Factors associated to bed net use in Cameroon: a retrospective study in Mfou health district in the Centre Region

Factors associated to bed net use in Cameroon: a retrospective study in Mfou health district in the Centre Region

 

Viviane Hélène Matong Tchinda^1,2,&, Antoine Socpa³, Aubin Armand Keundo⁴, Francis Zeukeng², Clovis Tiogang Seumen², Rose Gana Fomban Leke², Roger Somo Moyou¹

 

¹The Medical Research Centre, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plant Studies (IMPM), Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon, ²The Biotechnology Centre, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé Cameroon, ³The Department of Anthropology, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon, ⁴Ministry of Economy, Planning and Regional Development, Yaoundé Cameroon

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Viviane Hélène Matong Tchinda, The Medical Research Centre, Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plants Studies (IMPM), Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon.

 

 

Malaria remains a major public health problem in Cameroon and control strategies adopted by the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) include: prompt management of confirmed cases with artemisinin-based combination therapy, promotion and distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for pregnant women, environmental hygiene, etc. [1] Since adoption of ITNs as key preventive tool in 2002, several campaigns of free distribution of ordinary nets and latterly, long lasting insecticides treated nets (LLINs) were conducted all over the country, with priority given to pregnant women and children below five years. However, recent data [2] suggest that net possession and use remain low. While 52% of households possess any net, only 36% own an ITN, and only 28% of children below 5 years were reported to have slept under a net, with 21% under an ITN. One of the objectives of the Ministry of Health is to have 80% of children below five years sleeping under LLINs by 2015 [3]. Thus, to increase net possession, the NMCP has launched in August 2011 a national campaign for distribution of free LLINs to households, for universal coverage of the population. However, one of the greatest challenges is its effective use by individuals. Previous studies have shown that several factors influence net use. At individual level, these include: knowledge, beliefs, risks perception about malaria and perceived benefits of ITNs [4-12], age, sex and education level of individuals [10,13-16]. Household level factors include: net density [10,17-19], hanging status, paying for a net instead of obtaining free [20] household size, age, education and occupation of household head [10,19-22], structure, space, types of sleeping units and intra-household sleeping arrangements [6,7,23] and household decision making processes [24]. In addition, net characteristics (age, shape, colour, condition, etc.) have also been associated with its use [10,14,19,20,25]. Other factors include climate and temperature associated with increased net use in the rainy season or reduced use during excessive heat [4,26,27], as well as socio-cultural and socio-economic activities which can temporary reduce net use even among regular net users [26-28]. However, many of these studies have analysed net use with respect to vulnerable groups (pregnant women and children below five years) while the current strategy is universal coverage of the whole population. In this study, we used an unbiased population to analyse and identify modifiable factors where efforts should be channelled to, in order to increase net use in households and further reduce malaria transmission.

 

 

Description of the study area

 

The study was conducted in Mfou health district in the Mefou and Afamba division, Centre region of Cameroon. This is a forest area, with a population estimated at about 71373 in 2011, mainly farmers and traders [29]. The headquarter of the district (Mfou urban) is a semi-urban area located at about 25 km from Yaoundé, the capital city of Cameroon. The climate is equatorial with four seasons, two wet and two dry. Several small streams from the Mefou and Afamba River irrigate major parts of the area. Mfou is hyperendemic for malaria and transmission occurs all year round, with peaks during the rainy season and transition to the dry season (March-June and September-October). A survey conducted in February 2011 showed that Plasmodium falciparum was the main malaria species, while Anopheles gambiae s.s. was the major malaria vector in the area (Tchinda et al., unpublished observations).

 

Study design

 

This was a cross-sectional descriptive and analytical survey, conducted during the month of July 2011 after the rainy season. A two-stage cluster random sampling was used to select 4 health areas (Mfou, Nkilzok, Nkongoa and Nsimalen) among the 12 that constitute the district. The number of households per health area was selected proportionally to its population and sample size was calculated based on the proportion of children below 5 years who slept under any net the previous night [30].

