References

  1. Beckermann J, Van Camp J, Shuling L, Wahl SK, Collins A, Herzog CA. On-pump versus off-pump coronary surgery outcomes in patients requiring dialysis: perspectives from a single center and the United States experience. Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2006; 131(6):1261-1266. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, Schilling L-O, Falk V, Rauch T, Mohr FW. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2000; 69(4):1162-1166. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Walther T, Schmitt DV, Doll N, Falk V, Mohr FW. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: impact on postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2004; 77(4):1250-1256. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Puskas J, Williams W, Duke P, Staples J, Glas K, Marshall J, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2003; 125(4):797-808. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Mack M, Bachand D, Acuff T, Edgerton J, Prince S, Dewey T, Magee M. Improved outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting with beating-heart techniques. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2002; 124(3):598-607. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Buffolo E, Silva de Andrade JC, Rodrigues Branco JN, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1996; 61(1):63-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, Nathoe HM, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, van Boven W-J, Borst C, Buskens E, Grobbee DE. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2001; 104(15):1761-1766. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Hijman R, Nierich AP, Diephuis JC, et al. Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The journal of the American Medical Association. 2002; 287(11):1405-1412. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003; 348(5):394-402. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Roy P, Bhonsle N, Singh S, Das R, Hazari K, Bhattacharya S, Mandana K, Kaul A. Off pump vs on pump CABG?the controversy persists. Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2004; 20(1):15-15. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Messent M, Sinclair DG, Quinlan GJ, Mumby SE, Gutteridge JM, Evans TW. Pulmonary vascular permeability after cardiopulmonary bypass and its relationship to oxidative stress. Critical care medicine. 1997; 25(3):425-429. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Kaul T, Fields B, Riggins L, Wyatt D, Jones C, Nagle D. Adult respiratory distress syndrome following cardiopulmonary bypass: incidence, prophylaxis and management. The Journal of cardiovascular surgery. 1998; 39(6):777-81. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Asimakopoulos G, Smith PL, Ratnatunga CP, Taylor KM. Lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after cardiopulmonary bypass. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1999; 68(3):1107-1115. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Tenling A, Hachenberg T, Tyden H, Wegenius G, Hedenstierna G. Atelectasis and gas exchange after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 1998, 89(2):371-378. Google Scholar

  15. Tavakoli R, Weber A, Brunner-La Rocca H, Bettex D, et al. Results of surgery for irreversible moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation secondary to myocardial infarction. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2002; 21(5):818-824. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Barrett-Connor E, Giardina E-GV, Gitt AK, Gudat U, Steinberg HO, Tschoepe D. Women and heart disease: the role of diabetes and hyperglycemia. Archives of internal medicine. 2004; 164(9):934-42. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, Graham I, Mancia G, Pyörälä K. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Atherosclerosis. 1998; 140(2):199-270. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Bartnik M, Rydén L, Ferrari R, Malmberg K, Pyörälä K, et al. The prevalence of abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease across Europe The Euro Heart Survey on diabetes and the heart. European heart journal. 2004; 25(21):1880-1890. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G, Whitworth J, et al. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension: Guidelines sub-committee of the World Health Organization. Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, NY: 1993). 1999; 21(5-6):1009-60. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Kuzuya N. Guidelines for dining out for diabetics]. Nihon rinsho Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2002; 60(suppl 10):697-705. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1996; 62(3):932-935. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, Huber PR, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes. The journal of the American Medical Association. 2004; 291(15):1841-1849. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Williams ML, Muhlbaier LH, Schroder JN, Hata JA, et al. Risk-adjusted short-and long-term outcomes for on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2005; 112(9 suppl):I366-70. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Légaré J-F, Buth KJ, King S, Wood J, Sullivan JA, Friesen CH, Lee J, Stewart K, Hirsch GM. Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump. Circulation. 2004; 109(7):887-892. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Cannata A, Naliato M, Bonati L, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: meta-analysis of currently available randomized trials. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2003; 76(1):37-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Gerritsen W, Van Boven W, Driessen A, Haas F, Aarts L. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: oxidative stress and renal function. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2001; 20(5):923-929. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Rukosujew A, Klotz S, Reitz C, Gogarten W, Welp H, Scheld HH. Patients and complication with off-pump vs on-pump cardiac surgery? a single surgeon experience. Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2007; 6(6):768-771. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Plomondon ME, Cleveland JC, Ludwig ST, Grunwald GK, Kiefe CI, Grover FL, Shroyer AL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass is associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2001; 72(1):114-119. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Cleveland Jr JC, Shroyer A, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2001; 72(4):1282-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Al-Ruzzeh S, Ambler G, Asimakopoulos G, Omar RZ, Hasan R, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery reduces risk-stratified morbidity and mortality: a United Kingdom multi-center comparative analysis of early clinical outcome. Circulation. 2003; 108(suppl 1):II1-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Sabik JF, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Vacha C, Houghtaling PL, et al. Does off-pump coronary surgery reduce morbidity and mortality? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2002; 124(4):698-707. Google Scholar

  32. Stamou SC, Jablonski KA, Hill PC, Bafi AS, Boyce SW, Corso PJ. Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass versus the conventional approach in high-risk patients: The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2005; 79(2):552-557. Google Scholar

  33. Youn YN, Yoo KJ, Lee KJ, Kim CY, Ahn JY, Oh YJ. The comparison of clinical outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high risk patients. The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2004; 37(9):749-754. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Linde J, Møller C, Hughes P, Steinbrüchel D. Off-pump versus on-pump CABG in high-risk patients: Short-and mid-term outcome. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2006; 40(4):209-213. PubMed | Google Scholar

  35. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, Davies S, Collins P, Wang D, Sigwart U, Pepper J. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004; 350(1):21-28. PubMed | Google Scholar

  36. Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Endo M, Kurosawa H. Survival benefit of exclusive use of in situ arterial conduits over combined use of arterial and vein grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2005; 112(9 suppl):I299-303. PubMed | Google Scholar

  37. Kobayashi J, Tashiro T, Ochi M, Yaku H, Watanabe G, Satoh T, et al. Early outcome of a randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularization. Circulation. 2005; 112(9 supp):I338-343. PubMed | Google Scholar

  38. MacGillivray TE, Vlahakes GJ. Patency and the pump: The risks and benefits of off-pump CABG. The New England journal of medicine. 2004; 350(1):3-4. PubMed | Google Scholar