93-99. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Kotler DP, Ross R. Body mass index and waist circumference independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002; 75(4): 683-688. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Dhiman RK, Reddi R, Sharma A, Singh R, Kohli KK, Gupta S et al. Cisapride improves gallbladder emptying and bile lipid composition in patients with gallstones. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2001; 16(7): 816-820. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Huang SM, Yao CC, Pan H, Hsiao KM, Yu JK, Lai TJ et al. Pathophysiological significance of gallbladder volume changes in gallstone diseases. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010; 16(34): 4341. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Yoshida O, Okada Y. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Japan: a chronological and geographical study. Urologia Internationalis. 1990; 45(2): 104-111. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Sampaio FJ, Aragao AH. Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1992; 147(2): 322-324. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. Sari R, Balci N, Balci MK. Effects of exercise on gall bladder volume and motility in obese women. Journal of ClinicalUltrasound. 2005; 33(5): 218-222. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Degirmenci B, Albayrak R, Haktanir A, Acar M, Yucel A. Acute effect of smoking on gallbladder emptying and refilling in chronic smokers and nonsmokers: A sonographic study. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006; 12(34): 5540. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Pauletzki J, Althaus R, Holl J, Sackmann M, Paumgartner G. Gallbladder emptying and gallstone formation: a prospective study on gallstone recurrence. Gastroenterology. 1996; 111(3): 765-771. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Berr F, Mayer M, Sackmann MF, Sauerbruch T, Holl J, Paumgartner G. Pathogenic factors in early recurrence of cholesterol gallstones. Gastroenterology. 1994; 106(1): 215-24. PubMed | Google Scholar