Acute flaccid paralysis surveillance indicators in the Democratic Republic of Congo during 2008-2014

Acute flaccid paralysis surveillance indicators in the Democratic Republic of Congo during 2008-2014

Hugo Kavunga Membo^1,2,&, Aaron Mweene², Serge Alain Sadeuh-Mba³, Justin Masumu¹, Riziki Yogolelo¹, Norbert Ngendabanyikwa⁴, Eddy Sokolua⁴, Fred Sagamiko², Edgar Simulundu², Steve Ahuka¹, Jean Jacques Muyembe¹

 

¹Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (INRB), P.O Box 1197 Kinshasa 1, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, ²Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, P.O Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia, ³Service de Virologie, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun (CPC), rue Henri Dunant P.O Box 1274, Yaoundé, Cameroun, ⁴World Heath Organization (WHO), Central African Inter-country Bureau, Libreville, Gabon

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Hugo Kavunga Membo, Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (INRB), P.O Box 1197 Kinshasa 1, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

 

 

 

 

Poliomyelitis is a highly infectious disease caused by the polioviruses (PVs) belonging to the species Enterovirus C, genus Enterovirus and family Picornaviridae [1]. Like most other Enteroviruses, PVs are transmitted by the feco-oral route. Poliomyelitis can affect individuals of any age, but primarily involves children aged less than five years. In up to 1% of those infected the virus invades the central nervous system leading to muscle weakness and irreversible paralysis (usually in the lower limbs), often progressing to breathing difficulties, and death [2, 3]. In 1988, the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), aimed at eradicating polio by the year 2000 [4]. The strategies of the GPEI include conducting surveillance for Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) to determine the wild or vaccine-derived origin of PVs isolates, achieving high rate of routine polio immunization coverage of the population and carrying out supplemental immunization activities (SIA) in response to polio outbreaks. Two vaccines efficiently prevent the onset of poliomyelitis. Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) is very safe and induces a strong and protective general antibody response while Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV), used in mass vaccination campaigns in endemic regions, is made up of live attenuated viruses (Sabin strains of serotypes 1, 2 and 3) that are able to multiply to high titers in the gastrointestinal tract, thus inducing strong mucosal immunity to PVs [5]. The major disadvantage of OPV is that vaccine strains can replicate and mutate during inter human circulation in under immunized populations, thus leading to the emergence of neurovirulent vaccine derived PVs (VDPVs) [5, 6].

 

Although polio outbreaks continue to occur, the poliomyelitis incidence has drastically decreased by > 99%: from an estimated 350,000 cases in 1988 to 359 cases in 2014 [7]. The number of polio-endemic countries has also decreased from 125 countries in 1988, to only two countries in 2014 (Pakistan and Afghanistan) [7].

 

AFP is defined as acute or sudden onset of weakness or paralysis of a limb characterized as flaccid (reduced tone) in a child < 15 years of age [8]. AFP surveillance consists of the detection and investigation of flaccid paralysis of new onset in children less than 15 years or any other suspected poliomyelitis case in a person of any age. It has been adopted globally as an essential strategy for monitoring the progress of the polio eradication initiative [9]. Hence, AFP surveillance remains the “gold standard” to identify areas and populations who are at high risk, to assess polio status of a given country, to reveal the need of SIA and to certify the absence of wild PV (WPV) circulation in countries that are no longer reporting poliomyelitis cases [10].

 

In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) was introduced in 1978 with childhood vaccination schedule for polio including four doses of live-attenuated OPV at birth, 6, 10 and 14 months of age. The Polio Eradication Program led by the DRC’s EPI started in 1996 and its efforts have shown how much polio vaccine contributed to the decrease of poliomyelitis cases throughout the country in such a way that by 2001, DRC was no longer polio endemic. However, WPV transmission was reestablished in 2006 continuing until the onset of the last case on December 20, 2011 [11]. In the other hand, circulating VDPVs were isolated from 2004 to 2012; with a large VDPVs associated poliomyelitis outbreak that affected the Kasai Oriental and Maniema provinces from 2008 to 2012 [12]. Moreover, DRC as any other country remains at risk of WPVs re-importation from the remaining polio-endemic reservoirs [13, 14].

