SD Bioline malaria antigen Pf (HRP-2/pLHD) for assessing efficacy of artemisinin combination therapy against Plasmodium falciparum in pediatric patients in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

SD Bioline malaria antigen Pf (HRP-2/pLHD) for assessing efficacy of artemisinin combination therapy against Plasmodium falciparum in pediatric patients in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

 

Albert Lukuka Kilauzi¹, Jose Gaby Tshikuka Mulumba^2,&, Mgaywa Gilbert Mjungu Damas Magafu², Reginald Matchaba-Hove³, Roy Tapera³, Naoko Shimizu Magafu⁴, Jean Jacques Muyembe Tamfum¹

 

¹National Biomedical Research Institute (INRB), Democracy Avenue, P. O. Box 1197, Gombe, Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, ²Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Private bag 00713, Gaborone, Botswana, ³School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Private Bag 0022, Gaborone, Botswana, ⁴Japan Overseas Christian Medical Co-operative Services, C/o Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Tabora, Private Bag, Tabora, Tanzania

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Jose Gaby Tshikuka Mulumba, Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Private bag 00713, Gaborone, Botswana

 

 

 

 

Commercially available rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are numerous in the market. They all fall into three categories: (i) RDTs that detect the Plasmodium falciparum antigen histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP-2), (ii) RDTs that detect lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) from P. falciparum and (iii) RDTs that detect P. vivax aldolase in human whole blood [1].

 

Generally, it is known that P. falciparum (Pf) HRP-2 remains in the bloodstream for an extended time following a successful clearance of the parasite, thus, contributing to false positive results and limiting specificity of the test category that targets PfHRP-2 [2]. In contrast, pLDH is known to be rapidly cleared from the bloodstream and becomes undetectable at about the same time as blood smears become negative after a successful anti-malarial therapy [3,4].

 

In order to monitor the success of an anti-malarial drug therapy, particularly in the presence of fever, pLDH-based tests seem to be more useful since they become negative soon after parasites are cleared from the blood [3]. Thus, pLDH-based tests better discriminate false positive results from treatment failure than HRP-2 tests. SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT has been reportedly proven to be effective in reducing the rate of false positives caused by the persistence of HRP-2 after a successful drug therapy and guiding accurate prescription and monitoring efficacy of drug therapy in countries like Burkina Faso [4]. However, literature on the performance of the RDT in Kinshasa, DRC is scanty.

 

The objective of this study was to determine the performance of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) 3 band RDT in symptomatic pediatric malaria patients against microscopy of Giemsa-stained blood films and to evaluate the effectiveness of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) in monitoring the efficacy of ACT (artesunate amodiaquine) among pediatric patients in Kinshasa, DRC where P. falciparum transmission is characterized as high [5].

 

 

Study area, population and procedures

 

This study was conducted at Tembo Health Center in Kinshasa in DRC from October to December 2012. The health facility was chosen because of its relatively high number of pediatric patients in the 3 months preceding this study. This high number of pediatric patients was used as indicative of the availability of sufficient study participants. All pediatric patients who presented with symptoms of malaria during the study were invited to participate. After obtaining consent from patients' parents or guardians, demographic and clinical data were collected including previous anti-malarial drug intake. Blood samples (finger prick or venous blood) for thick and thin blood films and for the SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT were collected from the patients on the day of recruitment (day 0). Blood slides were stained with Giemsa 3% for 30 minutes. The first slide readings were performed at the study site while the second readings were conducted at the National Biomedical Research Institute in Kinshasa. Those with discrepant results were read by a third reader under the supervision of the principal investigator, a parasitologist, until when the final agreement was reached. Technicians reading blood slides were blinded to the results of the SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT. Likewise, those reading the RDT were blinded to the results of the blood slides.

 

SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and read after 15 minutes by the first laboratory technician and then after 30 minutes by the second laboratory technician who was blinded to readings from the first technician. In case of a discrepancy between the readings, the test was repeated. Results were recorded as follows: (i) when the 3 bands of the test kit were all colored, the test was positive for both PfHRP-2 and PfpLDH, (ii) when bands C and T1 were colored, the results were positive for Pf HRP-2 and not for PfpLDH, (iii) when bands C and T2 were colored, the results were positive for PfpLDH and not for PfHRP-2 and (vi) when only band C was colored, the results were negative. Parasite density was computed by counting the number of parasites/200 white blood cells (WBC) and assuming a WBC count of 8,000/µl [6].

 

Positive cases of malaria were managed as recommended by the DRC National Malaria Control Program and World Health Organisation (WHO) [7]. To monitor the persistence of HRP-2/pLDH in the blood, respondents were followed for 28 days from day 0. Thus, besides day 0, blood samples for thick and thin blood films as well as for the SD Bioline malaria Pf (HRP-2/pLHD) RDT were collected on day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21 and day 28. The tests were performed following the same procedure as described above.

