Closure of round cutaneous defects progressively with the purse string suture technique

Closure of round cutaneous defects progressively with the purse string suture technique

 

Fatih Küçükdurmaz¹, Ismail Agir^2,&, Seyitali Gümüstas², Hakan Kivilcim³, Cihangir Tetik⁴

 

¹Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey, ²Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman University, 02040 Adiyaman, Turkey, ³Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Umraniye Research and Education Hospital, 34899 Istanbul, Turkey, ⁴Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Umraniye Research and Education Hospital, 34899 Istanbul, Turkey

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Ismail Agir, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman University, 02040, Adiyaman, Turkey

 

 

 

 

Wound healing is an intricate process in which the skin (or another organ-tissue) repairs itself after injury [1]. There are four options for treating the wound: healing by second intention, primary closure, closure with local skin flap and closure with skin grafting [2,3]. Primary closure after skin expansion with expander may be another option for wound closure[4]. Immediate reconstruction is favoured except an area which heals likely well by second intention [2]. There are many closure techniques available to cutaneous surgeons.One of them isthe purse-string suture which is used to provide complete or partial closure of round skin defects. Greenbaum and Radonich first introduced the purse-string closure, which was used to repair a cutaneous surgical defect [4]. This running suture can either be placed horizontally in the dermis (intradermal or subcuticular purse-string suture)or be passed through the epidermis and dermis with each stitch (cuticular purse-string suture) [5,6]. Viscoelastic property of skin provides skin closure in purse string suturing. Gibson and Kenedi first described these viscoelastic properties in 1967; the main properties being creep and stress relaxation [2]. Thus the skin has remarkable molding properties that can be used to the surgeon´s advantage [7,8]. However large defects may not be completely closed. When the suture is cinched and tied, tissue at the wound periphery advances circumferentially, resulting in a decreased wound diameter. The resulting defect may either be covered with a skin graft or be allowed to heal by second intention [9]. In our animal study; we closed skin defect with a simple suture material by using subcuticular purse string suture technique by progressively cinching wound.

 

 

Animal Ethical Committee approval was obtained from Marmara University Medical Faculty Ethical Institution. Twenty Sprague-Dawrey rats (weights between 350 -400 gr) divided into toequal groups (n=10 rats). General anestesia was made with using 35 mg/kg intraperitoneal Ketamin hydrochlorid, then intramuscular sodium pentobarbital (18 mg/kg) was applied for anesthesia. All wounds were then dressed with a single layer of sterile gauze, and the rat was wrapped with elastic tape. After recovery from anesthesia, the animals were caged individually and allowed free access to food and water.

 

Surgical procedure: the hairs at the dorsum of the rats were removed with using a electric razor. We created a circular skin defect, 4 cm in diameter on dorsum of the rats with using a plastic temple in both groups. In group 1, subcutaneous purse string suture was applied all around the edge of the wound by using a nonabsorbable and monofilament suture (PROLENE TM Polyprolene suture) (Figure 1). Two ends of the suture was tightened with a sliding knot, a Duncan loop (Figure 2). In group 2, the skin defect, suture and the knot was made in same way but the wound left for a secondary healing (Figure 3). In post operative period, intramuscular antibiotic prophylaxis was given to both of the groups for 5 days.

 

Shrinking of the skin defects: we applied daily dressing to wounds in both groups by irrigation with 0.9% saline and covering with sterile gauze; the rat was wrapped with elastic tape after the dressing. In group 1, during the change of daily dressing the wound was shrinked by sliding the knot 1 cm every day. In group 2, only daily dressing was made with same way in group 1. The diameter of the lesions were measured with using a caliper and a photo was taken daily for documentation.

 

Statistical Analysis: T test was used for comparison of open wound area between two groups. Repeated measures ANOVA were used for intragroup open wound area differences. Non-parametric analog test was used in case of exceeding the normal value. Ten animals per group were found sufficient for 80% power.

 

 

The skin defects were closed totally in 13 days in group 1 on the other hand the mean diameter of skin defect in group 2 was 1,5-cm (p<0,001). There were no infection or suture related complication in group 1. No complication was observed in group 2 as well.