 

The Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (INRB), located at the capital city Kinshasa, is the WHO-accredited National Reference Poliomyelitis Laboratory (NRPL) in DRC. INRB has routinely registered epidemiological and virological data from AFP surveillance since 1997. Regular analyses of data generated from an AFP surveillance system are of great interest for the identification of potential problems to be addressed in order to guarantee timely detection of WPV re-importation or VDPV re-emergence. WHO developed a set of performance indicators to ensure that AFP surveillance is conducted with the required standards, maintained and operated uniformly [8].

 

This study describes the results of the surveillance of AFP in DRC from January 2008 to December 2014 and identifies the gaps that need to be addressed in order to provide the highest level of confidence in the control and prevention of PV infection in DRC.

 

 

Study area and design

 

The DRC is located in sub-Saharan Africa, bordered by Angola, the South Atlantic Ocean, the Republic of Congo, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania across Lake Tanganyika, and Zambia. The country is divided into eleven administrative provinces with 65 districts and 516 health zones [15]. The health system is organized according to national, provincial, district and health zone levels. According to the 2015 census, DRC is estimated to have a total population of about 70 million people with children under the age of 15 years being about 43 million [15]. Here, a retrospective descriptive study was conducted using AFP surveillance data routinely collected from January 2008 to December 2014 by the INRB at Kinshasa. All AFP cases reported nationwide during the studied period were considered for this study.

 

Organisation of AFP surveillance in DRC

 

Data for AFP surveillance is routinely registered in the weekly and monthly reporting system from the Health Zones and districts of all provinces of DRC. An AFP case is defined as any child < 15 years who develops acute onset of focal weakness or paralysis characterized as flaccid (including Guillain Barre Syndrome), without any other obvious cause [9, 10]. When a patient meeting the AFP case definition is presented at a health facility, the health care practitioners conduct comprehensive investigations to find out if PV is the cause of the paralysis. Investigations include recording of detailed history, conducting a systematic examination, and collecting two stool specimens, 24 to 48 hours apart, within 14 days of onset of symptoms. The case investigation form is filled with information on demographic, clinical history, vaccination history and dates of stool specimen collection to accompany the stool specimens sent to the WHO-accredited NRPL at the INRB for virological analysis. Virological analyses include virus isolation on Human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) and murine L20B (a derivative of murine L cells expressing the PV human receptor) cell cultures and identification of the resulting isolates by intratypic differentiation (ITD) with a real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay [16-18]. Suspected PV and VDPVs strains are further characterized by the sequencing of the VP1-capsid coding gene [19].

 

WHO Accredited National Reference Polio Laboratory

 

The WHO-accredited NRPL is located at the INRB in Kinshasa, the capital city of DRC. The NRPL follows standardized procedures for i) the isolation of PV and non polio enteroviruses (NPEVs) using RD and L20B cell cultures, ii) the PV identification to confirm WPV cases, iii) the differentiation of the three PV serotypes (1–3), WPVs, Sabin-like PVs and VDPVs by ITD and iv) the shipment of the suspected WPV and VDPV isolates to a WHO Specialized Polio Laboratory where sequencing of VP1 gene is performed. The timeliness, accuracy and quality of the NRPL are assessed through proficiency testing for laboratory techniques and annual onsite accreditation review [20].

 

Indicators of AFP surveillance performance

 

WHO has established some minimum performance indicators that should be used to ensure that the quality of AFP surveillance is achieved and maintained. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the AFP surveillance system using the following WHO-specified indicators:

 

Number of non-polio AFP cases per 100 000 population aged <15 years: this is an indicator of the sensitivity of the AFP surveillance system. The system should be able to detect at least two AFP cases per 100,000 children below the age of 15 years. In the specific case of DRC, with an estimated 43,000,000 less than 15 years, 860 AFP cases a year is the minimum target.

