References

  1. Kang W, Park K, Kim S, Shin D, Hong D. Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 36: 749-54. Google Scholar

  2. Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Chastang C, Ville Y. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. BJOG. 2005 Feb; 112(2): 192-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Oct; 47(5): 389-93. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Kehila M, Abouda HS, Sahbi K, Cheour H, Chanoufi MB. Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2016 May 17; 9(2): 127-31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Verhoeven CJ, Oudenaarden A, Hermus MA, Porath MM, Oei SG, Mol BW. Validation of models that predict Cesarean section after induction of labour. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep; 34(3): 316-21. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Hatfield AS, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug; 197(2): 186-92. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Park KH, Hong JS, Kang WS, Shin DM, Kim SN. Body mass index, Bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labour induction in twin gestations. J Perinat Med. 2009; 37(5): 519-23. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Fuentes A, Williams M. Cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun; 38(2): 224-31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Edwards RK, Richards DS. Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 43(3): 440-46. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Irion O. Reliability of the Bishop Score before labour induction at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004; 112(2): 178-81. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Cubal A, Carvalho J, Ferreira MJ, Rodrigues G, Carmo OD. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Sep; 39(9): 1391-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D. Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec; 88(6): 990-2. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Goldberg J, Newman RB, Rust PF. Interobserver reliability of digital and endovaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurement. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct; 177(4): 853-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Oct; 47(5): 389-93. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Bajpai N, Bhakta R, Kumar P, Rai L, Hebbar S. Manipal Cervical Scoring System by Transvaginal Ultrasound in Predicting Successful Labour Induction. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 May; 9(5): QC04-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Deepika G, Kumar A, Sood R, Sood A. "Prospective evaluation of clinical and ultrasonic feto-maternal parameters as predictors of caesarean delivery after induction of labour." International Journal of Biomedical Research [Online]. 2014; 5(1): 264-67. Google Scholar

  17. Boozarjomehri F, Timor-Tritsch I, Chao CR et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct; 171(4): 1081-7. PubMed | Google Scholar