Immunization coverage and its determinants among children aged 12 - 23 months in a peri-urban area of Kenya

Immunization coverage and its determinants among children aged 12 – 23 months in a peri-urban area of Kenya

 

Lilian Chepkemoi Maina^1,&, Simon Karanja¹, Janeth Kombich²

 

¹Institute of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Jomo Kenyatta University of agriculture and Technology. P.O.BOX 62000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya, ²Kabianga University College, P.O. Box 2030, 20200, Kericho, Kenya

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Lilian Chepkemoi Maina, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O.BOX 62000-00200 Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

 

 

There has been a significant rise in the coverage for the six major vaccine-preventable diseases; pertussis, childhood tuberculosis, tetanus, polio, measles and diphtheria since the initiation of Expanded Programme on Immunization in 1974 by the World Health Organization [1].

 

In developed countries, where accurate recording of immunization and reporting of diseases is in place, most vaccine-preventable diseases are at or near record lows [2]. Worldwide, DTP coverage increased to an estimated 82 per cent by the end of 2008. Polio is on the verge of eradication. Deaths from measles, a major killer disease, declined by 74 per cent worldwide and by 89 per cent in sub-Saharan Africa between 2000 and 2007 [3]. However, absolute numbers of unvaccinated infants are highest in the most populous developing countries, some of which enjoy fairly high rates of immunization coverage [4].

 

The complete immunization coverage in Kenya in 2003 was 57 % and this rose gradually in 2007 to 77% [5]. However, an estimated 35% of newborns had not been immunized in 2006, translating into 0.5 million unvaccinated children within the country. It is also reported that 20% of deaths among children less than five years of age, are caused by measles. In 2006, 1.5 million children were at risk of contracting measles after an upsurge of confirmed measles outbreaks in 39 districts in Kenya [6].

 

The Kenya Expanded Programme on Immunization recommends that children receive Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) at birth; three doses of Pentavalent vaccine and OPV at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age; and measles vaccine at 9 months of age. Immunizations are recorded on vaccine cards or booklets obtained from the clinics. Immunization coverage in Nakuru County in 2010 was 66% and a drop-out rate of 10.0% [7]. Reasons for this drop-out rate are still not known. This study therefore sought to find out the coverage rate of children aged 12-23 months in Kaptembwo as well as to identify the factors that influence it so as to propose recommendations for interventions and increase the immunization coverage.

 

In Kenya, there are few published studies which have been done and with the purpose of establishing factors that are associated with incomplete immunization. This study sought to identify specific factors associated with immunization coverage in order to advance improved intervention, policies/strategies therefore raising overall immunization coverage.

 

 

Study site

 

Nakuru is one of the most populous districts in Kenya and Kaptembwo is the largest low income settlement in this district covering an area of 25sq Km. The population of Kaptembwo is estimated to be 112,937 with approximately 36,404 households [8]. The choice of Kaptembwo as a study site has been influenced by the experience of work conducted by other investigators in similar settings. Emphasis and focus was put on excluded and invisible children [9]. Slum children have been identified amongst the most socially and economically deprived in the community [10] and are therefore in need of health services and especially universal childhood immunization services which are an entry point to provision of other essential health services. While the area is inhabited by people of low social economic status, the provision of health services in the area are far from adequate. Indeed there appears to be no known study conducted in the area on the determinants of immunization status among children aged 12 to 23 months. Therefore this study sought to determine the complete immunization coverage, antigen-specific coverage and factors associated with incomplete immunization.

 

Study design

 

A cross-sectional community-based study was conducted in which 380 mothers/guardians were interviewed and children aged 12-23 months were sampled. The participants had to meet the inclusion criteria of being residents in the study area for a period of not less than 2 years. The study employed a multi-stage study design as the area comprises of 3 Sub-locations namely; Kaptembwo, Githima and Mwariki each having 2 villages. One village from each Sub-location was randomly selected and included in the study. Sample size per village was done proportionate to its population size. Data was collected from mothers or guardians of the selected 12-23 months old children using a pre-tested semi structured questionnaires using a door to door approach. Information collected included the socio-demographic characteristics as well as knowledge, attitude and perceptions of the mothers/guardians towards immunization, immunization status of the children and other factors influencing coverage in the area. Child Health cards were scrutinized to aid in the assessment of the immunization status of the children. In case of absence of the child health cards, mothers/caretakers of the respective children were asked to recall the immunization history.

 

Ethical approval

 

Approval was obtained from Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Scientific Steering Committees and KEMRI National Ethical Review Committee. Permission was also sought from the relevant health institution management. Prior consent was obtained in accordance with the ethical guidelines. All stake holders were informed about the study. Informed consent was sought from the study participants before administration of the questionnaire.