 

Percentage of AFP cases with two adequate stool specimens: adequate stools are defined as two stool specimens collected from an AFP patient 24-48 hours apart and within 14 days of onset of symptoms. At least 80% of all AFP cases should have adequate stool specimens.

 

Condition of stool on arrival at laboratory: at least 80% of the stool specimens should arrive at the WHO accredited laboratory in “good condition”. A stool specimen is said to have arrived in good condition if it was transported under reverse cold chain conditions (with ice packs and a temperature indicator) and was received by the WHO accredited polio isolation laboratory in sufficient quantity (at least 8 grams) and with appropriate documentation.

 

Percentage of AFP cases investigated within 48 hours of being notified <48 hours: at least 80% of AFP cases should be investigated within 48 hours of being notified.

 

Percentage of stool specimens received in the laboratory within 3 days of collection: at least 80% of stool specimens collected from AFP cases should arrive at a WHO accredited polio isolation laboratory within 72 hours of being sent.

 

Percentage of specimen results sent from national laboratory within 14 days of receipt of the specimen in the laboratory: at least 80% of specimen results should be sent from the polio isolation laboratory within 14 days of specimen receipt by the laboratory while ITD results should be reported within 7 days of receipt

 

Percentage of stool specimens from which an NPEV is isolated: at least 10% of stool specimens submitted to the laboratory should have an NPEV isolated. This is an indicator of the quality of the reverse cold chain and how well the laboratory is able to perform routine isolation of enterovirus.

 

Percentage of AFP cases followed up at least 60 days from the onset: at least 80% of AFP cases requiring a follow-up examination should be reviewed at 60 days after the onset of paralysis by a national expert committee, to verify the presence of residual paralysis or weakness.

 

 

From January 2008 to December 2014, a total of 13,749 cases of AFP were reported nationwide by the surveillance system in DRC. Stool specimens originated from all eleven provinces of the country with the minority of them coming from the MANIEMA province (2.8%) and the majority from Province Orientale (16.5%) (Figure 1). The lowest numbers of cumulated cases were recorded in January and February with 6 % and 6.4 % respectively, while the highest number of cumulated cases was observed in July (10.3%) (Figure 2). Among the 13,749 AFP cases analysed, the largest proportion (85.2%) involved children under the age of 5 years and about 55% were from males (Table 1). The immunization status records showed that 15.5% of the children had received less than three doses of OPV, 58.9 % had received at least three doses of OPV, 7.3 % had never received any oral polio vaccine while the vaccination status of 18.3 % of the children was unknown. As shown in Table 1, 94.7% of the AFP cases had sudden onset of paralysis, 82.7% had fever at the onset of paralysis and less than half (42.1%) had asymmetric paralysis. Of all 13,749 AFP cases analyzed, 201 (1.5%) were classified as WPV cases, 768 (5.5%) as Sabin cases, 68 (0.5%) as circulating VDPV cases and 998 (7.2%) as NPEV cases. All recorded AFP cases could be classified as depicted in the virological classification flowchart presented in Figure 3. The National Expert Committee classified overall 214 (9.1%) cases with inadequate stool specimens as polio compatible while the remaining 2125 (90.9%) AFP cases with inadequate stool specimens were discarded (Figure 3).

 

The circulation of WPV has been stopped over the country since 2011 [13]. All WPV cases obtained during the study period were genetically characterized and results from this study showed that the most frequently serotype was WPV type 1 while WPV type 2 were not detected (data not shown). As expected, no WPV type 2 was isolated as previous reported worldwide [21]. WPV type 3 cases were recorded only in 2008 and 2009 (Table 2). However, circulating VDPVs type 2 were repeatedly isolated during a large poliomyelitis outbreaks from 2008 to 2012 while an ambiguous VDPV type 2 (without evidence of inter human transmission) was found in 2014 (Table 2).