 

 

Purse-string suture technique has been used for the restoration of defects by many surgeons and is particularly suited to circular defects [2]. There are two types of purse-string suture technique: Intradermal purse-string closure and Cuticular purse-string closure. The intradermal (or subcuticular) purse string suture is performed by passing the running suture horizontally in the dermis before it is pulled taut [10]. Purse-string suture technique allows almost complete or partial closure of the defect by advancing the skin from the entire periphery of the wound [2,11].

 

The purse-string suture closure have some advantages such as; it is a simple technique it doesn't need a special training, experience and it doesn't require a operation room also can be applied with several simple materials [2,12]. It is inexpensive and the final results are often good, especially in lax skin area. Besides angiogenesis is promoted with tension [6,13]. This procedure well suited for elderly patients, with loose skin [14,15]. This tecnique also have some disadvantages such as; the suture has to be retained for a long time. Allergic contact dermatitis, alopecia, exuberant granulation tissue, hypertrophic scar, postoperative pain, wound dehiscence are other problems which are seen with this technique [6,12,16-18]. Certain areas of the body present unique and difficult challenges such as the shoulder and back. However less mobile areas of the body with high excess skin laxity are more sutibale for cosmetically healing with optimal scars. By using the purse-string suture in problematic less skin laxity areas, the overall length of the scar can be minimized [11].

 

However the large wounds may not be suitable for primary closure. Capability for primary closure depends on viscoelasticity of the periperal tissue of wound. Gibson and Kenedi first described these viscoelastic properties in 1967; the main properties being creep and stress relaxation [2,19]. Mechanical creep occurs when a constant force stretches a piece of skin, when a piece of skin is stretched for a given distance and that distance is held constant; stress relaxation occurs and the force required to keep it stretched gradually decreases. This process occurs over minutes or hours [2,20]. However during surgery there is no sufficient time for maximum expansion to close big defects. On the other hand a tight skin closure decreases blood circulation to the skin edges, thereby causing the tissues to become ischemic and cause skin death. Skin death results in a wound that is larger than the initial wound [21]. In our study; we closed skin defect with purse string suture technique by stretching the wound daily. So we can close larger defect than closeable at a time. So mechanical complication of excessive traction such as unacceptable cosmetic appearance, tissue necrosis and deforming the surrounding structures can be avoided.

 

A wound that is more than 6 hours old is also not suitable for primary repair. The risk of infection is greatly increased after this amount of time has lapsed. Wound with empty space also insuitable for primary closure. Empty space which occurs due to loss of subcutaneous tissue or swelling of the skin around the wound. At primary closing of wound with empty space, blood may collect at empty space which increasing the likelihood of infection and problems with wound healing [22]. In such cases, secondary healing is preferred. Another advantage of our technique is during shrinking it also permits a secondary wound healing. So while gradual wound closing dead space also is filled with granulation and dirty tissues are cleaned with repeated dressing. So our technique rapid the wound closure so decreases the cost and the healing time according to the secondary healing. Animal choice may be a negative point for our study because rat dorsal skin is so lax. Reviewer may say that tissue gaining is due to this laxity not due to creep -stress relaxation period. However we didn't have another choice at our animal lab.

 

Another technique for closing large defect is expansion and later closing with tissue expander. The primary objective of tissue expander is gaining extra skin tissue. However it brings some minor and major complication such as pain, seroma, dog ears, widening of scars as minor complications and infection, expander exposure, implant failure, induced ischemia as major complication [3,23,24]. Sometimes wounds are complicated due to this complication. In our technique, skin tissue peripheral to wound is expanded with time as a result of creep and stress relaxation so complication due to tissue expander will be avoided.