 

Data management and analysis

 

The quantitative data from the field was coded and double entered into a computer database designed using MS-Access application and analysis was done using SPSS Statistical Software. Bivariate and Multivariate analysis were conducted to identify independent predictors of immunization coverage. Odds and Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR & AOR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were used to estimate the strength of association between independent variables and the dependent variable. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

 

The main outcome measures of the study included immunization coverage level and the vaccination levels of the various antigens administered to children. Other measures included the proportion of fully immunized children, proportion of children who had received none or part of the vaccines on the immunization schedule, different levels of knowledge and attitude regarding immunization among the respondents as well as perceived barriers to immunization in the study area.

 

 

General characteristics of the study participants

 

Majority of the participants (43.7%) were aged between 20 and 24 years and 29.7% were 25-29 years. Females were more (94.5%) than the males (5.5%). Those who had attained at-least a Primary School education were 58.7%, 33.2 % Secondary School Education and 2.6% college or University. Majority of participants 71.2% reported to have between 1 and 3 children while 20% had 4 to six children. Children enrolled in the study who were aged between 13-18 months were 50.3%, 43.4% aged between 19 - 23 months while 59.7% were females and 40.3% were males. Those born at a health facility were 60.5%, 22.4% at home and 17.1% through Traditional Birth Attendants (Table 1).

 

The immunization coverage in Kaptembwo

 

The study showed that 291 (76.6%) of the children were fully immunized by card and history. The immunization coverage by card and history was: BCG (99.5%), OPV0 (97.6%), OPV 1(98.7%), OPV2 (96.6%), OPV3 (90.5%), Penta 1(98.9), Penta 2 (96.6%), Penta 3 (90.0%), measles (77.4%). The drop-out rate between the first and third pentavalent vaccine coverage was 8.9%. Access to immunization services in the area is therefore outstanding at 98.9%. The lowest immunization coverage was recorded for Measles (77.4%) while BCG, which is the gateway for EPI was 99.5% (Table 2).

 

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants and immunization coverage

 

Bivariate Analysis was done to test for the strength of association between categorical variables. All exposure variables (Independent factors) were associated with the dependent variable (Immunization coverage) to determine which ones had significant association. Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were used to estimate the strength of association between independent variables and the dependent variable. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Among the factors that were found to be significantly associated with immunization coverage include; level of education; Primary education (p=0.002) and secondary education (p<0.001), number of children within the family (p<0.001, OR=2.71), Knowledge on immunization (p=0.005), place of birth (p<0.001, OR=2.77), advice on next date of growth monitoring (p=0.001), opinion of health services offered in the area (P=0.011) (Table 3).

 

Factors associated with immunization coverage

 

All independent variables identified to significantly associate with "Immunization coverage" at bivariate analysis were considered together in a Multivariate analysis. This was performed using Binary logistic regression where backward conditional method was specified in order to identify confounders and/or effect modifiers. Adjusted odds Ratio (AOR) with corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were used to estimate the strength of association between the retained independent predictors of "Full immunization coverage". Predictors of full immunization coverage in Kaptembwo were identified as; number of children within the family (p=0.001, OR=2.67), Place of birth (p=0.002 OR=2.26), advice on next date for growth monitoring (p= 0.003, OR=2.94), Opinion on immunization services offered in the area (p=0.008 OR=2.21) (Table 4).

 

On the opinion of respondents on the health immunization services offered in the area, 84.6% of mother/guardians who rated immunization services offered within the area as very good are more likely to have children who have received full immunization compared to those whose mothers/guardians rated immunization services as good (72.8%), (OR=2.05; 95% CI: 1.17 - 3.59; p=0.011) (Figure 1).

 

 

This study found that the immunization coverage in Kaptembwo was 67.7% and Penta 1 - Penta 3 drop-out rate of 8.9% which is indicative of good performance. Measles vaccine had the lowest coverage rate of 77.4%. By the age of one year, only 87.5% of children had been fully immunized. The immunization services in the area were rated as very good by 84.6% of the participants and access to these services was supported by the Penta 1 coverage rate of 98.9%. Measles (65.3%) and Polio (69.2%) were two of the most mentioned vaccine preventable diseases by participants.

 

Maternal education was one of the factors that was significantly associated with immunization coverage. In Kaptembwo, the proportion of fully immunized children of mothers/guardians who had attained secondary school education and above was 81.6% which is higher than those who had attained primary school education (76.7%) and even those with no formal education (42.9%). Previous studies have shown a significant association between immunization coverage and residing in an area with high levels of maternal/guardian education [11].

