References

  1. OMS. Pour une grossesse à moindre risque: le rôle capital de l'accoucheur qualifié: une déclaration conjointe OMS, ICM, FIGO. Genève: OMS ; 2005. Google Scholar

  2. Weil O, Fernandez H. Maternité sans risque: une initiative orpheline. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 1999; 28(3):205.

  3. Wall LL. Dead mothers and injured wives: the social context of maternal morbidity and mortality among the Hausa of northern Nigeria. Studies in family planning. 1998; 29(4):341-359. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, Ahn SY, Wang M, Makela SM et al. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 2010; 375(9726):1609-1623. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Ministère du Plan et Suivi de la Mise en œuvre de la Révolution de la Modernité (MPSMRM), Ministère de la Santé Publique (MSP) et ICF International, 2014. Enquête Démographique et de Santé en République Démocratique du Congo 2013-2014. Rockville, Maryland, USA : MPSMRM, MSP et ICF International.

  6. Das V, Agrawal S, Agarwal A. Consequences of delay in obstetric care for maternal and perinatal outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2010; 109(1):72-73. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Maleya A, Kakudji YK, Munan RM, Nsambi JB, Mukuku O, Kinenkinda XK, Kakudji PL. Issues materno-f œtales des grossesses non suivies à Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo. PanafricanMedical Journal (article en soumission). In Press.

  8. Danish N, Fawad A, Abbasi N. Assessment of pregnancy outcome in primigravida: comparison between booked and un-booked patients. J Ayub Med CollAbbottabad. 2010; 22 (2): 23-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Adeyemi AS, Adekanle DA, Afolabi AF. Predictors of vaginal delivery in nulliparous mothers. Ann Afr Med. 2014 Jan-Mar;13(1):35-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Ojiyi EE, Anozie UM, Dike EI, Okeudo C, Anolue F, Uzoma OI et al. Pregnancy outcome in primigravidae in a tertiary hospital: a three year review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 16 (1): 1-5.

  11. Munan R, Kakudji Y, Nsambi J, Mukuku O, Maleya A, Kinenkinda X, Kakudji P. Accouchement chez la primipare à Lubumbashi: pronostic maternel et périnatal. Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Sep 27;28:77. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Elrishi F, Suliman R. Seven years consecutive cesarean section in primigravidae: analysis and evaluation. Jourrnal of Medical Science and Clinical Research. 2015; 3(6): 6031-6041. Google Scholar

  13. Rozenholc AT, Ako SN, Leke RJ, Boulvain M. The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry and maternal height to predict dystocia in nulliparous women: a study in Cameroon. BJOG. 2007; 114(5): 630-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Molina FS, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2010; 27(2): 61-67. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Lenhard MS, Johnson TR, Weckbach S, Nikolaou K, Friese K, Hasbargen U. Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion. European Journal of Radiology. 2010;74(3): e107-e111. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Hamm B, Forstner R (Eds). MRI and CT of the female pelvis. Springer: Berlin; 2007. Google Scholar

  17. Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Hatab MR, Twickler DM, Leveno KJ. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005; 106 (5 Part 1): 919-926. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Spörri S, Hänggi W, Braghetti A, Vock P, Schneider H. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1997;89(6):902-908. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Munabi IG, Luboga SA, Mirembe F. A cross sectional study evaluating screening using maternal anthropometric measurements for outcomes of childbirth in Ugandan mothers at term. BMC research notes. 2015; 8(1): 205. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Chenge M, Van der Vennet J, Porignon D, Luboya NO, Kabyla I, Criel B. La carte sanitaire de la ville de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo Partie II: analyse des activités opérationnelles des structures de soins. Global Health Promotion. 2010; 17(3):75-84. Google Scholar

  21. Chenge M, Van der Vennet J, Porignon D, Luboya NO, Kabyla I, Criel B. La carte sanitaire de la ville de Lubumbashi, R épublique Démocratique du Congo Partie I: problématique de la couverture sanitaire en milieu urbain congolais. Global Health Promotion. 2010; 17(3):63-74. Google Scholar

  22. Chenge MF, Van der Vennet J, Luboya NO, Vanlerberghe V, Mapatano MA, Criel B. Health-seeking behaviour in the city of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo: results from a cross-sectional household survey. BMC Health Services Research. 2014; 14(1):1. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Guessous I, Cornuz J, Gaspoz JM, Paccaud F. Dépistage: principes et méthodes. Revue médicale suisse. 2010; 6(256):1390-1394.

  24. Kakoma JB. Cesarean section indications and anthropometric parameters in Rwandan nulliparae: preliminary results from a longitudinal survey. Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Aug 12;24:310. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Liselele HB, Boulvain M, Tshibangu KC, Meuris S. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2000;107(8):947-952. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Kara F, Yesildaglar N, Uygur D. Maternal height as a risk factor for cesarean section. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2005; 271(4):336-337. Google Scholar

  27. Tsu VD. Maternal height and age: risk factors for cephalopelvic disproportion in Zimbabwe. Int J Epidemiol. 1992; 21(5):941-946. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Read AW, Prendiville WJ, Dawes VP, Stanley FJ. Cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in low-risk primiparous women, Western Australia. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84(1):37-42. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Arendt E, Singh NS, Campbell OM. Effect of maternal height on caesarean section and neonatal mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of 34 national datasets. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 6;13(2):e0192167. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Kamina P. Anatomie gynécologique et obstétricale, Maloine Paris. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1972 Jan;67(1):17-23. PubMed

  31. Dujardin B, Van Cutsem R, Lambrechts T. The value of maternal height as a risk factor of dystocia: a meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 1996; 1(4): 510-21. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Mugisho E, Dramaix M, Porignon D, Musubao E, Hennart P. Evolution des donn ées maternelles et périnatales receuillies en routine entre 1980 et 1998 à la maternité de référence de Rutshuru en République démocratique du Congo I Décès maternels et interventions obstétricales. Cahiers d'études et de recherches francophones / Santé. 2002; 12(2):247-251. Google Scholar

  33. Kakoma JB, Karibushi J, Ramazani KR. Height, weight, external pelvic diameters and cesarean section: a cohort study in Southern Province of Rwanda (Huye District). Rwanda Medical Journal. 2010; 68(3): 21-24. Google Scholar

  34. Bisig B, Moreira J, Combes M, Asiimwe A, Bisoffi Z, Haegeman F et al. Does introduction of thresholds in decision aids benefit the patient? Comparison between findings-based and threshold-based diagnostic decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):E16-34. PubMed | Google Scholar