References

  1. Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. A new class of genetic element, Staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Jun; 44(6): 1549-55. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Hartman BJ, Tomasz A. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with betalactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1984 May; 158(2): 513-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Reynolds PE, Brown DF. Penicillin-binding proteins of beta-lactam-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, effect of growth conditions. FEBS Lett. 1985 Nov 11; 192(1): 28-32. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Kerttula AM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Finland: recent changes in the epidemiology, long term facility aspects, and phenotypic and molecular detection of isolates. Finland. Julkaisija-Utgivare-Publisher. 2007. Google Scholar

  5. Bootsma, MC, Diekmann O, Bonten MJ. Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103: 5620-5625. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Kaur R, Oberoi L, Aggarwal A. Comparative evaluation of Latex agglutination method with other phenotypic methods for detection of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012 Apr-Jun; 30(2): 252-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Hookey J, Richardson J, Cookson B. Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus Based on PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism and DNA sequence analysis of the coagulase gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr; 36(4): 1083-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard-Eleventh Edition, CLSI document M02-A11. CLSI, USA. Wayne, PA. 2012. Google Scholar

  9. Louie L, Majury A, Good Fellow J, Louie M, Simor AE. Evaluation of a latex Agglutination Test (MRSA-Screen) for detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Nov; 39(11): 4149-51. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Lee JH, Jeong JM, Park YH, Choi SS, Kim YH, Chae JS et al. Evaluation of the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus MRSA of Animal Origin. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(6): 2780-2782. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Sangeetha G, James J, Ranjith J. Comparison of different phenotypic methods with PCR detection of mecA gene for detection of methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012; 4(4): 495-497. Google Scholar

  12. Alipour F, Ahmadi M, Javadi S. Evaluation of different methods to detect methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Infect Public Health. 2014; 7(3): 186-91. Google Scholar

  13. Anand KB, Agrawal P, Kumar S, Kapila K. Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar; 27(1): 27-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. David V, Maria MT, Monica C, Alejandro Astrid P, Francisca M et al. Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2005; 55: 379–382. Google Scholar

  15. Girgis SA, Gomaa HE, Saad NE, Salem Mai M. A comparative study for detection of Methicillin resistance Staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction and phenotypic methods. Life Sci J. 2013; 10(4): 3711-3718. Google Scholar

  16. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility testing: Fourteenth Informational Supplement M100-S14. NCCLS, USA. Wayne, PA. 2004. Google Scholar

  17. CLSI. Performance standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Third Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S23. CLSI, USA. Wayne, PA. 2013. Google Scholar

  18. Cavassini M, Wenger A, Jaton K, Blanc DS, Bille J. Evaluation of MRSA screen, a simple anti-PBP-2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 May; 37(5): 1591–1594. PubMed | Google Scholar