 

The WHO defined the target of at least two AFP cases per 100 000 in children under 15 years as an indicator for measuring the sensitivity of AFP surveillance. This target was consistently achieved from 2008 to 2014. The proportion of AFP cases with 2 stool specimens collected within 14 days of onset of paralysis, during the investigation of AFP cases, was maintained above the WHO-specified national target of at least 80% except in 2010 where it was at 73% (Table 3). Two important indicators of AFP surveillance performance were consistently below the minimum standard throughout the study period. Despite the fact that most specimens arrived at the laboratory in good conditions, the proportion of stool specimens arriving at national level within three days of being sent did not reach 15% which is far below the acceptable minimum of 80% (Table 3). Moreover, the annualized non polio AFP rates that reveal the sensitivity of the system were consistently < 10% throughout the study period (Table 3).

 

 

The present study reports the incidence of AFP over seven-year (2008-2014) period in DRC. The performance of AFP surveillance over these years was also evaluated. The age distribution of AFP cases confirmed that low age was a risk factor as previously shown [22]. Accordingly, our results showed that 85.2% of AFP cases occurred in children below five years of age. Similarly, previous studies reported a frequency of 76.3% and 90% among this age group in Ghana [23] and in India [24], respectively. This indicates that though poliomyelitis can affect any age group, children under the age of five years predominantly get affected [10, 25]. Our findings indicate that the majority (55%) of AFP cases involved males. As described in 2008, by D’Errico et al. [26], the frequency of AFP was found to be consistently higher over the period of study among males than females with the mean incidence rate of 55% and 44.7% for boys and girls, respectively. This can be explained by the fact that there are sex differences in the susceptibility to infectious agents. Generally, males are more prone to develop an infectious disease than females and this may be probably related to genetic differences in immunologic responses [26].

 

This study revealed vaccination coverage with at least three OPV doses at 58.9% among AFP cases, which is lower compared to coverage rate found in Ikwa bom state in Nigeria (98.3%) [27]. This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that some parents failed to complete routine immunization (only one or two were given). Other parents had forgotten the number of OPV their children had taken since mass immunization campaigns are not systematically recorded. The apparent absence of WPVs and VDPVs circulation since 2012 is inconsistent with high vaccine failure among children. Hence, the actual coverage of the populations was likely above the estimates from field records especially after immunization responses to the 2008-2012 VDPV related poliomyelitis outbreaks. Accordingly, national polio vaccine coverage rate was estimated to have risen from 64% at the beginning in 2008 to at least 76% from 2009 to 2013 [28]. We found higher proportion of children with sudden onset of paralysis (94.7%) and 82.7% of cases had fever at onset which was higher than that reported in 2013 by Sevencan et al [29], who found 15% of AFP cases with prodromal fever in Turkey. Regarding the performance of the AFP surveillance in DRC, the findings of the present study mirrors those found previously, from 1997 to 2001 in DRC [30] in that AFP surveillance indicators were maintained above the WHO specified targets. The success of an AFP surveillance system does not only depend on the detection of AFP cases, but also hinges on the investigation and reporting of the cases. Results from DRC’s AFP surveillance showed that the country´s overall proportion of adequate stool specimens, during the investigation of AFP cases, was maintained above the WHO-specified national target of at least 80% from 2008 to 2014. However, the average NPEV isolation rate was consistently below the minimum requirement throughout the study period (Table 2). These NPEV isolation rates were lower than the 12% and 17.6% reported in Ghana [23] and Iraq [31], respectively. This could be explained by the fact that many NPEV strains belonging to the Enterovirus C species cannot be isolated on RD cells. Previous studies showed that the introduction of HEp-2c cell line in the isolation algorithm significantly increases the NPEV isolation rate in tropical settings [32, 33]. Moreover, the timeliness of transportation of the stool specimens is critical for the surveillance system as enteroviruses should survive until the time of analysis for the laboratory to be able to isolate them [34]. According to the WHO-specified national targets for AFP surveillance, at least 80% of stool specimens must arrive at the laboratory within 72 hours of collection [35-37]. Results from this study reveal that this target remained out of reach throughout the study period. The proportion of specimens that arrived at the laboratory within 72 hours was consistently less than 15% whereas it was expected to be at ?80%. This low performance for specimen’s transportation to the laboratory may be due to the big size of the country as well as the lack of good roads in remote areas. This issue could be overcome by setting up sub-national polio surveillance laboratories besides the NRPL in Kinshasa.

