Home | Volume 21 | Article number 229

Original article

Multidisciplinary approach to genomics research in Africa: the AfriCRAN model

Multidisciplinary approach to genomics research in Africa: the AfriCRAN model

 

Azeez Butali1,&, Peter Anthony Mossey2, Nikki Tiffin3, Wasiu Lanre Adeyemo4, Mekonen Abebe Eshete5, Chrispinanus Mumena6, Rosemary Audu7, Chika Onwuamah7, Pius Agbenorku8, Mobolanle Olugbenga Ogunlewe4, Adetokunbo Raphael Adebola9, Hecto Oladapo Olasoji10, Babatunde Aregbesola11, Ramat Oyebunmi Braimah11, Abimibola Victoria Oladugba12, Ifeanyichukwu Igwilo Onah13, Ezekiel Adebiyi14, Peter Babatunde Olaitan15, Lukman Olajide Abdur-Rahman16, Adebowale Adeyemo17

 

1Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA, 2Department of Orthodontics, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK, 3South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag, X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa, 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria, 5Department of surgery School of Medicine Faculty of health sciences Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa. Ethiopia, 6Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kigali Health Institute, P.O. Box 3286, Kigali, Rwanda, 7Human Virology Laboratory, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, 6, Edmond Crescent, P.M.B. 2013, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria, 8Department of Plastic Surgery, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, P.O. Box 448, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana, 9Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aminu Kano University Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria 10Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Nigeria, 11Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, 12Department of Biostatistics, University of Nigeria, Nssukka, Nigeria, 13Department of Plastic Surgery, National Orthopedic Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria, 14Department of Computer and Information Sciences and Covenant University Bioinformatics Research (CUBRe), Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria, 16Department of Pediatrics, University of Ilorin, Nigeria, 17Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

 

 

&Corresponding author
Azeez Butali, Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

 

 

Abstract

This article is an outcome of the African Craniofacial Anomalies Research Network (AfriCRAN) Human Hereditary and Health (H3A) grant planning meeting in 2012 in Lagos, Nigeria. It describes the strengths of a multidisciplinary team approach to solving complex genetic traits in the craniofacial region. It also highlights the different components and argues for the composition of similar teams to fast track the discovery of disease genes, diagnostic tools, improved clinical treatment and ultimately prevention of diseases.

 

 

Letter to PAMJ editors

Introduction

 

As we gradually and deliberately move towards the era of personalized medicine, it is important to understand the diversity that exists in the human genome. Emerging technologies and tools have made it possible to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying disease progression. Scientists are now able to interrogate the genome in order to determine the role of functional loci in coding and non-coding regions [1]. Clearly, we have made tremendous progress in the quest to use the knowledge of the genome to treat and prevent human diseases. Genomic studies in Africa is witnessing the best of times with the establishment of the Human , Hereditary and Health Africa (H3A) initiative supported by the NIH and Welcome Trust. The H3A was established to develop and support a continent-wide network of scientists and laboratories that will use "state of the art" approaches and technologies to the study of the complex interaction between environmental and genetic factors in disease etiology and pathogenicity. This initiative will also explore drug responses in African populations. The ultimate goal of the H3A is to use data obtained from research efforts to influence and inform strategies that will address health inequities. This is line with the vision of the WHO Global Burden of Diseases and the Global Oral Health Inequalities Research Network (GOHIRN) of the International Association for Dental Research. These global efforts and strategies will bring health benefits to Africans and indeed the World. Craniofacial conditions are amongst the most common health disparities and one of the leading causes of health inequality affecting low-income countries in the world [2]. In Africa, craniofacial disparity is being addressed by studying orofacial clefts through the African Craniofacial Anomalies Research Network (AfriCRAN). The African Craniofacial Anomalies Network (AfriCRAN) is a collection of craniofacial researchers in Africa working with international collaborators in order to collect data on genetic variations and environmental exposures from individuals and families with craniofacial abnormalities in Africa. These resources will be used to investigate the etiology of these complex traits and to serve as a basis for more extensive studies in the future. The Network´s major strength is its people, who bring their commitment, and expertise to this collaboration and who will be responsible for the Network's strong continental and international capacity. Orofacial cleft (OFC) is the most common birth defect of the head and one of the most common birth defects in humans. The overall prevalence is 1/700 live births and this differs across ethnic groups [2]. Orfacial cleft serve as a sentinel for all birth defects and therefore a good model for studies on etiology, treatment and prevention. The prevalence of overt OFC in Africa is 0.5/1000 and this is low compared to other populations [3]. Understanding the etiology of OFC in this unique population will provide additional insights into the etiology and this will be important for studies on prevention. In this article, we will highlight how AfriCRAN is leveraging on its multidisciplinary composition to carryout genomic studies on craniofacial anomalies beginning with orofacial clefts.

