Article references (36 references )


  1. Soto-Vega E, Casco S, Chamizo K, Flores Hernández D, Landini V and Guillén-Florez. Rising Trends of Cesarean Section Worldwide: a Systematic Review. Med Crave. 2015; 3(2): 1-7. Google Scholar

  2. Deneux-Tharaux C. Utérus cicatriciel: aspects épidémiologiques. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2012; 41(8): 697-707. Google Scholar

  3. Teguete I, Dolo A, Sissoko A, Thera A, Traoré M, Djire MY, Mounkoro N,Dolo T, Traore Y. Determining factors of cesarean delivery trends in developing countries: lessons from point G National Hospital (Bamako Mali).Intech Open Access. 2012; 161-202. Google Scholar

  4. Shah A, Fawole B, M'imunya JM, Amokrane F, Nafiou I, Wolomby JJ et al. Caesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 107(3): 191-197. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Dembélé A, Tarnagda Z, Ouédraogo JL, Thiombiano O et Bambara M. Issue des accouchements sur utérus cicatriciel dans un hôpital universitaire au Burkina. Pan Afr Med J. 2012; 12: 95-102. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Baldé IS, Sy T, Diallo A, Baldé O, Diallo MH, Diallo MC et al. Accouchement dans un contexte d'utérus cicatriciel à la maternité de l'hôpital national Ignace-Deen (Guinée). Rev Méd Périnat. 2017; 9(1): 32-36. Google Scholar

  7. De Brouwere V, Van Lerberghe W. Réduire les risques de maternité: stratégies et évidence scientifique. Studies in HSO&P. 2001; 18:480. Google Scholar

  8. Gomez P et B Kinzie. Basic maternal and newborn care: a guide for skilled providers. 2014. Accessed 23 December 2017

  9. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(8): 1091-110. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Mbassi SM, Mbu R et Bouvier-Colle MH. Use of routinely collected data to assess maternal mortality in seven tertiary maternity centers in Cameroon. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115(3):240-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Diémé MEF, Moreira P, Tamofo E et Diouf AA. Suivi des grossesses sur utérus cicatriciel: aspects qualitatifs et implications pronostiques. Med Santé Trop. 2014; 24(4): 409-415. Google Scholar

  12. Astatikie G,Limenih MA and Kebede M. Maternal and fetal outcomes of uterine rupture and factors associated with maternal death secondary to uterine rupture. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; 17:117-26. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Kabibou S, Sambo BT, Tchaou BA, Sidi R, Dénakpo J, Lokossou A et al. Les ruptures utérines à l'hôpital de Référence de Parakou au Bénin: aspects épidémiologiques, thérapeutiques et pronostiques. European Scientific Journal. 2015; vol11(24):149-60. Google Scholar

  14. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé(OMS). Recommandations de l'OMS concernant les soins prénatals pour que la grossesse soit une expérience positive. OMS. 2017. Google Scholar

  15. HAS. Suivi et orientation des femmes enceintes en fonction des situations à risque identifiées. 2016. Accessed 23 December 2017

  16. Eloundou Messi, Waïbaï Yaye. Contraintes à L'accès aux soins de santé maternelle dans la ville de Maroua. The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES). 2017; Vol6(1):13-21.

  17. El Hamdani FZ, Vimard P, Baali A, Zouini M, Cherkaoui M. Soins prénatals dans la ville de Marrakech. Méd et Santé Trop. 2013; 23: 162-167. Google Scholar

  18. Munro K,Jarvis C,Munoz M,De Souza V and Graves L. Undocumented Pregnant Women: what Does the Literature Tell Us? J Immigrant Minority Health.2013; 15:281-291. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Mamadi Kourouma,El hadj Oussedou Faye,Cheur Niang,Abdou Karim. Contribution à l'amélioration de la qualité de la consultation prénatale: le cas d'un centre de santé rural, Thiadiaye, département de M'Bour région de Thiès, (Sénégal). Mémoire pour l'obtention du diplôme de 3eme cycle de gestion des programmes de santé,2008. Centre Africain d'Etudes Supérieures en Gestion: 111. 2002. Accessed 23 December 2017

  20. Mouloud Zemouchi, Asmaa Lachemat, Mohamed Said Oukid. Problématique de l'utérus cicatriciel au Maghreb: quinzième Congrès International de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Reproduction de la Côte d'Azur.Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique Unité Hassiba Benbouali, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Blida-Algérie. 2016. Accessed 23 December 2017

  21. Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBA-2):a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG. 2010; 117(1): 5-19. Google Scholar

  22. Rezai S, Labine M, Gottimukkala S, Karp S, Sainvil L et al.Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) for Vaginal Birth after Previous Cesarean Section (VBAC) Versus Repeat Cesarean Section: a Review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016; J4(6): 00135. Google Scholar

  23. Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, Moore L, Jastrow N, Demers S et al. Systematic Review of Cesarean Scar Assessment in the Nonpregnant State: imaging Techniques and Uterine Scar Defect. Am J Perinatol. 2012; 29: 465-472. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Saoji A, Nayse J, Deoke A and Mitra A. Maternal Risk Factors of Caesarean Delivery in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India: a Case Control Study. People's Journal of Scientific Research. July 2016; 9(2): 18-2. Google Scholar

  25. Foumane P, Mve Koh V, Ze Minkande J, Njofang Ngantcha EA, Dohbit JS, Mboudou E.T1 Facteurs de risque et pronostic des césariennes d'urgence à l'hôpital gynéco-obstétrique et pédiatrique de Yaoundé (Cameroun). Méd et Santé Trop. 2014; 24(N81): 89-93. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Le Fonds des Nations Unies pour la Population (UNFPA). La mortalité maternelle: les soins obstétricaux d'urgence en point de mire (a focus on emergency obstetric care) mise à jour 2002. 2002. Accessed 23 December 2017

  27. Senturk MB, CakmakY, Atac H, Sukru M Budak. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section and outcomes in rural area of Anatolia. International Journal of Women's Health. 2015;7: 693-697. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Jennifer A, Tessmer-Tuckd, Sherif A, El-Nashara, Adrianne R. Raceke CM, Lohsec Abimbola O et al. Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: a cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2014; 77: 121-126. Google Scholar

  29. Landon MB, Grobman WA. What we have learned about trial of labor after cesarean section delivery from MFMU cesarean registry. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40(5): 281-86. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Abdoulfalah Abbassi H, El-Karoumi M, Morsad F,Samouh N, Matar NA et al. Accouchement du gros bébé sur utérus cicatriciel: la place de l'épreuve utérine, à propos de 355 dossiers. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2000; 29: 409-413.

  31. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A and Lieberman E. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; Oct;185(4): 903-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsen L, Stray-Prderson B and Vanguen S. Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb; 216(2): 165e1-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. Motomura K, Ganchimeg T, Nagata C, Ota E, Vogel JP, Betran AP et al. Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. SciRep. 2017; 7: 44093. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsen L, Daltveit A, Vangen S. Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG. 2016; 123: 780-787. PubMed | Google Scholar

  35. Ray P, Mondal A, Ray PK. Outcome of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a prospective study. Int J Sci Study. 2016; 4(9): 121-124. Google Scholar

  36. Landon BM, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY and Leindecker S. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior caesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004; 351(25): 2581-2589. Google Scholar