Community vaccine perceptions and its role on vaccination uptake among children aged 12-23 months in the Ileje District, Tanzania: a cross section study

Community vaccine perceptions and its role on vaccination uptake among children aged 12-23 months in the Ileje District, Tanzania: a cross section study

Pai Elia Chambongo^1,&, Patrick Nguku², Peter Wasswa³, Innocent Semali ⁴

 

¹Tanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, ²50 Haile Sellasie Street Asokoro,Abuja , Nigeria, ³African Field Epidemiology Network,Kampala, Uganda, ⁴Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences,Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

 

 

^&Corresponding author
Pai Elia Chambongo, Tanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

 

 

 

 

Childhood vaccination is a highly effective method for preventing vaccine preventable diseases[1- 4]. Globally it is estimated that about 22.4 million children under one year of age were not vaccinated with a third dose of pentavalent vaccine (Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus-Hepatitis B-Haemophilus type b influenza vaccine (DPT-HB-Hib)) in the year 2012, of whom 70% live in Africa [5] while 0.54%of the unvaccinated children were found in Tanzania. Children who miss vaccines or are partially vaccinated are said to be at high risk of vaccine preventable diseases that claim millions of lives each year [6,7]. It is also estimated that 10 million children under-five years die, one third of which is attributable to infectious diseases that would have been vaccine prevented [8,9].A child is said to underutilize a vaccine if he or she misses out on one or more of the recommended vaccine dose [10]. In response to the underutilization of vaccines, World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nation for International Children and Education Funds (UNICEF) developed the Global Immunization Vision and Strategy (GIVS) in 2006 aimed to help countries to vaccinate more people, especially those who are hard to reach [11]. Furthermore, GIVS emphasized on reaching every district strategy (RED), as it showed improvement in raising vaccination coverage in some countries where it was practiced [12]. RED focuses on ensuring that each district achieves 90% coverage for all antigens by 2015, thus all 156 districts in Tanzania should have 90% of its eligible children vaccinated. Unfortunately, only 50% of the districts in 2012 reported to have vaccination coverage above the required target (90%) [13]. Ileje district is among the districts with vaccination uptake consistently below 90% over the past ten years with its most recent third dose pentavalent coverage being 69% with a dropout of 15% [13] . Vaccination uptake is influenced by various factors that include social and economic status of the family [14,15], mother health status and experience in utilization of health care services [16,17] , age and education of the mother [18-20], polygamies [21], physical factors like distance to the facility [22], area of residence [23,24] and facility factors including lack of vaccines and diluents [25], staff shortage [26] , lack of policy on immunization [27] , lack of adequate transport facilities [12] and type of care providers [28]. Parents are sometimes reluctant to send their children for vaccination [29]. Lack of access to vaccination services could also be due to mothers' perception of vaccines. Perceiving of vaccine as safe and protective is likely to have positive effect on demand for vaccination [30,31]. In 2003, the summit of independent European vaccination experts was held with the aim of addressing the perception of vaccines and limited vaccination utilization to the general public [32]. Community perception that vaccines were deliberately contaminated with anti- fertility agents and Human Immune deficiency Virus (HIV) were observed to be major barrier towards polio eradication in Nigeria [33,34],as a result, fewer children were sent to vaccine centres [35]. Other factors related to underutilization of childhood vaccines are concerns on the vaccine safety and potential vaccine adverse effects [36 -38]. It has also been observed that the greater the perception that a vaccine is associated with adverse effects, the lower the vaccine demand in the community [30,39] . It is also reported that health providers' poor attitudes also contribute significantly to the negative perception on the immunization services among communities leading to low utilization and low vaccination among children [40,41]. There are also observations that the severity of vaccine preventable diseases (VPD) influence positively or negatively on vaccination uptake [39,42,43]. In spite of the above likely explanatory factors, there is limited data on community perception of vaccines and vaccination and its relationship with vaccine uptake in countries like Tanzania. Thus the study assessed the role of community perception on vaccination uptake among children in Ileje District, Tanzania.

 

 

Study area and population: we conducted a cross-sectional study in Ileje District in Mbeya Region. The district has a total population of 148490, of which 4.2% are infants, 18.9% are children under five and 22.7% are women of child bearing age ( National Census 2012). Also the district has a total of 26 health facilities including 23 dispensaries, 19 of which are owned by the government and 4 are owned by faith-based organisations. There is only one government-owned health centre, two hospitals, one of which is government-owned while the other is owned by a faith-based organization. The district is divided into two divisions, which are further divided into nine wards. A ward sub-divided to four or five villages.