 

 

As a result, closing large wound with purse string suture and gradual tightening decreases the healing time for wound which is not suitable for primary closing such as large wound, dirty wound or tight wound according to secondary healing. Moreover tissue is expanded without using any tissue expander.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Fatih Küçükdurmaz, research concept and design, collection and/or assembly of data, writing the article, critical revision of the article. Ismail Agir, research concept and design, collection and/or assembly of data, writing the article. Seyitali Gümüstas, writing the article. Hakan kivilcim, collection and/or assembly of data. Cihangir Tetik, research, concept and design. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

Figure 1: the skin defect and application of subcutaneous purse string is seen

Figure 2: drawing of Duncan loop knot

Figure 3: the skin defect in group 2 without suturing

 

 

1. Nguyen DT, Orgill DP, Murphy GF. Chapter 4: The Pathophysiologic Basis for Wound Healing and Cutaneous Regeneration. Biomaterials For Treating Skin Loss. Woodhead Publishing (UK/Europe) & CRC Press (US), Cambridge/Boca Raton; 2009. p. 25-57. Google Scholar


2. Patel KK, Telfer MRA. "round block" purse-string suture in facial reconstruction after operations for skin cancer surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;41(3):151-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Ronert MA, Hofheinz H, Manassa E, Asgarouladi H, Olbrisch RR. The beginning of a new era in tissue expansion: self-filling osmotic tissue expander-four-year clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct; 114(5):1025-31. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Greenbaum SS, Radonich MA. The purse-string closure. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22:1054-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Mulliken JB, Rogers GF. Circular excision of hemangioma and purse-string closure: the smallest possible scar. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109(5): 1544-1554. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Cohen PR, Martinelli PT. The cuticular purse-string suture: a modified purse-string suture for the partial closure of round postoperative wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2007 Jul;46(7):746-53. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Neumann CG.The expansion of an area of skin by progressive distention of a subcutaneous balloon. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1957 Feb; 19(2):124-30. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Sasaki GH. Intraoperative sustained limited expansion (ISLE) as an immediate reconstructive technique. Clin Plast Surg. 1987 Jul; 14(3):563-73. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Brady JG, Grande DJ. The purse-string suture in facial reconstruction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18(9):812-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Cohen PR, Martinelli PT. Closure of round cutaneous post operative wounds with the purse string suture. South Med J. 2006 Dec; 99(12):1401-2. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Weisberg NK, Greenbaum SS. Revisiting the purse-string closure: some new methods and modifications. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun; 29(6):672-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Tremolada C, Blandini D. The "Round Block" Purse-String Suture: a simple method to close skin defects with minimal scarring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Jul; 100(1):126-31. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Lantieri LA, Martin-Garcia N, Wechsler J, Mitrofanoff M, Raulo Y, Baruch JP. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in expanded tissue: a possible mechanism of angiogenesis in tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 101(2): 392-398. PubMed | Google Scholar


14. Mather MK, Harrington AC. Surgical pearl: purse-string suture in the management of poorly delinated melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998; 38(1): 99-101. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. Romiti R, Randle HW. Complete closure by purse-string suture after Mohs micrographic surgery on thin, sun-damaged skin. Dermatol Surg. 2002; 28(11): 1070-1071. PubMed | Google Scholar


16. Cohen PR, Martinelli PT. The purse-string suture revisited: a useful technique for the closure of cutaneous surgical wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2007 Apr;46(4):341-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Peled IJ, Zagher U, Wexler MR. Purse-string suture for reduction and closure of skin defects. Ann Plast Surg. 1985 May; 14(5):465-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Hodgson KJ, Hughes LE. A simple technique for improving the cosmesis of excision of a melanoma and skin grafting. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Nov;163(5):491-2. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Gibson T, Kenedi RM. Biomechanical properties of the skin. Surg Clin North Am. 1967 Apr;47(2):279-94. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Gibson T. Physical properties of skin. In: McCarthy J, ed. Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990: 207. Google Scholar


21. Goldwyn RM, Rueckert F. The value of healing by secondary intention for sizable defects of the face. Arch Surg. 1977;112:285. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Montandon D, D'Andiron G. The mechanism of wound contraction and epithelialization. Clin Plast Surg. 1977; 4:325. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Esposito G, DiCaprio G. Tissueexpansion in the treatment of pressureulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Mar;87(3):501-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Manders EK, Schenden MJ, Furrey JA, Hetzler PT et al. Soft-tissue expansion: concepts and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984 Oct; 74(4):493-507. PubMed | Google Scholar