References

  1. Fisher KS, Arnholt AT, Douglas ME, Vandiver SL. A randomized trial of the traditional sitting position versus the hamstring stretch position for labor epidural needle placement. Anesth Analg. 2009; 109(2): 532-534. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Tashayod ME, Tamadon S. Spinal block in sitting position without moving the legs. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 1980; 5(8): 529-33. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad SS, Hassan M, Marashi SM. Comparing the squatting position and traditional position for ease of spinal needle placement: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2014; 4(2): e13969. Google Scholar

  4. Obasuyi B, Fyne-face S, Mato CN. A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of lateral and sitting positions during induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013; 22(2): 124-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Shahzal K, Afshan G. Induction position for spinal anaesthesia: sitting versus lateral position. J Pak Med Assc. 2013; 63(1): 11-15. Google Scholar

  6. Afolayan Jm, Nwachukwu CE, Esangbedo ES, Omu OP, Amadasun FE, Fadare JO. Evolving pattern of spinal anaesthesia in stable eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section at University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2014; 23(4): 288-295. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Afolayan JM, Olajumoke TO, Esangbedo SE, Edomwonyi NP. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in pregnant women with fetal distress: time for reappraisal. Inter J Biomed Sci. 2014; 10(2): 103-110. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Biswas BK, Agarwal B, Bhattarai B, Dey S, Bhattacharyya P. Straight versus flex back: does it matter in spinal anaesthesia? Indian J Anaesth. 2012; 56(3): 259-64. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Russell IF. Spinal anaesthesia: sitting or lateral positions. Anaesth. 1996; 51(2): 198-199. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Fernandez R, Taboada M, Ulloa B, Rodriquez J, Masid A, Alvarez J. Needle-induced paresthesia during single spinal anaesthesia: a comparison of sitting versus lateral decubitus position. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010; 35(1): 41-4. Google Scholar

  11. Laakso E, Pitkanen M, Kytta J, Rosenberg PH. Knee-chest versus horizontal side position during induction of spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing disc surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1997; 79(5): 609-11. Google Scholar

  12. Badolov P, Celebi H, Mentes B. Comparison of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine in the prone or jacknife position with hyperbaric 0,5% bupivacaine in sitting position for anorectal surgery. Gazi Med J. 2005; (4): 176-179. Google Scholar

  13. Stokes IAF, Abery JM. Influence of hamstring muscles on lumbar spine curvature in sitting. Spine. 1980; 5 (6): 525-8. Google Scholar

  14. DeOliveira GR, Gomes HP, da Fonseca MH, Hoffman JC, Pederneiras SG, Garcia JH. Predictors of successful neuroaxial block; a prospective study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002; 19 (6): 447-51. Google Scholar

  15. Sandoval M, Shestak W, Sturmann K, Hsu C. Optimal patient position for lumbar puncture, measured by ultrasonography. Emerg Radiol. 2004; 10 (4): 179-81. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Platt F, Hall M. Hip flexion for lumbar puncture-not easy for obstetric practice. Anesthesia. 2001; 56 (3): 1023. Google Scholar

  17. Fredman B, Zohar E, Rislick U, Sheffer O, Jedeikin R. Intrathecal anaesthesia for the elderly: influence of induction position on perioperative haemodynamic stability and patient comfort. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001; 29 (4):377-82. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Baigmohammadi MT, Khan ZH. Modified sitting position: a new position for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105(2): 549. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Schelew BL, Vaghadia H. Ankylosing Spondylitis and neuroaxial anesthesia: a 10 year review. Can J Anaesth. 1996; 43(1): 65-8. Google Scholar

  20. Fisher A, Lupu L, Gurevitz B, Brill E, Margolin E, Hertzanu Y. Hip flexion and lumbar puncture: a radiological study. Anaesthesia. 2001; 56(3): 262-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Miro M, Guasch E, Gilsanz F. Comparison of epidural analgesia for labor: a retrospective study of 6497 cases. Inter J Obstet Anesth. 2008; 17(1): 15-17. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Tarkkila P, Huhtala J, Salminen U. Difficulties in spinal needle use: insertion characteristics and failure rates associated with 25-, 27- and 29-gauge Quincke-type spinal needles. Anaesthesia. 1994; 49(8): 723-5. PubMed | Google Scholar