 

Sample and procedure: we conducted a cross sectional study among mothers with children aged 12 to 23 months in Ileje district. A sample size of 380 mothers with children aged 12 -23 months was calculated by using a formula for calculating sample size for cross-sectional study, assumed a design effect 1.5, precision 5% and 69% proportion of children vaccinated with third dose of pentavalent as reported from the district [13]. Multistage sampling was done, started with selection of two divisions. In the second stage, we randomly selected two wards from each division. At the third stage, we randomly selected two villages in each ward. This was followed by the listing of all children 12-23 months residing in the selected villages. From this list, we randomly sampled children in each ward proportional of the total village population of all the selected villages.

 

Data Collection: a structured questionnaire was initially developed in English, which was later back-translated in Kiswahili language was used in the interview. It was pre-tested so as to identify difficult terminologies, ambiguous questions, estimated time for filling one questionnaire and other questionnaire related problems. This interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on participants'demographic information, children vaccination information and mother perceptions on vaccines and vaccination services. Child vaccination information was obtained from mother's history that was verified using the child vaccination card.

 

Study Variables: the outcome was whether a child had completed the under-five vaccination schedule. A child was considered to have completed vaccination schedule if one had received one dose of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), one dose of measles vaccine, four doses of Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) and three doses of Pentavalent (DTP-HB-Hib). It was coded ‘1’ if completed and ‘0’ otherwise. The explanatory variables that explained variation in immunization status included demographic factors and community perceptions on vaccination. Statements on vaccine perception was read to respondents who were asked to respond to each statement by either strongly agreeing, agreeing, disagreeing and strongly disagreeing with the perception statements. The perception statements covered the following categories on vaccination: perception toward vaccines efficacy, vaccine safety, provider-client relationship and severity of the vaccine preventable diseases. Perception responses were then reduced to binary variables whereby those responded strongly agree and agree were categorized as positive and coded ‘0’ the rest categorized as negative and coded ‘1’. Agreeing or disagreeing with the perception statement grouped mothers into whether they perceived vaccination positively or negatively respectively.

 

Data Management and Analysis: we collected data from October to November 2013 using a structured closed-ended questionnaire. The collected data was checked for completeness, consistency and other errors at the end of each data collection day. Data was then entered into an Epi-info database. It was followed with data cleaning and analysis was done using EPI INFO software version 3.5.4 Descriptive analysis was performed to determine frequency distribution of demographic factors, antigen uptake and perceptions. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine the crude odds ratio (cOR) of the associations between independent and dependent variables, where statistical significance was set at 0.05. All variables that had a p<0.2 at binary analysis were included into final multivariate logistic regression model which determined the association between vaccination uptake with independent variables.

 

Ethical Considerations: the proposal and request for ethical and research clearance was submitted to the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Science (MUHAS) Institutional Review Board (IRB) which granted clearance to conduct the study. Before a participant was recruited into a study she was asked to give a written signed informed consent. Confidentiality of the information as explained in the informed consent form was highly maintained. No non authorized individual was allowed to access information without permission, no name or postal address of any participant was collected.

 

 

Baseline characteristic of the respondents: a total of 380 mothers with children aged between 12 months to 23 months were recruited into the study. The mean age of the mothers was 27 years (SD 6.5) while that of children was 16 months (S.D 3.6). Majority of mothers 327/380 (86.1%) were married, 325/380 (85.5%) of mothers had completed seven or less years of schooling, 95/380 (25.1%) of the mothers had given birth before 21 years and 10/380 (2.6%) had given birth at the age of 41 years or older (Table 1).

 

Vaccination uptake: high proportion of children 71.1% (95%CI 66.2% - 75%) had completed their vaccination schedule. Utilization of individual vaccines varied widely; it was highest for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine 99.2% (95%CI 97.5% - 99.8%), followed by DPT-HB-Hib 91.8% (95%CI 88.6% - 94.4%) and least for OPV 73.4% (95%CI 68.7% - 77.8%). About eight children (2.1%) had never been vaccinated with OPV and pentavalent vaccines while 6.1% had never been vaccinated with measles vaccine. Out of 380 mothers, 376 (98.9%) had their child's vaccination card (Table 2).