 

Operational case definitions

 

Sensitivity of the RDT assay is defined herein as its ability to correctly detect blood specimens containing malaria antigen. It is the percentage of true positive (TP) malaria specimens identified by the RDT as positive divided by the number of specimens identified by the gold standard assay (Giemsa-stained blood smear) as positive (TP) + false negative (FN).

 

Specificity of the RDT assay is its ability to correctly discriminate specimens that do not contain malaria antigen. It is the percentage of true negative (TN) specimens identified by the RDT as negative divided by the number of specimens identified by the gold standard assay as negative (TN) + false positive (FP).

 

Positive predictive value (PV+) is the probability that when the test is reactive, the specimen actually contains malaria antigen. PV+ is calculated as TP/(TP + FP). Negative predictive value (PV-) is the probability that when a test is negative, a specimen does not have malaria antigen. PV- is calculated as TN/(FN+TN).

 

Data analysis

 

Data were entered into MS Excel (Redmond, WA, USA) independently by two people. The two datasets were then compared and discrepancies were corrected to create the final version that was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20 (Chicago, IL, USA). The performance of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT was assessed by measuring its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values against blood smear microscopy as the gold standard [8].

 

The proportion of false positives among the children were estimated as a function of PfHRP-2/pLDH antigen present in <1,000 parasites/µl, 1001 - 5,000 parasites/µl, 5,001 - 50,000 parasites/µl and in > 50,000 parasites/µl on day 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28. In other words, this represented the percentage of participants who tested positive for AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT while having a negative blood smear test for a given parasite density level and day of follow up. We compared groups using Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was set up at p < 0.05.

 

Ethical approval

 

This study was first approved by the DRC National Biomedical Research Institute's Research Committee. Written informed consent was sought from parents or guardians of the children who participated in this study. The parents or guardians were assured that the data would be kept confidential and used only for research purposes. Participants who tested positive for malaria were given standard malaria management as stipulated by the DRC National Malaria Control Program and WHO.

 

 

Study participants

 

In total, 501 children were screened for P. falciparum in this study. Their mean (standard deviation) age was 26.9 (5.8) months. The youngest was 3.4 months old while the oldest was 53.2 months old. Two hundred and thirty six (47.1%) participants who were screened were females and 265 (52.9%) were males. Three hundred and thirty five (66.9%) participants tested negative for malaria while 166 (33.1%) tested positive for malaria infection. Parents/guardians of 103 children (out of the 166) gave consent to participate in the follow up part of the study, giving a response rate of 62.0%.

 

SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) performance

 

The frequency distribution of the study participants by parasite density level is presented in Table 1 whereby the parasitaemia bracket 5,001-50,000/μl had the highest percentage of children i.e. 12.8%. Results of the SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT performance against blood smear microscopy as the gold standard are presented in Table 2. SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT exhibited high sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Table 3 presents the sensitivity of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT by level of P. falciparum parasitaemia. The sensitivity of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) ranged from 85.1% to 100%. The RDT exhibited its lowest sensitivity when the parasitaemia was less than 10,000/μl.

 

SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) performance during follow up days

 

One hundred and three patients who were positive for P. falciparum on day 0 and their parents or guardians consented to participate in this study were followed up till day 28. They were 48 females and 55 males. Their mean age (standard deviation) was 31.4 (7.4) months. The youngest was 6 months old and the oldest was 50 months. After treatment, on day 3 and day 7, all patients tested negative by blood smear microscopy. On day 14, two patients became positive by blood smear microscopy and two were lost to follow up. On day 21, four more patients became positive and six were lost to follow up. On day 28, eleven other patients became positive making a total of 17 patients who became positive. These cases represented either treatment failure or new infections and six more were lost to follow up making a total of 14 children lost to follow up. The performance of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) against blood smear microscopy by day of follow up is presented in Table 4.

 

Proportions/percentages of false positives by parasite density and by day of follow up

 

Figure 1 compares the proportions of false positives among participants in bands HRP-2 and pLDH on day 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Band HRP-2 had higher proportions of false positives than pLDH. Though the proportion of false positives dropped with days of follow up until day 28 it remained significantly higher in band HRP-2. The proportions of false positives in band pLDH were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than those in band HRP-2. In the pLDH band, except for patients having parasite densities of 5,001-50,000/µl where a few cases of false positives were observed till day 14, no single case of false positives was observed among patients with parasite densities ≤ 1,000/µl on day 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28. There were no false positives among children with parasite density ≤ 50,000/µl on 7, 14, 21 and 28 in band pLDH.

 

 

The main finding of this study is that the performance of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT among pediatric patients with symptomatic malaria in Kinshasa, DRC was high. The test attributes for testing and monitoring the efficacy of ACT treatment among pediatric patients in the population studied were reasonably high. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were found to be high. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were also high indicating the high performance of this test.