 

Although DRC maintained a four year period (2001-2005) without any confirmed PV cases throughout the country (possibly due to implementation of immunization activities and especially those involving the national immunization days (NIDs) program), polio outbreaks occurred in the DRC in 2006 following importation from Angola [30]. WPV has virtually disappeared in DRC since 2011 [38], but efforts should be made towards eradication of poliomyelitis caused by neurovirulent VDPVs by maintaining high quality AFP surveillance, supplemented by environmental surveillance which is being initiated. These are essential for timely detection and response to potential WPV re-introduction and VDPVs re-emergence in DRC.

 

 

The AFP surveillance system was efficient over the seven year period of 2008-2014 in the DRC with many indicators of performance above the minimum targets required by WHO. As a “gold standard” method for poliomyelitis detection, the continuous improvement of AFP surveillance is critical. Special efforts should focus on the timeliness of transportation of stool specimens to the polio reference laboratory. As long as WPV and circulating VDPVs strains are detected in any country worldwide, it will remain essential to achieve and maintain high quality AFP and environmental surveillance complying with required standards in order to ensure rapid detection and containment of PV circulation in DRC.

 

 

Authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

HKM contributed to the conception, design, analysis, interpretation of data, writing the manuscript and overall coordination of the study. ASM and ES participated to the proposal implementation and manuscript writing. SA, JM and SASM contributed to the conception, design, analysis and interpretation of data, and critical review of the manuscript. FS, YR, NN and EDS contributed to the conception, design, data interpretation and revision of the manuscript. JJM supervised the implementation of study and manuscript writing. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

The authors are grateful to all the staff from the Virology Department of Institut National de Recherche Biomedicale (INRB) in Kinshasa for their direct and indirect contributions to this work, INTRA-ACP Mobility scheme for their financial support to Dr. Hugo Kavunga Membo, The DRC’s WHO office, Expanded Program on Immunization and Ministry of health who provided valuable technical contributions to this study.

 

 

Table 1: proportions of AFP by year, age, sex, OPV doses and clinical symptoms in DRC from 2008 to 2014

Table 2: case number of AFP patient’s under-15-year-olds, WPV, Sabin, NPEV, and VDPV isolates collected, by year in DRC from 2008 to 2014

Table 3: AFP surveillance performance indicators in DRC from 2008 to 2014

Figure 1: number of AFP cases reported by Province in the DR Congo, 2008-2014. MAN=Maniema, B-CO=Bas Congo, N-KIV= Nord Kivu, S-KIV=Sud Kivu, KIN=Kinshasa, K-OC=Kasai Occidental, BDD=Bandundu, EQU=Equateur, K-OR= Kasai Oriental, KAT=Katanga, P-OR=Province Orientale

Figure 2: number of AFP cases reported by month from 2008-2014. Jan=January, Feb= February, Mar=March, Apr=April, May= May, Jun= June, Jul=July, Aug=August, Sep= September, Oct=October, Nov= November; Dec= December

Figure 3: flow chart showing the virological classification of AFP cases reported in DRC between 2008 and 2014

 

 