 

Mothers perceptions on vaccines and vaccination: about 232/380 (61.1%) mothers reported negative perceptions on the relationship between vaccine provider and clients while a greater proportion 336/380 (88.4%) reported being satisfied with the quality of vaccination services. Similarly, a high proportion 358/380 (94.2%) reported positive perception on the safety of the vaccines. However, a lower proportion 299/380 (78.6%) reported positive perception on the efficacy of the vaccines (Table 3).

 

Analysis of factors associated with vaccination completion: the final model showed that mothers who negatively perceived vaccine provider-client relationship (AOR 1.86, 95%CI 1.03-3.5) and those who were satisfied with vaccination services (AOR 2.63, 95%CI 1.1-6.3) were more likely to have their children completely vaccinated. A child being born in the health facility strongly increased the odds of being completely vaccinated (AOR 14.4, 95% CI 8.04- 25.8), while being young (≤ 17 months) reduced the likelihood of being completely vaccinated (AOR 0.51, 95%CI 0.29-0.9) (Table 4).

 

 

This study aimed to determine vaccine completion and its association with community's perception on vaccine among children aged 12-23 months in Ileje district, Tanzania. The study revealed a moderately high vaccination completion (71.1%) but with variations in vaccine uptake level among antigens. Being satisfied with vaccination services and having negative perceptions about vaccine provider-client relationship was associated with increased likelihood of completing vaccine. Other factors significantly associated with completion of vaccination were a child being born in the health facility and age of the child. Mother's perceptions on vaccine efficacy and safety and severity of vaccine preventable disease did not seem to influence child vaccination uptake Perceived satisfaction with vaccination services was seen to influence children vaccination completion. Satisfaction on vaccination services could have been as a result of good quality of vaccination service which also might have been contributed by facility factors like staff availability, short service waiting time, strictness in adherence to procedures [19]. Such attributes might have improved the quality of vaccination service and hence inspired mothers to take their children for vaccination. Similar findings were reported by the study conducted in rural in Chad [44] and in rural Nepal [45] that child vaccination uptake also depended on the quality of vaccination services. Improving quality of vaccination services might increase the likelihood of service utilization and hence higher chances of vaccination completion. Although the majority of mothers were satisfied with vaccination services, most had a negative perception on the relationship with the vaccine providers. In spite of this, they were more likely to complete vaccination than those who positively perceived vaccination. Vaccines providers can play an important role in ensuring that mother bring their children for vaccination. The way vaccine providers behave might promote or discourage mothers from sending children for vaccination. Our findings are not supported by studies elsewhere like Africa and Asia including Malawi and Ethiopia, India and Philippines [46] which revealed that mothers who had negative perception on the health providers were less likely to complete vaccination than those who perceived positively.

 

In the case of this study, perceiving health providers negatively could make mothers adhere to instructions closely to avoid uncomfortable encounters with providers. Thus fear and desire to maintain harmony could have made mothers send their children to health facilities and consequently finishing vaccination schedule. Respondents' socio-demographic factors such as age of the child and whether child was born in the health facility were significantly associated with children vaccine completion. It found that older children had significantly higher likelihood of vaccination completion compared to younger children. Similar results were obtained in studies conducted in Temeke district-Tanzania (unpublished) and in Guangzhou China, these studies indicated that younger children were less likely to have been vaccinated with measles antigen and influenza vaccine compared to older children [47]. Possible explanations could be children who do not complete vaccination at the expected age had to attend at older ages to complete vaccination, the older the child the more opportunities for vaccination hence the higher the odds of vaccination completion. Another explanation could be younger children represent a cohort that experienced a period of vaccine unavailability at health facilities and consequently reduced likelihood of completing their vaccination schedule [25]. Similarly children who were born in the health facility were more likely to have completed vaccination compared to those who were delivered at home. Children born in health facilities completed vaccination schedule simply because they had more chances of getting all essential health services at birth including vaccination doses and thus were more likely to be vaccinated with BCG and OPV0 vaccines that would have been missed out by those children born at home. Increasing the number of health facility deliveries might promote positive vaccination uptake and hence result in high vaccination completion. In addition, the contexts that enabled facility delivery also enabled access to health facility for vaccinations later in life. Similar results were reported in the study conducted in rural in Nigeria by Regina Eziuka [48], rural Mozambique [49] and in Mosul Iraq [28] that delivering in health facilities increased the likelihood of vaccination completion than home deliveries. The study had some limitations, it collected information based on the child vaccination cards and history for those mothers who did not have the cards, and were required to remember number of vaccines doses their child received. There were some perception statements that required mothers to recall the time they visited vaccination clinics and yet some of the mothers might have been not able to remember the vaccination status of their children and/or the way they attended vaccination clinics. However, the majority had vaccination cards and it was believed that mothers' responses were accurate and provided satisfactory information. The study employed a cross-section study design; therefore it was not able to infer the temporal sequence between vaccination uptake and mother's perceptions.