 

A structured household questionnaire was used to capture individual characteristics (age, sex, education level, status in the household, main occupation, net use), household characteristics including: family size, living standard, net possession and their number, household head’s knowledge about malaria, his perception of malaria as a serious disease, characteristics of house construction and the external environment surrounding households. Net characteristics (type, possession time, whether re-impregnated) were recorded as well. Interviews were conducted orally in French language and primarily with household heads or the spouses, and in case of absence, another adult member able to provide reliable information. Due to low level of education of some respondents in remote rural areas, community health workers provided translation to some of the questions when necessary in local language. The questionnaire was pre-tested in a non-survey area to determine the validity of pre-coded answers. An ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Institute of Medical Research and Medicinal Plants Studies. Household heads gave their informed consent before initiation of the questionnaire.

 

Data management and statistical analyses

 

Questionnaires were carefully reviewed after data collection, and data entry was performed in CSPro (version 4.0). All analyses (descriptive, univariate and multivariate) were performed in SPSS (version 18.0) and threshold for statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Analysis of the association between net use and independent variables was restricted to individuals living in households owning at least one net and who spent the previous night in households. The reported use/not use of a net the previous night was the dependent variable.

 

Net density was calculated by dividing the number of nets per household by the number of individuals and this was categorized as “low density” (ratio<0.5) and “high density” (ratio≥0.5). The household living standard was derived from relevant characteristics that were discriminative in both rural and urban Mfou areas: “type of floor material”, “type of wall material”, “type of toilet”, and “presence of a clock”. This was done using multiple correspondence factor analysis. Households were categorized as having “low”, “medium” and “high living standard”. Household head’s knowledge on malaria was based on the knowledge that mosquito bites transmit malaria and that sleeping under an ITN is currently the most effective method to prevent it. Respondents were categorized as having “good” or “average” knowledge. Perception of malaria as a serious disease was derived from three variables that determined whether malaria is: 1) a serious disease, 2) the leading cause of death in Cameroon and 3) the most prevalent disease in Cameroon. Respondents were categorized as having “good” or “average” perception about the seriousness of malaria. The environment of households was compounded from three variables including “presence of swampy areas/water ponds or rivers/streams”, “presence of bush/forest” and “household waste”. This was classified as environment “less suitable” or “very suitable” for mosquito proliferation. The characteristic of house was derived from three variables: “presence of a ceiling”, “presence of doors/or windows” and “presence of holes on walls”. This variable was classified as “secured” and “unsecured” for mosquito access.

 

All relevant variables that might explain the use of a mosquito net were used individually in univariate analysis (bivariate analysis of the association between each explanatory variable and the dependent variable). The relevance or choice of a variable was based on literature review (previous studies) and the context or environment of the study area. Only independent variables having a p-value≤0.10 in univariate logistic regression models were included in multivariate analysis. As no perfect or very high linear relationship should exist between two or more explanatory variables, a correlation matrix (multi-colinearity test) was performed with variables significant at this cut-off, in order to identify possible correlations. When two variables had a correlation coefficient of 0.6 or higher only one of them was included in the multivariate model. The correlation matrix showed that some variables such as age and occupation were highly correlated, which allowed us to eliminate the variable occupation. Variables were included one at a time, starting with the variable with greater statistical significance with the dependent variable. The variable not significant at p<0.05 was removed before inclusion of the subsequent variable, and so on and so forth, until the final model where all independent variables were significant was reached.

