References

  1. Charbel E Chalouhy. Renal Biopsy Technique. Drug & desease. Mai 2017.

  2. Belarbia A, Boussaadia I, Azzebi A et al. Ponction biopsies rénales: à propos de 311 cas. Néphrologie et Thérapeutique. 2011; 5(7): 432- 433.

  3. Mbarki, Houda, Belghiti, Khadija Alaoui, Harmouch Taoufiq et al. Ponction biopsies rénales dans le Service de Néphrologie de Fès: indications et résultats: à propos de 522 cas. PAMJ. 2016; 24: 21. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. LI, Lei-Shi et LIU, Zhi-Hong. Epidemiologic data of renal diseases from a single unit in China: analysis based on 13519 renal biopsies. Kidney international. 2004;3(66): 920-923. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Okpechi I, Swanepoel C, Duffield M. Patterns of renal disease in Cape Town South Africa: a 10-year review of a single-centre renal biopsy database. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26(6): 1853-1861. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Naumovic R, Pavlovic S, Stojkovic D. Renal biopsy registry from a single centre in Serbia: 20 years of experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24(3): 877-885. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Rychlik I, Jancova E, Tesar V et al. The Czech registry of renal biopsies: occurrence of renal diseases in the years 1994-2000. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004; 19(12): 3040- 3049. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Rivera F, Manuellopez-Gomez J, Perez-Garcia R. Clinicopathologic correlations of renal pathology in Spain. Kidney International. 2004; 66(3): 898-904. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Polito MG, de Moura LA, Kirsztajn GM. An overview on frequency of renal biopsy diagnosis in Brazil: clinical and pathological patterns based on 9617 native kidney biopsies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25(2): 490-496. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Traore H, Maiza H, Emal V et al. Ponction biopsie rénale indications, complications et résultats à propos de 243 biopsies rénales. Néphrologie et Thérapeutique. 2015; 5(11): 339. Google Scholar

  11. Whittier, William L, Korbet, Stephen M. Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2004; 1(15) : 142-147. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. En-Nya F, Bouattar T, Hajar B et al. Ponction-biopsie rénale: indications et résultats à propos de 549 biopsies rénales. Néphrologie et Thérapeutique. 2017;5(13) :344-345. Google Scholar

  13. Cui Salena, Heller Howard T, Waikar Sushrut S et al. Needle Size and the Risk of Kidney Biopsy Bleeding Complications. Kidney International Reports. 2016; 4(1):324-326. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Nicholson, Michael L, Wheatley, Timothy J, Doughman, Tahir M et al. A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney international. 2000; 1(58): 390-395. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Corapi KM, Chen JL, Balk EM, Gordon CE.Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 60(1): 62-73. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. McMahon GM, McGovern ME, Bijol V, Benson CB, Foley R, Munkley K, Schnipper J, Franz C, Lin J. Development of an outpatient native kidney biopsy service in low-risk patients: a multidisciplinary approach. Am j Nephrol. 2012;35(4):321-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Burstein DM, Korbet SM, Schwartz MM.The use of the automatic core biopsy system in percutaneous renal biopsies: a comparative study. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993; 22(4): 545-552. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Schena FP, The Italian group of renal immunopathology. Survey of the Italian registry of renal biopsies: frequency of the renal diseases for 7 consecutive years. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997; 12(3):418-426. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Naumovic R, Pavlovic S, Stojkovic D. Renal biopsy registry from a single centre in Serbia: 20 years of experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(3): 877-885. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Heaf J, Løkkegaard H and Larsen S. The epidemiology and prognosis of glomerulonephritis in Denmark 1985-1997. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 1999; 14(8): 1889-1897. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Kaab B Ben, Raies L, Ben F L et al. Biopsies rénales chez les sujets âgés: résultats d'une étude rétrospective: à propos de 32 cas. La Revue de Médecine Interne. 2014; 2(35): 167-168. Google Scholar