References

  1. Subtil D, Vaast P, Dufour P et al. Maternal consequences of cesarean as related to vaginal delivery. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2000;29(2 Suppl):10-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(3):465-70. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Bayahi L, Fekih A. Les indications des césariennes [En ligne].Fondation Genevoise pour la Formation et la Recherche Médicales. http://www.gfmer.ch/Endo/Reprod_health/Tunisia/cesarienne/CADRE_DU_TRAVAIL.html. Google Scholar

  4. Ministère de la santé publique, Office National de la Famille et de la Population. Enquête sur la santé et le bien être de la mère et l’enfant MICS3 [En ligne]. Tunis: 2008. http://www.childinfo.org/files/MICS3_Tunisia_FinalReport_2006_Fr.pdf. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Ministère du Développement et de la Coopération Internationale et Institut National de la Statistique. Suivi de la situation des enfants et des femmes en Tunisie- Enquête par grappes à indicateurs multiples [En ligne]. Tunis: 2011. http://www.childinfo.org/files/MICS4_Tunisia_Final_Report_2011-12_Fr.pdf. Google Scholar

  6. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(10):689-95. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Haumonté J-B, Raylet M, Sabiani L et al. Predictive factors for vaginal birth after cesarean section. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2012;41(8):735-52. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. El Kilani M. Epreuve utérine à propos de 400 cas. . 2008. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Huang WH, Nakashima DK, Rumney PJ et al. Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(1):41-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):907-10. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Hoskins IA, Gomez JL. Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):591-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Shipp TD, Zelop C, Repke JT et al. The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(4):585-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Bujold E, Hammoud AO, Hendler I et al. Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section: does maternal age influence the outcome?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1113-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Schmitz T. Particular maternal or fetal clinical conditions influencing the choice of the mode of delivery in case of previous cesarean. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2012;41(8):772-81. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Cohen A et al. Trial of labor after 40 weeks’ gestation in women with prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(3):391-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. d’Ercole C, Sentilhes L, Vayssière C et al. Delivery in women with previous cesarean section or other uterine surgery: guidelines for clinical practice - introduction. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2012;41(8):692-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Kugler E, Shoham-Vardi I, Burstien E et al. The safety of a trial of labor after cesarean section in a grandmultiparous population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;277(4):339-44. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Dyack C, Hughes PF, Simbakalia JB. Vaginal delivery in the grand multipara following previous lower segment cesarian section. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1997;23(2):219-22. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Adjahoto EO, Ekouevi DK, Hodonou KA. Factors predicting outcome of trial of labor after prior cesarean section in a developing country. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2001;30(2):174-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Essafi R. L’épreuve utérine sur utérus cicatriciel. Etude analytique à propos de 350 cas. . 2006. Google Scholar

  22. Lehmann M, Hedelin G, Sorgue C et al. Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 1999;28(4):358-68. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Deruelle P, Lepage J, Depret S, et al. Induction of labor and intrapartum management for women with uterine scar. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2012;41(8):788-802. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Weinstein D, Benshushan A, Tanos V et al. Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt 1):192-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Hendler I et al. Modified Bishop’s score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1644-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Phelan JP, Eglinton GS, Horenstein JM et al. Previous cesarean birth - Trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants. J Reprod Med. 1984;29(1):36-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Flamm BL, Goings JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication?. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(5):694-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Aboulfalah A, Abbassi H, El Karroumi M et al. Delivery of large baby after cesarean section: role of trial of labor: a propos of 355 cases. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2000;29(4):409-13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT et al. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(4):903-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth - Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89(3):319-31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450-63. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Arzel A, Boulot P, Mercier G et al. National Survey of the management and delivery of the unicicatriciel uterus in France in 2009. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2012;41(5):445-53. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Planned Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section (Trial of Labour). 2010. Google Scholar

  34. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. London: 2007. Google Scholar

  35. Haute autorité de santé. Recommandation de bonne pratique: Indications de la césarienne programmée à terme. France: 2012. Google Scholar