 

 

Description of households, net possession and use rates

 

A total of 323 households among the 541 surveyed, owned at least a net, giving a net possession rate of 59.7%, thus about 3 households out of 5. A total of 656 nets were declared in these households, with 18% being non-impregnated nets, 64.2% ordinary ITNs and 7% LLINs. The average number of nets per household was 2.0±1.2 with an average possession time of 2.3±1.6 years. Seventy nets (10.7%) were reported having been treated at least once with insecticides since an average period of 0.6 ± 0.7 year. In total, 4046 individuals were declared in households, 2259 among them resided in households owning at least a net and 962 slept under a net, giving a use rate of 42.6%. Table 1 gives the description of households, net possession and use rates. Looking at the age and sex-related use of net, the highest proportion of individuals using net the previous night was recorded in adults aged 25-49 years, followed by children aged below 5 years, while the lowest proportion was recorded among school-aged children and adolescents aged 5-24 years. No significant difference was observed with sex; however, females above 14 and less than 50 years tend to use nets more than men. Figure 1 shows the age and sex-related use of nets by individuals.

 

Univariate logistic regression analysis of the association between net use and explanatory factors in households owning at least one net

 

At the individual level, factors significantly associated with net use were: children below five years (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.08) compared to individuals above five years; age 5-24 years (OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.31-0.50) compared to children below five years; secondary education (OR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.18-1.78) and university level (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.26-2.61), compared to primary/no education. Regarding the main occupation of individuals (≥6years), unemployed persons or employed/retired ones had between 2-3 fold increases in net use compared to students (table 2). Also, parents relative to their children in general, had close to a threefold increase in net use (OR=2.94, 95% CI: 2.39-3.63).

 

At the household level, increasing net density was significantly associated with net use (OR=7.22, 95% CI: 5.34-9.78). While, increasing family size was significantly associated with a 50 and 63 % reduction in net use by individuals, respectively in big (8-10 persons) and very big (≥11 persons) sized families, compared to small ones (≤5 people). Additionally, houses allowing easy access to mosquitoes (OR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.04-1.51) and environment favourable to mosquito proliferation (OR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.30-1.86) were all significantly associated with increased net use (table 2). On the other hand, increased net use was observed among household heads with good knowledge on malaria (OR=1.38, 95% CI: 0.86-2.22) or good perception on its severity (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 0.75-2.06), compared to those with average or approximate knowledge or perception. However, no significant difference was observed between these two groups.

 

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between net use and explanatory factors in households owning at least one net

 

The final multivariate model consisted of 06 variables that were significantly associated with net use by individuals (table 3). The most determinant factor associated with increasing odds of nets been used was its density in households. Individuals residing in households with one or more nets per two persons, had a 9 fold increase in chances of using a net, compared to those living in households with lower net density (OR=8.88, 95% CI: 6.24-12.64). Age was significantly associated with reduced net use, taking as reference group children aged less than five years. In fact, after adjusting with other factors, school-aged children and adolescents aged 5-24 years, adults aged 25-49 years and older household members (≥50 years) had respectively, 66, 41 and 71% reduction on chances of using net compared to this reference group. Also, parents (heads of households and their spouses) had a threefold increase in chances of using a net (OR=3.32, 95% CI: 2.31-4.76) compared to their children/grand children. In addition, household members with secondary education had 1.4 increase chances of using net (OR=1.41, 95% CI: 1.11-1.80) compared to individuals with primary/no education. Moreover, the external environment of households, favourable to mosquito proliferation (OR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.18-1.80) and houses with easy access to mosquito (OR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.10-1.71) remained significantly associated with net use in the final multivariate model.

 

 

This study was designed to identify modifiable factors where efforts should be channelled to in order to accelerate effective net use in households of Mfou health district in Cameroon. Net use was expressed as the proportion of individuals in households owning at least one net, who slept under a net the previous night. Low net density was the most determinant factor of its use by individuals as previously observed [10,17-19].