 

 

Vaccination uptake in children aged 12-23 in Ileje showed variations per antigen; there was high utilization in BCG vaccine and low utilization in OPV vaccine. The vaccination completion was explained by mother's perception on vaccine provider-client relationship, satisfaction with vaccination services, place of delivery and age of a child. Immediate interventions to maintain and avert factors lowering vaccine uptakes level are required. Therefore the Council Health Management Team (CHMT) should ensure that the quality of vaccination services is maintained.Vaccinators should behave in that promotes the quality of vaccination service provision. The CHMT should encourage the community to deliver in health facilities and discourage child home delivery.

 

 

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 

 

Pai Elia Chambongo: participated in conception and design of the study, conducted field visit for data collection, summarized and analyzed the data, interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript, Patrick Nguku and Peter Wasswa: participated in analysis of the data, interpretation of the data, critically revising the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript, Innocent Semali: participated in detail revising conception and study design, presenting data, interpretation of the data critically revising of the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

This study was made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. We would like to pass our sincere appreciation to the Tanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (TFELTP) members who in one way or another made the study successful, including Dr. Janneth Mghamba, Dr. Steve Weisman, Senga Sembuche and Mohamed Abade. We also thank Dr. Peter Mmbuji for his inputs while drafting the manuscript. We thank the African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET) who helped in the technical review of this manuscript through a scientific writing workshop Other special thanks go to our research assistants and to the district in which the study was conducted specifically include Mr Yard Survar Simkoko district health officer for transport support; others are Ward officers, village chairpersons and study participants for their participation in the study.

 

 

Table 1: characteristics of study participants in Ileje district, Tanzania, Dec 2013 (N=380)

Table 2: levels of vaccination Uptake in children, Ileje district, Tanzania, Dec 2013 (N=380)

Table 3: mother’s perceptions on vaccine and vaccination in Ileje district, Tanzania, Dec 2013 (N=380)

Table 4: analysis of factors associated with vaccination completion, Ileje district, Tanzania, Dec 2013 (N= 380)

 

 

1. Frieden TR, Khabbaz v, Redd SC. A Center for Disease Control: Framework for preventing infectious disease in Sustaining the Essentials and innovating for the Future, 2011, pp. 1-25. Google Scholar


2. Nasr-eldin Mohamed. Vaccine and Vaccination: Impact and Challenges. Vaccines Vaccin. 2012; 3(3): 7560. PubMed | Google Scholar


3. Armstrong E P. Economic benefits and costs associated with target vaccinations.J Manag care Pharm (JMCP) Suppl B. 2007;13(7): S12-S15. PubMed | Google Scholar


4. Ghendon Y Z, Kaira A N, Elshina G A. The effect of mass influenza immunization in children on the morbidity of the unvaccinated elderly.Epidemiol Infect.2006;134 (1): 71-78. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. UNICEF/WHO, Global Immunization Data. 2012; 2-5. Google Scholar


6. WHO. Vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccines. 2012; 1-2. Google Scholar


7. Mastitis I G, Women H. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis in Hispanic Women.department of health and human services Centers for disease Control and Prevention.2009;58 (47): 2000-2008. PubMed | Google Scholar


8. Clemens J, Holmgren J, Kaufmann S H E, Mantovani A. Ten years of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization: challenges and progress. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(12):1069-1072. PubMed | Google Scholar


9. Keja K, Chan C, Hayden G, Henderson R H. Expanded programme on immunization. World Health Stat Q . 1988; 41(2):59-63. PubMed | Google Scholar