1. Knowles NJ, Hovi T, Hyypiä T, King AMQ, Lindberg AM, Pallansch MA, Palmenberg AC, Simmonds P, Skern T, Stanway G, Yamashita T, Zell R. Picornaviridae. In Virus Taxonomy: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Edited by King, AMQ, Adams, MJ, Carstens, EB and Lefkowitz, EJ, San Diego. 2012; pp 855-880. Google Scholar


2. Nathanson N, Kew OM. From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(11):1213-29. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Marx A, Glass JD, Sutter RW. Differential diagnosis of acute flaccid paralysis and its role in poliomyelitis surveillance. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(2):298-316. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. WHA41.28 R. 1988: Global eradication of poliomyelitis by the year 2000. Handbook of resolutions and decisions of the World Health Assembly and the Executive Board. 1988; Vol III, 2nd edition (1985-1989). Google Scholar


5. Combelas N, Holmblat B, Joffret ML, Colbere-Garapin F, Delpeyroux F. Recombination between poliovirus and coxsackie A viruses of species C: a model of viral genetic plasticity and emergence. Viruses. 2011 Aug;3(8):1460-84. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Joffret ML, Jegouic S, Bessaud M, Balanant J, Tran C, Caro V et al. Common and diverse features of cocirculating type 2 and 3 recombinant vaccine-derived polioviruses isolated from patients with poliomyelitis and healthy children. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(9):1363-73. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Hagan JE, Wassilak SG, Craig AS, Tangermann RH, Diop OM, Burns CC, et al. Progress toward polio eradication - worldwide, 2014-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(19):527-31. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. WHO. Recommended standards for surveillance of selected vaccine preventable diseases: Vaccines and Biologicals. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2003; pp 31-34. Google Scholar


9. WHO. Field Guide: For Supplementary Activities aimed at achieving polio eradication, 1996 revision. Geneva, World Health Organization. 1996. Google Scholar


10. Heymann DL. Polio eradication: finishing the job and protecting the investment. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Jan;82(1):1. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. WHO. Assessing the risks for poliovirus outbreaks in polio-free countries-Africa, 2012-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Sep 20;62(37):768-72. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Gumede N, Lentsoane O, Burns CC, Pallansch M, de Gourville E, Yogolelo R et al. Emergence of vaccine-derived polioviruses, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2004-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(10):1583-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Gumede N, Jorba J, Deshpande J, Pallansch M, Yogolelo R, Muyembe-Tamfum JJ et al. Phylogeny of imported and reestablished wild polioviruses in theDemocratic Republic of the Congo from 2006 to 2011. J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 1;210 Suppl 1:S361-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. WHO. Resurgence of wild poliovirus types 1 and 3 in 15 African countries, January 2008-March 2009. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009;84(16):133-40. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Anonymous. Plan National de Développent Sanitaire 2011-2015 et données de surveillance 20 Ministry of Health, Democratic Republic of Congo. 2015. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Anonymous. Isolation and identification of polioviruses. In: WHO, editor. Polio laboratory manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004. p. 87-100. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Anonymous. Intratypic differentiation of polioviruses. In: WHO, editor. Polio laboratory manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2004. p. 101-20. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Kilpatrick DR, Ching K, Iber J, Chen Q, Yang SJ, De L et al. Identification of vaccine-derived polioviruses using dual-stage real-time RT-PCR. J Virol Methods. 2014;197:25-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Kilpatrick DR, Iber JC, Chen Q, Ching K, Yang SJ, De L et al. Poliovirus serotype-specific VP1 sequencing primers. J Virol Methods. 2011;174(1-2):128-30. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. World Health Organization. Polio laboratory manual, 4th edition. Geneva: The Organization. WHO/IVB/04.10, 2004. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. WHO. Apparent global interruption of wild poliovirus type 2 transmission. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50(12):222-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Hamzat TH, Omotade TT. Acute flaccid paralysis: a five-year review of cases managed by physiotherapy at the University College Hospital, Ibadan. Afr J Health Sci. 2006;13(1-2):28-32. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Odoom JK, Ntim NA, Sarkodie B, Addo J, Minta-Asare K, Obodai E et al. Evaluation of AFP surveillance indicators in polio-free Ghana, 2009-2013. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:687. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Singh KKG, Kuma R. Acute paralytic poliomyelitis: change in number over years impact pf PPI: sentinel centre experience. Indian J Community Med. 2004;29:82-3. PubMed | Google Scholar


