References

1. Jales RM1, Sarian LO et al. Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug;82(8):1231-5. Google Scholar


2. Arkom Chaiwerawattana et al. Clinical outcome of breast cancer BI-RADS 4 lesions during 2003-2008 in NCI Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4063-6. Google Scholar


3. Wanaporn B, Ornsiri. Accuracy of subcategories A, B, C in BI-RADS 4 lesions by combined mammography and breast ultrasound findings. Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2011; 2(3): 728-733. Google Scholar


4. Sanders MA, Roland L, Sahoo S. Clinical Implications of Subcategorizing BI-RADS 4: breast lesions associated with microcalcification radiology–pathology correlation study. Breast J. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):28-31. PubMed | Google Scholar


5. Torres-Tabanera M1, Cárdenas-Rebollo JM, Villar-Castaño P et al. Analysis of the positive predictive value of the subcategories of BI-RADS(®) 4 lesions: preliminary results in 880 lesions. Radiología. 2012; 54(6):520-531. Google Scholar


6. Wiratkapun C, Bunyapaiboonsri W, Wibulpolprasert B, Lertsithichai P. Biopsy Rate and Positive Predictive Value for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010; 93(7): 830-7. PubMed | Google Scholar


7. Yoon JH, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK. Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. Ultrasound in Med & Biol. 2011; 37(5): 693-699. PubMed | Google Scholar