 

With over 80% of children delivered at a health facility having received full immunization, the place of birth was found to be one of the predictors of immunization coverage. Though 60.5% of deliveries were conducted at a health facility, the number of home/TBA assisted deliveries accounted for over 30% of all deliveries in the area. This study found that a child who was delivered in a health facility was 2.26 times more likely to receive full immunization compared to one delivered at home (by self) or by a Traditional Birth Attendant. Other investigators have also found similar associations between the place of birth of the child and immunization [12].

 

Advice given to mothers at health facilities during immunization services was also assessed and participants who recalled having been advised on the next date of growth monitoring had children who were 2.94 times more likely to receive full immunization. Other form of advice that was given at the health facility was reported to be; importance of completing immunization schedules as well as date of next dose of vaccine.

 

Participants who rated immunization services in the area as being very good (84.6%) were 2.21 times more likely to receive full immunization compared to one whose mother/guardian had a good opinion. Despite the rating of immunization services in the area as being good or very good, reasons given by participants for not taking children for immunization include; unawareness that the child was due for another vaccine, loss of immunization card, child was ill, migration of parents upcountry, service charge and shortage of vaccines at the health facilities. Previous studies have shown an association between full immunization coverage and the said factors [10,13].

 

This study was prone to recall bias as the respondents, who did not have the child health cards, were asked to recall the vaccines that were administered to their children. Some of the respondents did not give specific reasons for not taking their children for some of the vaccination. These aspects are therefore considered as limitations to the study.

 

 

The utilization of immunization services in Kaptembwo is good. The participants were aware of the immunization services being offered at the health facilities and importance was identified as being disease preventive. There was, however, no association between mothers/guardians age, marital status and level of education and employment and immunization coverage. There is need to strengthen communication, education and information skills of Health Workers to improve service provision and health education to mothers/guardians. The surveillance and referral systems in the area also need reinforcing so as to identify defaulters of immunization and reduce the drop-out rate.

 

 

'The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 

 

LCM: Primary author and was responsible for formulation of the research concept, designing the study, acquisition of data and analysis, interpretation of results and drafting of the manuscript. The Primary author also availed the funds for the research. SMK: Conception, design and coordination of the project, data analysis and interpretation and writing as well as the review of the draft manuscript. JK: Conception, design and coordination of the project, data analysis & interpretation and writing and review of the draft manuscript.

 

 

The authors hereby thank the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture & Technology (JKUAT), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), administrative Unit of Kaptembwo, all who participated in the study. We would also like to acknowledge Dr & Mrs. Malakwen for their financial support during the entire study.

 

 

Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Table 2: Immunization coverage among children aged 12-23 months old residing in the study area

Table 3: Immunization coverage in relation to socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Table 4: Logistic Regression

Figure 1: Immunization coverage in relation to opinion on the health immunization services offered within the area by the respondents

 

 

1. World Health Organization. World Health Assembly Fourteenth plenary meeting, Geneva. Handbook of Resolutions; WHO 1974 May; (1):823. Google Scholar


2. Orenstein WA, Douglas RG, Rodewald LE. Immunizations in the United States: success, structure and stress. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2005 May-Jun; 24(3):599-610. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. World Health Organization / United Nations Children?s Fund. Immunization Summary - A statistical reference containing data through 2008. UNICEF/WHO 2010. Google Scholar


4. United Nations Children?s Fund. Monitoring the situation of children and women: Child survival and health 2009, New York, United States of America. 2009. Google Scholar


5. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro. The Kenya Demographic and Health Survey Report (2008/09). 2010 June; 128-132. Google Scholar


6. Kenya Red Cross Society: Measles Outbreak. International Federation of Red Cross Information Bulletin no. 1/2006. Google Scholar


7. Kenya District Health Information Software. DHIS;2010.https://hiskenya.org/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action. Accessed 30 August 2012.


8. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. The Population & Housing Census Report. 2010 Aug; 1A:157. Google Scholar


9. United Nations Children's Fund. The state of the world?s children 2006: Excluded and invisible. UNICEF, New York. 2006: 57. Google Scholar


10. Owino LO, Irimu G, Olenja J, Meme JS. Factors influencing immunization coverage in Mathare Valley, Nairobi. East African Medical Journal. 2009 July; 86(7): 323-9. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. Kamau N, Esamai FO. Determinants of immunization coverage among children in Mathare Valley, Nairobi. East African Medical Journal. 2001 Nov; 78(11):590-4. PubMed | Google Scholar


12. Jani JV, De-Schacht C, Jani IV, Bjune G. Risk factors for incomplete vaccination and missed opportunity for immunization in rural Mozambique. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8:161.. PubMed | Google Scholar


13. Dugas M, Dubé E, Kouyaté B, Sanou A, Bibeau G. Portrait of a lengthy vaccination trajectory in Burkina Faso: from cultural acceptance of vaccines to actual immunization. BMC International Health Human Rights. 2009; 9(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed | Google Scholar