25. Mandell GL BJ, Dolin R. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th edition. New York: Churchill Livingston, 2000. PubMed | Google Scholar


26. D'Errico MM, Barbadoro P, Bacelli S, Esposto E, Moroni V, Scaccia F et al. Surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis in the Marches region (Italy): 1997-2007. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8(135):1471-2334. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. Bassey BE, Gasasira A, Mitula P, Frankson UU, Adeniji JA. Surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria 2004-2009. Pan Afr Med J. 2011;9:32. PubMed | Google Scholar


28. WHO-UNICEF. Immunization Summary. Report. 2014;Edition 2014. PubMed | Google Scholar


29. Sevencan F, Ertem M, Oner H, Aras Kilinc E, Kose OO, Demircioglu S et al. Acute flaccid paralysis surveillance in southeastern Turkey, 1999-2010. Turk J Pediatr. 2013;55(3):283-91. PubMed | Google Scholar


30. Kabue JP, Mushiya F, Pukuta E, Mbaya N, Yogolelo R, Muyamuna E et al. Virological surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis in Democratic Republic of Congo from 1997-2001. Med Trop. 2004;64(2):137-44. PubMed | Google Scholar


31. Jasem JA, Marof K, Nawar A, Khalaf Y, Al-Hamdani F, Ali S et al. An epidemiological analysis of acute flaccid paralysis and its surveillance system in Iraq, 1997-2011. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(448):1471-2334. PubMed | Google Scholar


32. Rakoto-Andrianarivelo M, Rousset D, Razafindratsimandresy R, Chevaliez S, Guillot S, Balanant J et al. High frequency of human enterovirus species C circulation in Madagascar. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2005 Jan;43(1):242-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


33. Sadeuh-Mba SA, Bessaud M, Massenet D, Joffret ML, Endegue MC, Njouom R, et al. High frequency and diversity of species C enteroviruses in Cameroon and neighboring countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(3):759-70. PubMed | Google Scholar


34. Adu F, Idowu A, Akintokun A, Adeniji J, Ajuwon B. Effect of temperature and distance on the viral outcome of clinical specimens from acute flaccid paralysis cases in Nigeria. J Clin Lab Anal. 2012 Jul;26(4):254-61. PubMed | Google Scholar


35. Apostol LN, Suzuki A, Bautista A, Galang H, Paladin FJ, Fuji N et al. Detection of non-polio enteroviruses from 17 years of virological surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis in the Philippines. J Med Virol. 2012;84(4):624-31. PubMed | Google Scholar


36. Dhole TN, Ayyagari A, Chowdhary R, Shakya AK, Shrivastav N, Datta T et al. Non-polio enteroviruses in acute flaccid paralysis children of India: vital assessment before polio eradication. J Paediatr Child Health. 2009;45(7-8):409-13. PubMed | Google Scholar


37. Lam RM, Tsang TH, Chan KY, Lau YL, Lim WL, Lam TH et al. Surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis in Hong Kong: 1997 to 2002. Hong Kong Med J. 2005;11(3):164-73. PubMed | Google Scholar


38. Alleman MM, Meyer SA, Mulumba A, Nyembwe M, Riziki Y, Mbule A, et al. Improved acute flaccid paralysis surveillance performance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2010-2012. J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 1;210 Suppl 1:S50-61. PubMed | Google Scholar