 

Children below five years were the group with high net use after adjusting with other factors, followed by adults aged 25-49 years, with a trend towards a high use in females, while school-aged children and adolescents and older household members remained the groups with lower net use. In fact, previous campaigns of distribution of free ITNs in Cameroon were given priority to pregnant women and children below five years. Moreover, mothers usually sleep with their nursing babies and young children, to make sure they are protected. Thus, the latter would be expected to use net more than other age groups. Conversely, older children usually sleep in separate bedrooms, with less attention to net use. This low net use in school-aged children and adolescents was previously observed [10,13-15] and is a matter of concern, since the objective now is universal coverage of the population with LLINs, in order to achieve a significant reduction in malaria transmission. If the latter are not protected, they might significantly contribute to transmission when infected, as well as develop severe forms of malaria with increased mortality. Therefore, appropriate health education, targeting particularly this age group is necessary.

 

Additionally, net use seems to be a privilege for parents in the study locality of Mfou as previously observed.24 Parents here represent household heads and their spouses who have the decision making position in the household. In the context of scarcity of nets and high mosquito nuisance as it is the case in this forest area, bed nets are preferentially used to avoid nuisance and have a quiet night sleep as previously observed in studies conducted in rural African settings [5,6,11,12,24].

 

As previously reported [16,21,22], education of individuals was significantly associated with increased net use and this is related to the fact that through school education, people acquire biomedical knowledge on malaria, especially its transmission, consequences of the disease and preventive methods. Educated individuals are well prepared to integrate messages about the benefits of ITNs and adhere to its use.

 

Our findings also suggested an association between increasing net use and poor house’s construction allowing easy access of mosquitoes, as well as the environment favourable to mosquito proliferation. In fact, Mfou health district is located in the midst of equatorial forest with many swampy areas, water ponds and rivers/streams, which constitute mosquitoes breeding sites. Moreover, most houses in the rural area are made up of mud and wood material, which sometimes have holes of walls. These houses often do not have a ceiling, or doors on bedrooms or windows. The abundance of mosquitoes creates a high nuisance, making populations to use mosquito nets. In line with these observations, previous studies have shown housing characteristics to be associated with increased mosquito numbers in homes [31].

 

Factors assessed in this study cannot explain in a holistic manner net use by individuals in households owning at least a net. Other factors could also contribute towards the understanding of this complex phenomenon. Moreover, qualitative studies are also necessary for the better understanding of individuals’ motivation in using net.

 

 

Taken together, our data suggest that for an effective coverage of populations with LLINs, all household members should feel concerned with its use. Thus, while increasing net possession and density within households, it is of paramount importance to conduct appropriate health education targeting especially older children who might constitute reservoir for transmission if not protected. Also, efforts towards management of environment and improvement of house construction are needed to eliminate Anopheles breeding sites.

 

 

This research was in part made possible through support for training in epidemiology provided by the MIM/TDR Malaria project (Grant ID: A60040) and the technical support from the training staff of the Department of Public Health of the School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Central Africa, Yaoundé, Cameroon. We thank the households’ heads and their representative for their participation, as well as the community health workers in the surveyed health areas of Mfou (Nkilzok, Nkongoa and Nsimalen) for their assistance during data collection. We are particularly grateful to the District Health Officer of Mfou health district for his cooperation during the research in the district.

 

 

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

 

 

VHMT conceived, designed the study, participated in data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. SA participated in the study design and critically reviewed the manuscript. NAA participated in the study design, sample collection and analysis, and reviewed the manuscript. FZ and CTS participated in data collection and management, and critically reviewed the manuscript. RGFL and MSR participated in the study conception and design, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

This research was in part made possible through support for training in epidemiology provided by the MIM/TDR Malaria project (Grant ID: A60040) and the technical support from the training staff of the Department of Public Health of the School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Central Africa, Yaoundé, Cameroon. We thank the households’ heads and their representative for their participation, as well as the community health workers in the surveyed health areas of Mfou (Nkilzok, Nkongoa and Nsimalen) for their assistance during data collection. We are particularly grateful to the District Health Officer of Mfou health district for his cooperation during the research in the district.

