Secondary reconstruction of vaginal stenosis using a posterior labial perforator based falandry flap

Secondary reconstruction of vaginal stenosis using a posterior labial perforator based falandry flap

Amine Slaoui^1,&, Tidiani Kariba Bagayogo¹, Tarik Karmouni¹, Khalid Elkhader¹, Abdelatif Koutani¹, Ahmed Ibn Attaya¹

¹Urology B, Ibn Sina, University Hospital, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

^&Corresponding author
Amine Slaoui, Urology B, Ibn Sina, University Hospital, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

The (re-) construction of a competent vagina in female patients may be indicated in cases where there is absence of a functional vagina. This absence may be absolute, for instance in congenital or iatrogenic cases, or relative, for example after trauma or infection [1]. Various procedures have been applied [2, 3]. The number and variety of these methods indicate that it is a challenging problem, and that the ideal solution to this problem is yet to be established. In this paper we present a case of a 49-year-old woman who had external genital abnormalities due to complication of six pregnancies. She had two operations (without plasty) in another hospital, and this had resulted in severe constriction of the all vagina (Figure 1, Figure 2). Clinically the patient reported dyspareunia complicated by an inability to have sex and therefore conflictsfamily. On physical examination the patient has stenosis of the all the vagina until the cervix. This stenosis is almost complete and impassable finger. Pelvic MRI shows a narrowing of the vaginal caliber proximal 1/3 (Figure 3, Figure 4).

The first Vaginoplasty using skin grafts was in 1898 Abbe [4] used a rubber pouch covered with a skin graft and stuffed with iodoform gauze to create a neovagina. In 1938 Mclndoe and Banister [5] re-introduced and popularized this technique. The technique we used was repairing vaginal stenosis by interposing between the vaginal walls, a skin flap pedicled removed using the Falandry technique at a high lip [6]. The patient is under spinal anesthesia. Perforators from the posterior labial artery were mapped at the lateral base of the labium major. One labial flap was designed based on those perforators After a skin incision, one labial border flap was elevated in advance as local flaps, and turned backwards (Figure 5). The flap was appointed to form the posterior wall, creating a vaginal lumen of adequate size (Figure 6, Figure 7). The patient was re-examined three weeks after the surgical act, it is satisfied sexually. After a decline of 3 months, there has been no recurrence.

Various flaps have been developed to overcome the drawbacks of skin grafts for the reconstruction of vagina. These include traditional muscle flaps, such as gracillis muscle flap, transverse abdominal muscle flap, and tensor fascia lata flap, and fascia cutaneous flaps, such as medial thigh flaps and gluteal flaps [7]. However, these conventional flaps have several disadvantages. The pedicle is remote from the perineal region and the flaps lack mobility. Therefore, a large flap is required to cover the defect as well as to provide mobility, which leads to an excessive flap volume and severe donor site scarring. Accordingly, a local flap based on perforators is easier to handle and suit- able for resurfacing. The arterial supply to the perineum is abundant, and arises from vessels of the lower abdomen, medial thigh, and gluteal region [8]. The perforators in the perineum include perforators of the superficial external pudendal artery, anterior cutaneous branch of the obturator artery, and the lateral branch of the posterior scrotal (labial) artery. Networks of chain-type vascular anastomose are formed by these perforators [9]. Because of their abundant blood supply, proximity to the defect and similarity of tissue characteristics, several perineal flaps have been suggested [10, 11]. The perforator from the posterior labial artery originates from the posterior labial artery within 1.5 cm of the posterior margin of the labium, and extends antero-laterally through deep fascia to the posterior-lateral base of the labia major. It gives off at least three to five branches and supplies the inferior perineal regions [8]. The posterior labial artery perforator is reliable and the flap can be elevated safely as long as it is connected to the perforator, allowing the flap to move without tension. Based on the posterior labial artery perforator, the labia is unfolded and the inner and outer surface of the labium major is expanded to form a large surface. Although the size of the flap would appear to be quite inadequate compared to large conventional flaps, its thinness and pliability with a large arc of rotation make it especially suitable for resurfacing the inner lining of the vagina. The design of the flap involves only the labium major, which have soft and elastic tissue appropriate to a vagina. Therefore, an effective outcome can be achieved without further operation. The labial border flap is turned back and closed primarily to the donor site, keeping the natural shape of the labial border and covering the reconstructed vaginal orifice circumferentially. Finally donor site morbidity is minimal [10], and scars are also easily concealed after the reconstruction, permitting a favorable aesthetic outcome. A few reports have described effective treatments for secondary or recurrent stenosis of the vaginal orifice [11]. The labia major has enough lining tissue and skin for this purpose if the flap is designed and transposed based on perforators near the base of the labia major.

The aim of vaginoplasty should be the creation of a neo-vagina that will be satisfying in appearance, function and feeling [12]. Further, it should not require major and risky surgical intervention, and it should not create new lesions and malfunctions or require long and distressing postoperative treatment [13]. Secondary reconstruction vaginal stenosis using a posterior lip flap perforator based Falandry responds perfectly to these criteria and seems to be an ideal technique.

The authors declare no competing interests.

All authors have read and agreed to the final version of this manuscript and have equally contributed to its content and to the management of the case.

Figure 1: preoperative aspect: vaginal stenosis

Figure 2: close view of the vaginal stenosis

Figure 3: pelvic MRI (T1): vaginal narrowing

Figure 4: pelvic MRI (T2): vaginal narrowing

Figure 5: one labial border flap was elevated in advance as local flap

Figure 6: the flap was appointed to form the posterior wall

Figure 7: vaginal lumen of adequate size: introduction of two fingers

1. Evans TN. The artificial vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967 Dec 1;99(7):944-51. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Mclndoe AH, Banister JB. An operation for the cure of congenital absence of the vagina. J obstetric Gynecology. 1938; 45:490-494. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Goldwyn RM. History of attempts to form a vagina. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977 Mar;59(3):319-29. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Abbe R. New method of creating a vagina in a case of con-genital absence. Med Rec. 1898;54:836-838. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Falandry L, Lahaye F, Marara C. A pedicled muscle fat flap of the major labia in the treatment of complex vesicovaginal fistula. Apropos of 11 cases. J Urol (Paris). 1990; 96(2):97-102. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Mclndoe AH, Banister JB. An operation for the cure of congenital absence of the vagina. J obstetric Gynecology. 1938;45:490-494. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Giraldo F. Cutaneous neo-vaginoplasty using the Malaga flap (vulvo-perineal fascia-cutaneous flap): a 12-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Mar;111(3):1249-56. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Purushothaman V. Horse shoe flap vaginoplasty -- a new technique of vaginal reconstruction with labia minor flaps for primary vaginal agenesis. Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Oct;58(7):934-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Jun B, Hasi W, Yang C, Song J. A micro dissection study of perforating vessels in the perineum. Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Dec;63(6):665-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Prakash V. Triple flap vaginoplasty for agenesis of the vagina. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Jun;37(6):501-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Kurita M, Ozaki M, Okazaki M, Omori M, Takushima A, Harii K. Secondary reconstruction of vaginal stenosis with bilateral pudendal thigh flaps. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Jun;45(3):168-72. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Davydov SN. 12-year experience with colpo-poiesis using the peritoneum. Gynakologe. 1980 Sep;13(3):120-1. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Wilflingseder P, Dapunt O, Fedisch H. Subsequent behaviour of small bowel-composite grafts in the vagina. Chir Plast. 1972;1: 281-288. PubMed | Google Scholar