References

  1. Chappuis G, Soltermann B. Numbur and cost of claims to minor cervical trauma in Europe: results from the comparative study by CEA, AREDOC and CEREDOC. Eur Spine J. 2008 Oct;17(10):1350-7. Epub 2008 Aug 15. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. McCaig LF, Ly N. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 emergency department summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics. N° 326 hyattsville, Md: National center for Health statistics, 200 (DHHS publication (PHS) 2002-1250 02-02259). In Press.

  3. Stiell IG, Clement C, Mc Knight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule versus the nexus Low-risk Criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 25;349(26):2510-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, Mower W, Luo JS, Zucker M. Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine eadiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Dec;21(12):1454-60. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Mahadevan S, Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Peeples N, Goldberg W, Sonner R. Interraterreliability of cervival spine injury criteria in patient with blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):197-201. Google Scholar

  6. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ et al. The Canadian C-Spine rule for Radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1841-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Weiner S. The actual application of the NEXUS and Canadian C-Spine Rules by Emergency Physicians. Internat J Emerg Med. 2005;5:1-5. In Press.

  8. Dickinson G, Stiell IG, Schull M, Brison R, Clement CM, Vandemheen KL et al. Retrospective application of the NEXUS low –risk application criteria for cervical spine radiography in Cannadian emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Apr;43(4):507-14. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Michaleef ZA, Maher CG, Verhagen AP, Rebbeck T, Lin CW. Accuracy of the Canadian C-Spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinical important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma; asystematic review. CMAJ. 2012 Nov 6;184(16):E867-76. Epub 2012 Oct 9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Tintinalli JE, Ruiz E, Krome RL. Emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide. 4th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1996. In Press.

  11. Gale SC, Gracias VH, Reilly PM, Schwab CW. The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1121-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Homles JF, Akkinepalli R. Computer Tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58(5):902-905. Google Scholar

  13. Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Deyo RA. Cervical spine injury screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 1999 Jul;212(1):117-25. Google Scholar

  14. Hanson JA, Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Wilson AJ. Cervical spine injury: a decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Mar;174(3):713-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Bailitz J, Starr F, Beecroft M, Bankoff J, Roberts R, Bokhari F et al. CT should replace three-view radiographs as initial sreening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk blunt cervical spine injury: a prospective comparison. J Trauma. 2009 Jun;66(6):1605-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Rybicki F, Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Ledbetter S, Dyson RL, Halt PS et al. Skin and thyroid dosimetry in cervical spine screening: two methods for evaluation and et comparison between a helical CT and radiographic trauma series. AJR. 2002;179(4):933-937. Google Scholar

  17. Quigley RS, Akpolat YT, Forrest BD, Wongworawat MD, Cheng WK. Reason for lawsuit in spinal cord injury affects final outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 1;40(11):851-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Mulkens TH, Marchal P, Daineffe S, Salgado R, Rijdt BT, Kegelaers B, Ternote JL. Comparison of low-dose with multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Sep;28(8):1444-50. PubMed | Google Scholar