 

 

Table 1: Description of households, net possession and use rates

Table 2: Univariate logistic regression analysis of the association between net use and explanatory factors in households owning at least one net

Table 3: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of association between net use and explanatory factors in households owning at least one net

Figure 1: Age and sex-related use of net by individuals

 

 

1. Ministry of Public Health, Cameroon/National Malaria Control Programme. 2011. Report of activities of the NMCP for the year 2010 (in French)


2. Cameroon DHS-MICS 2011. Preliminary report [PR13] (in French). 2011. Available online at: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/PR13/PR13.pdf


3. Ministry of Public Health, Cameroon. Health Sector Strategy 2001-2015. 2009; 109p


4. Binka N F and Adongo P. Acceptability and use of insecticide impregnated bednets in northern Ghana. Trop Med Int Health. 1997; 2:499-507. This article on PubMed


5. Adongo B Philip, Kirkwood Betty and Kendall Carl. How local community knowledge about malaria affects insecticide-treated net use in Northern Ghana. Trop Med Int Health. 2005; 10 (4):366-378. This article on PubMed


6. Doannio CMJ, Doudou TD, Konan YL, Djouaka R, Toe PL, Baldet T, Akogbeto M and Monjour L. Représentations sociales et pratiques liées à l’utilisation des moustiquaires dans la lutte contre le paludisme en Côte d’Ivoire (Afrique de l’Ouest). Med Trop. 2006; 66:45-52


7. Léa Paré Toé, Olé Skovmand et al. Decreased motivation in the use of insecticide-treated nets in a malaria endemic area in Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2009; 8: 175. This article on Pubmed Central


8. Hwang Jimee, Graves M Patricia, Jima Daddi, Reithinger Richard and Kachur S Patrick and the Ethiopia MIS Working Group. Knowledge of malaria and its association with malaria-related behaviours - results from the Malaria Indicator Survey, Ethiopia, 2007. Plos One. 2010; 5(7):e11692. This article on PubMed


9. Dye DV Timothy, Apondi Rose, Lugada S Eric, Kahn G James, Smith Jacqueline and Othoro Caroline. "Before we used to get sick all the time": perceptions of malaria and use of long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLINs) in a rural Kenyan community. Malar J. 2010; 9:345. This article on PubMed


10. Graves M Patricia, Ngondi M Jeremiah, Hwang Jimee, Getachew Asefaw, Gebre Teshome, Mosher W Aryc, Patterson E Amy, Shargie B Estifanos, Tadesse Zerihun, Wolkon Adam, Reithinger Richard, Emerson M Paul and Richards Jr O Frank. Factors associated with mosquito net use by individuals in households owning nets in Ethiopia. Malar J. 2010; 10:354. This article on Pubmed Central


11. Louis PJ, Le Goff G, Trebucq A, Migliani R, Louis JF, Robert V and Carnavale P. Feasibilité de la stratégie de lute par moustiquaires imprégnées d’insecticides rémanent en zone rurale au Cameroun. Ann Soc Belge Med Trop. 1992; 72(3):189-195


12. Chambon R, Lemardelev P, Louis FJ, Foumane V and Louis JP. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of populations faced with culicidae nuisances: results of 6 surveys taken in Cameroon in 1994. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1997; 90(5):364-369. This article on PubMed


13. Noor M Abdisalan, Kirui C Viola, Brooker J Simon and Snow W Robert. The use of insecticides treated nets by age: implications for universal coverage in Africa. BMC Pub Health. 2009; 9:369


14. Tsuang Angela, Lines Jo and Hanson Kara. Which family members use the best nets? An analysis of the condition of mosquito nets and their distribution within households in Tanzania. Malar J. 2010; 9:211. This article on PubMed


15. Baume A Carol and Marin M Celeste. Intra-household mosquito net use in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal, and Zambia: are nets being used? Who in the household uses them?. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007; 77:963-971. This article on PubMed


