Home | Volume 18 | Article number 141

Original article

Rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

Rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

 

José Mauricio Hernández Sarmiento1,2,&, Natalia Builes Restrepo2, Gloria Isabel Mejía1,2, Elsa Zapata2, Mary Alejandra Restrepo2, Jaime Robledo1,2

 

1School of Health Sciences, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (UPB), Medellín, Colombia, 2Bacteriology and Mycobacteriology Unit, Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB), Medellín, Colombia

 

 

&Corresponding author
José Mauricio Hernández Sarmiento, School of Health Sciences, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (UPB), Medellín, Colombia, Bacteriology and Mycobacteriology Unit, Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB), Medellín, Colombia

 

 

Abstract

Introduction: World Health Organization had estimated 9.4 million tuberculosis cases on 2009, with 1.7 million of deaths as consequence of treatment and diagnosis failures. Improving diagnostic methods for the rapid and timely detection of tuberculosis patients is critical to control the disease. The aim of this study was evaluating the accuracy of the cord factor detection on the solid medium Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar compared to the Lowenstein Jensen medium for the rapid tuberculosis diagnosis.

 

Methods: Patients with suspected tuberculosis were enrolled and their sputum samples were processed for direct smear and culture on Lowenstein Jensen and BACTEC MGIT 960, from which positive tubes were subcultured on Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar. Statistical analysis was performed comparing culture results from Lowenstein Jensen and the thin layer agar, and their corresponding average times for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The performance of cord factor detection was evaluated determining its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value.

 

Results: 111 out of 260 patients were positive for M. tuberculosis by Lowenstein Jensen medium with an average time ± standard deviation for its detection of 22.3 ± 8.5 days. 115 patients were positive by the MGIT system identifying the cord factor by the Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar which average time ± standard deviation was 5.5 ± 2.6 days.

 

Conclusion: The cord factor detection by Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar allows early and accurate tuberculosis diagnosis during an average time of 5 days, making this rapid diagnosis particularly important in patients with negative sputum smear.

 

 

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a social and public health problem worldwide, affecting more frequently vulnerable populations. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated on 2009 a global TB incidence of 137 per 100,000 population with 9.4 million cases and 1.7 million of deaths, being the second cause of infection- related death after HIV infection [1]. In Colombia, according to the Social Protection Ministry, the general incidence of TB was 24.3 per 100,000 population with 10,913 cases reported on 2009. In the same year, 1,665 TB cases were reported at the Department of Antioquia and close to 50% of them where located in Medellín city [2]. Performing a rapid and timely diagnosis and improving the sensitivity of the smear is critical to increase the detection rate of patients with respiratory symptoms in order to control the disease [3].

 

Some studies have evaluated the usefulness of cord formation detection, which is named “cord factor” (CF), for the presumptive identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex [4,5]. The CF is a molecule generated from the glycolipid trehalose 6-6´-dimycolate, a component of the mycobacterial cell wall which is toxic to mammalian cells and affects the host immune system by inhibiting the migration of polimorphonuclear neutrophils. The CF is responsible for the specific microscopic morphology observed in the M. tuberculosis complex growth called serpentine cords [6,7] (Figure 1). Other microorganisms can also produce this cord, as members of the bacterial genera Nocardia and Rhodococcus, and other mycobacteria such as M. marinum and M. kansassi [8-10]. It has been suggested that the presence of the CF, besides the rough colonial morphology, is associated with virulence of mycobaterial strains and it is one of the most important virulence factors present in M. tuberculosis [8,11,12].

 

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of the CF detection on a solid medium as Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar as a rapid method for the presumptive diagnosis of TB.

 

 

Methods

All patients underwent medical evaluation before being enrolled in the study. After signing informed consent an average of two sputum samples were taken per patient. If the first sample was smear positive, such specimen was processed to identify M. tuberculosis; if this sample was negative smear, a second specimen was taken for identification of the mycobacterium. Sputum samples were processed for microscopic examination preparing direct smear and staining by auramine-rhodamine staining technique (positive samples were confirmed by Kinyoun staining) at Bacteriology and Mycobacteriology Unit at Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas, Medellín (Colombia). According to the American Lung Association, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) were quantified on direct smear as follows: negative: AFB not found,+: 3-9 AFB in entire smear, ++: 10 or more AFB in the entire smear, +++: 1 AFB per field [13,14]. For culture, samples were inoculated into Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) slant solid medium, and the BACTEC MGIT 960 system (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA). The MGIT was a mycobacteria growth indicator tube with liquid medium that contained 7 ml modified Middlebrook 7H9 broth base, to which an enrichment factor, OADC (bovine albumin, dextrose, catalase and oleic acid) and an antibiotic mixture, PANTA (polymyxin B, amphotericin B, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim and azlocillin), were added. Additionally, MGIT tubes have an oxygen-quenched fluorochrome (tris 4, 7-diphenyl-1, 10-phenonthroline ruthenium chloride pentahydrate) embedded in silicone at the bottom of the tube. If microorganisms are growing, the free oxygen is utilized and is replaced with carbon dioxide, depleting free oxygen so that the fluorochrome is no longer inhibited, resulting in fluorescence within the MGIT tube when visualized under ultraviolet light [15]. The BACTEC MGIT 960 detects such fluorescence as positive signal by emitting an alarm. According to the protocol established in the laboratory, MGIT tubes identified as positives were centrifuged, smears were prepared from such sediments, which were stained by Kinyoun staining and were subcultured on Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar, where the CF was identified. The final identification of M. tuberculosis was based on niacin [13,16], nitrite reduction and catalase tests [13,14,16].

