References
- Soto-Vega E, Casco S, Chamizo K, Flores Hernández D, Landini
V and Guillén-Florez.
Rising Trends of Cesarean Section Worldwide: a Systematic Review. Med Crave.
2015; 3(2): 1-7. Google
Scholar
- Deneux-Tharaux C. Utérus cicatriciel: aspects épidémiologiques.
Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2012; 41(8): 697-707. Google
Scholar
- Teguete I, Dolo A, Sissoko A, Thera A, Traoré M, Djire
MY, Mounkoro N,Dolo T, Traore Y. Determining factors of cesarean delivery trends
in developing countries: lessons from point G National Hospital (Bamako Mali).Intech
Open Access. 2012; 161-202. Google
Scholar
- Shah A, Fawole B, M'imunya JM, Amokrane F, Nafiou I, Wolomby
JJ et al. Caesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal
and perinatal health in Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 107(3): 191-197. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Dembélé A, Tarnagda Z, Ouédraogo JL, Thiombiano O et Bambara
M. Issue des accouchements sur utérus cicatriciel dans un hôpital universitaire
au Burkina. Pan Afr Med J. 2012; 12: 95-102. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Baldé IS, Sy T, Diallo A, Baldé O, Diallo MH, Diallo MC et
al. Accouchement dans un contexte d'utérus cicatriciel à la maternité de
l'hôpital national Ignace-Deen (Guinée). Rev Méd Périnat. 2017; 9(1): 32-36. Google
Scholar
- De Brouwere V, Van Lerberghe W. Réduire les risques de
maternité: stratégies et évidence scientifique. Studies in HSO&P. 2001;
18:480. Google
Scholar
- Gomez P et B Kinzie. Basic
maternal and newborn care: a guide for skilled providers. 2014. Accessed
23 December 2017
- Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(8): 1091-110. PubMed | Google Scholar
- Mbassi SM, Mbu R et Bouvier-Colle MH. Use of routinely collected data to assess maternal mortality in seven tertiary maternity centers in Cameroon. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115(3):240-3. PubMed | Google Scholar
- Diémé MEF, Moreira P, Tamofo E et Diouf AA. Suivi des grossesses sur utérus cicatriciel: aspects qualitatifs et implications pronostiques. Med Santé Trop. 2014; 24(4): 409-415. Google Scholar
- Astatikie G,Limenih MA and Kebede M. Maternal and fetal outcomes of uterine rupture and factors associated with maternal death secondary to uterine rupture. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; 17:117-26. PubMed | Google Scholar
- Kabibou S, Sambo BT, Tchaou BA, Sidi R, Dénakpo J, Lokossou A et al. Les ruptures utérines à l'hôpital de Référence de Parakou au Bénin: aspects épidémiologiques, thérapeutiques et pronostiques. European Scientific Journal. 2015; vol11(24):149-60. Google Scholar
- Organisation Mondiale de la Santé(OMS). Recommandations
de l'OMS concernant les soins prénatals pour que la grossesse soit une expérience
positive. OMS. 2017. Google
Scholar
- HAS. Suivi
et orientation des femmes enceintes en fonction des situations à risque identifiées.
2016. Accessed 23 December 2017
- Eloundou Messi, Waïbaï Yaye. Contraintes à L'accès aux
soins de santé maternelle dans la ville de Maroua. The International Journal
Of Engineering And Science (IJES). 2017; Vol6(1):13-21.