Phenotyping

 

An essential pre-requisite for studies on human genetics is accurate and reliable phenotyping. Phenotypes are sets of observable characteristics and they are the product of the interaction between genotype (s) and the environment. In other words, phenotypes are the reflections of the nature and the nurture of an organism [4]. Phenotypes can be physical reflections or metabolic profiles that can be measured by some form of validated metrics. In AfriCRAN, our study coordinators in participating country are surgeons in different specialties (plastic surgery, ear nose and throat surgeons, pediatric surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons and dental surgeons). Using their individual and collective expertise, the surgeons and clinicians ensure that eligible cases are accurately phenotyped. For all the cases recruited, the surgeons carry out standardized physical examinations; take clinical photographs and record the full description of cleft phenotypes and all other recognizable malformations. All data obtained are entered into a secured Redcap database [5]. Centers also have access to echocardiogram and electrocardiogram results to rule out other heart defects. A second tier of phenotyping is done in collaboration with international collaborators in Iowa where there is expertise for detecting syndromes. We carry out regular reviews of cases as quality assurance before the genomic investigations. In a recent study, we used molecular techniques to tease out syndromic cases previously classified as non-syndromic clefts [6]. Our strategy is to make every opportunity for surgery available for research. Individuals are recruited through the hospitals and community surgical outreach programs in Nigeria, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya and Rwanda. Samples from the affected individual are collected in the hospital by the surgeons who also describe the phenotypes. AfriCRAN enjoys the services of specialist registrars and nurses who are employed as research assistants. These research personnel help in data collection from cleft subjects and their parents as well as unaffected controls.

 

Molecular genetics applications

 

The ultimate goal in any genetic research is to reduce the risk for the disease and to facilitate strategies for prevention. As we approach the era of personalized medicine, studies have argued that it is important to investigate diverse populations in the study of complex diseases [7-9]. The discoveries of candidate genes for orofacial clefts has benefitted from studies that included individuals from different populations. The first gene, IRF6 reported to be significantly associated with Van der Woude syndrome (VWS), Popliteal pterygium syndrome and non-syndromic clefts was first identified in monozygotic twins with Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) from Brazil [10]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provided additional evidence supporting the need to investigate diverse population groups for a complex trait such as CL(P) [11-13]. The African populations serve as the ancestral population to humans around the world and the African genome has accumulated the greatest genetic variations [14, 15]. The genomic era is witnessing the large scale sequencing of many personal genomes to understand disease etiology, mechanisms and diagnosis. This is possible through the success of GWAS for common, complex diseases and the reducing cost of generating data using high throughput technology. A vast majority of GWAS studies including those on non-syndromic orofacial clefts has been conducted in populations of European origin with only a few focused on Asian or African populations. We believe that an investigation of the genetic variations in these related populations across the world affords better opportunities to identify new risk genes/ loci. It will also provide an opportunity to understand the differential contributions of known candidate genes. These opportunities will expand our current understanding of these complex traits and provide the potentials for translating significant findings to affected individuals and families in other populations. These findings will bring forth several opportunities geared towards the design of accurate diagnostic and predictive markers, improved molecularly based treatment and better health for Africans and the world. The AfriCRAN is well suited to carryout genome-wide studies using a large cohort of orofacial cleft samples collected in countries from sub-Saharan Africa. The network works in collaboration with international partners at centers of excellence in Iowa, NIH and Pittsburgh in the United States, Dundee in the United Kingdom and Ottawa in Canada.