 

Statistical analysis was performed to compare culture results obtained from LJ medium (gold standard) and the Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar subcultured from the BACTEC MGIT 960 system, comparing as well their corresponding average times for detecting the mycobacterium or CF in the case of thin layer agar. Another comparison was carried out between direct smear and culture result. In order to evaluate the performance of CF detection as an indicator of M. tuberculosis´ presence, it was determined its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

 

This study was approved by the Ethics Research Committee at Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB).

 

 

Results

260 patients were enrolled in the study. 111 (43%) out of them were positive for M. tuberculosis by the LJ medium which average time ± standard deviations (SD) for detecting the mycobacterium was 22.3 ± 8.5 days (Figure 2) and of these, 10 patients were negative by the MGIT system. 115 (44%) patients were positive for M. tuberculosis by the MGIT system being positive as well for CF by the Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar subculture, which average time ± SD for CF detection was 5.5 ± 2.6 days (Figure 2) and 14 patients out of them were culture negative by the LJ. 135 patients were negative for both culture methods.

 

The detection of the CF as an indicator of the presence of M. tuberculosis had a 92.1% sensitivity, 98.5% specificity, 98.3% PPV, 92.9% NPV. The odds ratio for a CF positive test was 61 and for a negative test was 0.08.

 

 

Discussion

The reemerging of the M. tuberculosis infection has renewed the need to increase the initiative for introducing new diagnostic tools with good levels of sensitivity, specificity, low cost and feasibility to be implemented in resource-limited settings [17-19]. Our study demonstrated that the CF detection by Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar, the solid medium used to subculture positive MGIT tubes, as diagnostic method for pulmonary TB in patients with respiratory symptoms from Medellín (Colombia), had a sensitivity of 92.1% and a specificity of 98.5%, allowing a presumptive report of the isolation of M. tuberculosis in 90% of the cases during an average time of 5 days. This period of time may vary depending on the patient's bacteria load, being up to 10 days for patients with negative smear and positive culture, and up to 4 days for patients with one AFB per field on direct smear.

 

Other studies have suggested the usefulness of CF detection for rapid identification of the mycobacterium. One of them was carried out by Brazilian researchers from the Adolfo Lutz Institute, where 743 M. tuberculosis clinical strains were analyzed, obtained from patients with respiratory symptoms. In such study, it was found that the CF detection in liquid and on solid medium had a sensitivity of 98.5%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 97% and NPV of 93% compared to conventional typing tests, morphological analysis of growth and traditional biochemical methods, concluding that identifying cord growth is a rapid criterion for the identification of the M. tuberculosis complex [5]. Another study performed in the same Brazilian institute compared the detection of the CF with the PCR-restriction enzyme analysis (PRA) as the gold standard, suggesting that the presumptive identification of M. tuberculosis using the macroscopic evaluation of colonies combined with CF detection under microscopy is a simple, rapid and inexpensive test to be recommended in resource-poor settings [20].

 

Although is important to mention that an experienced technician is needed to appropriately identify the cord formation, the equipment and training for such a goal are cheaper and easier than those needed to apply other technologies such as molecular biology techniques, supporting resource-limited settings and less well-equipped laboratories [20,21]. The CF detection has proved to be a simple and rapid test that requires only a good microscopy technique and simple culture systems, solid or liquid medium, for detecting M. tuberculosis [22,23].

 

 

Conclusion

The present study suggests that the CF detection is a simple and rapid test, demonstrating a sensitivity of 92.1% and specificity of 98.5% leading to the identification of M. tuberculosis in only 5 days. Rapid diagnosis is particularly important in patients with negative sputum smears, because of the risk of this group of patients to undergo delays during diagnosis process and subsequent treatment.

 

 

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors’ contributions

José Hernández: Design and writing of the study. José Hernández and Natalia Builes: Enrollment of patients. José Hernández, Natalia Builes and Jaime Robledo: Data base management. Gloria Mejía, Elsa Zapata and Mary Restrepo: Processing of samples. Furthermore, all authors contributed to the analysis of results and preparation of the manuscript.

 

 

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible with the support of Medellín Mayor´s Office (Alcadía de Medellín) and Metrosalud (Public Hospitals Network from Medellín), which let us enroll patients from their local health service facilities. Furthermore, we thank the Development and Innovation Research Center (Centro de Investigación para el Desarrollo y la Innovación, CIDI) from Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (UPB) for its support in the execution of this study. The present study was funded by a grant from COLCIENCIAS code 22130416342.