10. Muhsen K, El-hai RA, Amit-aharon A, Nehama H, Gondia M. Risk factors of underutilization of childhood immunizations in ultraorthodox Jewish communities in Israel despite high access to health care services. Vaccine. 2012;30 (12): 2109-2115. PubMed | Google Scholar


11. WHO-UNICEF.Global Immunization Vision and Strategy 2006 - 2015: Report by the secretariate to the World Health Assembly. World Health Organization, 2011. Google Scholar


12. Macauley Rose O A. In-Depth Evaluation of the Reaching Every District in the African Region 2007. Google Scholar


13. EPI. Tanzania Routine vaccination data annual evaluation report. 2012. Google Scholar


14. Semali IA. Trends in Immunization Completion and Disparities in the Context of Health Reforms: The case study of Tanzania.BMC Health ServRes. 2010;10(1): 299. PubMed | Google Scholar


15. United Republic of Tanzania. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey. April, 2011. Google Scholar


16. Ndirangu J, Bärnighausen T, Tanser F, Tint k, Newell ML. Levels of childhood vaccination coverage and the impact of maternal HIV status on child vaccination status in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14(11):1383-93. PubMed | Google Scholar


17. Sia D, Fournier P, Kobiané J F, Sondo BK. Rates of coverage and determinants of complete vaccination of children in rural areas of Burkina Faso (1998-2003).BMC Public Health. 2009; vol 9: 416. PubMed | Google Scholar


18. Singh B, Singh A, Singh N. Determinants of immunization in bosomtwe district of ashanti region, ghana. Eur J Sci Res. 2012;77 (1):77-94. PubMed | Google Scholar


19. Angelillo IF, Ricciardi G, Rossi P, Pantisano P, Langiano L, Pavia M. Mothers and vaccination: knowledge , attitudes , and behaviour in Italy.Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77 (3): 224-229. PubMed | Google Scholar


20. Cakir B, Uner S, Temel F, Akin L. Lot quality survey: an appealing method for rapid evaluation of vaccine coverage in developing countries - experience in Turkey. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8 (1): 240. PubMed | Google Scholar


21. Sanou A, Simboro S, Kouyaté B, Dugas M, Graham J, Bibeau H. Assessment of factors associated with complete immunization coverage in children aged 12-23 months: a cross-sectional study in Nouna district, Burkina Faso. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009; 9 (Suppl 1): S10. PubMed | Google Scholar


22. Semali I A J. Equity and utilization of preventive health care services: The case of immunization completion among children 12-23 months in Kagera region Tanzania. East Afr J Public Health. 2009; 6 (1):1-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


23. Phukan R K, Barman M P, Mahanta J. Factors associated with immunization coverage of children in Assam, India: over the first year of life. J TropPediatr. 2009; 55 (4):249-52. PubMed | Google Scholar


24. Mohammad Naeem, Muhammad Zia Ul Islam Khan, Muhammad Adil, Syed Hussain Abbas, Muhammad Usman Khan, Ayasha Khan, Syeda Maria Naz. original article inequity in childhood immunization between urban and rural areas of peshawar. 2011; 23 (3): 134-137. Google Scholar


25. Phimmasane M, Douangmala S, Koffi P, Reinharz D, Buisson Y. Factors affecting compliance with measles vaccination in Lao PDR. Vaccine. 2010; 28 (41): 6723-6729. PubMed | Google Scholar


26. Prinja S, Gupta M, Singh A, Kumar R .Effectiveness of planning and management interventions for improving age-appropriate immunization in rural India. Bull World Health Organ. 2010; 88 (2): 97-103. PubMed | Google Scholar


27. Hope K, Butler M, Massey P D, Cashman P, Durrheim D N, Stephenson J, Worley A. Pertussis vaccination in child care workers: room for improvement in coverage, policy and practice. BMC Pediatr. 2012; 12 (1): 98. PubMed | Google Scholar


28. Al-lela O Q B, Baidi Bahari M, Al-abbassi M G, Salih M R M, Basher AY. Influence of health providers on pediatrics' immunization rate. J TropPediatr. 2012;58 (6): 441-5. PubMed | Google Scholar


29. BorràsE, DomínguezA, FuentesM, BatallaJ, CardeñosaN and PlasenciaA. Parental knowledge of paediatric vaccination. BMC Public Health. 2009; vol 9: 154. PubMed | Google Scholar


