References

  1. Mukherjee SN. Rising caesarean section rate. In J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 4(56):298-300. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Lopes T, Spirtos N, Naik R, Monaghan J. Bonney's Gynaecological Surgery, (11th ed). Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2010. Google Scholar

  3. XII World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rio de Janeiro, October 1988. In: Advances ingynecology and obstetrics, Volume 5.Pregnancy and labor. London, Parthenon Publishing Group, 1989. Google Scholar

  4. UNICEF/WHO/UNFPA, (1997). Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services.New York, United NationsPopulation Fund 1999. Google Scholar

  5. UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research (2008). Highlights of achievements, 1990-2001.Geneva, World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Family and Community Health. 2008; 14(124):470-83. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean delivery: short and long term complications. In J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 47(8):386-93. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Boley JP. The history of cesarean section. Can Med Assoc J. 1991; 145(4):319-22. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Torkan B, Parsay S, Lamyian M, Kazemnejad A, Montazeri A. Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2009; 9(6):4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Geidam AD, Audu BM, Kawuwa BM, Obed JY. Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the university of Maiduguri teaching hospital, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2009; 8(2):127-32. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Diallo FB, Diallo MS, Bangoura S, Diallo AB, Camara Y. Cèsarienne, facteur derèduction de morbiditè etde mortalitèfoeto-maternelle au Centre Hospitalier UniversitaireIgnace Deen de Conakry (Guinée). Méd d'Afrique Noire.1998; 45(6):123-28. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Forsah SF. Rates, Indications and Complications of Caesarean Deliveries: The case of Buea Regional Hospital. Unpublished MD thesis, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon 2012. Google Scholar

  12. Tebeu PM, Ngassa P, Mboudou E, Kongnyuy EJ, Binam F, Obama MT. Neonatal survival following cesarean delivery in northern Cameroon. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008; 103(3):259-60. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Pickrell K. An inquiry into the history of cesarean section. Bull Soc Med Hist (Chicago). 1935; 4(56):414-53. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Molyneux ME, Borgstein A, Taylor TE,Wirima JJ. Clinical features and prognostic indicators in paediatric cerebral malaria: a study of 131 comatose Malawian children. Q J Med. 1989; 71(265): 441-59. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth J, Landon MB, Thom E, Spong CY et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108(4):885-90. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Committee on Obstetric Practice. J Paediatr.2006; 117(22):1444-47. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Wijdicks EF. The diagnosis of brain death. NEJM. 2001; 344(16): 1215-21. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. World Health Organisation. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Toril K, Ola DS, Anne KD, Stein TN, Pal. Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195(6):1538-43. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Adekanle DA, Adeyemi AS, Fasanu AO. Caesarean section at a tertiary institution in Southwestern Nigeria: a 6-year audit. OJOG. 2013; 3(20):357-61. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Aziz N, Yousfani S, Soomro I. Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at the Liaquat university of medical & health sciences. Quarterly Medical Channel. 2011;17(4): 55- 59. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Bangal VB, Thorat PS, Patel NH, Borawake SK. Caesarean sections- are we doing right? IJBR. 2012; 3(4):281-84. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Furau C, Furau G, Dascau V, Ciobanu G, Onel C, Stanescu C. Improvements in cesarean section techniques: arad's obstetrics department experience on adapting the vejnovic cesarean section technique. MAEDICA J Clinic Med. 2013; 8(3):256-60. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Igberase GO, Ebeigbe PN, Andrew BO. High caesarean section rate: a ten year experience in a tertiary hospital in the Niger delta, Nigeria. Nigerian J Clinic Practice. 2009; 12(3):294-97. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Inyang-Etoh EC, Etuk SJ. Demographic and obstetric determinants of emergency caesarean section among women in Calabar, Nigeria. Glo Res J Med Sci. 2013; 3(7):20-24. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, Lezotte D, Lynch AM. Neonatal outcomes after elective caesarean delivery. Obstet Gyncol. 2009; 113(6):1231-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Lee HC, Gould JB, Boscardin WJ, El-Sayed YY, Blumenfeld YJ. Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(5):1095-101. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Liston FA, Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Jangaard KA. Neonatal outcomes with caesarean delivery at term. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008; 93(3):176-82. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Mahmut K. The Delivery methods and the factors affecting among giving birth in hospitals in Yozgat, Turkey. Int J Caring Sci. 2012; 5(2): 157-61. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Ojiyi EE, Dike EI, Anolue F, Chukwulebe A. Appraisal of caesarean section at the Imo State University Teaching Hospital, Orlu, Southeastern Nigeria. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 16(2):2. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Sugewe DE. Evolution des indications de césarienne à la maternité du CHU de Yaoundé sur une période de 10 ans (1990-1999), Unpublished MD thesis, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences,University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon 2000. Google Scholar

  32. Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, FawoleB,et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8(10):71. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. Teguete I, Traore Y, Sissoko A, Djire MY, Thera A, Dolo T et al. Determining factors of cesarean delivery trends in developing countries: lessons from Point G National Hospital (Bamako - Mali). Tech Cesarean Delivery. 2012;200(9):162-200. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006; 367 (9525): 1819-29. PubMed | Google Scholar

  35. Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low, medium and high income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006; 33 (4): 270-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  36. Nana PN, Djenabou A, Fomulu JN,Mbu RE, Tonye R, Wandji JC et al. Epidemio-clinical factors associated with caesarean delivery in two referral hospitals (Public/Faith-Based), Far-North Region, Cameroon. Clin Mother Child Health. 2011; 8(2):1-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  37. Doh AS. A clinical study of caesarean section at the University Teaching Hospital (CHU) Yaounde (1982-1989). Cent Afr J Med. 1991; 37(10):326-28. PubMed | Google Scholar

  38. Olusanya OB, Solanke O. Maternal and neonatal factors associated with mode of delivery under a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2009; 9(6):41. PubMed | Google Scholar

  39. Onsrud L, Onsrud M. Increasing use of cesarean section, even in developing countries. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996; 116(1):67-71. PubMed | Google Scholar

  40. Roosmalen JV, Does V. Caesarean birth rates worldwide: a search for determinants. Trop Geogr Med. 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed | Google Scholar

  41. Cragin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. NY Med J. 1916;104(2):1-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  42. Flamm BL. Once a cesarean, always a controversy.Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90(8):312-15. PubMed | Google Scholar

  43. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesth. 2005; 60(4):636-53. PubMed | Google Scholar

  44. Gordon A, McKechnie EJ, Jeffery H. Pediatric presence at cesarean section: justified or not? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193 (3 pt 1):599-605. PubMed | Google Scholar

  45. Algert CS, Bowen JR, Giles WB, Knoblanche GE, Lain SJ, Roberts CJ. Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study. BMC. 2009; 7(2):20. PubMed | Google Scholar

  46. Nkwabong E, Fomulu JN, Hamida A, Onana A, Tjek PT, Kouam L et al. The Risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in cameroonian primiparous women aged more than 26 years. Clinics in Mother and Child Health. 2011; 8(4):1-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  47. Apgar V, Holiday DA, James LS, Weisbrot IM, Berrien C. Evaluation of the newborn infant: second report. JAMA. 1958; 168(6):1985-88. PubMed | Google Scholar

  48. Allison S. Maternal and neonatal effects of caesarean section. BMJ. 2007; 335(7628):1003-1004. PubMed | Google Scholar

  49. Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Soldà G, Salvadori A, Trevisanuto D. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Pædiatr. 2004; 93(1):643-647. PubMed | Google Scholar