 

Bio-informatics

 

We work with scientists at the South African National Bio-informatics Institute (SANBI) who has substantial experience in bioinformatics research and genomics. This group specializes in elucidating the genetics underlying human disease using computational approaches, particularly in the African context. SANBI has the capacity to host a centralized relational database, with appropriate data fidelity, security and backup. Patient and sample details will be entered and accessed by consortium members through a browser-based, user-friendly front-end form. Additionally, SANBI will undertake processing of next generation sequencing data (genome and exome), functional SNP identification, and integration of data generated with gene and pathway analysis to determine clinical and biological meaning of disease-associated variation. Presently, SANBI works closely with the Bioinformatics department at Covenant University, Ogun State, Nigeria, as well as the H3 Africa Bioinformatics Network. SANBI is well-placed for this role, given that development of pipelines for analysis of next generation sequencing data is already underway at the Institute through an NIH funded H3A Bioinformatics Network.

 

Bioethics

 

Craniofacial anomalies are surrounded with considerable superstitions stemming from cultural beliefs in many countries on the African continent. Typically, children born with craniofacial anomalies are associated with ill omens, witchcrafts and are thought to be the consequence of an abuse by the gods on their mothers during pregnancy. The birth of children with orofacial clefts comes with some major concerns that include altercation in the families and infanticide (mainly due to deliberate aspiration of the affected child during breast feeding). Orofacial clefts are a matter of life and death in most part of Africa [16, 17]. Stigmatization of individuals and families is very common in Africa, where there is limited knowledge about the etiology and management of clefts [18]. Across the continent, it is still a challenge to explain the etiology of these phenotypes to families. Translating significant findings from genetic studies that may directly impact on personalized medicine will definitely pose additional challenges. Genomics research into any type of diseases or conditions raise a number of important ethical issues relating to informed consent [19]; privacy and confidentiality [20, 21]; data sharing and secondary use [22]. These challenges are very important when research is conducted in countries with low socio-economic indices and education levels [23]. There are also challenges associated with obtaining a valid informed consent [24, 25]. Genetic studies are extremely important and have provided significant insights into the etiology as well as clues to management and prevention [26-28]. They can also reveal hidden secrets about families e.g. risks for cancer, clefts etc [29-31]. Poorly managed information on these risks can add to pre-existing stigmatization, thus posing a challenge to the science community. For instance, in a study examining podoconiosis in Ethiopia [25] found that the association of a stigmatized condition with "blood", descent and family was thought to increase stigma for the entire family, and not just those suffering from the condition [25]. In another study in the US [32] found that even though respondents were less likely to attribute blame for having schizophrenia to patients when a genetic cause was known, they were also less likely to think that the person could improve with treatment [32]. In recognition of socially important issues that can directly affect the success of future genetic studies, AfriCRAN is working with bioethicists across the continent to develop studies that will influence policy changes aimed at reducing and abolishing stigmatization.

 

Prospects of a multidisciplinary team

 

There is improvement in the knowledge of the genome and successes in the application of genomic studies to improve diagnosis and treatment. Multidisciplinary approach is the silver lining in the dark cloud that has befallen genetic studies of complex traits. As more experts avail their skills, techniques and thoughts to teams; it will only be a matter of time for the genomic world to have direct bench to bed side applications.

 

 

Competing interests

Authors declare that there have no competing interests.

 

 

Authors’ contributions

All Authors participated in the conception and design of the paper. AB wrote the initial draft, PAM , NT and AA critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Erin Brothers-Smith for her administrative assistance, to the nurses and research assistants in Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia and Rwanda for patient recruitment, consenting, sample and data collection. Our gratitude goes to the Smile Train for supporting free cleft surgeries in Africa. This project was supported by grants from the NIDCR K99/R00 DE022378 (AB), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (AB) and H3A Planning Grant from the Welcome Trust (WLA).

 

 