16. Audrey Pettifor, Eboni Taylor et al. Bed net ownership, use and perceptions among women seeking antenatal care in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC): Opportunities for improved maternal and child health. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8: 331. This article on Pubmed Central


17. Macintyre Kate, Keating Joseph, Okbaldt B Yohannes, Zerom Mehari, Sosler Stephen, Ghebremeskel Tewolde and Eisele P Thomas. Rolling out insecticides treated nets in Eritrea: examining the determinants of possession and use in malarious zones during the rainy season. Trop Med Int Health. 2006; 11(6):824-833. This article on PubMed


18. Eisele P Thomas, Keating Joseph, Littrell Megan, Larsen David and Macintyre Kate. Assessment of insecticide-treated bednet use among children and pregnant women across 15 countries using standardized national surveys. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009; 80(2):209-14. This article on PubMed


19. Carol A Baume, Ana Cláudia Franca-Koh. Predictors of mosquito net use in Ghana. Malar J. 2011; 10: 265. This article on Pubmed Central


20. Macyntire Kate, Littrell Megan, Keating Joseph, Hamainza Busiku, Miller John and Eisele P Thomas. Determinants of hanging and use of ITNs in the context of near universal coverage in Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2011; 10:1093


21. Ndjinga K Julie and Minakawa Noboru. The importance of education to increase the use of bed nets in villages outside of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Malar J. 2010; 9:279. This article on PubMed


22. Alberto L García-Basteiro, Christopher Schwabe et al. Determinants of bed net use in children under five and household bed net ownership on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea. Malar J. 2011; 10:179. This article on Pubmed Central


23. Iwashita Hanako, Dida Gabriel, Futami Kyoko, Sonye George, Kaneko Satoshi, Horio Masahiro, Kawada Hitoshi, Maekawa Yoshihide, Aoki Yoshiki and Minakawa Noboru. Sleeping arrangement and house structure affect bed net use in villages along Lake Victoria. Malar J. 2010; 9:179. This article on PubMed


24. Okrah Jane, Traoré Corneille, Palé Augustin, Sommerfeld Johannes and Muller Olaf. Community factors associated with malaria prevention by mosquito nets: an exploratory study in rural Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health. 2002; 7:240-248. This article on PubMed


25. Ngondi M Jeremiah, Graves M Patricia, Gebre Teshome, Mosher W Aryc, Shargie B Estifanos, Emerson M Paul, Richards Jr O Frank and for the Ethiopia Malaria Indicator Survey Working Group. Which nets are being used: factors associated with mosquito net use in Amhara, Oromia and Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Regions of Ethiopia. Malar J. 2011; 10:92. This article on PubMed


26. Pulford Justin, Hetzel W Manuel, Bryant Miranda, Siba M Peter and Mueller Ivo. Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature. Malar J. 2011; 10:83. This article on PubMed


27. Alaii JA, Hawley WA, Kolczak MS et al. Factors affecting use of permethrin-treated bed nets during a Randomized controlled trial in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 Apr;68(4 Suppl):137-41. This article on PubMed


28. Dunn E Christine, Le Mare Ann and Makungu Christina. Malaria risk behaviours, socio-cultural practices and rural livelihoods in southern Tanzania: implications for bednet usage. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72:408-417. This article on PubMed


29. Equipe Cadre du District Santé de Mfou. Plan d’action opérationnel du district pour l’année 2011. 2011; 40 pages


30. MICS3 Cameroon. Final report (in French). 2006. Available online at: http://www.childinfo.org/files/MICS3_Cameroon_FinalReport_2006_Fr.pdf


31. Kirby J Matthew, Green Clare, Milligan M Paul, Sismanidis Charalambos, Jasseh Momadou, Conway J David and Lindsay W Steven. Risk factors for house entry by malaria vectors in rural town and satellite villages in Gambia. Malar J. 2008; 7:2. This article on PubMed