- El Hamdani FZ, Vimard P, Baali A, Zouini M, Cherkaoui M. Soins prénatals dans la ville de Marrakech. Méd et Santé Trop. 2013; 23: 162-167. Google Scholar
- Munro K,Jarvis C,Munoz M,De Souza V and Graves L. Undocumented Pregnant Women: what Does the Literature Tell Us? J Immigrant Minority Health.2013; 15:281-291. PubMed | Google Scholar
- Mamadi Kourouma,El hadj Oussedou Faye,Cheur Niang,Abdou
Karim. Contribution à l'amélioration
de la qualité de la consultation prénatale: le cas d'un centre de santé rural,
Thiadiaye, département de M'Bour région de Thiès, (Sénégal). Mémoire pour l'obtention
du diplôme de 3eme cycle de gestion des programmes de santé,2008. Centre Africain
d'Etudes Supérieures en Gestion: 111. 2002. Accessed 23 December 2017
- Mouloud Zemouchi, Asmaa Lachemat, Mohamed Said Oukid. Problématique
de l'utérus cicatriciel au Maghreb: quinzième Congrès International de Gynécologie
Obstétrique et Reproduction de la Côte d'Azur.Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique
Unité Hassiba Benbouali, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Blida-Algérie.
2016. Accessed 23 December 2017
- Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean
sections (VBA-2):a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and
adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections.
BJOG. 2010; 117(1): 5-19. Google
Scholar
- Rezai S, Labine M, Gottimukkala S, Karp S, Sainvil L et al.Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) for Vaginal Birth after Previous Cesarean Section (VBAC) Versus Repeat Cesarean Section: a Review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016; J4(6): 00135. Google Scholar
- Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, Moore L, Jastrow N,
Demers S et al. Systematic Review of Cesarean Scar Assessment in the
Nonpregnant State: imaging Techniques and Uterine Scar Defect. Am J Perinatol.
2012; 29: 465-472. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Saoji A, Nayse J, Deoke A and Mitra A. Maternal Risk
Factors of Caesarean Delivery in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India:
a Case Control Study. People's Journal of Scientific Research. July 2016; 9(2):
18-2. Google
Scholar
- Foumane P, Mve Koh V, Ze Minkande J, Njofang Ngantcha
EA, Dohbit JS, Mboudou E.T1 Facteurs de risque et pronostic des césariennes
d'urgence à l'hôpital gynéco-obstétrique et pédiatrique de Yaoundé (Cameroun).
Méd et Santé Trop. 2014; 24(N81): 89-93. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Le Fonds des Nations Unies pour la Population (UNFPA). La
mortalité maternelle: les soins obstétricaux d'urgence en point de mire (a
focus on emergency obstetric care) mise à jour 2002. 2002. Accessed 23
December 2017
- Senturk MB, CakmakY, Atac H, Sukru M Budak. Factors associated
with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section and outcomes in rural
area of Anatolia. International Journal of Women's Health. 2015;7: 693-697. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Jennifer A, Tessmer-Tuckd, Sherif A, El-Nashara, Adrianne
R. Raceke CM, Lohsec Abimbola O et al. Predicting vaginal birth after
cesarean section: a cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2014; 77: 121-126. Google
Scholar
- Landon MB, Grobman WA. What we have learned about trial of labor after cesarean section delivery from MFMU cesarean registry. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40(5): 281-86. PubMed | Google Scholar
- Abdoulfalah Abbassi H, El-Karoumi M, Morsad F,Samouh
N, Matar NA et al. Accouchement du gros bébé sur utérus cicatriciel:
la place de l'épreuve utérine, à propos de 355 dossiers. Gynecol Obstet Biol
Reprod. 2000; 29: 409-413.
- Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A and Lieberman E.
Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women
with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; Oct;185(4): 903-5. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsen L, Stray-Prderson B and
Vanguen S. Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2017 Feb; 216(2): 165e1-8. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Motomura K, Ganchimeg T, Nagata C, Ota E, Vogel JP, Betran
AP et al. Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with
prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.
SciRep. 2017; 7: 44093. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsen L, Daltveit A, Vangen
S. Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG. 2016; 123: 780-787. PubMed | Google
Scholar
- Ray P, Mondal A, Ray PK. Outcome of vaginal birth after
caesarean section: a prospective study. Int J Sci Study. 2016; 4(9): 121-124. Google
Scholar
- Landon BM, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY and Leindecker S. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior caesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004; 351(25): 2581-2589. Google Scholar