Reaction to Koppad SN et al. Bilateral spermatocytic seminoma: an update on "synchronous" and "sequential" presentation of this rare variant of testicular tumour

Reaction to Koppad SN et al. Bilateral spermatocytic seminoma: an update on "synchronous" and "sequential" presentation of this rare variant of testicular tumour

 

Piyush Kalakoti^1,&, Suman Sahu¹, Aarif Syed²

 

¹Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital, New Delhi, DL 110091, India, ²Chand Memorial Hospital, Patna, BR 800013, India

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Piyush Kalakoti, Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital (Govt. of Delhi), New Delhi, India

 

 

 

 

We read with interest the report of Koppad and colleagues [1] describing synchronous presentation of bilateral spermatocytic seminoma (SS) in an elderly male from rural India and appreciate their meticulous efforts in documenting this rare presentation. While the authors' [1] assert bilateral synchronous SS has been reported previously, with two cases each from Japan and France and one from the United States, we strongly disagree with the reported statistics and wish to draw attention of the authors and the readership of the journal to the gross inaccuracies in the report. We herein present our data following a comprehensive literature review to unveil the magnitude of bilateral presentation (synchronous and sequential) of this unique variant of testicular tumor, and to help disseminate precise lineage of information on the topic.

 

An exhaustive literature search was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE^®; EMBASE; CAB Abstracts; Current Contents and Google Scholar) for relevant, published, peer-reviewed articles up to mid February 2014. The search terms used were: seminoma; spermatocytic seminoma; bilateral spermatocytic seminoma with/without "synchronous" and "sequential"; testicular tumor and testicular cancer. Further, bibliographies of identified publications and articles citing them were also examined. Abstracts and reviews were as well included, without limitation on the language of publication. Inclusion of articles other than English language, where full texts and abstracts were unavailable for a possible translation, article selection relied mainly upon the title that had the search term "bilateral spermatocytic seminoma". The resulting citations were exported to EndNote^® X7 and articles were screened independently by two authors (PK and SS) by reviewing their titles and abstracts. The following criteria were applied for screening: 1) testicular tumors relevant to SS; 2) limited to human subjects. Potential conflicts arising upon article selection were resolved by discussion and consensus. Data from identifiable papers was synthesized following which SS of bilateral origin was divided into 3 categories: synchronous [1-5] and sequential [6-8], and lastly where presentation could not be identified [9,10] (Table 1). Even though bilateral, foreign language of the published literature and unavailability of full text or abstract for a possible review or translation limited our efforts to classify the latter into one of the two possible clinical presentations.

 

Although spermatocytic seminoma, a distinctive testicular germ cell tumor, was first described by Pierre Masson[11] in 1946, there exists only five possible cases describing its synchronous presentation in the existing literature, including the one reported by Koppad et al [1] (Table 1). Ascertained by the title and year of publication (1969, 1970), it is estimated that first such case of synchronicity in presentation was reported by Arvis et al [2, 3]; however foreign language of publication (French), in addition to lack of full texts and abstract raises concern over its certainty. Interestingly, it could be argued that cases published by Tmoyoshi and Kawamur (1968, Japan) [9], and Potet and Roland (1968, France) [10] on bilateral SS could be describing a synchronous presentation; however a possible confirmation was complicated due to the above foresaid reasons. In contrast, the case of SS by Maruta et al [5] in a 56 year old Japanese male was ascertained to be of synchronous presentation from the data extracted from abstract, and subsequent translation of full text into English language. Perhaps, Leocádio and Stein [4] unarguably described the first case of synchronous SS reported in English literature (Table 1).

 

With only handful of reports documenting bilateral presentation of this unique variant of testicular tumor, we perceive that incidence of such involvement could be much higher than what is reported since its first description almost 7 decades ago. Keeping in view of a possible malignant transformation and the risk it poses, prospective studies looking at unraveling the unknown pathogenesis of these tumors should also note for its bilateral affliction, if at all, for a better understanding of its presentation and also to uncover more epidemiological data on the same.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

Piyush Kalakoti and Suman Sahu conceptualized the letter, developed protocol for the search strategy, literature review, and contributed to sequence alignment and drafting the final version of the manuscript. Aarif Syed made critical contributions to the final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 

 

Table 1: Patient characteristics and clinical course of bilateral SS cases reported in medical literature

 

 

1. Koppad SN, Sonawane SR, Kapoor VB, Deshmukh AM, Borole KA. Bilateral synchronous spermatocytic seminoma: a rare case report from rural India and literature review. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:34. PubMed | Google Scholar


2. Arvis G, Potet F, Steg A. Simultaneous bilateral spermatocytal seminoma of the testicle: Case report and review of the literature. Ann Urol (Paris). 1969;3(3):161-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Arvis G, Potet F, Steg A, Benassayag E. Spermatocytic seminoma of the testicle with a bilateral form at the onset:case report and literature review. J Urol Nephrol (Paris). 1970;76(3):288-96. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Leocadio DE, Stein BS. A case of synchronous bilateral spermatocytic seminoma. Urol Oncol. 2008;26(2):202-3. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Maruta S, Shida Y, Takehara K, Onita T, Igawa T, Sakai H. A case report of bilateral spermatocytic seminoma. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2011;57(9):525-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


6. Bergner DM, Duck GB, Rao M. Bilateral sequential spermatocytic seminoma. J Urol. 1980;124(4):565. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Chung PW, Bayley AJ, Sweet J, Jewett MA, Tew-George B, Gospodarowicz MK, et al. Spermatocytic seminoma: a review. Eur Urol. 2004;45(4):495-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Xu N, Li F, Tian R, Shao M, Liu L, Guo K. A rare case of bilateral sequential spermatocytic seminoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11(1):175. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Tmoyoshi T, Kawamura J. Bilateral spermatocytic seminoma: report of a case. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1968;14(10):753-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Potet F, Roland J. Apropos of a case of bilateral spermatocytic seminoma. Ann Anat Pathol (Paris). 1968;13(3):361-71. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Masson P. Etude sur le seminome. Rev Can Biol. 1946;5(4):361-87. PubMed | Google Scholar