References

  1. Bousquet MC, Canis M, Bruhat MA. Adénomyose. La revue du praticien. 1999; 49(3): 282-286. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Gambone JC, Lench JB, Slesinski MJ, Reiter RC, Moore JG. Validation of hysterectomy indications and the quality assurance process. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73(6): 1045-1049. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Bird CC, Mc lein TW, Manolo-Estrella P. The exclusive adénomyosis of the uterus: Revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972; 122(1): 583-589. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Canis M, Mage G, Pouly GL et al. Adénomyose. EMC Gynecologie. 1989; 150 A20:5p. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Rao BN, Persaud V. Adenomyosis uteri. West Indian Med J. 1982; 31(4):205-212. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Molitor JJ. Adenomyosis: a clinical and pathological appraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 110(2): 275-284. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Rochet Y, Bermond A. L'adénomyose utérine, étude biologique, clinique, anatomique et chirurgicale: a propos de 157 observations. Rev Fr Gynecol. 1974; 69(3): 713-720. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Gautier C, Solmon F, Maillet R, Martin A, Oppermann A, Gillet JY. L'adénomyose utérine, 264 cas. Nouv Press med. 1977; 6(39): 3621-3623. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Owalabi TO, Strickler RC. Adenomyosis: a neglected diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1977; 50 (4): 424-427. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Fukamatsu Y, Tsukahara Y, Fukuta T. a clinicopathologic study on adenomyosis uterine. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984; 36(3): 431-436. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Nikkanen V, Punnonen R. Clinical significance of adenomyosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1980; 69(6): 278-280. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Whitted R, Verma U, Voigl B, Mendez L. Does cesarian delivery increase the prevalence of adenomyosis? A retrospective review. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95 (4 suppl 1): 83-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. GEE (Groupe d'étude sur l'endométriose). Compte rendu des 3èmes journées du GEE. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1994; 22 (suppl 12): 791-864. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Harris WJ, Daniell JF, Baxter JW. Prior cesariean section. A risk factor for adenomyosis? J Reprod Med. 1985; 30(3): 173-175. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Olive DL, Silverberg KM. Endometriosis and adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971 (5); 165: 229-231. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Nishida M. Relatrionship between the onset of dysmenorrhea and histologic findings in adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165(1): 229-231. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Killku P, Erkkola R, Grönroos M. Non specificity of symptoms related to adenomyosis: a prospective survey. Acta Obstet gynecol scand. 1984; 63(3): 229-231. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Bohlman ME, Ensor RE, Sanders RC. Sonographic findings in adenomyosis of the uterus. AJR. 1987; 148 (4): 765-766. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Siegler AM, Camilien L. Adenomyosis: a linical perspectives. J Reprod Med. 1994; 39(11): 841-853. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH et al. Adenomyosis: prospective comparaison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology. 1994; 190(3): 803-806. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Brioschi D, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma versus leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167(3): 603-606. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Reinhold C, Mc Carthy S, Bret P et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparaison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996; 199(1): 151-158. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Kang S, Turner DA, Foster GS et al. Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images. Am J Roenteng. 1996;166(5):1145-50. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Byun JY, Kim SE, Choi BG, Ko GY, Jung SE, Choi KH. Diffuse and focal adenomyosis: MR imaging findings. Radiographics. 1999; 19 (Spec No): S161-70. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Popp LW, Schwiedessen JP, Gaetge R. Myometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169(3): 546-549. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Takebayashi T, Fujino Y, Umesaki N, Ogita S. Danazol suspension injected in to the uterine cervix of patients with adenomyosis and myoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995; 39(3): 207-211. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Hallez IP, Netter A, Cartier R. Methodical intrauterine resection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156(5): 1080-1084. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Brun G, Roussilhes R, Saurel J. Endométrectomie pour métrorragie: 45 cas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1991; 20(4): 532-537. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Goldrath MH, Fuller TA, Segal S. Laser photovaporization of the endometrium for the treatment of menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 140(1): 14-19. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Quemere MP, Cravallo L, Roger V, D'ercole C, Blanc B. Impact of adenomyosis on results of endomtrial ablations. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1999; 27(5): 357-363. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Tafazoli F, Reinhold C. Uterine adenomyosis: current concepts in imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1999; 20(4): 267-277. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Mergui JL, Solidakis A. Adénomyose: place du traitement hystéroscopique. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1995; 23(10): 590-594. PubMed | Google Scholar