References

  1. Lienert F, Lohmueller JJ, Garg A, Silver PA. Syntheticbiology in mammaliancells: nextgenerationresearchtools and therapeutics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(2):95-107. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Mossey PA, Modell B. Epidemiology of oral clefts 2012: an international perspective. Front Oral Biol.2012;16:1-18. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Butali A, Adeyemo WL, Mossey PA et al. Prevalence of orofacial clefts in Nigeria. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2014; 51(3):320-325. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Wanscher JH. An analysis of Wilhelm Johannsen's genetical term "genotype' 1909-26.Hereditas. 1975;79 (1):1-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Paul Harris A, Robert Taylor, Robert Thielke et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Azeez Butali, Peter Mossey A, Wasiu Adeyemo L et al. Novel IRF6 Mutations in Families with Van Der Woude Syndrome and Popliteal Pterygium Syndrome from Sub-Saharan Africa. Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine. 2014; 2(3):254-260. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Ramos E, Callier SL, Rotimi CN. Why personalized medicine will fail if we stay the course. Per Med. 2012; 9(8):839-847. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Keinan A, Clark AG. Recent explosive human population growth has resulted in an excess of rare genetic variants. Science. 2012; 336(6082):740-743. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Tennessen JA, Bigham AW, O'Connor TD et al. Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes.Science. 2012; 337 (6090):64-69. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Kondo S, Schutte BC, Richardson RJ et al. Mutations in IRF6 cause Van der Woude and popliteal pterygium syndromes. Nat Genet. 2002; 32 (2):285-289. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Birnbaum S, Ludwig KU, Reutter H et al. Key susceptibility locus for nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on chromosome 8q24.Nature Genet. 2009; 41(4): 473-477. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Grant SFA, Wang K, Zhang H et al. A genome-wide association study identifies a locus for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on 8q 24. Journal of Pediatr. 2009;155 (6):909-913. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Beaty TH, Murray JC, Marazita ML et al. A genome wide association study of cleft lip with / without cleft palate using case-parent trios of European and Asian ancestry identifies MAFB and ABCA4 as novel candidate genes. Nat Genet.2010; 42 (6):525-529. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW. The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution. Nature Genetics. 2003; 33: 266-275. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Ramsay M, Tiemessen CT, Choudhury A et al. Africa: the next frontier for human disease gene discovery? Hum Mol Genet. October 15, 2011; 20(R2):R214-220. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Akinmoladun VI ,Owotade FJ, Afolabi AO. Bilateral transverse facial cleft as an isolated deformity: Case report. Ann Afr Med. 2007; 6(1):39-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Oginni F, Asuku M, Oladele A, Obuekwe O, Nnabuko R. Knowledge and cultural beliefs about the etiology and management of orofacial clefts In Nigeria's major ethnic groups. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2010; 47(4):327-334. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Adeyemo, Butali, James et al. 2014. Cleft lip and palate is associated with Felt, Internalized, Enacted, Felt normative, and Symbolic stigma. Unpublished.

  19. Mascalzoni D, Hicks A, Pramstaller P et al. Informed consent in the genomics era. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(9):e192. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Lunshof JE, Chadwick R, Vorhaus DB et al. From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9(5):406-411. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. P3G Consortium, Church G, Heeney C et al. Public access to genome-wide data: five views on balancing research with privacy and protection. PLoS Genet. 2009; 5(10):e1000665. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Foster MW, Sharp RR. Ethical issues in medical-sequencing research: implications of genotype-phenotype studies for individuals and populations. Hum Mol Genet. April 15, 2006; 15 Spec(No 1):R45-49. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Jantina de Vries, Susan Bull J, Ogobara Doumbo et al. Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries. BMC Medical Ethics. 2011;12:5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Nyika A. Ethical and practical challenges surrounding genetic and genomic research in developing countries. Acta Trop. 2009; 112 (Suppl 1):S21-31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Tekola F, Bull S, Farsides B et al. Impact of social stigma on the process of obtaining informed consent for genetic research on podoconiosis: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics. 2009; 10:13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Ng SB, Buckingham KJ, Lee C et al. Exomesequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(1):30-35. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Worthey EA, Mayer AN, Syverson GD et al. Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease.Genet Med. 2011; 13(3):255-262. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Pottier C, Hannequin D, Coutant S et al. High frequency of potentially pathogenic SORL1 mutations in autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2012; 17(9):875-879. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Tabor HK, Berkman BE, Hull SC et al. Genomics really gets personal: how exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research. Am J Med Genet A. 2011; 155A (12):2916-2924. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Tabor HK, Murray JC, Gammill HS et al. Non-invasive fetal genome sequencing: opportunities and challenges. Am J Med Genet A. 2012; 158A (10):2382-2384. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Jamal L, Sapp JC, Lewis K et al. Research participants' attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013; 22(8):964-968. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Phelan JC. Geneticization of deviant behavior and consequences for stigma: the case of mental illness. J Health Soc Behav. 2005; 46(4):307-322. PubMed | Google Scholar