A neglected case of giant synovial chondromatosis in knee joint

A neglected case of giant synovial chondromatosis in knee joint

 

Sancar Serbest^1,&, Ugur Tiftikçi¹, Fatih Karaaslan², Haci Bayram Tosun³, Hüseyin Fatih Sevinç¹, Mahi Balci⁴

 

¹Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey, ²Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey, ³Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey, ⁴Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Sancar Serbest, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey

 

 

 

 

Synovial osteochondromatosis (SOC) is a monoarticular, synovial, proliferative disease. It is a rare disease which presents as multiple cartilaginous nodules in synovial joints, bursae or tendon sheaths [1-3]. Although it is generally a primary condition, it can be secondary to osteoarthritis. This disease is more prevalent in 4^th and 5^th decades. It affects males more than females [1]. SOC most commonly involves knee joint with a frequency of 50-65%. Other places that are involved frequently include hip, elbow, shoulder, and ankle. Monoarticular involvement occurs. Observed clinical symptoms were pain (85-100% of cases), swelling (42-58% of cases) and limitation of joint movements (38-55%) at the involved area. Secondary osteoarthritis findings such as generalized joint effusions, locking, tenderness, and crepitation may also occur [2, 4]. Therefore early diagnosis and treatment of this disease is important. Although rare, SOC should be considered in differential diagnosis of cases including joint pathology. To the best of our knowledge a SOC case at this amount has never been reported. In this article we present a case of intraarticular SOC at knee joint that was successfully treated with knee arthrotomy.

 

 

A seventy two years old male presented to our clinic with swelling, pain, and limitation of movement at knee joint. The patient's history revealed swellings and pain at knee joint for nearly last 20 years. He was prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and rest. But pain didn't relieve and limitations in range of motion occurred at knee joint. Physical examination findings included a solid and semi-mobile mass at anterior knee region. Knee joint range of motion was 80 degrees flexion and 0 degrees extension. There wasn't any neurovascular pathology. Antero-posterior and lateral knee X-rays showed degenerative changes and a giant, irregular, calcific mass which started below patella and extended to suprapatellar area (Figure 1). Knee MRI revealed many loose bodies (consistent with synovial chondromatosis) isointense with fatty bone marrow at all sequences at the level of right knee joint. Scalloping was observed at tibial and femoral surfaces (Figure 2).

 

Decision for a surgical intervention was made and after informing the patient, consent was taken. Under spinal anesthesia, a tourniquet was applied to right lower extremity. Right knee was entered with an anterior longitudinal incision. Cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues were passed. Quadriceps mechanism was opened with a medial parapatellar incision and patella was toppled to left side. Intraarticular mass was exposed (Figure 3). The mass was released from surrounding tissues by blunt excision and excised with enucleation (Figure 4). Then synovial tissue was excised with synoviectomy. Surgical area was irrigated using abundant isotonic solution. The excised mass was sent to pathology laboratory. Pathology evaluation showed that the mass was consistent with synovial chondromatosis (Figure 5). Active and passive exercises were started at an early period after surgery. Recurrence was not detected at his last control visit. Knee movements were at full range when compared with the other knee. There was no pain or other complaints (Figure 6).

 

 

Synovial chondromatosis is a rare, monoarticular benign neoplasm with an unknown cause. It can be originated from any joint, tendon sheath, or bursae that have synovial tissue. It is characterized by cartilaginous nodule formation secondary to synovial metaplasia. These nodules may be calcified apart from synovial tissue. Although it is generally progressive in nature, it can limit itself and regress [3]. Transformation to malignancy is reported to be very low (5%). Delay in diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis pathology may occur due to slow progression of disease and calcification of free cartilage fragments at later stages [5]. Complaints of the patients are usually due to mechanical effects of free bodies. Milgram [2], defined three stages of this disease: Stage 1 (early stage) is the active intrasynovial stage during which there is no free articular body. Stage II is the transition stage from intrasynovial disease to free bodies. In this stage there are both active intrasynovial disease and free bodies. In stage III (late stage) there are multiple free bodies in the absence of intrasynovial involvement. When our case was diagnosed the disease was at stage III.

 

Radiologic features of disease vary according to stages. At first stage there is swelling only around the involved joint [6]. The most common radiologic finding, radiopaque free bodies with varying sizes, can be seen at any place in the joint cavity [7]. Calcification occurs at last stage and may not be observed in every patient [8]. Intraarticular liquid like masses, non-calcified masses or swellings which can be septated may be differentiated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) [9]. Especially MRI gets multiplanar sequences and is a very important diagnostic tool to evaluate soft tissues. Matsumoto et al [10] reported that MRI is much more helpful than CT. But hardness of diagnosis despite MRI should also be considered. In neglected cases or in cases with a long term disease, changes in bone or joint cartilage induced by multiple intraarticular lesions, bony erosion, or presence of local osteoporosis make diagnosis more difficult [11].