30. Harmsen I A, MollemaL, Ruiter R C A, Paulussen T G W, de Melker H E, Kok G. Why parents refuse childhood vaccination: a qualitative study using online focus groups. BMC Public Health. 2013;13 (1):1183. PubMed | Google Scholar


31. Mitchell S, Andersson N, Ansari N M, Omer K, Soberanis J L, CockcroftA. Equity and vaccine uptake: a cross-sectional study of measles vaccination in Lasbela District, Pakistan. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009; 9 ( Suppl 1): S7. PubMed | Google Scholar


32. Schmitt HJ, Booy R, Weil-Olivier C, Van Damme P, Cohen R, Peltola H. Child vaccination policies in Europe: a report from the Summits of Independent European Vaccination Experts.Lancet Infect Dis. 2003; 3 (2): 103-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


33. Yahya M. Polio vaccines-no thank you barriers to polio eradication in Northern Nigeria. AfrAff (Lond). 2006; 106 (423):185-204. PubMed | Google Scholar


34. Samba E, Nkrumah F, Leke R. Getting polio eradication back on track in Nigeria. NEngl J Med. 2004; 350 (7): 645-6. PubMed | Google Scholar


35. Gellin B G, Maibach E W and Marcuse E K. Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey. Pediatrics. 2000; 106 (5): 1097-102. PubMed | Google Scholar


36. Freed GL, Clark SJ, Butchart AT, Singe rDC, Davis MM. Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009. Pediatrics. 2010; 125 (4): 654-659. PubMed | Google Scholar


37. MacDonald N E, Smith J, Appleton M. Risk perception, risk management and safety assessment: What can governments do to increase public confidence in their vaccine system? in Biologicals. 2012; 40 (5):384-388. PubMed | Google Scholar


38. Alvarez-Pasquín M J, Heijbe l H, Yarwood J, Van Damme P. VACSATC (vaccine safety: attitudes, training and communication): why such a project?,Euro Surveill. 2009; 14 (16):. Google Scholar


39. Sadique M Z, Devlin N, Edmunds W J, Parkin D. The effect of perceived risks on the demand for vaccination: results from a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (2): e54149. PubMed | Google Scholar


40. Stockwel MS, Martinez R A. How Parents Negative Experiences at Immunization Visits Affect Child Immunization Status in a Community in New York City. Public Health Reports. 2011; vol126: 24-32. PubMed | Google Scholar


41. Gore P, Madhavan S , Curry D, McClung G, Castiglia M, Rosenbluth S A, Smego R A. Predictors of childhood immunization completion in a rural population. SocSci Med. 1999; 48 (8):1011-1027. PubMed | Google Scholar


42. Bond L, Nolan T. Making sense of perceptions of risk of diseases and vaccinations: a qualitative study combining models of health beliefs, decision-making and risk perception. BMC Public Health. 2011; vol 11: 943. PubMed | Google Scholar


43. Lau J T F, Mo P K H, Cai Y S, Yi H, Choi K C. Coverage and parental perceptions of influenza vaccination among parents of children aged 6 to 23 months in Hong Kong. BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 25;31(45):5281-8. PubMed | Google Scholar


44. Schelling E, Bechir M, Ahmed MA, Wyss K, Randolph TF, Zinsstag J. Human and animal vaccination delivery to remote nomadic families. Chad. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007; 13 (3): 373-379. PubMed | Google Scholar


45. Acharya L B, Cleland J. Maternal and child health services in rural Nepal: does access or quality matter more? Health Policy Plan. 2000; 15 (2): 223-229. PubMed | Google Scholar


46. Streef land P H, Chowdhury A M R. Quality of vaccination services and social demand for vaccinations in Africa and Asia. Bull World Health Organ. 1999; 77 (9): 722-730. Google Scholar


47. He L, Liao Q Y, Huang Y Q, Feng S, Zhuang X M. Parents'perception and their decision on their children's vaccination against seasonal influenza in Guangzhou. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015; 128 (3): 327-41. PubMed | Google Scholar


48. Regina Eziuka O. Immunization Coverage in A Rural Community in Southwestern Nigeria. J Vaccines Vaccin. 2012. Google Scholar


49. Jani JV, De Schacht C, Jani JV, Bjune G. Risk factors for incomplete vaccination and missed opportunity for immunization in rural Mozambique. BMC Public Health . 2008; vol. 8: 161. PubMed | Google Scholar