References

  1. Ministère de la santé. Etat de santé de la population marocaine. 2012; p 1.

  2. Diallo FB, Diallo MS, Bangoura S, Diallo AB, Camara Y. Césarienne: facteur de Réduction de Morbidité et de mortalité foeto-maternelle au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ignace Deen de Conakry (Guinée). Méd d'Afrique noire. 1998; 45(6): 359-364. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(10): 689-95. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Dupont C, Rudigoz RC, Cortet M et al. Frequency, causes and risk factors of postpartum haemorrhage: a population-based study in 106 French maternity units. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2014; 43(3): 244-53. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Lau WC, Fung HY, Rogers MS. Ten years experience of cesarean and post-partum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997; 74(24): 133-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Van Ham MA, Van Dongen PW, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of cesarean section,a retrospective study of intraoperative and post-operative maternal complications of cesarean section during a 10 year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997; 74(1): 1-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Abbassi H, Aboulfalah A, Morsad F, Matar N, Himmi A, El Mansouri A. Complications maternelles des césarinnes: analyse retrospective de 3231 interventions de Casablanca, Maroc. Cahiers Santé. 2000. Google Scholar

  8. Thèse médicale: la césarienne au CHU Hassan II de fès (à propos de 2532 cas). Faculté de médecine et de pharmacie de Fès. 2008. Google Scholar

  9. Fiona Smaill M, Rosalie Grivell M. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. 28 Oct 2014; 10: 1002. Google Scholar

  10. Audra, P. (1990) ''Infectious and hemorrhagic complications of cesarean section, about 2200 procedures''. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1990; 85(2): 111-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Owen, J WW. Andrews (1994)''Wound complications after cesarean sections''.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 37 (4): 842-55. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Graver-Tropper, DC Oxley et al.(1995) « Underestimation of surgical site infection rates in obstetrics and gynecology. » Am J Infect Control.1995; 23(1): 22-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Smaill FM, Gyte GM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; CD007482. Google Scholar

  14. Clement H, Caffin JP, Corty C. Prévention des complications thrombo-emboliques après césarienne. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1990; 85(2): 114-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Hickl EJ, Popkin DR, Peddle LJ. The safety of cesarean section in: eds, Women's health today, perspectives on current research and clinical practice: the proceedings of the XIVth world congress of gynecology and obstetrics Londres. The Parthenon Publishing Groupe. 1994; 7: 65-70. Google Scholar

  16. Lilford RJ, Van Cœverden de Groot HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risks of cesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute preexisting physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 97(10): 883-92. PubMed | Google Scholar