 

Differential diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis includes many diseases. Therefore it should be differentiated from benign lesions such as synovial hemangioma, pigmented villonodular synovitis, synovial cyst, lipoma arborescence and from malign lesions such as synovial chondrosarcoma and synovial sarcoma [12]. Malignant transformation was reported in a few cases at long term follow up [13]. Anract et al [14] reported that malign transformation is very rare and this condition should be suspected when there is bone involvement in MRI and a rapid progression of clinical picture. Big and hard lesions are much rarer than multiple small lesions. If the lesion size is big and patient's age is at later decades differential diagnosis should be made with more prevalent chondrosarcomas [15,16]. In our case it was easier with MRI to diagnose the intraarticular big mass which was seen with calcifications in X-ray films. However, differential diagnosis from conditions such as chondrosarcoma is very important. In literature early artroscopic or open debridement, synoviectomy, and removal of free cartilage pieces at an early stage before cartilage damage occurs have shown to be efficient treatments [15-17]. Severity of disease and affected location should be considered when deciding the treatment [15]. Additionally, in some cases that had osteochondroplasty after debridement osteoarthritis did not occur in two years follow up and successful results were achieved [7]. We preferred open surgery due to the size of the mass.

 

In our case, the biggest sized SOC was 20x19x6 cm, although there were many joint mice. In our literature search we found that the biggest masses that have been extracted till now were 10.5x5.5x5.5 cm [18], 6x4x4 cm [19], 5.3x3x2.3 cm [20], and our case had the biggest SOC ever extracted.

 

 

In conclusion, SOC with monoarticular involvement is a very rare disease. Clinical diagnosis is very difficult. Consistency of clinical, radiological and histological findings should be sought in every case. After the diagnosis synovial excision as complete as possible, extraction of free bodies, and a close follow up are warranted.

 

 

Authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

Figure 1: X-ray of right knee joint showing the radiodence body. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) X-ray of the knee

Figure 2: MRI T-2 image showing the effusion, synovial hypertrophy and a loose calcific body (a, b)

Figure 3: right knee joint exposed by medial parapatellar approach, a large loose body lying in front of intercondylar notch (a, b, c, d)

Figure 4: a large loose body of around 20x19x6 cm extracted from the knee joint (a, b c)

Figure 5: histopathology slide of the loose body showing lobules of cartilage without cellular atypia (a, b c)

Figure 6: radiographic findings after the removal of large loose body. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) X-ray of the knee

 

 

1. Murphy FP, Dahlin DC, Sullivan CR. Articular synovial chondromatosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962;44:77-86. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Milgram JW. Synovial osteochondromatosis: a histopathological study of thirty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(6):792-801. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Maurice H, Crone M, Watt I. Synovial chondromatosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(5):807-11. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Serbest S, Kesgin E, Tosun HB. Neglected case of hip joint synovial chondromatosis. Pam Med J. 2014;7(2):167-70. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Trias A, Quintana O. Synovial chondrometaplasia: review of world literature and a study of 18 Canadien cases. Can J Surg. 1976;19(2):151-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Hsueh CJ, Huang GS, Juan CJ, Wang SG, Liou CH, Hsiao HS et al. Synovial chondroma of the ankle in a young child after recent trauma: CT and MR features. Clin Imaging. 2001;25(4):296-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Kural C, Akyildiz MF, Erturk H, Bayraktar K. Synovial chondromatosis of the ankle joint and elbow in two cases. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39(5):441-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Mussey RD Jr, Henderson MS. Osteochondromatosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1949;31(3):619-27. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Narvaez JA, Narvaez J, Aguilera C, De Lama E, Portabella F. MR imaging of synovial tumors and tumor-like lesions. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(12):2549-60. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Matsumoto H, Kawakubo M, Otani T, Fujikawa K. Extensive post-traumatic ossification of the patellar tendon: a report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81(1):34-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Yamaguchi T, Naito M, Asayama I, Fujisawa M, Ishiko T, Kambe T et al. Arthroscopic surgery for synovial chondromatosis of the hip: a report of two cases. J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2003;4(2):90-1. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Wittkop B, Davies AM, Mangham DC. Primary synovial chondromatosis and synovial chondrosarcoma: a pictorial review. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(8):2112-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Hallam P, Ashwood N, Cobb J, Fazal A, Heatley W. Malignant transformation in synovial chondromatosis of the knee? Knee. 2001;8(3):239-42. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Anract P, Katabi M, Forest M, Benoit J, Witvoet J, Tomeno B. Synovial chondromatosis and chondrosarcoma: a study of the relationship between these two diseases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1996; 82(3):216-24. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Chillemi C, Marinelli M, de Cupis V. Primary synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder: clinical, arthroscopic and histopathological aspects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(6):483-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Richman JD, Rose DJ. The role of arthroscopy in the management of synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:91-3. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Jeon IH, Ihn JC, Kyung HS. Recurrence of synovial chondromatosis of the glenohumeral joint after arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(5):524-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Goel A, Cullen C, Paul AS, Freemont AJ. Multiple giant synovial chondromatosis of the knee, Case report. The Knee. 2001;8(3):243-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Dogan A, Harman M, Uslu M, Bayram I, Akpinar F. Rocky form giant synovial chondromatosis: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(5): 465-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Sourlas I, Brilakis EV, Mavrogenis AF, Stavropoulos NA, Korres DS. Giant intra-articular synovial osteochondromata of the knee. Hippokratia. 2013;17(3):281-3. PubMed | Google Scholar