References

  1. De Moor RJG, Deroose CAJG, Calberson FLG. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge. Int Endod J. 2004; 37(11): 789-99. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(9): 775-84. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Sert S, Aslanalp V, Tanalp J. Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. Int Endod J. 2004; 37(7): 494-9. PubMed

  4. Hoen MM, Pink FE. Contemporary endodontic retreatments: an analysis based on clinical treatment findings. J Endod. 2002; 28(12): 834-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Carrotte P. Endodontics: Part 4 Morphology of the root canal system. Br Dent J. 2004; 197(7): 379-83. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Vire D. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: Classification and evaluation. J Endod. 1991; 17(7): 338-42. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Grossman L, Olliet S, Del Rio C. Endodontics. 11th editi. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988.

  8. Ahmed HA, Abu-Bakr NH, Yahia NA, Ibrahim YE. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population. Int Endod J. 2007 Oct; 40(10): 766-71. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Rwenyonyi CM, Kutesa A, Muwazi LM, Buwembo W. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second permanent molar teeth in a Ugandan population. Odontology. 2009 Jul 29; 97(2): 92-6. PubMed

  10. Alam MS, Aziz-us-salam, Prajapati K, Rai P, Molla AA. Study of tooth length and working length of first permanent molar in Bangladeshi people. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2004 Apr; 30(1): 36-42. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Lahdesmaki R, Alvesalo L. Root growth in the permanent teeth of 45,X/46,XX females. Eur J Orthod. 2006 Jun 8; 28(4): 339-44. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Gulabivala K, Aung T, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod. 2001; 34(5): 359-70. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Rahimi S, Shahi S, Lotfi M, Zand V. Root canal configuration and the prevalence of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci. 2008; 50(1): 9-13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 58(5): 589-99. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Muriithi NJ, Maina SW, Gathece LW. Internal root morphology in mandibular first permanent molars in Kenyan population. 2012; 89(5): 166-71. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Loest C. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006; 39(12): 921-30. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Mosha H, Lema P. Reasons for tooth extraction among Tanzanians. East Afr Med J. 1991; 68(1): 10-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Rugarabamu PGN, Poulsen S, Masalu JRP. A longitudinal study of occlusal caries among schoolchildren in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Feb; 30(1): 47-51. Google Scholar

  19. Chen G, Yao H, Tong C. Investigation of the root canal configuration of mandibular first molars in a Taiwan Chinese population. Int Endod J. 2009 Nov 1; 42(11): 1044-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Chourasia HR, Meshram GK, Warhadpande M, Dakshindas D. Root canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molars in an indian population. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012: 1-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Peiris R, Malwatte U, Abayakoon J, Wettasinghe A. Variations in the root form and root canal morphology of permanent mandibular first molars in a Sri Lankan population. Anat Res Int. 2015; 2015: 803671. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Shahi S, Yavari HR, Rahimi S, Torkamani R. Root canal morphology of human mandibular first permanent molars in an Iranian population. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008; 2(1): 20-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Pattanshetti N, Gaidhane M. Root and canal morphology of the mesiobuccal and distal roots of permanent first molars in a Kuwait population clinical study. Int Endod. 2008; 41(9): 755-62. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Al-Nazhan S. Incidence of four canals in root canal treated mandibular first molars in a Saudi Arabian sub-population. Int Endod J. 1999; 32(1): 49-52. PubMed

  25. Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2002; 35(1): 56-62. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Demirbuga S, Sekerci A-E, Dinçer A-N, Cayabatmaz M, Zorba Y-O. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jul 1; 18(4): e737-44. PubMed

  27. Quadros I, Zaia A, Ferraz C, Souza Filho F, Gomes B. Radiographic prevalence of root canal ramifications in a sample of root canal treatments in a Brazilian Dental School. Braz Oral Res. 2007; 21(2): 112-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Baumann MA. A new approach to demonstration of root canal anatomy. J Dent Educ. 1994; 58(9): 704-8. PubMed

  29. Blaskovic-Subat V, Smojver I, Maricic B, Sutalo J. A computerized method for the evaluation of root canal morphology. Int Endod J. 1995; 28(6): 290-6. Google Scholar

  30. Omer OE, Al Shalabi RM, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey NM. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J. 2004; 37(5): 291-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Mayo CV, Montgomery S, del Rio C. A computerized method for evaluating root canal morphology. J Endod. 1986; 12(1): 2-7. PubMed | Google Scholar