References

  1. Joel Napeñas J, Michael Brennan T, Philip Fox C. Diagnosis and treatment of xerostomia (dry mouth). Odontology. 2009 Jul; 97(2): 76-83. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Kevser Aydin A, Hakan Terzioglu, Kezban Ulubayram, Nesrin Hasirci. Wetting properties of saliva substitutes on acrylic resin. Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Sep-Oct; 10(5): 473-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Kawazoe, Hamada. The role of saliva in retention of maxillary complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 40(2): 131-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Campbell RL. Some clinical observations regarding the role of the fluid film in the retention of dentures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1954 Jan; 48(1): 58-63. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Skinner EW, Campbell RL, Chung P. A clinical study of the forces required to dislodge maxillary denture bases of various designs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1953 Dec; 47(6): 671-80. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Stamoulis S. Physical factors affecting the retention of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1962; 12(5): 857-64. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Stanitz JD. An analysis of the part played by the fluid film in denture retention. J Am Dent Assoc. 1948 Aug; 37(2): 168-72. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Zora blahova, Milan neuman. Physical factors in retention of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1971; 25(3): 230-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Monsenego P, Proust J. Complete denture retention. Part I: physical analysis of the mechanism Hysteresis of the solid-liquid contact angle. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Aug; 62(2): 189-96. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Monsenego PH, Baszkin A. Complete denture retention. Part II: Wettability studies on various acrylic resin denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62: 308-12. Google Scholar

  11. Nehir Ozden, Funda Akaltan, Sefik Suzer, Guneri Akovali. Time-related wettability characteristic of acrylic resin surfaces treated by glow discharge. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82: 680-4. Google Scholar

  12. Gesser HD, Castaldi CR. Wetting dentures for adhesion and retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1971; 25(3): 236-43. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. O’brien, Ryge. Wettability of poly-(methyl methacrylate) treated with silicon tetrachloride. J Prosthet Dent. 1965 Mar-Apr; 15: 304-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Murray MD. Investigation into the effectiveness of surface treatment on poly(methyl methacrylate) when exposed in the mouth. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59(3): 368-73. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Vissink A, De Jong HP, Busscher HJ, Arends J, 'S-Gravenmade EJ. Wetting properties of human saliva and saliva substitutes. J Dent Res. 1986; 65: 1121-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Weerkamp AH, Wagner K, Vissink A, Gravenmade EJ. Effect of the application of a mucin-based saliva substitute on the oral microflora of xerostomic patients. J Oral Pathol. 1987 Oct; 16(9): 474-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Oh D-J, Lee J-Y, Kim Y-K, Kho H-S. Effects of carboxymethylcellulose (cmc)-based artificial saliva in patients with xerostomia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Nov; 37(11): 1027-31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Yuan Y, Lee TR. Contact angle and wetting properties. Surface science techniques. 2013. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Sharma and Chitre. An in-vitro comparative study of wettability of four commercially available saliva substitutes and distilled water on heat-polymerized acrylic resin. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2008; 8(1): 30-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Mathrawala NR, Hegde RJ. Lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital syndrome. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Apr-Jun; 29(2): 168-70. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Pattanaik Bikash, Pattanaik Seema. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a xerostomia patient with a mandibular split salivary reservoir denture. Annals and essence of dentistry. 2010; 2(3): 32-5 Google Scholar