 

 

Figures



Figure 1: Morphology of the cord factor on the Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar subcultured from the MGIT liquid medium, observed with 10X magnification using light microscopy. Microphotograhs kindly provided by Gloria I. Mejía, Bacteriology and Mycobacteriology Unit, Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas, Medellín, Colombia

Figure 2: Average time to obtain a presumptive positive result for M. tuberculosis by LJ and Middlebrook 7H11 thin layer agar subcultured from positive MGIT tubes

 

 

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Report 2010. Global tuberculosis control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010.

  2. Ministerio de la Protección Social, Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). Situación de Salud en Colombia, Indicadores básicos 2010. Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Colombia, 2010. Google Scholar

  3. World Health Organization. Chapter 1: Infectious diseases are the biggest killer of the young, In: Report on infectious diseases, Removing obstacles to healthy developments. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1999. Google Scholar

  4. Welch David F, Guruswamy Arthur P, Sides Sandra J, Shaw Charles H, Gilchrist Mary J. Timely culture for micobacteria which utilizes a microcolony method. J Clin Microbiol. 1993; 31(8):2178-2184. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Coelho Andrea G, Zamarioli Liliana A, Reis Clemira M, Duca Bruno F. Detection of cord factor for the presumptive identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Bras Pneumol. 2007; 33(6):707-711. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Behling Cynthia A, Bennett Beth, Takayama Kuni, Hunter Robert L. Development of a trehalose 6, 6- dimycolate model which explains cord formation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1993; 61(6):2296-2303. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Rajni, Rao Nisha, Meena Laxman S. Biosynthesis and virulent behavior of lipids produced by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: LAM and Cord Factor: An Overview. Biotechnol Res Int. 2011; 2011:274693. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Julián Esther, Roldán Mónica, Sánchez-Chardi Alejandro, Astola Oihane, Agustí Gemma, Luquin Marina. Microscopic cords, a virulence-related characteristic of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, are also present in nonpathogenic mycobacteria. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192(7):1751-1760. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Attorri Silvia, Dunbar Sherry, Clarridge Jill E 3rd. Assessment of morphology for rapid presumptive identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium kansasii. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(4):1426-1429. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Ueda S, Fujiwara N, Naka T, Sakaguchi I, Ozeki Y, Yano I, Kasama T, Kobayashi K. Structure-activity relationship of mycoloyl glycolipids derived from Rhodococcus sp 4306. Microb Pathog. 2001; 30(2):91-99. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Harland Christopher W, Rabuka David, Bertozzi Carolyn R, Parthasarathy Raghuveer. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence factor trehalose dimycolate imparts desiccation resistance to model mycobacterial membranes. Biophys J. 2008; 94(12):4718-4724. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Hunter Robert L, Olsen Margaret, Jagannath Chinnaswamy, Actor Jeffrey K. Trehalose 6,6 ´-dimycolate and lipid in the pathogenesis of caseating granulomas of tuberculosis in mice. Am J Pathol. 2006; 168(4):1249-1261. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Mejia GI, Castrillon L, Trujillo H, Robledo JA. Microcolony detection in 7H11 thin layer culture is an alternative for rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999; 3(2):138-142. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public health mycobacteriology: A guide for the Level III Laboratory. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, 1985. Google Scholar

  15. Siddiqi Salman H, Rüsch-Gerdes Sabine. Section I: Principle of Procedures, In: MGIT procedure manual, For BACTECTM MGIT 960TM TB System. Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics. July 2006; pp 11. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Master RN. Mycobacteriology, In: Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. Isenberg HD (Ed), ASM Press, Washington, DC, 1992; vol 1: pp 3.0.1-3.4. Google Scholar

  17. Drobniewski FA, Hoffner S, Rusch-Gerdes S, Skenders G, Thomsen V, WHO European Laboratory Strengthening Task Force. Recommended standards for modern tuberculosis laboratory services in Europe. Eur Respir J. 2006; 28(5):903-909. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diagnostic Standards and Classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161(4 Pt 1):1376-1395. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Hale Yvonne M, Pfyffer Gaby E, Salfinger Max. Laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections: new tools and lessons learned. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33(6):834-846. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Simeâo Fernanda C, Chimara Erica, Oliveira Rosângela S, Yamauchi Jonas U, Latrilha Fábio O, Telles Maria A. Cord factor detection and macroscopic evaluation of mycobacterial colonies: an efficient combined screening test for the presumptive identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex on solid media. J Bras Pneumol. 2009; 35(12):1212-1216. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Sohn Hojoon, Minion Jessica, Albert Heidi, Dheda Keertan, Pai Madhukar. TB diagnostic tests: how do we figure out their costs?. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009; 7(6):723-733. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Yagupsky Pablo V, Kaminski Dorothy A, Palmer Kathleen M, Nolte Frederick S. Cord formation in BACTEC 7H12 medium for rapid, presumptive identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Clin Microbiol. 1990; 28(6):1451-1453. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Robledo JA, Mejía GI, Morcillo N, Chacón L, Camacho M, Luna J, Zurita J, Bodon A, Velasco M, Palomino JC, Martin A, Portaels F. Evaluation of a rapid culture method for tuberculosis diagnosis: a Latin American multi-center study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006; 10(6):613-619. PubMed | Google Scholar