Diabetic retinopathy at the Yaoundé Central Hospital in Cameroon: epidemiology and angiographic findings

Diabetic retinopathy at the Yaoundé Central Hospital in Cameroon: epidemiology and angiographic findings

 

Chantal Nanfack¹, Godefroy Koki ^1,2, Lawrence Mbuagbaw^3,&, Assumpta Lucienne Bella^1,4

 

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde 1, PO Box 1364,Yaounde, Cameroon, ²Hôpital militaire de Région N 1, Cameroon, ³Centre for the Development of Best Practices in Health (CDBPH), Yaounde Central Hospital, Henri Dunant Avenue, Messa, PO Box 87, Yaounde, Cameroon, ⁴Yaounde Central Hospital, Henri Dunant Avenue, Messa, PO Box 87, Yaounde, Cameroon

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Centre for the Development of Best Practices in Health (CDBPH), Yaounde Central Hospital, Henri Dunant Avenue, Messa, PO Box 87, Yaounde, Cameroon

 

 

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of many complications of diabetes. It is the fifth cause of blindness worldwide and the first cause of blindness before the age of 50 in developed countries [1 , 2 ]. It is responsible for close to 5% of all cases of blindness [2]. The incidence and prevalence of DR are proportional to the duration of diabetes and life expectancy. Hence, after 20 years living with diabetes, 90% of those with type I and 60% of those with type II develop DR [3 , 4]. In Cameroon, early screening, diagnosis and timely management of ocular disease is poor and reflected by the burden of visual impairment (4.6% increase in the past decade) despite the preventable nature of this affliction [ 5, 6].

 

In order to report the risk factors, incidence and severity of different types of DR we conducted a cross-sectional analytical study in patients who had done Fluorescein Angiography (FA)at the Yaounde Central Hospital (YCH) Diabetic Retinopathy Prevention and Management Project (DRPMP). We obtained ethical clearance from the YCH Ethics Board and consulted patient records from October 2007 to January2010. We included all patients who were diagnosed with DR using FA.DR was classified using the French Association for the Study of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases (ALFEDIAM) classification [ 7].

 

Data were collected from 419 eligible patient files belonging to 239 males (57.0%) and 180 females (43.0%) who had DR.The incidence of DR was39.9%.Their average age was 58.2 years (range 29-87). The average age for patients with type I and type II diabetes was 51.6 and 59.0 years respectively. Most had type II diabetes (96.2%). The mean duration of diabetes before the diagnosis of DR was 8.2 years.Two hundred and fifty-two(60.1%) had both diabetes and high blood pressure (HBP). The average level of glycated haemoglobin was 9.7%(range 6-17.7%). Thirty patients (7.15%) had diabetic maculopathy; 27(6.43%) with maculao edema and 3(0.7%) had ischemic maculopathy.Amongst the patients with proliferative DR, 26.7%(112) had a formal indication for laser photo coagulation. Fifteen patients (3.6%) presented with complicated forms of proliferative DR.However,non-proliferative DR was more frequent (68.7%) (Figure 1).

 

The mean duration of diabetes before diagnosis of DR is comparable with other reports [8]. Glycaemic control was poor(9.72%).Strict control of glycaemia is necessary for the prevention of DR [ 9]. Concomitant HBP and diabetes were not a risk factor for DR in this study.

 

Poor knowledge about the complications of diabetes, poor compliance with treatment and the absence of comprehensive health insurance may explain these high figures. Many of these patients suffered from complicated forms of retinal disease that require currently unavailable endocular surgery. Additional efforts in primary prevention through lifestyle modifications and risk factor prevention are needed. Secondary prevention by better glycaemic control and early screening for DR should be implemented.

 

 

DR is frequent in our setting. Even though it occurs earlier in patients with type I diabetes, it is more frequent in patients with type II diabetes. A yearly eye exam in diabetics is highly recommended as such preventive measures are cost-effective [ 8, 10 ]. FA is a useful tool for typing DR.

 

 

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

CN, GK and ALB conceived the study. LM analyzed the data. CN and LM drafted the first manuscript. GK and ALB reviewed several versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.

 

 

We express our heartfelt gratitude to the staff of the Yaounde Central Hospital Diabetic Retinopathy Prevention and Management Project (DRPMP).

 

 

Figure 1: Distribution of participants by severity of diabetic retinopathy; DR: Diabetic Retinopathy; NPDR: Non-proliferative DR; PDR: Proliferative DR

 

 

1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States. 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/general05.htm#what. Accessed 09 November 2012.


2. WHO. State of the World's Sight. Vision 2020: The Right to Sight. 2005. http://www.vision2020.org/mediaFiles/downloads/45095048/ExecutiveSummary_pdf.pdf. Accessed 09 November 2012.


3. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XVII The 14-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(10):1801-15. This article on PubMed


4. Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM, Cotch MF, Folsom AR, Klein BE, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(3):446-55. This article on PubMed


5. Oye JE, Kuper H. Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Limbe urban area, South West Province, Cameroon. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1435-9. This article on PubMed


6. Koki G, Bella AL, Omgbwa EA, Epee E, Sobngwi E, Kouanang KA. Rétinopathie diabétique du Noir africain: étude angiographique. Cahiers Santé. 2010;20(3):127-32.


7. Massin P, Angioi-Duprez K, Bacin F, Cathelineau B, Cathelineau G, Chaine G, et al. [Recommendations of the ALFEDIAM (French Association for the Study of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases) for the screening and surveillance of diabetic retinopathy]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1997;20(4):302-10. This article on PubMed


8. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy X Four-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 years or more. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(2):244-9. This article on PubMed


9. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). VIII Study design, progress and performance. Diabetologia. 1991; 34 (12):877-90. This article on PubMed


10. Javitt JC, Canner JK, Sommer A. Cost effectiveness of current approaches to the control of retinopathy in type I diabetics. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96(2):255-64. This article on PubMed