 

Although the sensitivity of the test went a bit down to 85.1% among patients with parasite densities ≤ 1,000/μl, this study showed sensitivity of about 100% for parasite densities > 1,000/μl. Similar results are found in the literature [9,10]. These results indicate that when using SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT in this population, the probability of testing positive when one truly has malaria is more-or-less 100% which indicates high performance of this test in Kinshasa, DRC.

 

The evaluation of the performance of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) for monitoring the efficacy of ACT treatment showed higher proportions of false positives with respect to the HRP-2 band irrespective of patient parasites density and day of follow up. This means that readings from the test band HRP-2 are not suitable for monitoring the efficacy of ACT treatment. The fact that false positive cases were barely seen on the pLDH band makes this band the most suitable for monitoring the efficacy of ACT treatment. Though few cases of false positives were observed among patients with parasite densities of 5001- 50,000/µl up to day 14, no single case of false positive was observed among patients with other parasite densities up to the end of the follow up. The concomitant capability of the pLDH band to turn negative when blood smear microscopy is negative or positive when blood smear microscopy is positive as demonstrated herein is an attribute that makes SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT a suitable test for monitoring the efficacy of ACT treatment in this area of high P. falciparum transmission.

 

Considering the high level of P. falciparum transmission in Kinshasa, the major limitation of this test is its inability to differentiate between true treatment failure and reinfection cases as in total 17 cases (16.5%) became positive before the end of the study after initial successful treatment. Whether these were true cases of treatment failure or cases of new infection, only a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure can differentiate. PCR is not easily accessible in this resource-poor country. Thus, SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT can serve as a guide and a prioritization tool for monitoring the efficacy of ACT treatment in communities were the study was conducted. Once decreased ACT efficacy is suspected in a community, PCR should then be employed to discriminate between treatment failure and reinfection.

 

 

SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) RDT has been shown to have high sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values among pediatric patients with symptomatic malaria in Kinshasa, DRC. The RDT's relatively good attributes make it suitable for use as a guide in the monitoring of the efficacy of ACT treatment among pediatric patients in resource-poor areas like Kinshasa, DRC.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

ALK and JGTM conceived the study and participated in its design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. MGMDM, RBMH and RT participated in data analysis, interpretation and manuscript preparation. NSM, JJMT participated in data collection, analysis and manuscript preparation. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 

 

We gratefully acknowledge the scientific and technical inputs received from staff at the National Malaria Control Program in Kinshasa, the National Biomedical Research Institute in Kinshasa and from all our partners. Our special thanks go to all health care workers at Tembo Health Center and to the patients who consented to participate in this study for their cooperation.

 

 

Table 1: frequency distribution of the study participants by parasite density level

Table 2: SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) performance against blood smear microscopy as the gold standard

Table 3: sensitivity of SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) by level of P. falciparum parasitaemia

Table 4: SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) performance by day of follow up

Figure 1: sensitivity of HRP-2 or pLDH band of the SD Bioline malaria AgPf(HRP-2/pLDH) by parasite density in follow up days

 

 

1. Dzakah EE, Kang K, Ni C, Wang H, Wu P, Tang S, Wang J, Wang J, Wang X. Plasmodium vivax aldolase-specific monoclonal antibodies and its application in clinical diagnosis of malaria infection in China. Malar J. 2013; 12:199. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Swarthout TD, Counihan H, Senga RK, van de Broek I. Paracheck-Pf accuracy and recently treated Plasmodium falciparum infections: is there a risk of over-diagnosis? Malar J. 2007; 6:58. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Hance P, Garnotel E, De Pina JJ, Vedy S, Ragot C, Chadli M, Morillon M. Tests immuno-chromatographiques rapides de détection du paludisme, principes et stratégies d'utilisation. Med Trop (Mars). 2005;65(4):389-393. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Maltha J, Guiraud I, Lompo P, Kaboré B, Gillet P, Van Geet C, Tinto H, Jacobs J. Accuracy of PfHPR2 versus Pf-pLDH antigen detection by malaria rapid diagnostic tests in hospitalized children in a seasonal hyperendemic malaria transmission area in Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2014; 13:20. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Coene J. Malaria in urban and rural Kinshasa: the entomological input. Med Vet Entomol. 1993; 7(2): 127-137. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. WHO. Parasitologie médicale: technique de base pour le laboratoire. Geneva, World Health Organisation; 1993. Google Scholar


7. WHO. Methods for surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy. Geneva, World Health Organisation; 2009. Google Scholar


8. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston, Brown and Company; 1987. Google Scholar


9. WHO. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: summary results of WHO malaria RDT product testing: rounds 1-3 (2008-2011). Geneva, World Health Organisation; 2011. Google Scholar


10. Houzé S, Boly MD, Le Bras J, Deloron P, Faucher JF. PfHRP2 and PfLDH antigen detection for monitoring the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Malar J. 2009;8:211. PubMed | Google Scholar